Dems effed around, and now they're gonna find out.

[el midgetron]

You'll be right in my neck of the woods, just outside of Richmond. When you get away from NOVA, Va is pretty red.

 

[el midgetron]

 

[el midgetron]

But they got Trump for paying a prostitute for sex……

 

[BULLDOG]

Democrats definitely used existing law and courts to exhaust 34 charges in and around unprecedented offenses; offenses that occurred 8 years ago, and waited until Trump was out of office to prosecute; only because he’s running for office and remains a legitimate threat for the Democrats..

The Democrats effed up alright …. They exposed themselves once again to use any means possible to attack political opponents. This is going to backfire on them.

I defy Democrats to take this further and throw Trump in jail.

Of course they are unprecedented. We never had a crooked president like trump.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Of course they are unprecedented. We never had a crooked president like trump.

These offenses have been committed at that level; just not prosecuted with such vigor until it was strategically convenient. If Trump is not running for President, how likely are these offenses going to be prosecuted?

 

[BULLDOG]

These offenses have been committed at that level; just not prosecuted with such vigor until it was strategically convenient. If Trump is not running for President, how likely are these offenses going to be prosecuted?

So when did anybody form a list of fake electors and try to steal an election?

 

[el midgetron]

It’s all political.

 

[el midgetron]

 

[Rumpole]

The Intelligencer...

View attachment 955001

12ft

Comment: The fix was in.

The New York Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics issued an advisory opinion stating that Merchan's impartiality in the case involving Donald Trump could not "reasonably be questioned" due to the modest size of his contributions. The committee concluded that these donations did not create an appearance of bias or favoritism sufficient to disqualify him from presiding over the case

Judge Juan Merchan Need Not Step Aside in People v. Trump: Advisory Panel | New York Law Journal

In an advisory opinion, an ethics panel said Judge Juan Merchan should be able to continue to presiding over litigation in the criminal prosecution of Donald Trump.

www.law.com

 

[Missourian]

The New York Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics issued an advisory opinion stating that Merchan's impartiality in the case involving Donald Trump could not "reasonably be questioned" due to the modest size of his contributions. The committee concluded that these donations did not create an appearance of bias or favoritism sufficient to disqualify him from presiding over the case

Judge Juan Merchan Need Not Step Aside in People v. Trump: Advisory Panel | New York Law Journal

In an advisory opinion, an ethics panel said Judge Juan Merchan should be able to continue to presiding over litigation in the criminal prosecution of Donald Trump.

www.law.com

Isn't this like the police investigating their own.

If the police say a police shooting is justified...do you just take that as the gospel?

 

[hadit]

The New York Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics issued an advisory opinion stating that Merchan's impartiality in the case involving Donald Trump could not "reasonably be questioned" due to the modest size of his contributions. The committee concluded that these donations did not create an appearance of bias or favoritism sufficient to disqualify him from presiding over the case

Judge Juan Merchan Need Not Step Aside in People v. Trump: Advisory Panel | New York Law Journal

In an advisory opinion, an ethics panel said Judge Juan Merchan should be able to continue to presiding over litigation in the criminal prosecution of Donald Trump.

www.law.com

But every male justice in the country needs to control his wife's expression of her political opinions or must recuse himself from any case that is in any way political, because reasons and he's a weenie.

 

[el midgetron]

 

[DBA]

You're setting yourself up for crying about a fake election again, you big dummy. I bet you think there is no possible way Trump can lose. Am I right?

There is certainly a way for him to lose as long as Democrats have the ability to scam the system with the "new" mass mail-in balloting system and no voter id. That is why the Democrats are so sure of victory. They can find the any votes they may need in key swing states.

 

[john doe 101]

There is certainly a way for him to lose as long as Democrats have the ability to scam the system with the "new" mass mail-in balloting system and no voter id. That is why the Democrats are so sure of victory. They can find the any votes they may need in key swing states.

You are mentally ill.

 

[el midgetron]

LOL

 

[el midgetron]

 

[DBA]

You are mentally ill.

Yeah, there is no way the upstanding Democratic Party would ever stoop to such levels. Is that what you actually believe?

 

[DBA]

Purely coincidental.

 

[Rumpole]

But every male justice in the country needs to control his wife's expression of her political opinions or must recuse himself from any case that is in any way political, because reasons and he's a weenie.

Sorry I did not engage with those who traffic in sophomoric cheap shots

 

[Rumpole]

It's called the crows coming home to roost