Every rational president wants competent generals, not traitorous woke cucks like Milley.
You are the traitorous, treasonous anti-military asshole.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every rational president wants competent generals, not traitorous woke cucks like Milley.
Says who? "No evidence" seems to be the Dim's favorite talking point.
No, just have a good insight on Obama. He's well known for infesting government agencies with his woke cronies.
delusional
So Trump was promoting Woke Generals? Does Desantis know about this?
Where's the treason, you fucking NAZI?You are the traitorous, treasonous anti-military asshole.
As I've said many times, only Republicans have to obey the law.Where are any convictions?
No you retarded hack. Durham proved his charges. As the jurors admitted. THEY claimed that lying to the FBI was no big deal and shouldn’t have been charged, NOT their decision to make. Manafort? Oh yeah, the bullshit charges of tax crimes that had already been adjudicated. Thrown out of court in the SDNY. Keep digging....Or......the Durham's allegations were dogshit.
Look at Sussmann's charges. Sussmann made no false statement to anyone. Durham charged him because he claims Sussman didn't disclose to the FBI that his firm did work for Hillary Clinton.
But this was no secret. It was common knowledge that Sussman's firm worked for Clinton. Even the agent admitted he already knew. Durham tried to charge Sussmann with a felony for supposedly 'witholding' information that was common knowledge and everybody knew. And there were FBI Emails to confirm it.
It took the jury 6 hours to laugh Durham's dogshit allegations out of the court room.
Compare that to say....Mueller's legal case against Manafort, with conviction of 8 felonies.
No, true. Miley is nothing but a woke hack who couldn’t hold a candle to Patton, Eisenhower, or Schwarzkopf.
delusional
So Trump was promoting Woke Generals? Does Desantis know about this?
All the military leaders, career professionals, who rose to the top -- all wrong. Only Trump is right.
screw you
Durham proved his charges.
Yes he did prove them. Per the jury’s own statements dumbfuck. They don’t get to decide it “wasn’t a big deal and shouldn’t have been charged.” Meanwhile, Smith’s case is on the brink of getting totally tossed out for illegal actions. Again.
Facts:No you retarded hack. Durham proved his charges. As the jurors admitted. THEY claimed that lying to the FBI was no big deal and shouldn’t have been charged, NOT their decision to make. Manafort? Oh yeah, the bullshit charges of tax crimes that had already been adjudicated. Thrown out of court in the SDNY. Keep digging....
After the jury admitted Durham proved his case, Sussman’s own lawyers said he lied, but it didn’t matter. Keep laughing as your boy Smith has his case tossed.Facts:
Despite expectations that Durham might charge senior government officials, his team produced only three prosecutions. A former FBI lawyer pleaded guilty to altering an email the FBI relied on in applying to eavesdrop on an ex-Trump campaign aide. Two other defendants — a lawyer for the Clinton campaign and a Russian-American analyst — were both acquitted on charges of lying to the FBI.
Special prosecutor ends Trump-Russia investigation, saying FBI acted hastily
A special prosecutor has ended his four-year investigation into possible FBI misconduct in its probe of ties between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. The report Monday from special counsel John Durham offers withering criticism of the bureau but a meager court record that...apnews.com
Facts:
Quotes:After the jury admitted Durham proved his case, Sussman’s own lawyers said he lied, but it didn’t matter. Keep laughing as your boy Smith has his case tossed.
But after almost four years — far longer than the Russia investigation itself — Mr. Durham’s work is coming to an end without uncovering anything like the deep state plot alleged by Mr. Trump and suspected by Mr. Barr. Moreover, a monthslong review by The New York Times found that the main thrust of the Durham inquiry was marked by some of the very same flaws — including a strained justification for opening it and its role in fueling partisan conspiracy theories that would never be charged in court — that Trump allies claim characterized the Russia investigation
Whitewater.You have to commit a crime first.
After the first prosecution failed, Durham realized that convicting a Democrat in DC was a futile endeavor.Facts:
Despite expectations that Durham might charge senior government officials, his team produced only three prosecutions. A former FBI lawyer pleaded guilty to altering an email the FBI relied on in applying to eavesdrop on an ex-Trump campaign aide. Two other defendants — a lawyer for the Clinton campaign and a Russian-American analyst — were both acquitted on charges of lying to the FBI.
Special prosecutor ends Trump-Russia investigation, saying FBI acted hastily
A special prosecutor has ended his four-year investigation into possible FBI misconduct in its probe of ties between Russia and Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. The report Monday from special counsel John Durham offers withering criticism of the bureau but a meager court record that...apnews.com
Blow Job.Whitewater.
Every rational president wants competent generals, not traitorous woke cucks like Milley.