E Carroll Judge Boots Out Trump Voters From Jury Selection

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hahaha

You believe any idiotic lie. Poor little guy.

 

[eagle1462010]

Did John “Jack” Smith Start the Lois Lerner-led IRS Targeting Scandal in 2010?

One of the well-known things behind the Lerner/IRS scandal is the pressure that Lois was under from the Department of Justice to “do something about” the Tea Party and Citizens United. Lois was quite candid about it later (here’s Lois Lerner on YouTube discussing the “everybody’s screaming at us” pressure).

And one of the people applying the pressure? John (“Jack”) Smith. According to both Politico and CNN, the same Jack Smith just appointed special counsel for the current Donald Trump investigations.

 

[Flash]

If they refused to answer....he booted them out.
If they said they voted for Trump...he booted them out.
Only Biden voters are allowed on the jury in the E Carroll trial.

This is what we see in a Banana Republic.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Did John “Jack” Smith Start the Lois Lerner-led IRS Targeting Scandal in 2010?

One of the well-known things behind the Lerner/IRS scandal is the pressure that Lois was under from the Department of Justice to “do something about” the Tea Party and Citizens United. Lois was quite candid about it later (here’s Lois Lerner on YouTube discussing the “everybody’s screaming at us” pressure).

And one of the people applying the pressure? John (“Jack”) Smith. According to both Politico and CNN, the same Jack Smith just appointed special counsel for the current Donald Trump investigations.

Haha, poor cultists. So desperate for a life line.

Jack Smith could have given Bill Clinton. BJ in the Oval Office, and it would have no bearing on your orange God's crime spree.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

So your retort is another tweet from him lacking any evidence?

 

[mudwhistle]

So your retort is another tweet from him lacking any evidence?

You seem to think everything I post is a lie.....so who gives a shit.

Matters not.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Your post got chopped.

Yes. That happens sometimes. I have no idea why.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You seem to think everything I post is a lie.....so who gives a shit.

Matters not.

He does that a lot. It's almost a trademark.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You seem to think everything I post is a lie.....so who gives a shit.

Matters not.

That's right. Not a single one of your desperate fantasies matter one iota.

 

[justoffal]

Corruption at its finest.

That's good.....it will set up a successful appeal.
Trump's attorneys can likewise claim that the jury is biased....no problem here.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If they refused to answer....he booted them out.
If they said they voted for Trump...he booted them out.
Only Biden voters are allowed on the jury in the E Carroll trial.

Are you a supporter of the glorious 1,000 year democrat Reich?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That's good.....it will set up a successful appeal.
Trump's attorneys can likewise claim that the jury is biased....no problem here.

No it won't, and no they can't. They can yell it into microphones at press conferences to fool gullible idiots, but they can't make unevidenced claims in a courtroom.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Liberals pull out all the stakes to get rid of President Trump.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Are you a supporter of the glorious 1,000 year democrat Reich?

Are you on hard drugs?

 

[justoffal]

No it won't, and no they can't. They can yell it into microphones at press conferences to fool gullible idiots, but they can't make unevidenced claims in a courtroom.

Sure they can....if it's actually true that the judge excluded any he thought were Trump voters....
So far I don't know that it is true. If it is that's a pretty stupid move.

 

[mudwhistle]

Are you a supporter of the glorious 1,000 year democrat Reich?

That's a strange question.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That's a strange question.

It's the only one that matters to the democrat Cult

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sure they can....if it's actually true that the judge excluded any he thought were Trump voters....
So far I don't know that it is true. If it is that's a pretty stupid move.

No, andyou clearly don't understand how any of this works.

Anyone can say any stupid shit outside the courthouse to fool the low IQ cultists.

But they don't get to make these unevidenced and idiotic claims in a courtroom.

 

[justoffal]

No, andyou clearly don't understand how any of this works.

Anyone can say any stupid shit outside the courthouse to fool the low IQ cultists.

But they don't get to make these unevidenced and idiotic claims in a courtroom.

Ok....like I said. IF it's true it's a pretty stupid move. Because yes it would be idiotic and DEFINITELY fodder for a guaranteed appeal reversal. But yes ...you are right to say that it's only said so far not proven.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Just curious...

Has there been any reliable confirmation that if someone just voted for Trump that they were rejected for jury duty?

WW