Boycott Israel

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

France.

I thought BDS was illegal in France, Oh well.

 

[Flash]

Boycott Israel? Does that mean I can't buy IMI ammo? That is good ammo.

I am still pissed about the USS Liberty incident but I still buy IMI ammo.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

Washington Free Beacon
Report: Leading BDS Organization Tied to Palestinian Terrorist Groups

Report: Leading BDS Organization Tied to Palestinian Terrorist Groups

Hamas leaders Fathi Hammad (2R) and Mahmoud al-Zahar (2L) / Getty Images

An American umbrella group of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS) against Israel facilitates tax-exempt donations to a Palestinian coalition that includes numerous U.S.-designated terrorist organizations, according to a new report.

The U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, a Virginia-based nonprofit that coordinates the efforts of 329 different pro-BDS organizations, is a fiscal sponsor of the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), which is based in the West Bank and Gaza, Tablet magazine reported Friday.

The BNC, created in Ramallah in 2007, counts the Council of National and Islamic Forces, commonly known as PNIF, among its members. Five different U.S-designated terrorist organizations are members of PNIF: Hamas, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), the Popular Front – General Command (PFLP-GC), the Palestine Liberation Front, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).


"Since its founding, the BNC has frequently and openly collaborated with known leaders of these terror organizations," Tablet reported. "In 2015, for example, the BNC held a press conference to pressure the Palestinian government not to import gas from Israel, featuring a speech by Khalida Jarrar, then a member of the Palestinian parliament for the PFLP and still an active official in the terror group. A video of the BNC-hosted press conference features Jarrar seated alongside BNC secretariat member Omar Barghouti."

 

[P F Tinmore]

Washington Free Beacon
Report: Leading BDS Organization Tied to Palestinian Terrorist Groups

Report: Leading BDS Organization Tied to Palestinian Terrorist Groups

Hamas leaders Fathi Hammad (2R) and Mahmoud al-Zahar (2L) / Getty Images

An American umbrella group of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS) against Israel facilitates tax-exempt donations to a Palestinian coalition that includes numerous U.S.-designated terrorist organizations, according to a new report.

The U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, a Virginia-based nonprofit that coordinates the efforts of 329 different pro-BDS organizations, is a fiscal sponsor of the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), which is based in the West Bank and Gaza, Tablet magazine reported Friday.

The BNC, created in Ramallah in 2007, counts the Council of National and Islamic Forces, commonly known as PNIF, among its members. Five different U.S-designated terrorist organizations are members of PNIF: Hamas, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), the Popular Front – General Command (PFLP-GC), the Palestine Liberation Front, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).


"Since its founding, the BNC has frequently and openly collaborated with known leaders of these terror organizations," Tablet reported. "In 2015, for example, the BNC held a press conference to pressure the Palestinian government not to import gas from Israel, featuring a speech by Khalida Jarrar, then a member of the Palestinian parliament for the PFLP and still an active official in the terror group. A video of the BNC-hosted press conference features Jarrar seated alongside BNC secretariat member Omar Barghouti."

Oooo, terrorists. Is name calling all you got?

 

[Hollie]

Washington Free Beacon
Report: Leading BDS Organization Tied to Palestinian Terrorist Groups

Report: Leading BDS Organization Tied to Palestinian Terrorist Groups

Hamas leaders Fathi Hammad (2R) and Mahmoud al-Zahar (2L) / Getty Images

An American umbrella group of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS) against Israel facilitates tax-exempt donations to a Palestinian coalition that includes numerous U.S.-designated terrorist organizations, according to a new report.

The U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, a Virginia-based nonprofit that coordinates the efforts of 329 different pro-BDS organizations, is a fiscal sponsor of the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), which is based in the West Bank and Gaza, Tablet magazine reported Friday.

The BNC, created in Ramallah in 2007, counts the Council of National and Islamic Forces, commonly known as PNIF, among its members. Five different U.S-designated terrorist organizations are members of PNIF: Hamas, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), the Popular Front – General Command (PFLP-GC), the Palestine Liberation Front, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).


"Since its founding, the BNC has frequently and openly collaborated with known leaders of these terror organizations," Tablet reported. "In 2015, for example, the BNC held a press conference to pressure the Palestinian government not to import gas from Israel, featuring a speech by Khalida Jarrar, then a member of the Palestinian parliament for the PFLP and still an active official in the terror group. A video of the BNC-hosted press conference features Jarrar seated alongside BNC secretariat member Omar Barghouti."

Oooo, terrorists. Is name calling all you got?

Your hurt feelings are a hoot.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Washington Free Beacon
Report: Leading BDS Organization Tied to Palestinian Terrorist Groups

Report: Leading BDS Organization Tied to Palestinian Terrorist Groups

Hamas leaders Fathi Hammad (2R) and Mahmoud al-Zahar (2L) / Getty Images

An American umbrella group of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (BDS) against Israel facilitates tax-exempt donations to a Palestinian coalition that includes numerous U.S.-designated terrorist organizations, according to a new report.

The U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, a Virginia-based nonprofit that coordinates the efforts of 329 different pro-BDS organizations, is a fiscal sponsor of the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), which is based in the West Bank and Gaza, Tablet magazine reported Friday.

The BNC, created in Ramallah in 2007, counts the Council of National and Islamic Forces, commonly known as PNIF, among its members. Five different U.S-designated terrorist organizations are members of PNIF: Hamas, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), the Popular Front – General Command (PFLP-GC), the Palestine Liberation Front, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).


"Since its founding, the BNC has frequently and openly collaborated with known leaders of these terror organizations," Tablet reported. "In 2015, for example, the BNC held a press conference to pressure the Palestinian government not to import gas from Israel, featuring a speech by Khalida Jarrar, then a member of the Palestinian parliament for the PFLP and still an active official in the terror group. A video of the BNC-hosted press conference features Jarrar seated alongside BNC secretariat member Omar Barghouti."

Oooo, terrorists. Is name calling all you got?

Don't be mean to the terrorists, eh?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RISE OF PALESTINIAN CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT

 

[Sixties Fan]

Over 80 Fliers Promoting University of Missouri Event With Israeli Journalist ‘Systematically Torn Down’

 

[P F Tinmore]

Over 80 Fliers Promoting University of Missouri Event With Israeli Journalist ‘Systematically Torn Down’

The Palestinian village of Najd was attacked and depopulated days before the 1948 war. The people fled to Gaza. Israel destroyed Najd and built the settlement of Sderot on its ruins. Israel has never legally acquired that territory.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You keep bringing up this issue of "legally acquired that territory." I don't think you can define that by statute or established protocol.

Over 80 Fliers Promoting University of Missouri Event With Israeli Journalist ‘Systematically Torn Down’

The Palestinian village of Najd was attacked and depopulated days before the 1948 war. The people fled to Gaza. Israel destroyed Najd and built the settlement of Sderot on its ruins. Israel has never legally acquired that territory.

(QUESTION)

Please answer these simple questions so that we may understand and appreciate your position better.

• Comparatively speaking, how doyou tell the difference between "legally" and "Illegally" acquired territory?

• Just how would the Arab Palestinians acquire territory legally?

• What specific laws are you citing as an authority for your position?​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You keep bringing up this issue of "legally acquired that territory." I don't think you can define that by statute or established protocol.

Over 80 Fliers Promoting University of Missouri Event With Israeli Journalist ‘Systematically Torn Down’

The Palestinian village of Najd was attacked and depopulated days before the 1948 war. The people fled to Gaza. Israel destroyed Najd and built the settlement of Sderot on its ruins. Israel has never legally acquired that territory.

(QUESTION)

Please answer these simple questions so that we may understand and appreciate your position better.

• Comparatively speaking, how doyou tell the difference between "legally" and "Illegally" acquired territory?

• Just how would the Arab Palestinians acquire territory legally?

• What specific laws are you citing as an authority for your position?​

Most Respectfully,
R

• Comparatively speaking, how doyou tell the difference between "legally" and "Illegally" acquired territory?

Illegally would be conquest by force. Legally would be that the territory was ceded to Israel by treaty.

• Just how would the Arab Palestinians acquire territory legally?

The village of Najd predated the Ottoman Empire by an unknown nember of years without question.

• What specific laws are you citing as an authority for your position?

There are laws governing the acquisition of territory and military conquest is not one of them.

Thanks for asking.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Anti-Israel group calls on E.U. to cancel Israeli-Palestinian gathering

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well, I think you got this all wrong.

• Comparatively speaking, how do you tell the difference between "legally" and "Illegally" acquired territory?

Illegally would be conquest by force. Legally would be that the territory was ceded to Israel by treaty.

(COMMENT)

There legal and binding clause is:

All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

The elements of the Arab League, acting in support of the Arab Palestinians, used both Threats or Actual Force on the Israelis to destroy the political sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Jewish State.

Turkey hereby renounces all rights and title whatsoever over or respecting the territories situated outside the frontiers laid down in the present Treaty and the islands other than those over which her sovereignty is recognized by the said Treaty, the future of these territories and islands being settled or to be settled by the parties concerned.

The provisions of the present Article do not prejudice any special arrangements arising from neighborly relations which have been or may be concluded between Turkey and any limitrophe countries.

This clause is the clause that rendered the future disposition of the territory (the portion in question) into the hands of the Allied Powers.

• Just how would the Arab Palestinians acquire territory legally?

The village of Najd predated the Ottoman Empire by an unknown nember of years without question.

(COMMENT)

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.

During the course of armed conflict or Urban Renual, demarcations, political jurisdiction and subdivisions are often changed. In that region of the world, the names of places destroyed and built over change and alter the landscape. It is a domestic issue that is beyond international intervention.

• What specific laws are you citing as an authority for your position?

There are laws governing the acquisition of territory and military conquest is not one of them.

(COMMENT)

Actually, there is NO Internationally agreed upon protocol on the acquisition of territory other than what I have previously cited. And the Customary Law is all over the road. What we do know is that the Arab Palestinians have not had much success in establishing sovereignty (almost none).

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well, I think you got this all wrong.

• Comparatively speaking, how do you tell the difference between "legally" and "Illegally" acquired territory?

Illegally would be conquest by force. Legally would be that the territory was ceded to Israel by treaty.

(COMMENT)

There legal and binding clause is:

All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

The elements of the Arab League, acting in support of the Arab Palestinians, used both Threats or Actual Force on the Israelis to destroy the political sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Jewish State.

Turkey hereby renounces all rights and title whatsoever over or respecting the territories situated outside the frontiers laid down in the present Treaty and the islands other than those over which her sovereignty is recognized by the said Treaty, the future of these territories and islands being settled or to be settled by the parties concerned.

The provisions of the present Article do not prejudice any special arrangements arising from neighborly relations which have been or may be concluded between Turkey and any limitrophe countries.

This clause is the clause that rendered the future disposition of the territory (the portion in question) into the hands of the Allied Powers.

• Just how would the Arab Palestinians acquire territory legally?

The village of Najd predated the Ottoman Empire by an unknown nember of years without question.

(COMMENT)

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.

During the course of armed conflict or Urban Renual, demarcations, political jurisdiction and subdivisions are often changed. In that region of the world, the names of places destroyed and built over change and alter the landscape. It is a domestic issue that is beyond international intervention.

• What specific laws are you citing as an authority for your position?

There are laws governing the acquisition of territory and military conquest is not one of them.

(COMMENT)

Actually, there is NO Internationally agreed upon protocol on the acquisition of territory other than what I have previously cited. And the Customary Law is all over the road. What we do know is that the Arab Palestinians have not had much success in establishing sovereignty (almost none).

Most Respectfully,
R

The elements of the Arab League, acting in support of the Arab Palestinians, used both Threats or Actual Force on the Israelis to destroy the political sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Jewish State.

Palestine has international borders. Israel has no borders.

So who was violating whose territory?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well, I think you got this all wrong.

• Comparatively speaking, how do you tell the difference between "legally" and "Illegally" acquired territory?

Illegally would be conquest by force. Legally would be that the territory was ceded to Israel by treaty.

(COMMENT)

There legal and binding clause is:

All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

The elements of the Arab League, acting in support of the Arab Palestinians, used both Threats or Actual Force on the Israelis to destroy the political sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Jewish State.

Turkey hereby renounces all rights and title whatsoever over or respecting the territories situated outside the frontiers laid down in the present Treaty and the islands other than those over which her sovereignty is recognized by the said Treaty, the future of these territories and islands being settled or to be settled by the parties concerned.

The provisions of the present Article do not prejudice any special arrangements arising from neighborly relations which have been or may be concluded between Turkey and any limitrophe countries.

This clause is the clause that rendered the future disposition of the territory (the portion in question) into the hands of the Allied Powers.

• Just how would the Arab Palestinians acquire territory legally?

The village of Najd predated the Ottoman Empire by an unknown nember of years without question.

(COMMENT)

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter Vll.

During the course of armed conflict or Urban Renual, demarcations, political jurisdiction and subdivisions are often changed. In that region of the world, the names of places destroyed and built over change and alter the landscape. It is a domestic issue that is beyond international intervention.

• What specific laws are you citing as an authority for your position?

There are laws governing the acquisition of territory and military conquest is not one of them.

(COMMENT)

Actually, there is NO Internationally agreed upon protocol on the acquisition of territory other than what I have previously cited. And the Customary Law is all over the road. What we do know is that the Arab Palestinians have not had much success in establishing sovereignty (almost none).

Most Respectfully,
R

This clause is the clause that rendered the future disposition of the territory (the portion in question) into the hands of the Allied Powers.

The Allied Powers did not acquire sovereignty over that territory. They held it in trust for the inhabitants until they could stand alone.

 

[Shusha]

The Allied Powers did not acquire sovereignty over that territory. They held it in trust for the inhabitants until they could stand alone.

Sometimes you make it weirdly hard to argue with you. Yep. Until they could stand alone. Jewish Palestinians got that shit sorted out. What is taking the Arab Palestinians so long to be able to "stand alone"?

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Allied Powers did not acquire sovereignty over that territory. They held it in trust for the inhabitants until they could stand alone.

Sometimes you make it weirdly hard to argue with you. Yep. Until they could stand alone. Jewish Palestinians got that shit sorted out. What is taking the Arab Palestinians so long to be able to "stand alone"?

Everything they tried to do Britain shut them down.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Boycott Israel
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

OH, you are so confused. You do not even know what the term "Palestine" actually means; let alone understand the borders.

The elements of the Arab League, acting in support of the Arab Palestinians, used both Threats or Actual Force on the Israelis to destroy the political sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Jewish State.

Palestine has international borders. Israel has no borders.

So who was violating whose territory?

(IMPORTANT REFERENCE)

​

​

SOURCE: Under Secretary General for Legal Affairs Legal Affairs
​

(COMMENT)

Of course, you would have a dispute over the borders. Both the major Arab Palestinian factions (Ramallah Government and Gaza Government) have their own particular view on this matter.

In the eyes of many Arab Palestinians, particularly those involved hostilities and in the support of violence, your view "must be" the proper view. Otherwise, the entire justification for the actions of the Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters, begins to unravel.

The term "Palestine" does not mean what you think it means. While there is no legal impediment in using the term "Palestine" as to describe the geographic area once under the Mandate for Palestine, the boundaries of that geographic area did not constitute a self-governing institution (a state). Take a few minutes to read and understand the Memo.

As for the borders of Israel, they are actual and physical. The sovereignty of Israel is not theoretical but enforced and treated as a fact in reality. YOU touch the border. It has the quality of real substance, a tangible object. It is not some pipe dream that the Arab Palestinians and fantasy.

Now that does not mean that the Arab Palestinians can live as refugees in self-imposed enclaves run by the UNRWA. But the Arab Palestinians do this at the own discretion.

Most Respectfully,
R