Domestic Destablization-psyops and infiltration of US GOV.

Not a qualification. Simple knowledge.

It is accomplished by using hypnosis to the level of somnambulism on children then exploiting the instinct of fear as related to remembering the events of the trance.

emomem175.jpeg


INFERENCE ONE

Relating potentials for hypnotic performance to results of research, practice and experiments of hypnosis. Christopher A. Brown 8/17/01

BASIS 1 of INFERENCE

The first sentance of page 175 of EMOTIONS and MEMORY, 1964, by David Rappaport,

"The general tendency" of the subject to forget the events of the trance after emerging from it."

BASIS 2 of INFERENCE

(1) of the same paragraph states that, "The hypnotist can successfully suggest that no posthypnotic amnesia develop".

Basis 2 Restated; Suggestion conducive to remembering is successful or generally, suggestion effecting memory has effect against a general tendancy.

CONDITIONS OF BASIS

The first note page 175, EMOTIONS and MEMORY, Note #8 states (first note below main text) that the results of memory described "in general are valid only with subjects who are able to reach the somanmbulistic stages ofhypnosis."

INFERENCE ONE

Logical inference of BASIS 1 with BASIS 2, is that; suggestion to forget will have a greater effect on memory because of the general "tendency to forget". Research confirms with observations of behavior consistent with general hyperamnesia at the top of page 176, the end of a footnote that begins on page 175 stating;

"we find hypnotized people indignantly denying they have been hypnotized."

INFERENCE ONE

If the tendancy is to forget following hypnosis that induces a trance to the level of somanmbulism and suggection effecting memory is successful then suggestion to forget will be more effective than suggestion to remember.

.

Another general perspective.

What is the correct answer to this question?

Q.What is easier to do than forgetting?

A. I don't remember.



emomem176.jpeg



The psyops uses these people as "nutters", so they can ridicule them and marginalize everyone opposing the treasonous acts of infiltrators.

That is what MKultra was about. Here is an aspect that is somewhat documented.

Project "Bluebird" - Colin A. Ross MD
 
Not a qualification. Simple knowledge.

It is accomplished by using hypnosis to the level of somnambulism on children then exploiting the instinct of fear as related to remembering the events of the trance.

emomem175.jpeg


INFERENCE ONE

Relating potentials for hypnotic performance to results of research, practice and experiments of hypnosis. Christopher A. Brown 8/17/01

BASIS 1 of INFERENCE

The first sentance of page 175 of EMOTIONS and MEMORY, 1964, by David Rappaport,

"The general tendency" of the subject to forget the events of the trance after emerging from it."

BASIS 2 of INFERENCE

(1) of the same paragraph states that, "The hypnotist can successfully suggest that no posthypnotic amnesia develop".

Basis 2 Restated; Suggestion conducive to remembering is successful or generally, suggestion effecting memory has effect against a general tendancy.

CONDITIONS OF BASIS

The first note page 175, EMOTIONS and MEMORY, Note #8 states (first note below main text) that the results of memory described "in general are valid only with subjects who are able to reach the somanmbulistic stages ofhypnosis."

INFERENCE ONE

Logical inference of BASIS 1 with BASIS 2, is that; suggestion to forget will have a greater effect on memory because of the general "tendency to forget". Research confirms with observations of behavior consistent with general hyperamnesia at the top of page 176, the end of a footnote that begins on page 175 stating;

"we find hypnotized people indignantly denying they have been hypnotized."

INFERENCE ONE

If the tendancy is to forget following hypnosis that induces a trance to the level of somanmbulism and suggection effecting memory is successful then suggestion to forget will be more effective than suggestion to remember.

.

Another general perspective.

What is the correct answer to this question?

Q.What is easier to do than forgetting?

A. I don't remember.



emomem176.jpeg



The psyops uses these people as "nutters", so they can ridicule them and marginalize everyone opposing the treasonous acts of infiltrators.

That is what MKultra was about. Here is an aspect that is somewhat documented.

Project "Bluebird" - Colin A. Ross MD

:eusa_hand:
 

Attachments

  • $moron.jpg
    $moron.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 52
Wow! What a coincidence! That is exactly what I would expect the infiltrating perpetrators to say about the methods they use to create secrecy.

That the basis for what I posted is one of the most respected compilations of psychological research would make it imperative.

Consistent and predictable agents.
 
Wow! What a coincidence! That is exactly what I would expect the infiltrating perpetrators to say about the methods they use to create secrecy.

That the basis for what I posted is one of the most respected compilations of psychological research would make it imperative.

Consistent and predictable agents.
damn, how is it no doctor has had you locked up for evaluation yet?
 
They don't do that for being observant, well informed and dedicated to protecting the US Constitution.
 
They don't do that for being observant, well informed and dedicated to protecting the US Constitution.

but you arent doing any of that.

(and all you people thought i was joking when i said he thinks there are all these manchurian canidates running around)
 
They don't do that for being observant, well informed and dedicated to protecting the US Constitution.
i disagree
i think you dont actually get medical help because you know they WOULD lock you up

They don't do that for being observant, well informed and dedicated to protecting the US Constitution.

but you arent doing any of that.

(and all you people thought i was joking when i said he thinks there are all these manchurian canidates running around)

Agents of the infiltrating perpetrators of secret methods of mass murder hate facts.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2100967-post943.html
 
They don't do that for being observant, well informed and dedicated to protecting the US Constitution.
i disagree
i think you dont actually get medical help because you know they WOULD lock you up

They don't do that for being observant, well informed and dedicated to protecting the US Constitution.

but you arent doing any of that.

(and all you people thought i was joking when i said he thinks there are all these manchurian canidates running around)

Agents of the infiltrating perpetrators of secret methods of mass murder hate facts.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2100967-post943.html

you dont have any facts. you have delusions.:cuckoo:

you simply make shit up as you go along.

jesus, you claim that you didnt pay over $30,000 worth of child support because of some paper from 1876!!!! :lol:
 
i disagree
i think you dont actually get medical help because you know they WOULD lock you up

but you arent doing any of that.

(and all you people thought i was joking when i said he thinks there are all these manchurian canidates running around)

Agents of the infiltrating perpetrators of secret methods of mass murder hate facts.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2100967-post943.html

you dont have any facts. you have delusions.:cuckoo:

you simply make shit up as you go along.

jesus, you claim that you didnt pay over $30,000 worth of child support because of some paper from 1876!!!! :lol:

I couldn't pay because the county sheriff failed to appear on subpoena.

subdengif.gif


But the infiltrators of the US government would not want you to recognize violations of law or damages from them. The failure to appear deprived me of information I needed to confirm important events that would have brough considerable income. If I would have had the documents subpoenaed I would have paid off all of the child suport within one year.

Myself and my children were also deprived of needed medical information.
 
Last edited:
Agents of the infiltrating perpetrators of secret methods of mass murder hate facts.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2100967-post943.html

you dont have any facts. you have delusions.:cuckoo:

you simply make shit up as you go along.

jesus, you claim that you didnt pay over $30,000 worth of child support because of some paper from 1876!!!! :lol:

I couldn't pay because the county sheriff failed to appear on subpoena.

subdengif.gif


But the infiltrators of the US government would not want you to recognize violations of law or damages from them.

you already had not paid for YEARS even before then!! :lol:
 
you dont have any facts. you have delusions.:cuckoo:

you simply make shit up as you go along.

jesus, you claim that you didnt pay over $30,000 worth of child support because of some paper from 1876!!!! :lol:

I couldn't pay because the county sheriff failed to appear on subpoena.

subdengif.gif


But the infiltrators of the US government would not want you to recognize violations of law or damages from them.

you already had not paid for YEARS even before then!! :lol:

Maybe you start to see the damages there. There were many issues hinging on those documents. That is why I sued the County. I wanted to pay but the county failed to appear.

Then the deprivals of Constitutional right escalated in retribution.

MUNICIPAL FAILURE TO APPEAR ON SUBPOENA
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1962601-post3635.html
WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html
CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html
MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html
estopped
STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html
 
I couldn't pay because the county sheriff failed to appear on subpoena.

subdengif.gif


But the infiltrators of the US government would not want you to recognize violations of law or damages from them.

you already had not paid for YEARS even before then!! :lol:

Maybe you start to see the damages there. There were many issues hinging on those documents. That is why I sued the County. I wanted to pay but the county failed to appear.

Then the deprivals of Constitutional right escalated in retribution.

MUNICIPAL FAILURE TO APPEAR ON SUBPOENA
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1962601-post3635.html
WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html
CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html
MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html
estopped
STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html

you wanted to pay!!!! :lol:

but you didnt, jackass. if you want to pay then just pay. they will take it. they even took the money that you have in your pocket!! :lol:
 
you already had not paid for YEARS even before then!! :lol:

Maybe you start to see the damages there. There were many issues hinging on those documents. That is why I sued the County. I wanted to pay but the county failed to appear.

Then the deprivals of Constitutional right escalated in retribution.

MUNICIPAL FAILURE TO APPEAR ON SUBPOENA
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1962601-post3635.html
WELFARE FRAUD CREATES CHILD SUPPORT
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802693-post2845.html
CITIZENS OF 9th CIRCUIT DEPRIVED OF DUE PROCESS, PETITION FOR ENBANC HEARING
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802123-post2829.html
MOTION QUASH CONTEMPT, ESTOPPEL
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802288-post2836.html
estopped
STOP PAYMENT ON CHECK
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1802771-post742.html

you wanted to pay!!!! :lol:

but you didnt, jackass. if you want to pay then just pay. they will take it. they even took the money that you have in your pocket!! :lol:

And the state court commissioner rewrote the transcripts of the hearing where I tricked her into admitting she violated my Constitutional rights by refusing to examine prima facie evidence of fraud which assisted the defendant in defrauding me for $2k.

Lawyers examine the court records and mumble "incomprehensible" regarding the behaviro of the clerks and the judge. This issue here. Where the clerks refuse to file pleading and only will stanp them "recieved" is a total deprivation of rights.

209449mot.strik.dec.face1.jpg
 
sure thats what happened...


its not like you get caught making shit up all the time. :cuckoo:

Is that what you think Constitutional rights are? Made up?

That stamp "RECIEVED" is a due process violation by the clerks serving the interests of corrupt judiciary. I have a right to access to the court, to the judge and for the judge to be unbiased and proactive in seeing laws followed without prejudice. Stamped "FILED" means the judge must consider the facts therin.

Or does pretending that you think rights are "made up" serve the interests of those working for the demise of the Constitution?
 
sure thats what happened...


its not like you get caught making shit up all the time. :cuckoo:

Is that what you think Constitutional rights are? Made up?

That stamp "RECIEVED" is a due process violation by the clerks serving the interests of corrupt judiciary. I have a right to access to the court, to the judge and for the judge to be unbiased and proactive in seeing laws followed without prejudice. Stamped "FILED" means the judge must consider the facts therin.

Or does pretending that you think rights are "made up" serve the interests of those working for the demise of the Constitution?
LOL clearly there were no "facts" contained
 
sure thats what happened...


its not like you get caught making shit up all the time. :cuckoo:

Is that what you think Constitutional rights are? Made up?

That stamp "RECIEVED" is a due process violation by the clerks serving the interests of corrupt judiciary. I have a right to access to the court, to the judge and for the judge to be unbiased and proactive in seeing laws followed without prejudice. Stamped "FILED" means the judge must consider the facts therin.

Or does pretending that you think rights are "made up" serve the interests of those working for the demise of the Constitution?
LOL clearly there were no "facts" contained

The infiltrating perpetrators of mass murder would appreciate that you overlook the point of stamping a legal pleading "RECIEVED" instead of "FILED.

agents have lots of selectivity going on.

Here are the facts on the pages folloing the improperly filed/ conformed face page.



2. The motion is based on this notice of motion and motion with its declaration and memoranda of points and authorities herein and on such evidence as may be presented at the hearing of the motion.

Date; Christopher A. Brown.

MOTION TO STRIKE; DECLARATION OF RESPONDENT

3. The declaration filed in answer to respondents Amended Motion to Disqualify contains a false statement which does not respect the facts of the proceedings and if allowed to remain in the record can represent a substancial deprivation of rights.
I Christopher A. Brown declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of perjury of the laws of the State of California the foregoing to be true and correct.
Date; Christopher A. Brown.

MEMORANDA OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

4. Respondent respectfully moves the Court to strike from the record the Declaration of Colleen Sterne on grounds that it presents false statements that will further confuse the record. As precedent for the declaration to be striken the respondent refers to WAIKIKI GALLERIA v. DFS GROUP, L.P. CV. NO. 07-00293 DAE-LEK, Filed 10/30/2007, in THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII; where the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Strike and DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike because the commissioners declaration is not based on sufficient facts. This action is requested under California Cope of Civil Procedure 435 and 436(a).

SUPPORTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE.

5. The declaration of the commissioner filed January 17 2008 on page 3, line 15-16 states, 6/22/06 BROWN filed a motion to Dismiss Contempt Proceedings and a Motion to Quash. A true statement.

On lines 17-18 the declaration states,

"On 9/26/06 BROWNS motions were denied in part, the Motion to Quash was sent to another judicial officer for hearing and was denied. "

209449sterne.dec.answer3.jpg


The above statement is false. The respondents Motion to Quash was never heard and never denied. Under these facts, the commissioner is acting more as an adversary or advocate for petitioner, rather than as an expert who could be an impartial trier of fact in issue. The commissioner offers a conclusion to the respondents motion to quash not supported by the record. The commissioners declaration is not based on a factual basis and is therefore inadmissible.

PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE;

6. Christopher A. Brown, the respondent in this legal action, under the provisions of; California Evidence Code section 452.

Matters which may be judicially noticed.

Judicial notice may be taken of the following matters..........

(b) and (c), "legislative enactment's of any state of the United States"

7. Respondent requests that the court take judicial notice of

California Code of Civil Procedure §435 and §436.

CCP, §436: The court may, upon a motion made pursuant to Section 435, or at any time in its discretion, and upon terms it deems proper: (a) Strike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading.

PRAYER

8. Respondent prays that this Motion to Strike is granted and that if it is not granted the concurrently filed Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is granted in the alternative.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: pro per respondent, Christopher A. Brown,
 
ROFLMAO

what a dipshit
you think that actually means anything to ANYONE on here?
all it does is prove how fucking delusional you are
 

Forum List

Back
Top