Democrats Move Towards Violent Confrontation

[Ame®icano]

You wanna find out what I'm gonna do

Yes, that's right, which is why i directly asked you. I also knew you would not answer, because you are actually a huge sissy with a big mouth and not much else. Of course, you worked up the stones to ask everyone else what they are going to do.

Since you're so brave, why don't you answer question I asked first?

Because i am ignoring your attempts to change the subject, of course. What a stupid question.

So, go on big guy, let's hear your line in the sand and what you plan to do if it is crossed.

As I recall that is my question you're avoiding.

And I did not changed the subject, see the thread title, Rambo.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You wanna find out what I'm gonna do

Yes, that's right, which is why i directly asked you. I also knew you would not answer, because you are actually a huge sissy with a big mouth and not much else. Of course, you worked up the stones to ask everyone else what they are going to do.

Since you're so brave, why don't you answer question I asked first?

Because i am ignoring your attempts to change the subject, of course. What a stupid question.

So, go on big guy, let's hear your line in the sand and what you plan to do if it is crossed.

As I recall that is my question you're avoiding.

Neat!

So tough guy, lets hear it. It's okay. I won't show your mom

 

[Ame®icano]

You wanna find out what I'm gonna do

Yes, that's right, which is why i directly asked you. I also knew you would not answer, because you are actually a huge sissy with a big mouth and not much else. Of course, you worked up the stones to ask everyone else what they are going to do.

Since you're so brave, why don't you answer question I asked first?

Because i am ignoring your attempts to change the subject, of course. What a stupid question.

So, go on big guy, let's hear your line in the sand and what you plan to do if it is crossed.

As I recall that is my question you're avoiding.

Neat!

So tough guy, lets hear it. It's okay. I won't show your mom

I doubt you even understood my post.

Let's say, what you don't know can't hurt you, which means you practically invulnerable.

 

[Stephen Brandon]

Yes, it could get ugly. My feeling is, though that it could play out this way. Mitch McConnell tables impeachment as he did the Merrick Garland confirmation. The pink pussycat-hat brigade descends on Washington once again, setting up a confrontation with the Trump supporters - a possible recipe for a left-right showdown in the streets.

 

[Ringtone]

TheProgressivePatriot said that Barack Obama is not a socialist. . . .

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes, that's right, which is why i directly asked you. I also knew you would not answer, because you are actually a huge sissy with a big mouth and not much else. Of course, you worked up the stones to ask everyone else what they are going to do.

Since you're so brave, why don't you answer question I asked first?

Because i am ignoring your attempts to change the subject, of course. What a stupid question.

So, go on big guy, let's hear your line in the sand and what you plan to do if it is crossed.

As I recall that is my question you're avoiding.

Neat!

So tough guy, lets hear it. It's okay. I won't show your mom

I doubt you even understood my post.

Let's say, what you don't know can't hurt you, which means you practically invulnerable.

Neat!

Looks like we can all mark ourselves quite safe from you, windbag.

 

[Ame®icano]

Since you're so brave, why don't you answer question I asked first?

Because i am ignoring your attempts to change the subject, of course. What a stupid question.

So, go on big guy, let's hear your line in the sand and what you plan to do if it is crossed.

As I recall that is my question you're avoiding.

Neat!

So tough guy, lets hear it. It's okay. I won't show your mom

I doubt you even understood my post.

Let's say, what you don't know can't hurt you, which means you practically invulnerable.

Neat!

Looks like we can all mark ourselves quite safe from you, windbag.

Do you even know what question was, shitstain?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Because i am ignoring your attempts to change the subject, of course. What a stupid question.

So, go on big guy, let's hear your line in the sand and what you plan to do if it is crossed.

As I recall that is my question you're avoiding.

Neat!

So tough guy, lets hear it. It's okay. I won't show your mom

I doubt you even understood my post.

Let's say, what you don't know can't hurt you, which means you practically invulnerable.

Neat!

Looks like we can all mark ourselves quite safe from you, windbag.

Do you even know what question was, shitstain?

Still whining?

I will leave you to it. Maybe you will get lucky, and one of your fellow cultists will grow a pair and answer the question you are too big a sissy to answer yourself.

But i doubt it.

 

[Faun]

Other directors on that board were also paid millions.

They got paid millions? How many other countries were they from? How little experience in that field of work did they have?

I don't know where they're from, nor does it matter. But it was reported than Biden's wages were not out of the ordinary compared to what other board members were paid.

Yet way out of the ordinary considering his expertise....which was nada.

So? Perhaps they hired him for name recognition. That's not a crime.

Sure, that's it, they hired him and paid him big bucks because they recognized his name...idiot.

And your explanation is....?

 

[Thinker101]

They got paid millions? How many other countries were they from? How little experience in that field of work did they have?

I don't know where they're from, nor does it matter. But it was reported than Biden's wages were not out of the ordinary compared to what other board members were paid.

Yet way out of the ordinary considering his expertise....which was nada.

So? Perhaps they hired him for name recognition. That's not a crime.

Sure, that's it, they hired him and paid him big bucks because they recognized his name...idiot.

And your explanation is....?

Really!? You need an explanation of why they would pay an unskilled, no talent person that happens to be related to a VP millions of dollars?

 

[Faun]

I don't know where they're from, nor does it matter. But it was reported than Biden's wages were not out of the ordinary compared to what other board members were paid.

Yet way out of the ordinary considering his expertise....which was nada.

So? Perhaps they hired him for name recognition. That's not a crime.

Sure, that's it, they hired him and paid him big bucks because they recognized his name...idiot.

And your explanation is....?

Really!? You need an explanation of why they would pay an unskilled, no talent person that happens to be related to a VP millions of dollars?

Since you have no evidence of any benefits gained by such a connection, it seems that is not a valid explanation. If that were the reason, Burisma would have let him go after Biden was no longer vice president.

 

[Thinker101]

Yet way out of the ordinary considering his expertise....which was nada.

So? Perhaps they hired him for name recognition. That's not a crime.

Sure, that's it, they hired him and paid him big bucks because they recognized his name...idiot.

And your explanation is....?

Really!? You need an explanation of why they would pay an unskilled, no talent person that happens to be related to a VP millions of dollars?

Since you have no evidence of any benefits gained by such a connection, it seems that is not a valid explanation. If that were the reason, Burisma would have let him go after Biden was no longer vice president.

Yep, $50,000/month doesn't go as far as it use to, besides, that was chump change compared to the China dealings.

 

[Faun]

So? Perhaps they hired him for name recognition. That's not a crime.

Sure, that's it, they hired him and paid him big bucks because they recognized his name...idiot.

And your explanation is....?

Really!? You need an explanation of why they would pay an unskilled, no talent person that happens to be related to a VP millions of dollars?

Since you have no evidence of any benefits gained by such a connection, it seems that is not a valid explanation. If that were the reason, Burisma would have let him go after Biden was no longer vice president.

Yep, $50,000/month doesn't go as far as it use to, besides, that was chump change compared to the China dealings.

Which has nothing to do with the vice president. Again, as evidenced by both your lack of evidence that anyone benefited from that relationship as well as the fact they kept him on the board even after his father was VP.

 

[Thinker101]

Sure, that's it, they hired him and paid him big bucks because they recognized his name...idiot.

And your explanation is....?

Really!? You need an explanation of why they would pay an unskilled, no talent person that happens to be related to a VP millions of dollars?

Since you have no evidence of any benefits gained by such a connection, it seems that is not a valid explanation. If that were the reason, Burisma would have let him go after Biden was no longer vice president.

Yep, $50,000/month doesn't go as far as it use to, besides, that was chump change compared to the China dealings.

Which has nothing to do with the vice president. Again, as evidenced by both your lack of evidence that anyone benefited from that relationship as well as the fact they kept him on the board even after his father was VP.

Great, get back to me when you make $50,000/month.

 

[Faun]

And your explanation is....?

Really!? You need an explanation of why they would pay an unskilled, no talent person that happens to be related to a VP millions of dollars?

Since you have no evidence of any benefits gained by such a connection, it seems that is not a valid explanation. If that were the reason, Burisma would have let him go after Biden was no longer vice president.

Yep, $50,000/month doesn't go as far as it use to, besides, that was chump change compared to the China dealings.

Which has nothing to do with the vice president. Again, as evidenced by both your lack of evidence that anyone benefited from that relationship as well as the fact they kept him on the board even after his father was VP.

Great, get back to me when you make $50,000/month.

LOL

So you're complaint is he was paid a good salary. So are trump's kids. Guess there's something nefarious there too, huh?

 

[Thinker101]

Really!? You need an explanation of why they would pay an unskilled, no talent person that happens to be related to a VP millions of dollars?

Since you have no evidence of any benefits gained by such a connection, it seems that is not a valid explanation. If that were the reason, Burisma would have let him go after Biden was no longer vice president.

Yep, $50,000/month doesn't go as far as it use to, besides, that was chump change compared to the China dealings.

Which has nothing to do with the vice president. Again, as evidenced by both your lack of evidence that anyone benefited from that relationship as well as the fact they kept him on the board even after his father was VP.

Great, get back to me when you make $50,000/month.

LOL

So you're complaint is he was paid a good salary. So are trump's kids. Guess there's something nefarious there too, huh?

Sigh...cmon, you can't really be that stupid, can you?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yep, $50,000/month doesn't go as far as it use to, besides, that was chump change compared to the China dealings.

True! Ivanka's China trademarks are estimated to be worth as much as a few hundred million, if she doesn't suck as bad at business as her father.

 

[Faun]

Since you have no evidence of any benefits gained by such a connection, it seems that is not a valid explanation. If that were the reason, Burisma would have let him go after Biden was no longer vice president.

Yep, $50,000/month doesn't go as far as it use to, besides, that was chump change compared to the China dealings.

Which has nothing to do with the vice president. Again, as evidenced by both your lack of evidence that anyone benefited from that relationship as well as the fact they kept him on the board even after his father was VP.

Great, get back to me when you make $50,000/month.

LOL

So you're complaint is he was paid a good salary. So are trump's kids. Guess there's something nefarious there too, huh?

Sigh...cmon, you can't really be that stupid, can you?

LOL

You literally have no explanation to back your bulkshit while you hurl that bluff.

 

[Dragonlady]

So? Perhaps they hired him for name recognition. That's not a crime.

Sure, that's it, they hired him and paid him big bucks because they recognized his name...idiot.

And your explanation is....?

Really!? You need an explanation of why they would pay an unskilled, no talent person that happens to be related to a VP millions of dollars?

Since you have no evidence of any benefits gained by such a connection, it seems that is not a valid explanation. If that were the reason, Burisma would have let him go after Biden was no longer vice president.

Yep, $50,000/month doesn't go as far as it use to, besides, that was chump change compared to the China dealings.

I see you've swallowed Trump's talking points about the Bidens hook, line and sinker. If you were as smart as you claim, you would realize that Trump lied to you.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ide-trumps-false-claims-about-ukraine-bidens/

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes, it could get ugly. My feeling is, though that it could play out this way. Mitch McConnell tables impeachment as he did the Merrick Garland confirmation. The pink pussycat-hat brigade descends on Washington once again, setting up a confrontation with the Trump supporters - a possible recipe for a left-right showdown in the streets.

It would be foolish for McConnell to do that. First off because nothing will happen to Trump. Secondly, it would force representatives to vote yes or no. Then the voters can weed out their garbage come election time.