Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While it's logical that all homosexuals are not child molesters, some child child molesters are homosexual. Some child molesters are also straight.
As a percentage of population vs percentage of child molesters, homosexual men make up an extrodinarily high amount of the child molesting group. The disproportionate numbers suggest that homosexuals are more likely to molest children than straight men.
"You're looking at a much higher rate of abuse," said Reisman, a former university research professor who recently completed a study titled, "Crafting Gay Children." "The Department of Justice just released data and the rate of abuse are off the charts."
But Reisman points to figures from a 1991 population study by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
It showed that 8 million girls were abused by age 18 by heterosexual men, a ratio of 1 victim to 11 adult men. However, 6-8 million boys were abused by age 18 by 1-2 million adult homosexuals, a ratio of 3-5 victims for every gay adult.
Homosexuals more likely to molest kids study reports
"You're looking at a much higher rate of abuse," said Reisman, a former university research professor who recently completed a study titled, "Crafting Gay Children." "The Department of Justice just released data and the rate of abuse are off the charts."
But Reisman points to figures from a 1991 population study by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
It showed that 8 million girls were abused by age 18 by heterosexual men, a ratio of 1 victim to 11 adult men. However, 6-8 million boys were abused by age 18 by 1-2 million adult homosexuals, a ratio of 3-5 victims for every gay adult.
Can't argue with the numbers, homosexuals are 3 times as likely to molest boys as straight men.
For example: In 1987, Dr. Stephen Rubin of Whitman College conducted a ten-state study of sex abuse cases involving school teachers. He studied 199 cases. Of those, 122 male teachers had molested girls, while 14 female teachers had molested boys. He also discovered that 59 homosexual male teachers had molested boys and four female homosexual teachers had molested girls. In other words, 32 percent of those child molestation cases involved homosexuals. Nearly a third of these cases come from only 1-2% of the population.
Dr. Judith Reisman, in her book, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, describes the research done by Dr. Gene Abel. This researcher compared the molestation rates of self-confessed homosexual and heterosexual child molesters. In a sample of 153 homosexual molesters, they confessed to a total of 22,981 molestations. This is equivalent to 150 children per molester. Self-admitted heterosexual molesters admitted to 4,435 molestations. This comes to 19.8 victims per molester. Dr. Abel concluded that homosexuals “sexually molest young boys at an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls.”
This high rate of molestations by homosexuals is consistent with other studies conducted during the past several decades. Here are just a few studies that show homosexuals molesting children at epidemic rates:
The Los Angeles Times conducted a survey in 1985 of 2,628 adults across the U.S. Of those, 27% of the women and 16% of the men had been sexually molested. Seven percent of the girls and 93% of the men had been molested by adults of the same sex. This means that 40% of child molestations were by homosexuals. (Los Angeles Times, August 25-6, 1985)
In 1984, a Vermont survey of 161 adolescents who were sex offenders found that 35 of them were homosexuals (22%). (Wasserman, J., “Adolescent Sex Offenders—Vermont, 1984” Journal American Medical Association, 1986; 255:181-2)
In 1991, of the 100 child molesters at the Massachusetts Treatment Center for Sexually Dangerous Persons, a third were heterosexual, a third were bisexual, and a third were homosexual. (Dr. Raymond Knight, “Differential Prevalence of Personality Disorders in Rapists and Child Molesters,” Eastern Psychological Association Conference, New York, April 12, 1991)
Drs. Freund and Heasman of the Clark Institute of Psychiatry in Toronto reviewed two studies on child molesters and calculated that 34% and 32% of the sex offenders were homosexual. In cases these doctors had handled, 36% of the molesters were homosexuals. (Freund, K. “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1984; 10:193-200)
From these studies and many more, it is evident that homosexuals molest children at a far greater rate than do their heterosexual counterparts.While they comprise only 1-2% of the population, they are responsible for upwards of a third or more of all sexual molestations of children.
My source comes from the DOJ you wombat. Religious bias means nothing if you cite other sources. It wasn't a blog, it was an article with research.
They quoted the DOJ.
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/163390.pdf
For example: In 1987, Dr. Stephen Rubin of Whitman College conducted a ten-state study of sex abuse cases involving school teachers. He studied 199 cases. Of those, 122 male teachers had molested girls, while 14 female teachers had molested boys. He also discovered that 59 homosexual male teachers had molested boys and four female homosexual teachers had molested girls. In other words, 32 percent of those child molestation cases involved homosexuals. Nearly a third of these cases come from only 1-2% of the population.
Dr. Judith Reisman, in her book, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, describes the research done by Dr. Gene Abel. This researcher compared the molestation rates of self-confessed homosexual and heterosexual child molesters. In a sample of 153 homosexual molesters, they confessed to a total of 22,981 molestations. This is equivalent to 150 children per molester. Self-admitted heterosexual molesters admitted to 4,435 molestations. This comes to 19.8 victims per molester. Dr. Abel concluded that homosexuals “sexually molest young boys at an incidence that is occurring from five times greater than the molestation of girls.”
This high rate of molestations by homosexuals is consistent with other studies conducted during the past several decades. Here are just a few studies that show homosexuals molesting children at epidemic rates:
The Los Angeles Times conducted a survey in 1985 of 2,628 adults across the U.S. Of those, 27% of the women and 16% of the men had been sexually molested. Seven percent of the girls and 93% of the men had been molested by adults of the same sex. This means that 40% of child molestations were by homosexuals. (Los Angeles Times, August 25-6, 1985)
In 1984, a Vermont survey of 161 adolescents who were sex offenders found that 35 of them were homosexuals (22%). (Wasserman, J., “Adolescent Sex Offenders—Vermont, 1984” Journal American Medical Association, 1986; 255:181-2)
In 1991, of the 100 child molesters at the Massachusetts Treatment Center for Sexually Dangerous Persons, a third were heterosexual, a third were bisexual, and a third were homosexual. (Dr. Raymond Knight, “Differential Prevalence of Personality Disorders in Rapists and Child Molesters,” Eastern Psychological Association Conference, New York, April 12, 1991)
Drs. Freund and Heasman of the Clark Institute of Psychiatry in Toronto reviewed two studies on child molesters and calculated that 34% and 32% of the sex offenders were homosexual. In cases these doctors had handled, 36% of the molesters were homosexuals. (Freund, K. “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1984; 10:193-200)
From these studies and many more, it is evident that homosexuals molest children at a far greater rate than do their heterosexual counterparts.While they comprise only 1-2% of the population, they are responsible for upwards of a third or more of all sexual molestations of children.
The board genius weighs in once again. Heterosexuals outnumber gays by overwhelming numbers. Maybe 3% of the population is gay. And we don't go after child molesters?While it's logical that all homosexuals are not child molesters, some child child molesters are homosexual. Some child molesters are also straight. Not much to be done about it but wait and observe. If something happens to one of these kids at the hands of one of these dudes, maybe let's not let him survive to go to court. Just wondering what the latest repercussions to the latest progressively naive decisions made on America will be.
Actually the large majority of pedophiles are heterosexual.
While most pedophiles are heterosexual we don't see the boy scouts writing policy that excludes heterosexuals from being leaders.
Seems to me the logical thing to do would be to exclude the largest group that are pedophiles yet they allow the largest group to be leaders.
Why isn't there a campaign to prevent the largest group of pedophiles to be involved with young boys?
Oh that's right, they're heterosexual and it's ok for heterosexuals to be the largest group of pedophiles.
The Boy Scouts are a private organization and are setting their own rules. How can you object to that?That's the same "freedom" you assholes want to give to bakers, photographers, and anyone else who disagrees with you.
And it is force, or it will become so when the lawsuits start flying.
You assholes can't accept anyone different than you, and you use government to make it that way. You are all miserable excuses for human beings.
That is the way things work with public accommodation
"We don't serve negroes here " is no longer acceptable regardless of your personal beliefs or hatreds
Boy Scouts are not a public accommodation, and neither is a contracted baker or photographer.
They are doing it under duress. Plus the change they made will not be enough for nosy busybody asshats such as yourself. The result will be religious groups being forced to either accept gay volunteer leaders in their sponsored troops, or quitting scouts.
Again, you don't favor equality, you favor superiority.
The BSA is a private organization. The Supreme Court said they can make their own rules. They have been dragging their feet on this for over a decade and are finally recognizing reality. Gays are accepted in America.
Some religious groups have still not accepted that fact. They can either accept it or drop their scouting program. Just like BSA made a choice, those churches can make a choice. Nobody is holding a gun to their head
BSA wasn't forced to do anything. They changed their policy of their own free will. This is something you advocate for on a regular basis...let business decide, not government.it won't end at allow, and you know it.
You mean they will force everyone to be gay?
Damned gay agenda
No they will force troops sponsored by religious organizations to accept gay volunteer leaders, even if that goes against the religious tenets of said organization.
Deny it all you like, make light of it all you like, but you know it's going to happen.
Government has been part of the duress being applied to them and you know it. And their change won't be enough. I actually have no issue with the current change, but again, it won't be enough for miserable twats such as yourself. You will now go after troops that want to keep the ban in place for their own troops.
You mean like duress up until the 60's were children who were non christers were made to feel as outsiders in school when goyim prayers were recited in public schools funny how things evolve? No?
BSA wasn't forced to do anything. They changed their policy of their own free will. This is something you advocate for on a regular basis...let business decide, not government.it won't end at allow, and you know it.
You mean they will force everyone to be gay?
Damned gay agenda
No they will force troops sponsored by religious organizations to accept gay volunteer leaders, even if that goes against the religious tenets of said organization.
Deny it all you like, make light of it all you like, but you know it's going to happen.
Government has been part of the duress being applied to them and you know it. And their change won't be enough. I actually have no issue with the current change, but again, it won't be enough for miserable twats such as yourself. You will now go after troops that want to keep the ban in place for their own troops.
Sure, but not legally. The BSA already won at the SCOTUS, the right to discriminate. They would get pressure, but it's the "free market" kind ya'll like.
The only miserable twat I see is you.BSA wasn't forced to do anything. They changed their policy of their own free will. This is something you advocate for on a regular basis...let business decide, not government.it won't end at allow, and you know it.
You mean they will force everyone to be gay?
Damned gay agenda
No they will force troops sponsored by religious organizations to accept gay volunteer leaders, even if that goes against the religious tenets of said organization.
Deny it all you like, make light of it all you like, but you know it's going to happen.
Government has been part of the duress being applied to them and you know it. And their change won't be enough. I actually have no issue with the current change, but again, it won't be enough for miserable twats such as yourself. You will now go after troops that want to keep the ban in place for their own troops.
He knows about the SCOTUS ruling. I'm beginning to think Marty is a big phony.BSA wasn't forced to do anything. They changed their policy of their own free will. This is something you advocate for on a regular basis...let business decide, not government.You mean they will force everyone to be gay?
Damned gay agenda
No they will force troops sponsored by religious organizations to accept gay volunteer leaders, even if that goes against the religious tenets of said organization.
Deny it all you like, make light of it all you like, but you know it's going to happen.
Government has been part of the duress being applied to them and you know it. And their change won't be enough. I actually have no issue with the current change, but again, it won't be enough for miserable twats such as yourself. You will now go after troops that want to keep the ban in place for their own troops.
Sure, but not legally. The BSA already won at the SCOTUS, the right to discriminate. They would get pressure, but it's the "free market" kind ya'll like.
The Boy Scouts are a private organization and are setting their own rules. How can you object to that?That is the way things work with public accommodation
"We don't serve negroes here " is no longer acceptable regardless of your personal beliefs or hatreds
Boy Scouts are not a public accommodation, and neither is a contracted baker or photographer.
They are doing it under duress. Plus the change they made will not be enough for nosy busybody asshats such as yourself. The result will be religious groups being forced to either accept gay volunteer leaders in their sponsored troops, or quitting scouts.
Again, you don't favor equality, you favor superiority.
The BSA is a private organization. The Supreme Court said they can make their own rules. They have been dragging their feet on this for over a decade and are finally recognizing reality. Gays are accepted in America.
Some religious groups have still not accepted that fact. They can either accept it or drop their scouting program. Just like BSA made a choice, those churches can make a choice. Nobody is holding a gun to their head
Gays are accepted by some Americans, tolerated by more. Stop speaking for other people.
The gun will come later, when gays start suing the troops that don't want them as leaders.
The Boy Scouts are a private organization and are setting their own rules. How can you object to that?Boy Scouts are not a public accommodation, and neither is a contracted baker or photographer.
They are doing it under duress. Plus the change they made will not be enough for nosy busybody asshats such as yourself. The result will be religious groups being forced to either accept gay volunteer leaders in their sponsored troops, or quitting scouts.
Again, you don't favor equality, you favor superiority.
The BSA is a private organization. The Supreme Court said they can make their own rules. They have been dragging their feet on this for over a decade and are finally recognizing reality. Gays are accepted in America.
Some religious groups have still not accepted that fact. They can either accept it or drop their scouting program. Just like BSA made a choice, those churches can make a choice. Nobody is holding a gun to their head
Gays are accepted by some Americans, tolerated by more. Stop speaking for other people.
The gun will come later, when gays start suing the troops that don't want them as leaders.
Volunteer leader? Never happened before. I haven't seen women sue to become Boy Scout Leaders
If you don't want your son in scouts, don't send him.
Because you are the one being offendedThe Boy Scouts are a private organization and are setting their own rules. How can you object to that?
They are doing it under duress. Plus the change they made will not be enough for nosy busybody asshats such as yourself. The result will be religious groups being forced to either accept gay volunteer leaders in their sponsored troops, or quitting scouts.
Again, you don't favor equality, you favor superiority.
The BSA is a private organization. The Supreme Court said they can make their own rules. They have been dragging their feet on this for over a decade and are finally recognizing reality. Gays are accepted in America.
Some religious groups have still not accepted that fact. They can either accept it or drop their scouting program. Just like BSA made a choice, those churches can make a choice. Nobody is holding a gun to their head
Gays are accepted by some Americans, tolerated by more. Stop speaking for other people.
The gun will come later, when gays start suing the troops that don't want them as leaders.
Volunteer leader? Never happened before. I haven't seen women sue to become Boy Scout Leaders
If you don't want your son in scouts, don't send him.
If some group doesn't want a gay scout leader, they should just accept it and move on to another troop. Why should a persons involvement in scouting be related to their approval of a homosexual lifestyle?
Because you are the one being offendedThey are doing it under duress. Plus the change they made will not be enough for nosy busybody asshats such as yourself. The result will be religious groups being forced to either accept gay volunteer leaders in their sponsored troops, or quitting scouts.
Again, you don't favor equality, you favor superiority.
The BSA is a private organization. The Supreme Court said they can make their own rules. They have been dragging their feet on this for over a decade and are finally recognizing reality. Gays are accepted in America.
Some religious groups have still not accepted that fact. They can either accept it or drop their scouting program. Just like BSA made a choice, those churches can make a choice. Nobody is holding a gun to their head
Gays are accepted by some Americans, tolerated by more. Stop speaking for other people.
The gun will come later, when gays start suing the troops that don't want them as leaders.
Volunteer leader? Never happened before. I haven't seen women sue to become Boy Scout Leaders
If you don't want your son in scouts, don't send him.
If some group doesn't want a gay scout leader, they should just accept it and move on to another troop. Why should a persons involvement in scouting be related to their approval of a homosexual lifestyle?
Same applied to troops accepting "negroes" and people not wanting their sons in a troop led by a negro
Society changes
When it comes to discrimination, they are the sameBecause you are the one being offendedThe BSA is a private organization. The Supreme Court said they can make their own rules. They have been dragging their feet on this for over a decade and are finally recognizing reality. Gays are accepted in America.
Some religious groups have still not accepted that fact. They can either accept it or drop their scouting program. Just like BSA made a choice, those churches can make a choice. Nobody is holding a gun to their head
Gays are accepted by some Americans, tolerated by more. Stop speaking for other people.
The gun will come later, when gays start suing the troops that don't want them as leaders.
Volunteer leader? Never happened before. I haven't seen women sue to become Boy Scout Leaders
If you don't want your son in scouts, don't send him.
If some group doesn't want a gay scout leader, they should just accept it and move on to another troop. Why should a persons involvement in scouting be related to their approval of a homosexual lifestyle?
Same applied to troops accepting "negroes" and people not wanting their sons in a troop led by a negro
Society changes
Race and sexual orientation are not the same, no matter how much your side tries to make it so.
Society can change, but you forcing it to change by being assholes via the government is wrong, and that you don't see it is sad.
