Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, do they stay in the cages until purchased for another entry into the States? I'm thinking lots of these poor kids end up in ditches and wooded areas, dead or dying. After they have been used do you really think the adults who have used them will provide security, shelter, and a happy family life?How many again?I wonder what they do with the children once they've been turned loose?
I thought. They were in cages
Amazing that the photos and videos of the caravans marching north feature almost no children but when the invaders arrive at the border, they all have "families".When you grow up in their condition, you MIGHT have something to say.
When was the last time you walked 2000 miles?
As they say " if you haven't been there you have zero to say"
Might be useful if you knew the def of liberal.
Latin, free
For the individual and small gov
What does walking 2000 miles have to do with the fact that kids might be trafficked? I'll answer for you because your unable. Nothing. It sounds like you have zero to say. You personaly do not know if the kid was from honduras or picked up off the street in Mexico, but their skin is brown so you don't know the difference.
Amazing that the photos and videos of the caravans marching north feature almost no children but when the invaders arrive at the border, they all have "families".When you grow up in their condition, you MIGHT have something to say.
When was the last time you walked 2000 miles?
As they say " if you haven't been there you have zero to say"
Might be useful if you knew the def of liberal.
Latin, free
For the individual and small gov
What does walking 2000 miles have to do with the fact that kids might be trafficked? I'll answer for you because your unable. Nothing. It sounds like you have zero to say. You personaly do not know if the kid was from honduras or picked up off the street in Mexico, but their skin is brown so you don't know the difference.
I am not your mother, I shouldnt have to post any other links. If you thought it was false you should have proved otherwise. But again your a democrat and you need help wiping your butt. So ...its on the ICE website too and if you do a google search other local news stations picked it up. but go ahead , bash the post because you dont want to know the truth..Daily mail, the most laughed at bunch in the uk.
No surprise that they're liars and cheats too. Reason enough to give the choice of leaving and never coming back or standng up in front of a firing squad. Ship the kids back to where they came from and banish their parents from ever coming here.
Info wars better
So why didn't you post the link to the ICE website originally? Why didn't you post that link in the post I'm responding to? If you have a more reliable source, don't you feel an obligation to provide it?
I also wonder how many children die during their "walk" north? Why aren't those deaths reported?Amazing that the photos and videos of the caravans marching north feature almost no children but when the invaders arrive at the border, they all have "families".When you grow up in their condition, you MIGHT have something to say.
When was the last time you walked 2000 miles?
As they say " if you haven't been there you have zero to say"
Might be useful if you knew the def of liberal.
Latin, free
For the individual and small gov
What does walking 2000 miles have to do with the fact that kids might be trafficked? I'll answer for you because your unable. Nothing. It sounds like you have zero to say. You personaly do not know if the kid was from honduras or picked up off the street in Mexico, but their skin is brown so you don't know the difference.
You don't see them because they are all in the back. When they approach the border, they are ordered to the front of the mob so that the liberal MSM can record and play it on the news.
Let's test all "families", not just the suspect groups including children.
Daily Mail - Media Bias/Fact Check
I say that you need a less questionable source.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immi...82d3f3d96d5_story.html?utm_term=.004356bc4965
Please note that DHS are ONLY TESTING PEOPLE THESE SUSPECT ARE NOT RELATED TO THE CHILDREN, AND IF THIS REPORT IS CORRECT, DHS OFFICIALS ARE WRONG 2/3 OF THE TIME WHEN MAKING SUCH ASSESSMENTS.
Fools on this board will say that means 1/3 of the people crossing the border with children, are lying about relationships, but in reality it's only 1/3 of the people they're testing at most. What percentage are they testing? If you test 100 people and 30 of them aren't related to the children, that sounds like a lot. But if there are 10,000 people crossing the border, and you're only testing 100 you suspect aren't related, and 30 out of 10,000 aren't related, that's less than 1% of the total people crossing the border.
Daily Mail - Media Bias/Fact Check
I say that you need a less questionable source.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immi...82d3f3d96d5_story.html?utm_term=.004356bc4965
Please note that DHS are ONLY TESTING PEOPLE THESE SUSPECT ARE NOT RELATED TO THE CHILDREN, AND IF THIS REPORT IS CORRECT, DHS OFFICIALS ARE WRONG 2/3 OF THE TIME WHEN MAKING SUCH ASSESSMENTS.
Fools on this board will say that means 1/3 of the people crossing the border with children, are lying about relationships, but in reality it's only 1/3 of the people they're testing at most. What percentage are they testing? If you test 100 people and 30 of them aren't related to the children, that sounds like a lot. But if there are 10,000 people crossing the border, and you're only testing 100 you suspect aren't related, and 30 out of 10,000 aren't related, that's less than 1% of the total people crossing the border.
The pilot program will focus on a select number of adults suspected by Customs and Border Protection agents of posing as the parents of migrant children...
In many cases, he says, immigrant parents already in the U.S. pay for fake documents for an adult travelling companion to bring their children.
Fake Birth Certificates And 'Fake Families' Amid Migrant Surge At Border
The officials at the border can sniff out those they think are phonies--they are good at their jobs. It is still a small number of family units that come through the border overall and the stats--1/3 are not related--shows those officials know their jobs.
Good for them.
The article explains that a lot of these "non parents" are relatives of the child, or a friend of the family, trying to bring children to be with parents already in the US. Apparently illegally, so that's no good, though. If the parents were here legally, wouldn't it be easy for them to get their children here?
I also wonder how many children die during their "walk" north? Why aren't those deaths reported?Amazing that the photos and videos of the caravans marching north feature almost no children but when the invaders arrive at the border, they all have "families".liberals dont care about those children, they only care about the children that might be potential votes for them in the futureWhen you grow up in their condition, you MIGHT have something to say.
When was the last time you walked 2000 miles?
As they say " if you haven't been there you have zero to say"
Might be useful if you knew the def of liberal.
Latin, free
For the individual and small gov
What does walking 2000 miles have to do with the fact that kids might be trafficked? I'll answer for you because your unable. Nothing. It sounds like you have zero to say. You personaly do not know if the kid was from honduras or picked up off the street in Mexico, but their skin is brown so you don't know the difference.
You don't see them because they are all in the back. When they approach the border, they are ordered to the front of the mob so that the liberal MSM can record and play it on the news.
Except it's not.Maybe it's like here.
I am not surprised.
Gals don't know who their fathers are?
Daily mail "told" the examiner?
A real reputable source.
You can't be a Brit, we laugh at the Mail
I wonder what our hospital rate is.
As through History, migrants are the most aggressive and inventive and productive.
Would you have the guts to give up everything and move thousands of miles?
I guess you know our Muslims are better educated and earn more than we local rubes?
VERIFY: Report claiming one third of families seeking asylum in US aren't related is misleading
The pilot program found 30% of the migrants tested weren’t actually related to the children they were with. What's left out is that authorities only tested migrants that they already suspected were with children not their own.
A Washington Examiner story reporting on this same pilot program stated the rapid DNA tests were of adult immigrants who were suspected of arriving at the southern border with children other than their own. It stated about 30% of those tested were found to be unrelated to the children they were with.
An ICE official confirmed to VERIFY that there was a pilot program for DNA testing of migrant adults suspected of fraudulently posing as families. The ICE official also confirmed that the number in the Examiner story -- 30% -- was correct.
The official said fraudulent families are already being identified without DNA testing through law enforcement observations, documented evidence or other intelligence by various teams.
ICE officers are trained to identify potential fraud and human trafficking - if they suspect it, the pilot program does DNA testing. Nothing wrong with that. It helps stop REAL cases of trafficking without harrassing legitimate families. Too bad the OP lied.
Daily Mail - Media Bias/Fact Check
I say that you need a less questionable source.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immi...82d3f3d96d5_story.html?utm_term=.004356bc4965
Please note that DHS are ONLY TESTING PEOPLE THESE SUSPECT ARE NOT RELATED TO THE CHILDREN, AND IF THIS REPORT IS CORRECT, DHS OFFICIALS ARE WRONG 2/3 OF THE TIME WHEN MAKING SUCH ASSESSMENTS.
Fools on this board will say that means 1/3 of the people crossing the border with children, are lying about relationships, but in reality it's only 1/3 of the people they're testing at most. What percentage are they testing? If you test 100 people and 30 of them aren't related to the children, that sounds like a lot. But if there are 10,000 people crossing the border, and you're only testing 100 you suspect aren't related, and 30 out of 10,000 aren't related, that's less than 1% of the total people crossing the border.
Cool...they have time and $$ to do DNA testing, but they can't give them beds, blankets, clothes, shampoo, or toothbrushes. #MAGA! I bet all CRCs are proud as punch.
What a better use of money instead of getting them beds, blankets, diapers, food, water, toothbrushes, etc.Let's test all "families", not just the suspect groups including children.
Daily Mail - Media Bias/Fact Check
I say that you need a less questionable source.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/immi...82d3f3d96d5_story.html?utm_term=.004356bc4965
Please note that DHS are ONLY TESTING PEOPLE THESE SUSPECT ARE NOT RELATED TO THE CHILDREN, AND IF THIS REPORT IS CORRECT, DHS OFFICIALS ARE WRONG 2/3 OF THE TIME WHEN MAKING SUCH ASSESSMENTS.
Fools on this board will say that means 1/3 of the people crossing the border with children, are lying about relationships, but in reality it's only 1/3 of the people they're testing at most. What percentage are they testing? If you test 100 people and 30 of them aren't related to the children, that sounds like a lot. But if there are 10,000 people crossing the border, and you're only testing 100 you suspect aren't related, and 30 out of 10,000 aren't related, that's less than 1% of the total people crossing the border.
There are thousands of AmericansCool...they have time and $$ to do DNA testing, but they can't give them beds, blankets, clothes, shampoo, or toothbrushes. #MAGA! I bet all CRCs are proud as punch.
