Democrat Prosecutor: Trump Should Not Be Allowed to Defend Himself

[j-mac]

Like I stated.................

There are entire libraries filled with subjects and words, you don't understand.

I'm typing moron NOT talking.

Poor closeted homo.

You tried to use “teabagger” as a disgusting pejorative, and now we see that you’re homophobic as well…

You are being laughed at…

 

[kyzr]

Hey, you are the one who are supporting a guy who has been indicted for 91 felonies in 4 jurisdictions.

You forgot to describe the 91 felony "indictments".

1. NYC Letitia James ran for DA on "getting Trump", so her bullshit indictment isn't even a crime. Its an interpretation on the value of property. Not like the bribery, extortion, and Tax Evasion of the Bidens.

2. Fani Willis in Ga also ran on "getting Trump" and her charges relate to questioning the results of elections. She will be juggling many trials in different courts. She is in wayyyyy over her Low-IQ head regarding RICO. The Bidens have more RICO exposure than Trump.

3. Jack Smith was "appointed" illegally, so his indictments for J6 and mishandling classified documents will probably be thrown out by the courts.

 

[Marener]

Corruption? You don't know a damned thing about corruption as you support the current corrupt puppet in the WH today. Spare me....

Trump is corruption. He’s always been corrupt. He told us he was corrupt before he was elected. Remember when he said he would send donations to politicians and they would do what he said? That’s corruption.

He convinced MAGA that he would use his corruption to fix the system. Turns out he corrupted it more. What did you expect?

 

[Marener]

Now where using tales as a guide ? ROTFLMBO

It’s a parable and it’s informative.

Trump was always corrupt to benefit himself. That’s how he ran his company. That’s how he ran the government.

 

[Marener]

You forgot to describe the 91 felony "indictments".

1. NYC Letitia James ran for DA on "getting Trump", so her bullshit indictment isn't even a crime. Its an interpretation on the value of property. Not like the bribery, extortion, and Tax Evasion of the Bidens.

2. Fani Willis in Ga also ran on "getting Trump" and her charges relate to questioning the results of elections. She will be juggling many trials in different courts. She is in wayyyyy over her Low-IQ head regarding RICO. The Bidens have more RICO exposure than Trump.

3. Jack Smith was "appointed" illegally, so his indictments for J6 and mishandling classified documents will probably be thrown out by the courts.

Trump ran on “getting Clinton”. Spare us the outrage.

 

[beagle9]

Hey, you are the one who are supporting a guy who has been indicted for 91 felonies in 4 jurisdictions.

And you know damned well what is going on in this entire bull shite game... It's an all out scam to get Trump at a cost that would burn down the entire show if y'all have too in order to get him.

Why don't you tell us what it's all been truly about ? You know, the agenda that has been creeping it's way into power for year's now, and how it's reached the top rungs, and how it is to be protected at all cost. Yeah tell everyone what it's truly about with you leftist.

The preview of it all has been plastered everywhere, but it's being denied by leftist that such things exist, just like the bull shite is being denied about men in women sports not being a good thing (by you leftist), and how going into females bathrooms as boys or men is not an unacceptable practice going on either, otherwise that is also being denied by you leftist when it's debated or brought up...

What else will the left deny as it goes after Trump and their opposition who yes are against all such things that are being denied by the left, otherwise that the left claims such things don't exist when confronted ?

It's easy to see the groups that are behind destroying Trump, because Trump represents the American people that are against such things. It's just that simple. Any Republican or Democrat rep best tow the line and conform or they are going to be dealt with just like Trump and the Americans are being dealt with by the left to date eh ???

 

[beagle9]

It’s a parable and it’s informative.

Trump was always corrupt to benefit himself. That’s how he ran his company. That’s how he ran the government.

Why do you cherry pick with Trump, otherwise when you have a president that meets all the same criteria that you are using on Trump ? We know why....

 

[Marener]

Why do you cherry pick with Trump, otherwise when you have a president that meets all the same criteria that you are using on Trump ? We know why....

No other president has been this corrupt, openly and brazenly.

Hell, even Nixon knew enough to hide it.

 

[j-mac]

Trump is corruption. He’s always been corrupt. He told us he was corrupt before he was elected. Remember when he said he would send donations to politicians and they would do what he said? That’s corruption.

He convinced MAGA that he would use his corruption to fix the system. Turns out he corrupted it more. What did you expect?

No....Just because you bleating dodo birds bleat, doesn't make your arguments true...

 

[struth]

He does if he wants to stay out of jail, Q-NUT.

haha yes under demafasict regimes that seems to be the norm for people accused of things…but this is still America, and the rule of law still exist, the burden is on the govt, not the defense. Trump is innocent until you demafasict prove otherwise. Since you all can’t actually do that, you are resorting to these demafasict tactics

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

You tried to use “teabagger” as a disgusting pejorative, and now we see that you’re homophobic as well…

You are being laughed at…

Wrong teabagger.
Republicans aren't republicans anymore and they never were conservative.
Bush and Trump proved that.

 

[j-mac]

Wrong teabagger.
Republicans aren't republicans anymore and they never were conservative.
Bush and Trump proved that.

Your opinion as a lib nut sucker makes your point moot.....

 

[Marener]

No....Just because you bleating dodo birds bleat, doesn't make your arguments true...

And where is your argument?

Its absence is conspicuous.

 

[j-mac]

And where is your argument?

Its absence is conspicuous.

What argument...Your post is emotional bs....I don't argue with nonsense...

 

[SeaMajor7]

Trump is corruption. He’s always been corrupt. He told us he was corrupt before he was elected. Remember when he said he would send donations to politicians and they would do what he said? That’s corruption.

He convinced MAGA that he would use his corruption to fix the system. Turns out he corrupted it more. What did you expect?

LIAR!!!

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

haha yes under demafasict regimes that seems to be the norm for people accused of things…but this is still America, and the rule of law still exist, the burden is on the govt, not the defense. Trump is innocent until you demafasict prove otherwise. Since you all can’t actually do that, you are resorting to these demafasict tactics

Trump will have to prove his innocence.

Proud Boys leaders: Trump caused Jan. 6 attack​

Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2023/04/25 › prou...
Apr 25, 2023 — A lawyer for Enrique Tarrio told jurors that prosecutors are using him as a “scapegoat” for the former president.

Stewart Rhodes says fellow Oath Keepers were 'stupid' to ...​

NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › politics › justice-department
Nov 7, 2022 — Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes said at his seditious conspiracy trial that other members of the far-right group who stormed the Capitol ...

Rats are turning on their dear leader.

 

[berg80]

Come on Stormy, this isn't about establishing anything, it's about rigging the election so that you don't have to get your asses handed to you by the big orange boogeyman....And throwing a temper tantrum when you don't get your way...You know, what a child would do...

Is enforcing the rule of law really such a foreign concept to you? I suppose it must be, it has to be, in order to remain loyal to the Orange Insurrectionist.

 

[kaz]

Apparently you are unaware the CO SC ruling was based on extensive evidence presented by both sides leading up to the lower court ruling. Expert testimony was given and Trump's attorneys were afforded every opportunity to present whatever evidence they chose to present.

Then why did three of the seven DEMOCRATS in the Colorodo SCOTUS vote against it?

Flip parties and you flip sides. EVERYONE in BOTH parties know that, MAGA man.. There is nothing to see here. You cry and wail, and flip sides when the parties flip. You aren't a man

 

[berg80]

You forgot to describe the 91 felony "indictments".

1. NYC Letitia James ran for DA on "getting Trump", so her bullshit indictment isn't even a crime. Its an interpretation on the value of property. Not like the bribery, extortion, and Tax Evasion of the Bidens.

2. Fani Willis in Ga also ran on "getting Trump" and her charges relate to questioning the results of elections. She will be juggling many trials in different courts. She is in wayyyyy over her Low-IQ head regarding RICO. The Bidens have more RICO exposure than Trump.

3. Jack Smith was "appointed" illegally, so his indictments for J6 and mishandling classified documents will probably be thrown out by the courts.

These displays of ignorance, regurgitating right wing talking points, are ones I assume you would not express if not for the anonymity afforded to you by this message board.

 

[j-mac]

Is enforcing the rule of law really such a foreign concept to you? I suppose it must be, it has to be, in order to remain loyal to the Orange Insurrectionist.

There is nothing tangential about the "rule of law" connected to anything you cretins are doing right now...