Christophera
Evidence & Reason Rule
- Aug 23, 2009
- 5,298
- 43
- Thread starter
- #461
if it was 70' below street level, that would be BELOW GRADEthe WTC was the most widely photographed construction process of its time, you can not even possibly think that they wouldnt have ever got a photo showing them pouring the concrete for the core, especially is it was 12' thick
they couldnt avoid it
Considering the 12 foot thick part was 70 feet below the street, it is not surprising the public has a picture, but you are not reasonable so that wouldn't matter.
That the core was 60 to 35 back from the face with only 9 foot vertical between floors, all of that at least 40 feet over the street, wouldn't mean much either.
So you will just have to fail on the fact the core is totally empty in all images of 9-11.
Note the very fine arcing vertical elements. Those were of the north concrete core wall .
Support for the FEMA lie is always unreasonable because there is no evidence. Keeping the methods of mass murder secret is not so easy.
The cause of death is invalid.
MORON
Bwwwwwwaaaaahhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! OMG!
This is the concrete core of WTC 2, 400 feet up, perhaps 4 foot thick walls,
Judging by this, at about the same height for WTC 1
However, there are never any steel core columns seen on 9-11 in the core area because they didn't exist.
Last edited: