schmidlap
Platinum Member
- Oct 30, 2020
- 10,021
- 6,588
The question as to whether public health experts and epidemiologists or ideologues are more qualified to deal with a pandemic should never arise, of course, but the latter fancy themselves more knowledgable than climatologists in that discipline as well.I live in a country where we locked down early, we locked down hard, and we re-opened slowly. As of Christmas Eve, we back in lockdown for 30 days. There are mask mandates everywhere. We've lost 14,000 people, and we've had 500,000 cases. Our rate of infection per million citizens is #85 in the world.
But we've cancelled everything this year, and masked up when out of our homes. Our schools didn't open until late September, and they're closed after the holidays, for two full weeks. They may not re-open.
Canada followed the scientists - to the letter. The government didn't push to reopen as soon as cases started to drop. We got down to 200 cases a day in the entire country - before we re-opened at all. We started buying PPE in January, and never ran out. Our hospitals were never overwhelmed, although we are close to capacity right now - hence the lockdown.
As a result of our containing the virus, our economy hasn't crashed. Yes there's been damage, but unlike the USA, our people have sufficient money and protections to see us through to the vaccine, and we've already bought enough vaccine for everyone in the country.
Such fanaticism is emotionally-driven and utterly impervious to rational thinking with its objective, analytical approach and reliance on actual empirical data rather than their immutable dogma.