Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your point was that I didn't care about civilian casualties,
NO. My point is that you are a liar. I understand that you are lying in part to justify your continued support for the Republican/White Evangelical Christian invasion of Iraq that caused the deaths of half a million Iraqis. So you care, but only so much that you want to be excused , even praised for killing them. You made the lives of the survivors so wonderful.
"Could have been manufactured"?
LOL!!! BULLSHIT.
What is bullshit about that?
They were disarming Iraq Of any banned weapons that could have been manufactured after the unilateral destruction in 1991 of leftover munitions from the Iran Iraq war in the 1980s.
DIdnt you think ‘at the time’ just exactly as W’s warmongers did that SH had the capability to manufacture and stockpile new lethal WMD and give them to terrorists.
Your point was that I didn't care about civilian casualties,
NO. My point is that you are a liar. I understand that you are lying in part to justify your continued support for the Republican/White Evangelical Christian invasion of Iraq that caused the deaths of half a million Iraqis. So you care, but only so much that you want to be excused , even praised for killing them. You made the lives of the survivors so wonderful.
I didn't start this thread. I have no desire to be excused or praised for anything in this thread.
THe point of your thread is to smear your ideological and partisan enemies.
"Bloodthirst" is a phrase you have used repeatedly.
YOu never asked me, about how I felt about the collateral damage. You just assumed and then built a house of cards on top of that self serving assumption.
Go ahead, ask me.
Your point was that I didn't care about civilian casualties,
NO. My point is that you are a liar. I understand that you are lying in part to justify your continued support for the Republican/White Evangelical Christian invasion of Iraq that caused the deaths of half a million Iraqis. So you care, but only so much that you want to be excused , even praised for killing them. You made the lives of the survivors so wonderful.
I didn't start this thread. I have no desire to be excused or praised for anything in this thread.
THe point of your thread is to smear your ideological and partisan enemies.
"Bloodthirst" is a phrase you have used repeatedly.
YOu never asked me, about how I felt about the collateral damage. You just assumed and then built a house of cards on top of that self serving assumption.
Go ahead, ask me.
You simply don't know anything about Iraq or the oil business or the track record of the inspectors. The invasion of Iraq was based on Bibi's Clean Break Strategy. The Brits began selling the war in 1997 with Operation Mass Appeal.
And, nobody gave a shit about the 50 Christian Churches in Baghdad.
The whole episode is stupid and utterly shameful.
Your point was that I didn't care about civilian casualties,
NO. My point is that you are a liar. I understand that you are lying in part to justify your continued support for the Republican/White Evangelical Christian invasion of Iraq that caused the deaths of half a million Iraqis. So you care, but only so much that you want to be excused , even praised for killing them. You made the lives of the survivors so wonderful.
I didn't start this thread. I have no desire to be excused or praised for anything in this thread.
THe point of your thread is to smear your ideological and partisan enemies.
"Bloodthirst" is a phrase you have used repeatedly.
YOu never asked me, about how I felt about the collateral damage. You just assumed and then built a house of cards on top of that self serving assumption.
Go ahead, ask me.
You simply don't know anything about Iraq or the oil business or the track record of the inspectors. The invasion of Iraq was based on Bibi's Clean Break Strategy. The Brits began selling the war in 1997 with Operation Mass Appeal.
And, nobody gave a shit about the 50 Christian Churches in Baghdad.
The whole episode is stupid and utterly shameful.
You say "jews" like it is supposed to have an impact on me. Hint: It doesn't.
The Brits? Again, I know other countries were involved. You say it, like that alone is enough to make a point.
It doesn't.
Your point was that I didn't care about civilian casualties,
NO. My point is that you are a liar. I understand that you are lying in part to justify your continued support for the Republican/White Evangelical Christian invasion of Iraq that caused the deaths of half a million Iraqis. So you care, but only so much that you want to be excused , even praised for killing them. You made the lives of the survivors so wonderful.
I didn't start this thread. I have no desire to be excused or praised for anything in this thread.
THe point of your thread is to smear your ideological and partisan enemies.
"Bloodthirst" is a phrase you have used repeatedly.
YOu never asked me, about how I felt about the collateral damage. You just assumed and then built a house of cards on top of that self serving assumption.
Go ahead, ask me.
You simply don't know anything about Iraq or the oil business or the track record of the inspectors. The invasion of Iraq was based on Bibi's Clean Break Strategy. The Brits began selling the war in 1997 with Operation Mass Appeal.
And, nobody gave a shit about the 50 Christian Churches in Baghdad.
The whole episode is stupid and utterly shameful.
You say "jews" like it is supposed to have an impact on me. Hint: It doesn't.
The Brits? Again, I know other countries were involved. You say it, like that alone is enough to make a point.
It doesn't.
You have some sort of mental block. I didn't say "jews" .. I said Bibi's Clean Break Strategy.
Operation Mass Appeal was British.. MI6 and Sir Dereck Plumbly.
The inspectors were not disarming him, they were going though the motions trying to use process to prevent a war.
The inspectors were not disarming him, they were going though the motions trying to use process to prevent a war.
Verification that Iraq was disarmed is what disarming means. So the inspectors were disarming Iraq and you are a liar when you say they were not.
The inspectors did not know ‘at the time’ that SH had none of what W and the Warmongers said he had.
....
The inspectors would have said anything to avoid war,
The inspectors would have said anything to avoid war,
You are a liar which is why you have no response to the point about W’s draft resolution on March 8 leaving SH in power if verified disarmed by March 17
Correll - W’s offer to leave SH in powe
3. Decides that Iraq will have failed to take the final opportunity afforded by Resolution 1441 (2002)
(Blix could have stopped the invasion here
….. unless, on or before 17 March 2003, the council concludes that Iraq has demonstrated full, unconditional, immediate, and active cooperation in accordance with its disarmament obligations under Resolution 1441 (2002) and previous relevant resolutions, and is yielding possession to UNMOVIC and the IAEA of all weapons, weapon delivery and support systems and structures, prohibited by Resolution 687 (1991) and all subsequent resolutions, and all information regarding prior destruction of such items;
Are you implying that Blix could have or should have "concluded" something based solely on his desire to stop a war?
It is interesting that you consider it a chance for "BLIX" to take action to stop the invasion.
Are you implying
Are you implying that Blix could have or should have "concluded" something based solely on his desire to stop a war?
No. I’m providing you with important facts in order to debunk your bullshit assertion that Blix was going through the motions of disarming Iraq in order to stop the war.
if BLIX was not being professional and just wanted to stop the war he could’ve taken W up on the offer to the UNSC and declared that Iraq was disarmed by March 17th. He didn’t do that and that cost half a million Iraqis their lives. Blix is not responsible for W’s disastrous decision to stop the peaceful inspections in order to disarm Iraq by killing Iraqis as if their lives had no bearing on the decision.
It is interesting that you consider it a chance for "BLIX" to take action to stop the invasion.
I’m not considering it a chance. It was a Chance based on the draft resolution W was circulating at the time. But you have no use for facts. I don’t know what W would have done if Blix had reported that Iraq was disarmed before March 17 but it sure would have made Blair and Bush go back on their word that was clear and in writing if they went ahead with the invasion after saying they would not on that condition.
Are you implying
I’m not implying anything. I presented you with a fact and it’s up to you to accept it or explain why a fact is not a fact.
Sorry, I have no idea what we are talking about now. Since you cut everything.
You not considering it a chance. But it was a chance?
