CNN’s Laura Coates Makes the Case that Trump and His Surrogates Actually Incited Capitol Violence

In the video clip, Laura Coates really nails his ass to the wall. Watch...


two issues-----1) Coates spoke at length but never managed to come up with an actual directive to
commit violence-----despite her STRUGGLE to do
so. Some of the comments were DESIGNED TO
EVOKE EMOTION----but none included a call to
actual violence
2) "Equal justice" (read that "equal" not the mystery word "equitable".) Is ANYONE out there willing to apply the same criteria for the determination of criminal incitement to ALL SPEAKERS or are the jails too full?
 
In the video clip, Laura Coates really nails his ass to the wall. Watch...


two issues-----1) Coates spoke at length but never managed to come up with an actual directive to
commit violence-----despite her STRUGGLE to do
so. Some of the comments were DESIGNED TO
EVOKE EMOTION----but none included a call to
actual violence
2) "Equal justice" (read that "equal" not the mystery word "equitable".) Is ANYONE out there willing to apply the same criteria for the determination of criminal incitement to ALL SPEAKERS or are the jails too full?

Trump's staff and advisors have been telling us for four years that Trump really didn't mean what he said, wink wink.
 
In the video clip, Laura Coates really nails his ass to the wall. Watch...


two issues-----1) Coates spoke at length but never managed to come up with an actual directive to
commit violence-----despite her STRUGGLE to do
so. Some of the comments were DESIGNED TO
EVOKE EMOTION----but none included a call to
actual violence
2) "Equal justice" (read that "equal" not the mystery word "equitable".) Is ANYONE out there willing to apply the same criteria for the determination of criminal incitement to ALL SPEAKERS or are the jails too full?

Trump's staff and advisors have been telling us for four years that Trump really didn't mean what he said, wink wink.

now you are being silly
 
In the video clip, Laura Coates really nails his ass to the wall. Watch...


two issues-----1) Coates spoke at length but never managed to come up with an actual directive to
commit violence-----despite her STRUGGLE to do
so. Some of the comments were DESIGNED TO
EVOKE EMOTION----but none included a call to
actual violence
2) "Equal justice" (read that "equal" not the mystery word "equitable".) Is ANYONE out there willing to apply the same criteria for the determination of criminal incitement to ALL SPEAKERS or are the jails too full?

Trump's staff and advisors have been telling us for four years that Trump really didn't mean what he said, wink wink.


Democrats had been giving the wink wink to protests all over the country for the last year because for the most part, the burning and looting did not affect THEM. Those were protests that were also hijacked by violent elements and took lives and property , but it was only the lives and property of us lowly American citizens.
We watched for months as people committed crimes only to be let out of jail without bail, all with the approval of liberal Democrats. Is it any wonder a sense of lawlessness has permeated society?

Now two wrongs do not make a right, but hypocritical Democrats still need to pull their head out of their ass. Conservatives protesting for what they see as justice is just as valid as when Libs do it.
It was criminal to storm the Capitol building, however peaceful protestors had every right to assemble outside.
I don't see where Trump called for actual violence. Most of the hundreds of thousands of people went there to have a voice. Was it Trump who incited violence? or was it the actions of Democrats by taking away the voice of much of this country? There is a reason a large portion of the country feels that Democrats have marginalized them and this round started in 2016 when they called their elected president illegitimate. It's probably not too surprising that fringe groups could act up on their own, but I'm pretty sure the storming of the capitol building caught Trump by surprise. There's no way that was a top down coup attempt. First give away is that the shooting was all one sided.
 
So? Her opinion is better than anyone else's? I wouldn't waste my time.
 
two issues-----1) Coates spoke at length but never managed to come up with an actual directive to
commit violence-----despite her STRUGGLE to do
so. Some of the comments were DESIGNED TO
EVOKE EMOTION----but none included a call to
actual violence
2) "Equal justice" (read that "equal" not the mystery word "equitable".) Is ANYONE out there willing to apply the same criteria for the determination of criminal incitement to ALL SPEAKERS or are the jails too full?
Do you stand by these outdated comments?

This is back when Republicans were denying the insurrection was violent. Before all the video's came out.
 
Do you stand by these outdated comments?

This is back when Republicans were denying the insurrection was violent. Before all the video's came out.
relatively speaking----the "insurrection" was NOT VIOLENT. I survived
the utter destruction of Newark, NJ, 1967-----and have lived in NYC for
many decades. You want to call that little picnic "VIOLENT"?
 
relatively speaking----the "insurrection" was NOT VIOLENT. I survived
the utter destruction of Newark, NJ, 1967-----and have lived in NYC for
many decades. You want to call that little picnic "VIOLENT"?
Yes it was violent. And it's proof Republicans STOLE 2000 and tried to do it again in 2020. By riot. In 2000 it was the Brooks Brother Riots led by Roger Stone and it turns out he was involved in the 2020 riots too. Only this time it didn't work because Trump lost 5 STATES not just 1.

And rioting and sending the decision to the Supreme Court is only one of many tactics Republicans use to steal elections. We're on to you now.
 

Forum List

Back
Top