Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????so I see all these whites are evil threads/white supremacists/white supremacists running for office/white hate groups/whites committing hate crimes/etc
let's make it clear right here:
blacks -etc are racists/haters/prejudiced/bigots/etc also
they also have their groups geared to helping their race and their race only
blacks commit hate crimes at over TWICE the rate of whites
Offenders
so I see all these whites are evil threads/white supremacists/white supremacists running for office/white hate groups/whites committing hate crimes/etc
let's make it clear right here:
blacks -etc are racists/haters/prejudiced/bigots/etc also
they also have their groups geared to helping their race and their race only
blacks commit hate crimes at over TWICE the rate of whites
Offenders
From your link.
In 2015, race was reported for 5,493 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders:
48.4 percent were White.
24.3 percent were Black or African American.
Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk
So essentially you are saying its a wash, in regards to racism. Ergo, blacks are just as racist as whites. However, whites win the morality contest because blac
If everything is a wash and blacks are just as guilty of racism as whites......I don't understand why black poverty is 2 1/2 times that of whites and why black wealth is 15 times less than whites and why black unemployment it twice that of whites.
I am trying to figure out how we became unequal economically if everything whites did to blacks was offset by things blacks did against whites. I mean, it seems logical to me is that the one guilty of doing the most dirt against the other......would be the one that is ahead.
Three rules for staying out of poverty
"You can avoid poverty by:
1. Graduating from high school.
2. Waiting to get married until after 21 and do not have children till after being married.
3. Having a full-time job.
If you do all those three things, your chance of falling into poverty is just 2 percent. Meanwhile, you’ll have a 74 percent chance of being in the middle class.
Applies to everyone
These rules apply to all races and ethnic groups. Breaking these rules is becoming more commonplace, unfortunately, for all racial groups.
By contrast, young adults who violated all three norms - dropped out, got married before 21 and had children out of wedlock and didn’t have a full-time job - had a 76 percent chance of winding up in poverty and a 7 percent chance of winding up in the middle class."
There are all kind of studies that show even when whitSes don't follow the recipe, they get better opportunities than blacks:
Study: Black man and white felon – same chances for hire
I can do this all day.....your turn.
I like the way the study claims to know what people are thinking.
THe three steps are still valid.
The illegitimacy rate for blacks is over 70%.
The vast majority of black families do not have a "primary breadwinner".
That's a fine "recipe", if you are actively trying to keep blacks poor.
I hear black unemployment is at an all time low.
Are you encouraged at all by that?
You are missing the point. Whites can do the same dysfunctional things as blacks......and society still rewards them better than blacks.
Liar
Your refusal to acknowledge education as a way to get smarter is also part of the problem.The brain is like a muscle, if you don't exercise it, it stagnates. People don't become strong by sitting around and hoping for evolution to give them bigger muscles, they go out there and challenge themselves physically to get the job done. It's the same with the brain, you need to work it to make it stronger...Blacks are, in general, intellectually inferior to Whites and Asians. This is from generations of poor schooling, in Africa, and here in the US. Now I'm not saying that blacks aren't smart enough to catch up, there probably are, but you all need to stay in school, even if that had never been part of "African culture". And one more thing, please pull your pants up, everyone is laughing at you.Again, since you refuse to take off the spidey man underwear......your position is that blacks are natural inferior to whites.
Now, like I pointed out before, the manifestation of individuals with such beliefs:
Hiring manager:. Less likely to hire an African American. More likely to fire an African American.
Teacher : More likely to suspend or put blacks in remedial education, because they believe blacks can't keep up.
Loan officer : More likely to charge blacks higher interest on loan or deny loans, all other things being equal.
Police officer : More likely to think the black person is a threat to their lives and hence respond more forcefully.
Judge : More likely to give black longer and stiffer sentences.
Home owner : More likely to move from the neighborhood when blacks start moving in:
Parent : More likely to take their kids out of school systems when blacks start enrolling.
Politics : More likely to align with the political party that is most in opposition to black interest.
etc...etc.
In fact, your views, and others who share them, would help create/incubate the conditions in blacks that you complain about. Its not an issue of what came first, the chicken or the egg either. Blacks did not come to America as a people who had children out of wedlock. Blacks did not come to America with high rates of crime. Blacks did not come to America with "black culture"....but rather, "African culture". All the things you all complain about came about from centuries of contact with whites.
It takes thousands of years for evolutionary changes in the brain that would impact the intelligence of a "race". Your theory is absurd. What impacted learning in Africa was nutrition, not poor schooling. Schooling does not create intelligence. Schooling creates knowledge. I mean, you can learn everything there is to learn, but your kids are not born knowing all the things you learned. Schooling has little to do with innate intelligence, although IQ test confuses that fact.
I will say this though, if you can convince a people they are less intelligent, they will perform less intelligently.
When I was growing up some of the strongest people I knew were country boys from the south who never lifted a weight in the life. Rather, their daily life was such that it built their muscles, without the need of a gym. Schools are like Gyms in that they are places designed to exercise the brain, but a person would be naive to believe that school is the only place a persons mind is challenged to think.
Keep in mind also all the inventions that came from people who were not well educated.....but tinkerers.
People Who Changed the World – Without Formal Education
So tell us, how many tinkerers have made it into space?
rac·istHow can you prove you are not racist when clearly your post indicate that you are?sure--my OP is ridiculoussame defshow me the links to your definition. like this the definition of racism
belief or doctrine
doc·trine
ˈdäktrən/
noun
- a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, or other group
If you plant two seeds at the same time and in a couple of months one yields a healthy bloom while the others bloom seems stunted and defective, what would explain the observation that one flower is inferior to the other?
The two possibilities that jump right out is that one of the seeds was genetically defective relative to the other and or the soil, sun and hydration was defective for one relative to the other, all other things being equal. In other words, one either argues the defective seed theory or defective environment theory.
The defective seed defective environment theory holds for the black white issue in America. Why do the black and white seed yield different socioeconomic blooms after 300 years in the same lands of America? Now, studying history, it clearly shows that, metaphorically speaking, that blacks received inferior soil, sun and hydration from white society relative to what the white seed was afforded in general. This certainly is a very plausible reason why blacks yield less than whites. If you discredit the plausibility of this theory that they inferior yield is due to inferior treatment by society......are you not saying that the black seed is defective or inferior to the white seed?
you--being black --have to be right and never racist/hateful
me--being white--automatic racist
Like I said, I cannot demonstrate that you are racist when you are consciously trying to demonstrate that you are not racist. That is why you avoided responding to what I posted about explaining why blacks and whites yields are different after 300 years in the same nation. However, your avoidance, to me, is not proof, but more evidence that you are a racist, based upon that part in the definition that saying linking outcomes to race and genetics makes one a racist. .
Instead of dealing with what I presented....you will do everything but and may just stop responding. Why? Again, I cannot demonstrate the evidence of your racist thinking and belief, when you are trying to prevent me doing such and the best way for you to do that is by not responding or by obfuscation and deflection.
No I am feeding you a dose of your own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...You either want people to dislike you or you have no empathy for anything anybody does but yourself...How can you prove you are not racist when clearly your post indicate that you are?sure--my OP is ridiculoussame def
belief or doctrine
doc·trine
ˈdäktrən/
noun
- a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, or other group
If you plant two seeds at the same time and in a couple of months one yields a healthy bloom while the others bloom seems stunted and defective, what would explain the observation that one flower is inferior to the other?
The two possibilities that jump right out is that one of the seeds was genetically defective relative to the other and or the soil, sun and hydration was defective for one relative to the other, all other things being equal. In other words, one either argues the defective seed theory or defective environment theory.
The defective seed defective environment theory holds for the black white issue in America. Why do the black and white seed yield different socioeconomic blooms after 300 years in the same lands of America? Now, studying history, it clearly shows that, metaphorically speaking, that blacks received inferior soil, sun and hydration from white society relative to what the white seed was afforded in general. This certainly is a very plausible reason why blacks yield less than whites. If you discredit the plausibility of this theory that they inferior yield is due to inferior treatment by society......are you not saying that the black seed is defective or inferior to the white seed?
you--being black --have to be right and never racist/hateful
me--being white--automatic racist
Like I said, I cannot demonstrate that you are racist when you are consciously trying to demonstrate that you are not racist. That is why you avoided responding to what I posted about explaining why blacks and whites yields are different after 300 years in the same nation. However, your avoidance, to me, is not proof, but more evidence that you are a racist, based upon that part in the definition that saying linking outcomes to race and genetics makes one a racist. .
Instead of dealing with what I presented....you will do everything but and may just stop responding. Why? Again, I cannot demonstrate the evidence of your racist thinking and belief, when you are trying to prevent me doing such and the best way for you to do that is by not responding or by obfuscation and deflection.
I guess yaw are playing tag team huh? When your boy tapped out rather than reveal his racism........you tap in for him asking me to prove that I am not a racist. The difference is I will answer any line of questioning you want me to and I am pretty sure that a reasonable person would not conclude that my answers are racist.
How about you answer the question I presented about seeds and the analogy with blacks?
Education brings your brain to a much higher level, where you can then go into space... While you exercise your brain hunting and gathering, before you go back to your mud hut at night.Your refusal to acknowledge education as a way to get smarter is also part of the problem.The brain is like a muscle, if you don't exercise it, it stagnates. People don't become strong by sitting around and hoping for evolution to give them bigger muscles, they go out there and challenge themselves physically to get the job done. It's the same with the brain, you need to work it to make it stronger...Blacks are, in general, intellectually inferior to Whites and Asians. This is from generations of poor schooling, in Africa, and here in the US. Now I'm not saying that blacks aren't smart enough to catch up, there probably are, but you all need to stay in school, even if that had never been part of "African culture". And one more thing, please pull your pants up, everyone is laughing at you.
It takes thousands of years for evolutionary changes in the brain that would impact the intelligence of a "race". Your theory is absurd. What impacted learning in Africa was nutrition, not poor schooling. Schooling does not create intelligence. Schooling creates knowledge. I mean, you can learn everything there is to learn, but your kids are not born knowing all the things you learned. Schooling has little to do with innate intelligence, although IQ test confuses that fact.
I will say this though, if you can convince a people they are less intelligent, they will perform less intelligently.
When I was growing up some of the strongest people I knew were country boys from the south who never lifted a weight in the life. Rather, their daily life was such that it built their muscles, without the need of a gym. Schools are like Gyms in that they are places designed to exercise the brain, but a person would be naive to believe that school is the only place a persons mind is challenged to think.
Keep in mind also all the inventions that came from people who were not well educated.....but tinkerers.
People Who Changed the World – Without Formal Education
So tell us, how many tinkerers have made it into space?
Smart is a metric of knowledge, not necessarily intelligence. I mean, when a person is born they are already wired for genetically for intelligence...but they are not very smart because they have no knowledge or learning. Also, I never stated that education was not a way to get smarter. Nothing I said states or infers that but your intelligence level will impact your ability to comprehend what I said. I inferred that formal education is not the only or exclusive means to exercise your brain. Anytime you try to figure something out.....you are exercising your brain. Taking what you know and using it to figure out what you don't know is intelligence, as well as pattern recognition.
No they are not and you my friend do not know every person that is black, brown, white or whatever color they may be or however you segregationist try to describe people you hate...No, I'm asking black men to raise their children and to quit being violent criminals. Do those two things and you'll thrive like everyone else.You have to reach for the past to find a real problem with "white culture". That means we've done our job today. When is the black community going to do the same?I don't know that white people consciously changed their "sh!ty" culture. One might argue that after you enslaved, colonized and invaded other peoples lands and resources and trickling them down to the white masses, that your culture improved. All I know is what when whites were all in one place, Europe, without people of different races, life was pretty "sh!ty" because the elite white oppressed the white masses.....creating sh!ty white subcultures incubated by poverty. The oppression of other races allowed white masses to become the relative elites, thus improving your culture at the expense of others culture.
Are you asking me when black people are going to lift themselves up by putting others down.....like whites have done through the seesaw economics the last 500 years or so?
Well......a black person is as likely to have an IQ of 135 or above as they are to murder someone. I don't know why you want to characterize black people as violent when only a very small percentage of blacks are committing violent crimes.
In regards to children born out of Wedlock, most of Western Europe has rates up their with black Americans and I do not hear white people condemning their culture as the root of their woes.
Well, even if not all Negroid's are murderers, most of them are rude, obnoxious, big mouths, that's enough reason to not like them.
no--the blacks don't want to have a conversationNo I am feeding you a dose of you own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...How can you prove you are not racist when clearly your post indicate that you are?sure--my OP is ridiculousIf you plant two seeds at the same time and in a couple of months one yields a healthy bloom while the others bloom seems stunted and defective, what would explain the observation that one flower is inferior to the other?
The two possibilities that jump right out is that one of the seeds was genetically defective relative to the other and or the soil, sun and hydration was defective for one relative to the other, all other things being equal. In other words, one either argues the defective seed theory or defective environment theory.
The defective seed defective environment theory holds for the black white issue in America. Why do the black and white seed yield different socioeconomic blooms after 300 years in the same lands of America? Now, studying history, it clearly shows that, metaphorically speaking, that blacks received inferior soil, sun and hydration from white society relative to what the white seed was afforded in general. This certainly is a very plausible reason why blacks yield less than whites. If you discredit the plausibility of this theory that they inferior yield is due to inferior treatment by society......are you not saying that the black seed is defective or inferior to the white seed?
you--being black --have to be right and never racist/hateful
me--being white--automatic racist
Like I said, I cannot demonstrate that you are racist when you are consciously trying to demonstrate that you are not racist. That is why you avoided responding to what I posted about explaining why blacks and whites yields are different after 300 years in the same nation. However, your avoidance, to me, is not proof, but more evidence that you are a racist, based upon that part in the definition that saying linking outcomes to race and genetics makes one a racist. .
Instead of dealing with what I presented....you will do everything but and may just stop responding. Why? Again, I cannot demonstrate the evidence of your racist thinking and belief, when you are trying to prevent me doing such and the best way for you to do that is by not responding or by obfuscation and deflection.
I guess yaw are playing tag team huh? When your boy tapped out rather than reveal his racism........you tap in for him asking me to prove that I am not a racist. The difference is I will answer any line of questioning you want me to and I am pretty sure that a reasonable person would not conclude that my answers are racist.
How about you answer the question I presented about seeds and the analogy with blacks?
No I am feeding you a dose of your own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...You either want people to dislike you or you have no empathy for anything anybody does but yourself...How can you prove you are not racist when clearly your post indicate that you are?sure--my OP is ridiculousIf you plant two seeds at the same time and in a couple of months one yields a healthy bloom while the others bloom seems stunted and defective, what would explain the observation that one flower is inferior to the other?
The two possibilities that jump right out is that one of the seeds was genetically defective relative to the other and or the soil, sun and hydration was defective for one relative to the other, all other things being equal. In other words, one either argues the defective seed theory or defective environment theory.
The defective seed defective environment theory holds for the black white issue in America. Why do the black and white seed yield different socioeconomic blooms after 300 years in the same lands of America? Now, studying history, it clearly shows that, metaphorically speaking, that blacks received inferior soil, sun and hydration from white society relative to what the white seed was afforded in general. This certainly is a very plausible reason why blacks yield less than whites. If you discredit the plausibility of this theory that they inferior yield is due to inferior treatment by society......are you not saying that the black seed is defective or inferior to the white seed?
you--being black --have to be right and never racist/hateful
me--being white--automatic racist
Like I said, I cannot demonstrate that you are racist when you are consciously trying to demonstrate that you are not racist. That is why you avoided responding to what I posted about explaining why blacks and whites yields are different after 300 years in the same nation. However, your avoidance, to me, is not proof, but more evidence that you are a racist, based upon that part in the definition that saying linking outcomes to race and genetics makes one a racist. .
Instead of dealing with what I presented....you will do everything but and may just stop responding. Why? Again, I cannot demonstrate the evidence of your racist thinking and belief, when you are trying to prevent me doing such and the best way for you to do that is by not responding or by obfuscation and deflection.
I guess yaw are playing tag team huh? When your boy tapped out rather than reveal his racism........you tap in for him asking me to prove that I am not a racist. The difference is I will answer any line of questioning you want me to and I am pretty sure that a reasonable person would not conclude that my answers are racist.
How about you answer the question I presented about seeds and the analogy with blacks?
That will gait them nowhere..no--the blacks don't want to have a conversationNo I am feeding you a dose of you own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...How can you prove you are not racist when clearly your post indicate that you are?sure--my OP is ridiculous
you--being black --have to be right and never racist/hateful
me--being white--automatic racist
Like I said, I cannot demonstrate that you are racist when you are consciously trying to demonstrate that you are not racist. That is why you avoided responding to what I posted about explaining why blacks and whites yields are different after 300 years in the same nation. However, your avoidance, to me, is not proof, but more evidence that you are a racist, based upon that part in the definition that saying linking outcomes to race and genetics makes one a racist. .
Instead of dealing with what I presented....you will do everything but and may just stop responding. Why? Again, I cannot demonstrate the evidence of your racist thinking and belief, when you are trying to prevent me doing such and the best way for you to do that is by not responding or by obfuscation and deflection.
I guess yaw are playing tag team huh? When your boy tapped out rather than reveal his racism........you tap in for him asking me to prove that I am not a racist. The difference is I will answer any line of questioning you want me to and I am pretty sure that a reasonable person would not conclude that my answers are racist.
How about you answer the question I presented about seeds and the analogy with blacks?
they just want to scream RACIST whenever we try to have a conversation --a conversation with facts/evidence
facts and evidence to them are like a cross to a vampire
as proven on this very thread
See.This is exactly what I mean..Now asshole(any color or race can be one) show a post where I said that blacks are inferior..Go ahead.. I will wait until you find nothing but your fake outrage and lies(any color or race can lie)..No I am feeding you a dose of your own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...You either want people to dislike you or you have no empathy for anything anybody does but yourself...How can you prove you are not racist when clearly your post indicate that you are?sure--my OP is ridiculous
you--being black --have to be right and never racist/hateful
me--being white--automatic racist
Like I said, I cannot demonstrate that you are racist when you are consciously trying to demonstrate that you are not racist. That is why you avoided responding to what I posted about explaining why blacks and whites yields are different after 300 years in the same nation. However, your avoidance, to me, is not proof, but more evidence that you are a racist, based upon that part in the definition that saying linking outcomes to race and genetics makes one a racist. .
Instead of dealing with what I presented....you will do everything but and may just stop responding. Why? Again, I cannot demonstrate the evidence of your racist thinking and belief, when you are trying to prevent me doing such and the best way for you to do that is by not responding or by obfuscation and deflection.
I guess yaw are playing tag team huh? When your boy tapped out rather than reveal his racism........you tap in for him asking me to prove that I am not a racist. The difference is I will answer any line of questioning you want me to and I am pretty sure that a reasonable person would not conclude that my answers are racist.
How about you answer the question I presented about seeds and the analogy with blacks?
That's fine. You are another person who believes that blacks are inferior. That is the "sane" conversation that you want to have. Yet, you will not accept the ramifications of beliefs like yours when in the hands of people with power and authority. Keep in mind that 65% of the current population of the US is white and white disproportionately control the banks, the companies and power in this nation. Thus, beliefs like yours, among whites, it what creates and incubates the conditions in blacks which you loath.
See.This is exactly what I mean..Now asshole(any color or race can be one) show a post where I said that blacks are inferior..Go ahead.. I will wait until you find nothing but your fake outrage and lies(any color or race can lie)..No I am feeding you a dose of your own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...You either want people to dislike you or you have no empathy for anything anybody does but yourself...How can you prove you are not racist when clearly your post indicate that you are?Like I said, I cannot demonstrate that you are racist when you are consciously trying to demonstrate that you are not racist. That is why you avoided responding to what I posted about explaining why blacks and whites yields are different after 300 years in the same nation. However, your avoidance, to me, is not proof, but more evidence that you are a racist, based upon that part in the definition that saying linking outcomes to race and genetics makes one a racist. .
Instead of dealing with what I presented....you will do everything but and may just stop responding. Why? Again, I cannot demonstrate the evidence of your racist thinking and belief, when you are trying to prevent me doing such and the best way for you to do that is by not responding or by obfuscation and deflection.
I guess yaw are playing tag team huh? When your boy tapped out rather than reveal his racism........you tap in for him asking me to prove that I am not a racist. The difference is I will answer any line of questioning you want me to and I am pretty sure that a reasonable person would not conclude that my answers are racist.
How about you answer the question I presented about seeds and the analogy with blacks?
That's fine. You are another person who believes that blacks are inferior. That is the "sane" conversation that you want to have. Yet, you will not accept the ramifications of beliefs like yours when in the hands of people with power and authority. Keep in mind that 65% of the current population of the US is white and white disproportionately control the banks, the companies and power in this nation. Thus, beliefs like yours, among whites, it what creates and incubates the conditions in blacks which you loath.
so I see all these whites are evil threads/white supremacists/white supremacists running for office/white hate groups/whites committing hate crimes/etc
let's make it clear right here:
blacks -etc are racists/haters/prejudiced/bigots/etc also
they also have their groups geared to helping their race and their race only
blacks commit hate crimes at over TWICE the rate of whites
Offenders
So essentially you are saying its a wash, in regards to racism. Ergo, blacks are just as racist as whites. However, whites win the morality contest because blac
so I see all these whites are evil threads/white supremacists/white supremacists running for office/white hate groups/whites committing hate crimes/etc
let's make it clear right here:
blacks -etc are racists/haters/prejudiced/bigots/etc also
they also have their groups geared to helping their race and their race only
blacks commit hate crimes at over TWICE the rate of whites
Offenders
If everything is a wash and blacks are just as guilty of racism as whites......I don't understand why black poverty is 2 1/2 times that of whites and why black wealth is 15 times less than whites and why black unemployment it twice that of whites.
I am trying to figure out how we became unequal economically if everything whites did to blacks was offset by things blacks did against whites. I mean, it seems logical to me is that the one guilty of doing the most dirt against the other......would be the one that is ahead.
Three rules for staying out of poverty
"You can avoid poverty by:
1. Graduating from high school.
2. Waiting to get married until after 21 and do not have children till after being married.
3. Having a full-time job.
If you do all those three things, your chance of falling into poverty is just 2 percent. Meanwhile, you’ll have a 74 percent chance of being in the middle class.
Applies to everyone
These rules apply to all races and ethnic groups. Breaking these rules is becoming more commonplace, unfortunately, for all racial groups.
By contrast, young adults who violated all three norms - dropped out, got married before 21 and had children out of wedlock and didn’t have a full-time job - had a 76 percent chance of winding up in poverty and a 7 percent chance of winding up in the middle class."
There are all kind of studies that show even when whitSes don't follow the recipe, they get better opportunities than blacks:
Study: Black man and white felon – same chances for hire
I can do this all day.....your turn.
I like the way the study claims to know what people are thinking.
THe three steps are still valid.
The illegitimacy rate for blacks is over 70%.
The vast majority of black families do not have a "primary breadwinner".
That's a fine "recipe", if you are actively trying to keep blacks poor.
I hear black unemployment is at an all time low.
Are you encouraged at all by that?
Do you even have an inkling of what percentage of Blacks are poor? I've told you so many times it ought to have sunk in by now.And the high illegimacy rate doesn't seem to be a factor for that 75% of Blacks living above the poverty line. That dynamic existed in the black community during most of the OBama adminstration and continues til this very day.
children that read while young get many benefitsYour refusal to acknowledge education as a way to get smarter is also part of the problem.The brain is like a muscle, if you don't exercise it, it stagnates. People don't become strong by sitting around and hoping for evolution to give them bigger muscles, they go out there and challenge themselves physically to get the job done. It's the same with the brain, you need to work it to make it stronger...Blacks are, in general, intellectually inferior to Whites and Asians. This is from generations of poor schooling, in Africa, and here in the US. Now I'm not saying that blacks aren't smart enough to catch up, there probably are, but you all need to stay in school, even if that had never been part of "African culture". And one more thing, please pull your pants up, everyone is laughing at you.
It takes thousands of years for evolutionary changes in the brain that would impact the intelligence of a "race". Your theory is absurd. What impacted learning in Africa was nutrition, not poor schooling. Schooling does not create intelligence. Schooling creates knowledge. I mean, you can learn everything there is to learn, but your kids are not born knowing all the things you learned. Schooling has little to do with innate intelligence, although IQ test confuses that fact.
I will say this though, if you can convince a people they are less intelligent, they will perform less intelligently.
When I was growing up some of the strongest people I knew were country boys from the south who never lifted a weight in the life. Rather, their daily life was such that it built their muscles, without the need of a gym. Schools are like Gyms in that they are places designed to exercise the brain, but a person would be naive to believe that school is the only place a persons mind is challenged to think.
Keep in mind also all the inventions that came from people who were not well educated.....but tinkerers.
People Who Changed the World – Without Formal Education
So tell us, how many tinkerers have made it into space?
Smart is a metric of knowledge, not necessarily intelligence. I mean, when a person is born they are already wired for genetically for intelligence...but they are not very smart because they have no knowledge or learning. Also, I never stated that education was not a way to get smarter. Nothing I said states or infers that but your intelligence level will impact your ability to comprehend what I said. I inferred that formal education is not the only or exclusive means to exercise your brain. Anytime you try to figure something out.....you are exercising your brain. Taking what you know and using it to figure out what you don't know is intelligence, as well as pattern recognition.
children that read while young get many benefitsYour refusal to acknowledge education as a way to get smarter is also part of the problem.The brain is like a muscle, if you don't exercise it, it stagnates. People don't become strong by sitting around and hoping for evolution to give them bigger muscles, they go out there and challenge themselves physically to get the job done. It's the same with the brain, you need to work it to make it stronger...It takes thousands of years for evolutionary changes in the brain that would impact the intelligence of a "race". Your theory is absurd. What impacted learning in Africa was nutrition, not poor schooling. Schooling does not create intelligence. Schooling creates knowledge. I mean, you can learn everything there is to learn, but your kids are not born knowing all the things you learned. Schooling has little to do with innate intelligence, although IQ test confuses that fact.
I will say this though, if you can convince a people they are less intelligent, they will perform less intelligently.
When I was growing up some of the strongest people I knew were country boys from the south who never lifted a weight in the life. Rather, their daily life was such that it built their muscles, without the need of a gym. Schools are like Gyms in that they are places designed to exercise the brain, but a person would be naive to believe that school is the only place a persons mind is challenged to think.
Keep in mind also all the inventions that came from people who were not well educated.....but tinkerers.
People Who Changed the World – Without Formal Education
So tell us, how many tinkerers have made it into space?
Smart is a metric of knowledge, not necessarily intelligence. I mean, when a person is born they are already wired for genetically for intelligence...but they are not very smart because they have no knowledge or learning. Also, I never stated that education was not a way to get smarter. Nothing I said states or infers that but your intelligence level will impact your ability to comprehend what I said. I inferred that formal education is not the only or exclusive means to exercise your brain. Anytime you try to figure something out.....you are exercising your brain. Taking what you know and using it to figure out what you don't know is intelligence, as well as pattern recognition.
Benefits of Early Reading - Why Teach Your Child to Read?
- Neurological
- Educational
- Psychological
- Social
- Linguistic
..now imagine the opposite:
a family with a tense atmosphere/they do not teach the kids to read/math
the child doesn't get the right amount or the right food
--most likely you looking at a very retarded teen and then adult --an angry teen/adult
See.This is exactly what I mean..Now asshole(any color or race can be one) show a post where I said that blacks are inferior..Go ahead.. I will wait until you find nothing but your fake outrage and lies(any color or race can lie)..No I am feeding you a dose of your own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...You either want people to dislike you or you have no empathy for anything anybody does but yourself...How can you prove you are not racist when clearly your post indicate that you are?Like I said, I cannot demonstrate that you are racist when you are consciously trying to demonstrate that you are not racist. That is why you avoided responding to what I posted about explaining why blacks and whites yields are different after 300 years in the same nation. However, your avoidance, to me, is not proof, but more evidence that you are a racist, based upon that part in the definition that saying linking outcomes to race and genetics makes one a racist. .
Instead of dealing with what I presented....you will do everything but and may just stop responding. Why? Again, I cannot demonstrate the evidence of your racist thinking and belief, when you are trying to prevent me doing such and the best way for you to do that is by not responding or by obfuscation and deflection.
I guess yaw are playing tag team huh? When your boy tapped out rather than reveal his racism........you tap in for him asking me to prove that I am not a racist. The difference is I will answer any line of questioning you want me to and I am pretty sure that a reasonable person would not conclude that my answers are racist.
How about you answer the question I presented about seeds and the analogy with blacks?
That's fine. You are another person who believes that blacks are inferior. That is the "sane" conversation that you want to have. Yet, you will not accept the ramifications of beliefs like yours when in the hands of people with power and authority. Keep in mind that 65% of the current population of the US is white and white disproportionately control the banks, the companies and power in this nation. Thus, beliefs like yours, among whites, it what creates and incubates the conditions in blacks which you loath.
No and I love black pussy..See.This is exactly what I mean..Now asshole(any color or race can be one) show a post where I said that blacks are inferior..Go ahead.. I will wait until you find nothing but your fake outrage and lies(any color or race can lie)..No I am feeding you a dose of your own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...You either want people to dislike you or you have no empathy for anything anybody does but yourself...How can you prove you are not racist when clearly your post indicate that you are?
I guess yaw are playing tag team huh? When your boy tapped out rather than reveal his racism........you tap in for him asking me to prove that I am not a racist. The difference is I will answer any line of questioning you want me to and I am pretty sure that a reasonable person would not conclude that my answers are racist.
How about you answer the question I presented about seeds and the analogy with blacks?
That's fine. You are another person who believes that blacks are inferior. That is the "sane" conversation that you want to have. Yet, you will not accept the ramifications of beliefs like yours when in the hands of people with power and authority. Keep in mind that 65% of the current population of the US is white and white disproportionately control the banks, the companies and power in this nation. Thus, beliefs like yours, among whites, it what creates and incubates the conditions in blacks which you loath.
Do you believe blacks are inferior?
Let's see some proof of those made up numbers of yours.and???!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????so I see all these whites are evil threads/white supremacists/white supremacists running for office/white hate groups/whites committing hate crimes/etc
let's make it clear right here:
blacks -etc are racists/haters/prejudiced/bigots/etc also
they also have their groups geared to helping their race and their race only
blacks commit hate crimes at over TWICE the rate of whites
Offenders
so I see all these whites are evil threads/white supremacists/white supremacists running for office/white hate groups/whites committing hate crimes/etc
let's make it clear right here:
blacks -etc are racists/haters/prejudiced/bigots/etc also
they also have their groups geared to helping their race and their race only
blacks commit hate crimes at over TWICE the rate of whites
Offenders
From your link.
In 2015, race was reported for 5,493 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders:
48.4 percent were White.
24.3 percent were Black or African American.
Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk
WINNER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Billy the math specialist
blacks are only less than 13% of the population
whites around 67%
you do have a 4th grade math level or higher, I assume??
blacks are committing hate crimes at over TWICE the rate
No and I love black pussy..See.This is exactly what I mean..Now asshole(any color or race can be one) show a post where I said that blacks are inferior..Go ahead.. I will wait until you find nothing but your fake outrage and lies(any color or race can lie)..No I am feeding you a dose of your own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...You either want people to dislike you or you have no empathy for anything anybody does but yourself...I guess yaw are playing tag team huh? When your boy tapped out rather than reveal his racism........you tap in for him asking me to prove that I am not a racist. The difference is I will answer any line of questioning you want me to and I am pretty sure that a reasonable person would not conclude that my answers are racist.
How about you answer the question I presented about seeds and the analogy with blacks?
That's fine. You are another person who believes that blacks are inferior. That is the "sane" conversation that you want to have. Yet, you will not accept the ramifications of beliefs like yours when in the hands of people with power and authority. Keep in mind that 65% of the current population of the US is white and white disproportionately control the banks, the companies and power in this nation. Thus, beliefs like yours, among whites, it what creates and incubates the conditions in blacks which you loath.
Do you believe blacks are inferior?
No and I love black pussy..See.This is exactly what I mean..Now asshole(any color or race can be one) show a post where I said that blacks are inferior..Go ahead.. I will wait until you find nothing but your fake outrage and lies(any color or race can lie)..No I am feeding you a dose of your own medicine..See how that works?.Since you and your buddies don't want to have a conversation like sane people do...You either want people to dislike you or you have no empathy for anything anybody does but yourself...
That's fine. You are another person who believes that blacks are inferior. That is the "sane" conversation that you want to have. Yet, you will not accept the ramifications of beliefs like yours when in the hands of people with power and authority. Keep in mind that 65% of the current population of the US is white and white disproportionately control the banks, the companies and power in this nation. Thus, beliefs like yours, among whites, it what creates and incubates the conditions in blacks which you loath.
Do you believe blacks are inferior?
So did slave owners.
If you do not believe that blacks are inferior to whites, then how does two equal races become unequal in a country after both have existed in the country for over 300 years?
