Corona virus likely to be gone soon in US

[depotoo]

Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.

With less than a fourth* of the population of the US.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

With less than a third of the population of the US.

Irrelevant right now, as the spread has just begun. How are you people not getting this? The virus was not sprinkled evenly over the two countries from outer space. It has to travel over time and space to infect people.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.

With less than a third of the population of the US.

That's right. But it is far from over. I monitored the numbers, and your president's rhetoric. When he blamed the virus on europe, and banned Europeans, but not the UK and Ireland, he sure liked the US numbers.

Then some testing started, lol.

 

[JGalt]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?

No idea where you're coming up with your numbers. 308 deaths out of 25,471 cases in the US. That comes out to 1.2% no matter how you do the math.

Microsoft Bing COVID-19 Tracker

Unless you're using common core math, which explains alot.

 

[depotoo]

With less than a third of the population of the US.

Irrelevant right now, as the spread has just begun. How are you people not getting this? The virus was not sprinkled evenly over the two countries from outer space. It has to travel over time and space to infect people.

Our first case was Jan 21, theirs was Jan 28.

 

[L.K.Eder]

With less than a third of the population of the US.

Irrelevant right now, as the spread has just begun. How are you people not getting this? The virus was not sprinkled evenly over the two countries from outer space. It has to travel over time and space to infect people.

Our first case was Jan 21, theirs was Jan 28.

And what happened in between?

 

[flack]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?

No idea where you're coming up with your numbers. 308 deaths out of 25,471 cases in the US. That comes out to 1.2% no matter how you do the math.

Microsoft Bing COVID-19 Tracker

Unless you're using common core math, which explains alot.

I hear that.

 

[depotoo]

Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.

With less than a third of the population of the US.

That's right. But it is far from over. I monitored the numbers, and your president's rhetoric. When he blamed the virus on europe, and banned Europeans, but not the UK and Ireland, he sure liked the US numbers.

Then some testing started, lol.

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

 

[Pogo]

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?

You are intelligent enough to know that at this point in the starting wave, this number is completely without merit.

And it’s disgraceful to even repeat it.

Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?

Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?

Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.

Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.

You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.

A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved. ALL of those can be expected to diminish as enough time passes to allow recoveries.

As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.

 

[depotoo]

The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?

You are intelligent enough to know that at this point in the starting wave, this number is completely without merit.

And it’s disgraceful to even repeat it.

Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?

Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?

Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.

Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.

You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.

A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.

As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.

So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

With less than a third of the population of the US.

Irrelevant right now, as the spread has just begun. How are you people not getting this? The virus was not sprinkled evenly over the two countries from outer space. It has to travel over time and space to infect people.

Our first case was Jan 21, theirs was Jan 28.

Right, so it makes sense that we would pace them in cases for quite a while, regardless of population size, all else being equal.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.

With less than a third of the population of the US.

That's right. But it is far from over. I monitored the numbers, and your president's rhetoric. When he blamed the virus on europe, and banned Europeans, but not the UK and Ireland, he sure liked the US numbers.

Then some testing started, lol.

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

Yeah. I know. You don't have to repeat that. But i will repeat that numbers are low if you do not test. Now that testing has ramped up, numbers ramp up. And the US numbers seems to be increasing significantly faster than the german numbers.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.

 

[Pogo]

I don't know what AM radio ass summa y'all continue to pull this from but the US death rate, at the moment, is 63%.

63%?

You better check your math there, Pythagoras

The actual mortality rate for the Chinese Wuhan Virus in the US is between 1.4% to 2%, which is far lower than the Flu.

Looks like the Democrats are gonna have to come up with a new disease or something.

The actual mortality rate has yet to be established --- it can't be without sufficient time --- but at the moment it's running at 64%. It went up a bit. As I and my link just laid out. What's 301 divided by 472 on your planet?

No idea where you're coming up with your numbers. 308 deaths out of 25,471 cases in the US. That comes out to 1.2% no matter how you do the math.

Microsoft Bing COVID-19 Tracker

Unless you're using common core math, which explains alot.

That's because you can't read.

You DON'T COUNT 25,471 cases whose outcome you DON"T KNOW. DUH!

If ten people go out to climb Mount Kilimanjaro, and three of them are found dead, and the other seven are unaccounted for, you do NOT have a mortality rate of 30%. If the other seven show up, THEN you do.

Understand?

 

[Pogo]

Btw, USA has passed Germany in the confirmed infected count. Lol.

With less than a third of the population of the US.

That's right. But it is far from over. I monitored the numbers, and your president's rhetoric. When he blamed the virus on europe, and banned Europeans, but not the UK and Ireland, he sure liked the US numbers.

Then some testing started, lol.

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

See where your post says 72 cases per 1M population?

A week ago that number was SIX.

 

[Pogo]

You are intelligent enough to know that at this point in the starting wave, this number is completely without merit.

And it’s disgraceful to even repeat it.

Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?

Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?

Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.

Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.

You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.

A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.

As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.

So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?

Once AGAIN ---- I DIDN'T BRING IT UP. The OP did. Go ahead, check posts 1 and 2.

 

[depotoo]

Tot Cases/
1M pop
Germany
267
US
72

Irrelevant right now, as a direct comparison.. Stop that, you are being silly.

How is it irrelevant? Our population is much larger than theirs is. We had the first case, before them, yet we sit much lower on infection rate at this point in time.

 

[L.K.Eder]

And it’s disgraceful to even repeat it.

Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?

Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?

Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.

Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.

You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.

A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.

As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.

So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?

Once AGAIN ---- I DIDN'T BRING IT UP. The OP did. Go ahead, check posts 1 and 2.

You opened yourself to this. As i said, consider the audience. They will home in on your fallacious number, but not on the initially posted fallacious number.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How is it irrelevant?

Because it doesn't inform you on anything whatsoever. You do understand what the word "irrelevant" means, right?

 

[Pogo]

Dafuk does that even mean? You want the numbers buried?

Look, it was the OP who took the initiative to gurgle up bogus numbers. I corrected them. EVEN THEN with the caveat that the number was at present meaningless. What the fuck do you want here? Fake numbers?

Numbers that will not cause mass panic when we know they will drop waaaayyyyy down.

Read much? EVERY SINGLE TIME I've quoted that number --- ALWAYS in response to some wag putting up fake numbers --- I've done so with the notation that it isn't realistic, because it can't be realistic, because TIME. Not enough has gone by to establish it. With a 24-day incubation period the number who will recover is Not Yet Recorded.

You want a realistic number? THERE AREN'T ANY. But if some wag keeps repeating bogus ones, they're going to be corrected.

A better estimation of a realistic number is, again, to consider the aggregate, that body of samples that has had time --- as also previously noted, that is at the moment 12%, and as noted at the same time, THAT TOO has to settle, with time. A still-better view can be ascertained by looking at China, the first country to deal with CV and therefore has had the most TIME, which has a CURRENT rate of just 4%. But that too is not yet settled as China, like everybody else still has active cases not yet resolved.

As I said at the beginning, flinging random numbers out and declaring "this is the mortality rate, full stop" is just irresponsible. Not only is it bogus math, it's pure speculation based on bogus math.

So why repeat it if it isn’t realistic?

Once AGAIN ---- I DIDN'T BRING IT UP. The OP did. Go ahead, check posts 1 and 2.

You opened yourself to this. As i said, consider the audience. They will home in on your fallacious number, but not on the initially posted fallacious number.

I don't have a fallacious number. The OP did. The audience, well that's up to them, they can figure it out or wallow in ignorance. You can lead the horse to water...