Christian friends of gays and lesbians

[THE LIGHT]

Pretty sure Bodecea is a gay woman.

Isn't that saying the same thing?

Oh aren't you illuminating .

Just asking questions...some people have a hard time doing the math.

 

[CurveLight]

Really?

Yeah, why don't you link that right here then..

My link is in the garage getting fixed. (You can't seriously have missed those posts)

No, I'm totally cereal.




Post the evidence of your accusations toward Immie.

Check out posts around 503, 496, etc in that area and you'll see them.

 

[eagleseven]

I've always imagined Bodecea as a buff Rachel Maddow.

 

[CurveLight]

Should heterosexual Lesbians be allowed to stop gay women from using the term "Lesbian?"

 

[eagleseven]

Should heterosexual Lesbians be allowed to stop gay women from using the term "Lesbian?"

I'd rather watch lesbians than thespians, though they are often one and the same.

 

[CurveLight]

Should heterosexual Lesbians be allowed to stop gay women from using the term "Lesbian?"

I'd rather watch lesbians than thespians, though they are often one and the same.

Who said anything about thespians?

 

[eagleseven]

Should heterosexual Lesbians be allowed to stop gay women from using the term "Lesbian?"

I'd rather watch lesbians than thespians, though they are often one and the same.

Who said anything about thespians?

How can you tell a homosexual thespian from a lesbian?

You can't!

 

[random3434]

I'd rather watch lesbians than thespians, though they are often one and the same.

Who said anything about thespians?

How can you tell a homosexual thespian from a lesbian?

You can't!

If one was a lesbian, and a thespian, and they won a Tony, would that be considered sexist?

 

[Valerie]

I've followed the dialogue and what I've concluded is Immie is a bigot on the grounds he does not want gays to have the title "Marriage" because he sees that as wrong.


I agree he is generally a nice guy but that doesn't mean he isn't a bigot.

Oh isn't that swell of you. He sees that as wrong? How?


He sees the legal terminology as threatening the separation of Church and State which is a legitimate concern for for all of us, not just BIGOTS.




That bigotry label implies intolerance toward gays and that is not true about Immie.


You seriously need to post a direct quote right here right now that justifies your labeling him a BIGOT for no reason.














I'll wait.

 

[eagleseven]

If one was a lesbian, and a thespian, and they won a Tony, would that be considered sexist?

It would be considered a modern miracle, unless Tony is the drag king next door.

 

[CurveLight]

I've followed the dialogue and what I've concluded is Immie is a bigot on the grounds he does not want gays to have the title "Marriage" because he sees that as wrong.


I agree he is generally a nice guy but that doesn't mean he isn't a bigot.

Oh isn't that swell of you. He sees that as wrong? How?


He sees the legal terminology as threatening the separation of Church and State which is a legitimate concern for for all of us, not just BIGOTS.




That bigotry label implies intolerance toward gays and that is true about Immie.


You seriously need to post a direct quote right here right now that justifies your labeling him a BIGOT for no reason.














I'll wait.

It's not threatening to the separation of church and state because marriage is not a religious institution. If it is a religious institution and since the State legally recognizes marriages that means the line you "fear" has already been crossed.

Doh!

(Marriage is not a religious institution.)

 

[Valerie]

I've followed the dialogue and what I've concluded is Immie is a bigot on the grounds he does not want gays to have the title "Marriage" because he sees that as wrong.


I agree he is generally a nice guy but that doesn't mean he isn't a bigot.

Oh isn't that swell of you. He sees that as wrong? How?


He sees the legal terminology as threatening the separation of Church and State which is a legitimate concern for for all of us, not just BIGOTS.




That bigotry label implies intolerance toward gays and that is true about Immie.


You seriously need to post a direct quote right here right now that justifies your labeling him a BIGOT for no reason.














I'll wait.

It's not threatening to the separation of church and state because marriage is not a religious institution. If it is a religious institution and since the State legally recognizes marriages that means the line you "fear" has already been crossed.

Doh!

(Marriage is not a religious institution.)

I was actually arguing on the other side of that issue with Immie. D'oh!

I thought you read the thread?



Still doesn't make him a BIGOT now does it ?

 

[DiveCon]

I've followed the dialogue and what I've concluded is Immie is a bigot on the grounds he does not want gays to have the title "Marriage" because he sees that as wrong.


I agree he is generally a nice guy but that doesn't mean he isn't a bigot.

Oh isn't that swell of you. He sees that as wrong? How?


He sees the legal terminology as threatening the separation of Church and State which is a legitimate concern for for all of us, not just BIGOTS.




That bigotry label implies intolerance toward gays and that is true about Immie.


You seriously need to post a direct quote right here right now that justifies your labeling him a BIGOT for no reason.














I'll wait.

It's not threatening to the separation of church and state because marriage is not a religious institution. If it is a religious institution and since the State legally recognizes marriages that means the line you "fear" has already been crossed.

Doh!

(Marriage is not a religious institution.)

actually, as it stands right now, Marriage is BOTH a religious institution AND a civil one
the proposal is that it be confined to religion and keep the government out of it, and all legal matters currently contained in marriage be moved into civil union contracts that everyone can legally partake

 

[CurveLight]

Oh isn't that swell of you. He sees that as wrong? How?


He sees the legal terminology as threatening the separation of Church and State which is a legitimate concern for for all of us, not just BIGOTS.




That bigotry label implies intolerance toward gays and that is true about Immie.


You seriously need to post a direct quote right here right now that justifies your labeling him a BIGOT for no reason.














I'll wait.

It's not threatening to the separation of church and state because marriage is not a religious institution. If it is a religious institution and since the State legally recognizes marriages that means the line you "fear" has already been crossed.

Doh!

(Marriage is not a religious institution.)

I was actually arguing on the other side of that issue with Immie. D'oh!

I thought you read the thread?



Still doesn't make him a BIGOT now does it ?

Ummm......if someone disagrees so deeply with a group correctly using a term simply because of gender then yes that qualifies as bigotry. He disagrees so much with the term gay marriage he is willing to force a superfluous legal nightmare of terminology and try to justify his position on the fear some gays are so evil they are using this as a means to an end to attack churches.

Even when kindly asked to prove his fear justified by citing two or three cases where any church has been forced to marry anyone he comes up with absolutely no examples and instead tries to use a photography business and a church owned pavillion that was rented to the public as his evidence. Not only did neither case force a church to marry anyone but neither example was about a fucking church. When people base objections on positions void of facts they are desperately seeking a way to legitimize their bigotry.

 

[Madeline]

I sense we are no longer discussing christian friendship on this thread.

 

[CurveLight]

Oh isn't that swell of you. He sees that as wrong? How?


He sees the legal terminology as threatening the separation of Church and State which is a legitimate concern for for all of us, not just BIGOTS.




That bigotry label implies intolerance toward gays and that is true about Immie.


You seriously need to post a direct quote right here right now that justifies your labeling him a BIGOT for no reason.














I'll wait.

It's not threatening to the separation of church and state because marriage is not a religious institution. If it is a religious institution and since the State legally recognizes marriages that means the line you "fear" has already been crossed.

Doh!

(Marriage is not a religious institution.)

actually, as it stands right now, Marriage is BOTH a religious institution AND a civil one
the proposal is that it be confined to religion and keep the government out of it, and all legal matters currently contained in marriage be moved into civil union contracts that everyone can legally partake

Thank you for affirming my claim marriage is not endemic to religion.

 

[CurveLight]

I sense we are no longer discussing christian friendship on this thread.

It was never about Christian friendship.

 

[eagleseven]

I sense we are no longer discussing christian friendship on this thread.

It was never about Christian friendship.

Are you aware of the thread title?

 

[Valerie]

I sense we are no longer discussing christian friendship on this thread.

It was never about Christian friendship.

Immie has been posting as a Christian friend of gays and lesbians and you falsely accused him of bigotry. I think that's pretty relevant to the OP.







Got that quote yet?

 

[Madeline]

Seems to me being harsh to Immie is counter-productve. He is mistaken, but more likely to listen and learn if you're not busy calling him a bigot. Don't your friends ever make mistakes, CurveLight?