Did George Stephanopoulos trick Trump or help Trump?

[iceberg]

No one invented anything. The Clinton campaign hired a opposition research firm. They sent a guy to Russia to see what Trump was doing in Russia. This dossier was not used to get the FISA warrant to find out why a Trump campaign advisor was speaking to the Russians.

Investigate your asses off. While you are at it, investigate why Trump lied about his campaign's Russian contacts, why he lied about his business dealings in Russia, and lied about the Trump Tower meeting.

1. Yes the unverified dossier was used to get a FISA warrant against Carter Page, who was NOT charged with anything. Stay tuned, FBI indictments coming
2. Trump's activities were investigated by Mueller and NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION was the outcome.
3. It's Barr's turn at bat, he and Durham, Huber, and Horowitz should have a few more indictments than the Mueller Investigation.

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

he used that term to give dingleberrys who cling on to asshair in an annoying manner hope.

cling on, woman.

 

[BS Filter]

No one invented anything. The Clinton campaign hired a opposition research firm. They sent a guy to Russia to see what Trump was doing in Russia. This dossier was not used to get the FISA warrant to find out why a Trump campaign advisor was speaking to the Russians.

Investigate your asses off. While you are at it, investigate why Trump lied about his campaign's Russian contacts, why he lied about his business dealings in Russia, and lied about the Trump Tower meeting.

1. Yes the unverified dossier was used to get a FISA warrant against Carter Page, who was NOT charged with anything. Stay tuned, FBI indictments coming
2. Trump's activities were investigated by Mueller and NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION was the outcome.
3. It's Barr's turn at bat, he and Durham, Huber, and Horowitz should have a few more indictments than the Mueller Investigation.

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

 

[BS Filter]

No one invented anything. The Clinton campaign hired a opposition research firm. They sent a guy to Russia to see what Trump was doing in Russia. This dossier was not used to get the FISA warrant to find out why a Trump campaign advisor was speaking to the Russians.

Investigate your asses off. While you are at it, investigate why Trump lied about his campaign's Russian contacts, why he lied about his business dealings in Russia, and lied about the Trump Tower meeting.

1. Yes the unverified dossier was used to get a FISA warrant against Carter Page, who was NOT charged with anything. Stay tuned, FBI indictments coming
2. Trump's activities were investigated by Mueller and NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION was the outcome.
3. It's Barr's turn at bat, he and Durham, Huber, and Horowitz should have a few more indictments than the Mueller Investigation.

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

So OJ didn't do it?

The DNC and Hillary's campaign paid for dirt on Trump.
Steel went to the Russians and gave the info to the FBI.
FBI fell for fake dossier and then tried to cover it up.

All legakl.

Trump[ said he would accept foreign help & not tell the FBI.

What part of that are you too fucking stupid to get?

OJ was exonerated.

 

[RealDave]

1. Yes the unverified dossier was used to get a FISA warrant against Carter Page, who was NOT charged with anything. Stay tuned, FBI indictments coming
2. Trump's activities were investigated by Mueller and NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION was the outcome.
3. It's Barr's turn at bat, he and Durham, Huber, and Horowitz should have a few more indictments than the Mueller Investigation.

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

Funny how you want to indict Hillary for some crime, don;t know what it is,. but indict her.

Yet you think Trump has done nothing wrong.

 

[peach174]

No one invented anything. The Clinton campaign hired a opposition research firm. They sent a guy to Russia to see what Trump was doing in Russia. This dossier was not used to get the FISA warrant to find out why a Trump campaign advisor was speaking to the Russians.

Investigate your asses off. While you are at it, investigate why Trump lied about his campaign's Russian contacts, why he lied about his business dealings in Russia, and lied about the Trump Tower meeting.

1. Yes the unverified dossier was used to get a FISA warrant against Carter Page, who was NOT charged with anything. Stay tuned, FBI indictments coming
2. Trump's activities were investigated by Mueller and NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION was the outcome.
3. It's Barr's turn at bat, he and Durham, Huber, and Horowitz should have a few more indictments than the Mueller Investigation.

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

So OJ didn't do it?

The DNC and Hillary's campaign paid for dirt on Trump.
Steel went to the Russians and gave the info to the FBI.
FBI fell for fake dossier and then tried to cover it up.

All legakl.

Trump[ said he would accept foreign help & not tell the FBI.

What part of that are you too fucking stupid to get?

He said he'd do both.
So who's being stupid.

 

[deanrd]

1. Yes the unverified dossier was used to get a FISA warrant against Carter Page, who was NOT charged with anything. Stay tuned, FBI indictments coming
2. Trump's activities were investigated by Mueller and NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION was the outcome.
3. It's Barr's turn at bat, he and Durham, Huber, and Horowitz should have a few more indictments than the Mueller Investigation.

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

And just think, the Republicans were controlling both the House and the Senate. Are you saying Republicans are inept? That they couldn’t find crimes you could find?

 

[basquebromance]

"they know they can't get me, because i was never involved. i'm not a target. there's nothing. they've told me i'm not a target. they know what would happen if they made me a target. everyone understands everyone" - Trump on Mueller and the Democrats

 

[deanrd]

I’m surprised that a self-described stable genius like Donald Trump could be tricked by someone as stupid as George.

 

[RealDave]

1. Yes the unverified dossier was used to get a FISA warrant against Carter Page, who was NOT charged with anything. Stay tuned, FBI indictments coming
2. Trump's activities were investigated by Mueller and NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION was the outcome.
3. It's Barr's turn at bat, he and Durham, Huber, and Horowitz should have a few more indictments than the Mueller Investigation.

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

So OJ didn't do it?

The DNC and Hillary's campaign paid for dirt on Trump.
Steel went to the Russians and gave the info to the FBI.
FBI fell for fake dossier and then tried to cover it up.

All legakl.

Trump[ said he would accept foreign help & not tell the FBI.

What part of that are you too fucking stupid to get?

He said he'd do both.
So who's being stupid.

"It's not an interference, they have information -- I think I'd take it," Trump said. "If I thought there was something wrong, I'd go maybe to the FBI -- if I thought there was something wrong."

The law says to take it to the FBI. Not maybe. Not if you don't want to.

 

[Care4all]

What doesn't kill Trump makes him stronger. though he was wounded again and again, he never bleeds out.

he's been under investigation for 50 years. bring it on, Dems!

this song was written for him... the only thing missing is he is a male and not a woman!


I am woman, hear me roar
In numbers too big to ignore
And I know too much to go back an' pretend
'Cause I've heard it all before
And I've been down there on the floor
No one's ever gonna keep me down again

Oh yes, I am wise
But it's wisdom born of pain
Yes, I've paid the price
But look how much I gained
If I have to, I can do anything
I am strong
(Strong)
I am invincible
(Invincible)
I am woman

You can bend but never break me
'Cause it only serves to make me
More determined to achieve my final goal
And I come back even stronger
Not a novice any longer
'Cause you've deepened the conviction in my soul

Oh yes, I am wise
But it's wisdom born of pain
Yes, I've paid the price
But look how much I gained
If I have to, I can do anything
I am strong
(Strong)
I am invincible
(Invincible)


Read more: Helen Reddy - I Am Woman Lyrics | MetroLyrics

 

[BS Filter]

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

Funny how you want to indict Hillary for some crime, don;t know what it is,. but indict her.

Yet you think Trump has done nothing wrong.

Comey said she committed crimes. He spelled it out in July of 2016 on National television. Tell me what Trump did.

 

[deanrd]

1. Yes the unverified dossier was used to get a FISA warrant against Carter Page, who was NOT charged with anything. Stay tuned, FBI indictments coming
2. Trump's activities were investigated by Mueller and NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION was the outcome.
3. It's Barr's turn at bat, he and Durham, Huber, and Horowitz should have a few more indictments than the Mueller Investigation.

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

Have you noticed that every time Trump has been discovered to have committed another crime or been involved in some kind of treason, Republicans go nuts with the but but but Hillary comments?

She hasn’t been in office for nearly 7 years. That horse is so dead and has been beaten a long time ago. They need to find another scapegoat. A new one.

 

[BS Filter]

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

And just think, the Republicans were controlling both the House and the Senate. Are you saying Republicans are inept? That they couldn’t find crimes you could find?

Comey found crimes. The repubs in Congress are just as corrupt as Democrats.

 

[BS Filter]

Wow. Just fucking Wow. Mueller did not say no obstruction. How fucking stupid are you.
The dossier was not used to get a warrant. Carter got picked up on a wire tap on a suspected Russian operative.

Like I say, investigate all you want. Can't wait until they turn up collusion evidence.

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

Have you noticed that every time Trump has been discovered to have committed another crime or been involved in some kind of treason, Republicans go nuts with the but but but Hillary comments?

She hasn’t been in office for nearly 7 years. That horse is so dead and has been beaten a long time ago. They need to find another scapegoat. A new one.

What crime did Trump commit?

 

[deanrd]

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

Funny how you want to indict Hillary for some crime, don;t know what it is,. but indict her.

Yet you think Trump has done nothing wrong.

Comey said she committed crimes. He spelled it out in July of 2016 on National television. Tell me what Trump did.

Give us some direct quotes by Comey.

In the meantime, in my signature line is a direct link to the Mueller report. Read that. Especially part two. Part two covers obstruction of justice, but part one covers all the connections, over 140, with Trump and the Russians.

 

[basquebromance]

POTUS is a national security threat. that's not a fucking exaggeration. that's where we are right now

 

[BS Filter]

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

Funny how you want to indict Hillary for some crime, don;t know what it is,. but indict her.

Yet you think Trump has done nothing wrong.

Comey said she committed crimes. He spelled it out in July of 2016 on National television. Tell me what Trump did.

Give us some direct quotes by Comey.

In the meantime, in my signature line is a direct link to the Mueller report. Read that. Especially part two. Part two covers obstruction of justice, but part one covers all the connections, over 140, with Trump and the Russians.

The press conference in July, 2016. Didn't you watch it?

 

[Care4all]

1. Yes the dossier was used to illegally get a FISA warrant
"With the release of the House Intelligence Committee Memo, it is manifestly clear that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI participated in a fraud on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to surveil Carter Page, a U.S. citizen. The FBI and the DOJ deliberately and intentionally advanced unverified opposition research paid for by one political party (the Democratic National Committee) designed to harm the opposing party by creating a fictional Russian collusion story as reliable fact. All this took place in the midst of a U.S. presidential election.
FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice"

2. Mueller did not say that the president was guilty of obstruction, he did not recommend indictment, he documented close calls and said he couldn't "exonerate" the president, which is NOT his job. Mueller either indicts or does not indict. Not indicting means "innocent of".

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

Funny how you want to indict Hillary for some crime, don;t know what it is,. but indict her.

Yet you think Trump has done nothing wrong.

Comey said she committed crimes. He spelled it out in July of 2016 on National television. Tell me what Trump did.

No he didn't say she committed crimes, he said she (and primarily her staff) was extremely careless...

Was she in bed with the Russians or Chinese or Saudi Arabians or Israel, in a conspiracy to commit crimes? Did she intentionally commit a crime, with malice? She messed up, was not aware of the problems she may have caused. You don't imprison people for that....

shoot, Petreaus INTENTIONALLY gave compartmental top secret Defense documents including defense codes to his lover, who was writing a biography on him, and then lied about doing it to the FBI investigators.... and he only got a Misdemeanor charge in a plea deal, and probation... he never went to jail.

Even if charged with an indictment of a crime, Hillary would not have been locked up either. that's just a made up, right wing, wet dream.

 

[BS Filter]

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

Funny how you want to indict Hillary for some crime, don;t know what it is,. but indict her.

Yet you think Trump has done nothing wrong.

Comey said she committed crimes. He spelled it out in July of 2016 on National television. Tell me what Trump did.

No he didn't say she committed crimes, he said she (and primarily her staff) was extremely careless...

Was she in bed with the Russians or Chinese or Saudi Arabians or Israel, in a conspiracy to commit crimes? Did she intentionally commit a crime, with malice? She messed up, was not aware of the problems she may have caused. You don't imprison people for that....

shoot, Petreaus INTENTIONALLY gave compartmental top secret Defense documents including defense codes to his lover, who was writing a biography on him, and then lied about doing it to the FBI investigators.... and he only got a Misdemeanor charge in a plea deal, and probation... he never went to jail.

Even if charged with an indictment of a crime, Hillary would not have been locked up either. that's just a made up, right wing, wet dream.

Comey said she could be indicted, but didn't deliberately do it. Therefore, she was let off.

 

[iceberg]

The Democrats are playing word games. No one can be exonerated unless they are indicted first. If you aren't charged or indicted, you are innocent by default. Mueller deliberately used "exonerated" so Democrats could play this game.

he used that term because there was plenty of evidence that the President could have been indicted for, IF HE WERE NOT a sitting president. He was passing it on to the Congress, the only means there is to do any kind of reprimand, for his illegal or wrong doings, that the Constitution gives us.

1000 ex prosecutors and AG's, both Republican and Democratic, said the evidence that Mueller collected on President Trump's obstruction of justice presented in the Mueller report, would have resulted in an indictment for any human being walking this earth... except the president, because the DOJ has a rule, that says the sitting President can NOT be indicted for his CRIMES.

Remember, a criminal indictment does not mean they are guilty... the person being charged criminally, is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

There is all kinds of evidence that Hillary could have been indicted in 2016, but she wasn't.

Funny how you want to indict Hillary for some crime, don;t know what it is,. but indict her.

Yet you think Trump has done nothing wrong.

Comey said she committed crimes. He spelled it out in July of 2016 on National television. Tell me what Trump did.

No he didn't say she committed crimes, he said she (and primarily her staff) was extremely careless...

Was she in bed with the Russians or Chinese or Saudi Arabians or Israel, in a conspiracy to commit crimes? Did she intentionally commit a crime, with malice? She messed up, was not aware of the problems she may have caused. You don't imprison people for that....

shoot, Petreaus INTENTIONALLY gave compartmental top secret Defense documents including defense codes to his lover, who was writing a biography on him, and then lied about doing it to the FBI investigators.... and he only got a Misdemeanor charge in a plea deal, and probation... he never went to jail.

Even if charged with an indictment of a crime, Hillary would not have been locked up either. that's just a made up, right wing, wet dream.

and lynch made him change the terminology on that or the terminology he was going to use was prosecution worthy.

funny how you miss all this shit while calling other liars.