Does Anyone NOT Think Hillary is Corrupt?

[Care4all]

are you fricken crazy? the FBI has released preliminary finding regarding her emails. Are you calling them liars?

SHOW US THE FBI PRELIM RELEASE

LINK PLEASE

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/01/nearly-1000-clinton-emails-had-classified-info.html

Please don't confuse the left with facts, it hurts their little heads.

The state department never said the stuff Fox said.

What FOX is doing, is saying that the emails that the State Department are releasing have something on them, that were blacked out before the release, THEREFORE in their silly heads, these emails had classified information on them.

Which is simply a BIG FAT LIE and PROPAGANDA.

The government has 100 classifications for UNCLASSIFIED emails....not CLASSIFIED emails, but UNCLASSIFIED emails, where they can go in and black out information before releasing them on FOIA requests.

President Bush, tried to get those UNCLASSIFIED classifications merged together instead of having 100 different ones, have just one name for them. The House tried to get a bill passed to do this, but failed.


So, FOX NEWS has NO IDEA of how many emails were deemed classified AFTER THE FACT, they are presuming INCORRECTLY that all emails release on the FOIA by the State Dept are classified when they blacked out something, which is simply not true.

and they also failed to mention in this link's report that it is as common as dirt, for the State department and other agencies to mark things classified, that never were when initially writen or discussed.

they have the habit of OVER CLASSIFYING information that we, the tax payers who are paying for it, should be able to see.

So leaving ALL OF THIS PERTINENT INFORMATION, out of the FOX link and video is why Fox News is spewing nothing but right wing propaganda, and they got all of you believing, Hook, Line, and SINKER.

THEY'VE PLAYED YOU LIKE A VIOLIN.

A nutter talks and says nothing, thanks...for nothing.

oh, so I am a "nutter" now?

hmmmm, interesting, very interesting!

 

[Papageorgio]

SHOW US THE FBI PRELIM RELEASE

LINK PLEASE

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/12/01/nearly-1000-clinton-emails-had-classified-info.html

Please don't confuse the left with facts, it hurts their little heads.

The state department never said the stuff Fox said.

What FOX is doing, is saying that the emails that the State Department are releasing have something on them, that were blacked out before the release, THEREFORE in their silly heads, these emails had classified information on them.

Which is simply a BIG FAT LIE and PROPAGANDA.

The government has 100 classifications for UNCLASSIFIED emails....not CLASSIFIED emails, but UNCLASSIFIED emails, where they can go in and black out information before releasing them on FOIA requests.

President Bush, tried to get those UNCLASSIFIED classifications merged together instead of having 100 different ones, have just one name for them. The House tried to get a bill passed to do this, but failed.


So, FOX NEWS has NO IDEA of how many emails were deemed classified AFTER THE FACT, they are presuming INCORRECTLY that all emails release on the FOIA by the State Dept are classified when they blacked out something, which is simply not true.

and they also failed to mention in this link's report that it is as common as dirt, for the State department and other agencies to mark things classified, that never were when initially writen or discussed.

they have the habit of OVER CLASSIFYING information that we, the tax payers who are paying for it, should be able to see.

So leaving ALL OF THIS PERTINENT INFORMATION, out of the FOX link and video is why Fox News is spewing nothing but right wing propaganda, and they got all of you believing, Hook, Line, and SINKER.

THEY'VE PLAYED YOU LIKE A VIOLIN.

A nutter talks and says nothing, thanks...for nothing.

oh, so I am a "nutter" now?

hmmmm, interesting, very interesting!

You have always been a nutter, you shouldn't try to fool yourself.

 

[jillian]

Speaking of not being bright enough, how are you and your lib friends going to handle when Hillary gets indicted?

She won't.

the loons always think if they disagree with someone's politics, that person should be indicted or impeached. it's all the brain dead know. that's why the so-called "fiscal conservatives" wasted 70 million dollars of our money going after a blue dress.

they're mentally ill.

True, they are still thinking Scott Walker, George Bush and Dick Cheney will be indicted any day now.

no. it's generally only rightwingnut losers who think they should indict people for disagreeing with them.

that said, cheney would probably be found guilty of war crimes were he ever to travel to certain places.

 

[The Rabbi]

Speaking of not being bright enough, how are you and your lib friends going to handle when Hillary gets indicted?

She won't.

the loons always think if they disagree with someone's politics, that person should be indicted or impeached. it's all the brain dead know. that's why the so-called "fiscal conservatives" wasted 70 million dollars of our money going after a blue dress.

they're mentally ill.

True, they are still thinking Scott Walker, George Bush and Dick Cheney will be indicted any day now.

no. it's generally only rightwingnut losers who think they should indict people for disagreeing with them.

that said, cheney would probably be found guilty of war crimes were he ever to travel to certain places.

You're such an idiot. It is left wingers world wide who call for indicting people. Like Henry Kissinger.

 

[Papageorgio]

Speaking of not being bright enough, how are you and your lib friends going to handle when Hillary gets indicted?

She won't.

the loons always think if they disagree with someone's politics, that person should be indicted or impeached. it's all the brain dead know. that's why the so-called "fiscal conservatives" wasted 70 million dollars of our money going after a blue dress.

they're mentally ill.

True, they are still thinking Scott Walker, George Bush and Dick Cheney will be indicted any day now.

no. it's generally only rightwingnut losers who think they should indict people for disagreeing with them.

that said, cheney would probably be found guilty of war crimes were he ever to travel to certain places.

Both sides the nutters want indictments. That is the way it is, only a nutter would think otherwise.

 

[jillian]

Speaking of not being bright enough, how are you and your lib friends going to handle when Hillary gets indicted?

She won't.

the loons always think if they disagree with someone's politics, that person should be indicted or impeached. it's all the brain dead know. that's why the so-called "fiscal conservatives" wasted 70 million dollars of our money going after a blue dress.

they're mentally ill.

True, they are still thinking Scott Walker, George Bush and Dick Cheney will be indicted any day now.

no. it's generally only rightwingnut losers who think they should indict people for disagreeing with them.

that said, cheney would probably be found guilty of war crimes were he ever to travel to certain places.

Both sides the nutters want indictments. That is the way it is, only a nutter would think otherwise.

no.

and its you guys who keep spending millions of our dollars for political purpose on "hearings" and begging for impeachment and indictments.

but that would be reality. so I understand you're allergic to it.

 

[Papageorgio]

She won't.

the loons always think if they disagree with someone's politics, that person should be indicted or impeached. it's all the brain dead know. that's why the so-called "fiscal conservatives" wasted 70 million dollars of our money going after a blue dress.

they're mentally ill.

True, they are still thinking Scott Walker, George Bush and Dick Cheney will be indicted any day now.

no. it's generally only rightwingnut losers who think they should indict people for disagreeing with them.

that said, cheney would probably be found guilty of war crimes were he ever to travel to certain places.

Both sides the nutters want indictments. That is the way it is, only a nutter would think otherwise.

no.

and its you guys who keep spending millions of our dollars for political purpose on "hearings" and begging for impeachment and indictments.

but that would be reality. so I understand you're allergic to it.

You are seriously claiming your BS after the Dems launched their Operation BS on Walker? You are a freakin joke.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[Papageorgio]

I'm right with you there.

 

[Dr Grump]

Bubba Clinton lied under oath. The subject of the lie doesn't matter. The crime is lying under oath. The impeachment was proper

For the record, Nixon lied but never under oath.

Hillary used an illegal unsecure personal server to send over 1000 emails containing classified data. She violated national security laws. She should be prosecuted.

Lying is lying to me. An oath means nothing. If you think somebody putting their hand on a bible and lying is somehow different from somebody not putting their hand on the bible and lying, then you're an idiot. A lie, is a lie, is a lie. It is the content of the lie that matters, not a friggin bible.

 

[Dr Grump]

Yes, Nixon lied about one political party spying on the other one. BFD.

BFD? Really? So you're more worried about Clinton lying under oath about getting a blow job, than you are about Nixon lying (not under oath) trying to undermine democracy? What a dick....

 

[Dr Grump]

The Clintons are terrible people who should never set foot in the whitehouse again.

If you voted for Bush jnr, STFU. If not, whatever....

 

[Redfish]

I said that the proof is coming, and it is. HRC will never be president, book it.

OK. If you say the proof is coming, I'll believe you. Just like the proof from almost three decades of unfounded accusations that is still on the way. When should we expect all that proof to show up. It's been better than 26 years.

the Clinton corruption is well documented, you are free to ignore it if you choose.

Well documented, and yet you haven't been able to produce one single case where she has been found guilty of anything. Why is that?

Democrats in the White House and Justice Department.

The right wing. Home of NO CONSPIRACY THEORY LEFT BEHIND

Aren't you the lefty that claimed that Bush and Cheney orchestrated 9/11 as an excuse to go to war? speaking of conspiracy theories

 

[Redfish]

When the FBI finishes the investigation and Obama's Justice Department indicts her, what will the Democrats do? Ya'll better have a plan just in case Obama throws her under the bus. Seriously, have you not considered why Obama would continue to even support her for President given all of the stupid shit she has done? About the only reason I can come up with is that Obama respects her incompetence almost as much as he takes pride in his own.

Indicted for what? The FBI Has not even stated Hillary is under investigation, that's all right wing propaganda....the Fbi has stated they were reviewing her emails because the IG recommended such, for procedures among the various departments that review classification.... before releasing FOIA requests, and have specifically stated that Clinton is not under criminal investigation as the right wing propagandists proclaim.

She very clearly violated both laws and procedures for classified information. That isnt even in dispute. What else they will find is another question.

Odd that the FBI doesn't seem to agree with you. Which court or investigation proved she violated any law?

Thanks to Hillary deleted all of those e-mails, they have not finished their investigation. Just wait! Then we will see if the Dems refuse to prosecute her, or throw her under the bus.

Simply HOGWASH!

She deleted her personal emails, and sent to archive only emails that were government emails.

She FOLLOWED the government procedure for doing such.

The government requires all employees to delete and NOT SEND TO THE GVT ARCHIVES, any emails of the gvt employee that are personal.

The FBI has her server, and has had it since September, which has ALL OF HER EMAILS, including the ones she simply deleted, on her server. Her server was NEVER WIPED CLEAN, as the right wing LIARS and PROPAGANDISTS stated.

Why does SHE get to decide which ones are personal and which ones might contain incriminating information? you cannot be as gullible as you seem to be.

 

[Redfish]

Yes, Nixon lied about one political party spying on the other one. BFD.

BFD? Really? So you're more worried about Clinton lying under oath about getting a blow job, than you are about Nixon lying (not under oath) trying to undermine democracy? What a dick....

undermine democracy?????????????? WTF are you smoking? political parties have been spying on each other since 1776, they just got caught that time.

 

[Redfish]

Bubba Clinton lied under oath. The subject of the lie doesn't matter. The crime is lying under oath. The impeachment was proper

For the record, Nixon lied but never under oath.

Hillary used an illegal unsecure personal server to send over 1000 emails containing classified data. She violated national security laws. She should be prosecuted.

Lying is lying to me. An oath means nothing. If you think somebody putting their hand on a bible and lying is somehow different from somebody not putting their hand on the bible and lying, then you're an idiot. A lie, is a lie, is a lie. It is the content of the lie that matters, not a friggin bible.

In the eyes of the law it is different. Perjury and simply lying are not the same legally.

Nixon lied, Clinton committed perjury. Its very likely that Hillary also committed perjury in the Benghazi hearings.

Obama would love to bring her down, if the FBI finds enough evidence watch Obama and his AG jump on it. Remember the obamas and the Clintons hate each other.

 

[Redfish]

The Clintons are terrible people who should never set foot in the whitehouse again.

If you voted for Bush jnr, STFU. If not, whatever....

Bush was not a great president, he made some big mistakes. But compared to Obama he was top tier. Gore or Kerry would have been much much worse.

 

[The Rabbi]

Bubba Clinton lied under oath. The subject of the lie doesn't matter. The crime is lying under oath. The impeachment was proper

For the record, Nixon lied but never under oath.

Hillary used an illegal unsecure personal server to send over 1000 emails containing classified data. She violated national security laws. She should be prosecuted.

Lying is lying to me. An oath means nothing. If you think somebody putting their hand on a bible and lying is somehow different from somebody not putting their hand on the bible and lying, then you're an idiot. A lie, is a lie, is a lie. It is the content of the lie that matters, not a friggin bible.

In the eyes of the law it is different. Perjury and simply lying are not the same legally.

Nixon lied, Clinton committed perjury. Its very likely that Hillary also committed perjury in the Benghazi hearings.

Obama would love to bring her down, if the FBI finds enough evidence watch Obama and his AG jump on it. Remember the obamas and the Clintons hate each other.

Dr Grump doesnt care about the law. He doesnt care that a CEO having an affair with a 22yr old staffer would get him fired anywhere immediately. He only cares that Bill Clinton was a Democrat and therefore a good guy and Nixon was a Republican and therefore a bad guy.

 

[The Rabbi]

The Clintons are terrible people who should never set foot in the whitehouse again.

If you voted for Bush jnr, STFU. If not, whatever....

Bush was not a great president, he made some big mistakes. But compared to Obama he was top tier. Gore or Kerry would have been much much worse.

Bush was hit with a lot, unlike Clinton.
He first was hit with 9/11 which represented the failure of the Clinton administration to confront Islamic terrorism, despite many indications. Then he had the dot bomb and the subsequent recession. His policies ended that recession within 18 months btw. Then he had to deal with Clinton's failure to rein in Saddam and enforce the terms of the truce and the no fly zone, as well as Saddam's WMD program.
These were all major challenges and overall Bush did fine and exhibited real leadership. Did I approve of every policy and program? No. Bush's extension of TARP to auto makers over Congressional objection was inexcusable. His imposition of steel tariffs as a sop to unions and steel makers was aweful. His expansion of the drug benefit was poor, as was No Child Left Behind. But with so much going on he was bound to make mistakes. And Bush was a big government Republican in the Nixon/Rockefeller mold.

 

[Dr Grump]

undermine democracy?????????????? WTF are you smoking? political parties have been spying on each other since 1776, they just got caught that time.

Not saying they haven't. My point is you find it more disturbing that a guy lied under oath about a blow job than you do about somebody who lied (albeit not under oath) about trying to subvert democracy. I know which one has more of an affect on me directly, while the other has no affect on me at all.