Educating Democrats: Economics

[P@triot]

Then give me one example in all of history where liberals or unions brought a dictator to power!

Castro, Chavez, Mao, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Obama, FDR,

While not all conservatives are authoritarians; all highly authoritarian personalities are political conservatives.
Robert Altmeyer - The Authoritarians

What Mao Zedong said about liberalism

"Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension.

It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads."

Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung - Combat Liberalism

Hey stupid, Mao Tse-tung was a master of manipulation of dupes like you. He wanted liberalism to spread world-wide like a cancer. Of course he's not going to stand up there and announce that his oppression is nothing more than advanced liberalism (ie government control, gun control, market control - see a theme yet stupid)?

Seriously, the fact that you cite Mao Tse-tung for credibility on anything is glaring evidence of A.) just how radical left-wing you are, and B.) just how fuck'n stupid you are (which explains A).

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Castro, Chavez, Mao, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Obama, FDR,

While not all conservatives are authoritarians; all highly authoritarian personalities are political conservatives.
Robert Altmeyer - The Authoritarians

What Mao Zedong said about liberalism

"Liberalism is extremely harmful in a revolutionary collective. It is a corrosive which eats away unity, undermines cohesion, causes apathy and creates dissension.

It robs the revolutionary ranks of compact organization and strict discipline, prevents policies from being carried through and alienates the Party organizations from the masses which the Party leads."

Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung - Combat Liberalism

Hey stupid, Mao Tse-tung was a master of manipulation of dupes like you. He wanted liberalism to spread world-wide like a cancer. Of course he's not going to stand up there and announce that his oppression is nothing more than advanced liberalism (ie government control, gun control, market control - see a theme yet stupid)?

Seriously, the fact that you cite Mao Tse-tung for credibility on anything is glaring evidence of A.) just how radical left-wing you are, and B.) just how fuck'n stupid you are (which explains A).

yes our liberals would have us believe it is just coincidence that they spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb!!!

Norman Thomas (US socialist presidential candidate) quotes:
The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.

 

[P@triot]

You just don't know what you are talking about and you don't want to know. The first thing a communist is going to do is get rid of liberals.

using idiot liberal unions ("workers of the world unite") is an essential part of Marxism.

LIberals buy into it hook line and sinker. This is why our liberals spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb!

Who would listen to them? Union workers are far from being Marxists and probably would side more with conservatives than liberals, if the conservatives didn't try to stab the union workers in the back. Republicans and conservatives go after the money that is anti-union, but ideologically, the unions would split their vote if they weren't alienated. Marxism just doesn't cut it in America and I doubt it ever will.

Stop being an idiot troll.... You're not fooling anyone. Claiming unions are more conservative than liberal is as fucking absurd as claiming that Frank Sinatra was more gay than Liberace or that Michael Jordan has more hair than Troy Polamalu. You know it. We all know it. You're just being a stupid asshole now (I mean, significantly more than usual).

 

[P@triot]

Continuing my series on educating liberals, today we cover their absolute weakest point - economics. Of course, part of this weakness stems from their greed. When you're crazed out of your mind with getting your hands on other people's money, you're not likely to stop and think about what that is doing to the economy. But who knows, maybe today some young liberal will actually read the facts listed below and become the first liberal in US history to actually THINK.

• In 1968, there were 51 people employed full-time for every 1 person on disability.
  
  
• In 1997, there were 24 people employed full-time for every 1 person on disability (less than HALF than 1968)
  
  
• Today (2013), there are 13 people employed full-time for every 1 person on disability.

It is simply unsustainable. It cannot be denied. It cannot be debated. It cannot be ignored. It is unsustainable - and liberal policy of expecting the few to provide for the many (just like communist countries did) does not work. It's been tried by communists nations world wide and it has a 100% failure rate. It's more than just burdening the few. It's taking away the incentive for production, innovation, etc. When it doesn't matter how hard I work, because I'll get the same as everyone else, I stop working hard and put in the same effort as everyone else (it's just a reality that the utopian-based communist ideology refuses to take into account).

8,830,026: Americans on Disability Hits New Record for 192nd Straight Month | CNS News

Well, you've done it again. Made a fool of yourself trying to educate others.

You know, this disability meme has been repeated by others on this forum and I have shown them the errors of their ways many times. Too bad you weren't paying attention.

Here is what I have shown them, and now you:


A 2006 report: The Growth in the Social Security Disability Rolls: A Fiscal Crisis Unfolding

In 1985, 2.2 percent of individuals between the ages of 25 and 64 were receiving DI benefits, but by 2005 this fraction had risen to 4.1 percent. If recent entry and exit rates continue in the years ahead, then more than 6 percent of the nonelderly adult population will soon be receiving DI benefits.

The rapid expansion of the beneficiary population has three main causes.
First, a set of congressional reforms in 1984 to Disability Insurance screening led to rapid growth in the share of recipients suffering from back pain and mental illness. Because these disorders have comparatively low mortality, the average duration of disability spells—and hence the size of the recipient population—has increased. Second, a rise in the after-tax DI income replacement rate—that is, the ratio of disability income to former labor earnings—strengthened the incentives for workers to seek benefits. Third, a rapid increase in female labor force participation expanded the pool of insured workers. The aging of the baby boom generation has contributed little to the rise of receipt of disability benefits, while improvements in population health have likely reduced the incidence of disabling medical disorders.

The Republican House, Republican Senate, and Republican White House did nothing to stop it.


Nothing to do with Obama. Ain't that a bitch?

Once again you humiliate yourself on this forum with pure, unadulterated, stupidity (like the other day when you claimed that we should have attacked Yemen and Saudi Arabia because the terrorists weren't born in "Al Qaeda" - they were born in those nations ).

You claim (and I quote you word for word here you ignorant stupid fuck) "Nothing to do with Obama. Ain't that a bitch"?

Except, my original post is still there and not once did I mention Obama. Not once.

See, you go off all half-cocked like the ignorant fuck that you are before reading what is written. And, well, that's why you're an absolute fucking joke on this board....

Now tell me again how you believe we should have launched operations against Austria instead of Germany because Adolf Hitler was born in Austria?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Union workers are far from being Marxists and probably would side more with conservatives than liberals, if the conservatives didn't try to stab the union workers in the back. .

unions guys have a red state cultural conservatism about them but they vote liberal marxist class warfare in the end

The AFL-CIO's election night polling, done by Hart Research, found that union members voted for Obama at a rate of 65 percent to Romney's 33. The margins were even larger in the perennial battleground of Ohio, where issues like Obama's auto industry rescue and outsourcing tied to Romney's Bain Capital apparently had added resonance. Seventy percent of Buckeye State union voters backed Obama on Tuesday.

 

[bripat9643]

You just don't know what you are talking about and you don't want to know. The first thing a communist is going to do is get rid of liberals.

using idiot liberal unions ("workers of the world unite") is an essential part of Marxism.

LIberals buy into it hook line and sinker. This is why our liberals spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb!

Who would listen to them? Union workers are far from being Marxists and probably would side more with conservatives than liberals, if the conservatives didn't try to stab the union workers in the back. Republicans and conservatives go after the money that is anti-union, but ideologically, the unions would split their vote if they weren't alienated. Marxism just doesn't cut it in America and I doubt it ever will.

The Democrat leadership is all pure Marxist, so what do you mean Marxism doesn't cut it in America?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

using idiot liberal unions ("workers of the world unite") is an essential part of Marxism.

LIberals buy into it hook line and sinker. This is why our liberals spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb!

Who would listen to them? Union workers are far from being Marxists and probably would side more with conservatives than liberals, if the conservatives didn't try to stab the union workers in the back. Republicans and conservatives go after the money that is anti-union, but ideologically, the unions would split their vote if they weren't alienated. Marxism just doesn't cut it in America and I doubt it ever will.

The Democrat leadership is all pure Marxist, so what do you mean Marxism doesn't cut it in America?

this is true and like the unions they have learned not to use the terms Marxist socialist communist to describe themselves! They don't want to be associated with Stalin anymore.

 

[Dubya]

using idiot liberal unions ("workers of the world unite") is an essential part of Marxism.

LIberals buy into it hook line and sinker. This is why our liberals spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb!

Who would listen to them? Union workers are far from being Marxists and probably would side more with conservatives than liberals, if the conservatives didn't try to stab the union workers in the back. Republicans and conservatives go after the money that is anti-union, but ideologically, the unions would split their vote if they weren't alienated. Marxism just doesn't cut it in America and I doubt it ever will.

Stop being an idiot troll.... You're not fooling anyone. Claiming unions are more conservative than liberal is as fucking absurd as claiming that Frank Sinatra was more gay than Liberace or that Michael Jordan has more hair than Troy Polamalu. You know it. We all know it. You're just being a stupid asshole now (I mean, significantly more than usual).

I know a lot of union members, fool, and obviously you don't.

 

[P@triot]

Who would listen to them? Union workers are far from being Marxists and probably would side more with conservatives than liberals, if the conservatives didn't try to stab the union workers in the back. Republicans and conservatives go after the money that is anti-union, but ideologically, the unions would split their vote if they weren't alienated. Marxism just doesn't cut it in America and I doubt it ever will.

Stop being an idiot troll.... You're not fooling anyone. Claiming unions are more conservative than liberal is as fucking absurd as claiming that Frank Sinatra was more gay than Liberace or that Michael Jordan has more hair than Troy Polamalu. You know it. We all know it. You're just being a stupid asshole now (I mean, significantly more than usual).

I know a lot of union members, fool, and obviously you don't.

First of all, I do know a lot of union members (100% of them are liberals)

Second, and much more importantly, you don't have to know a union member to see and understand their policy/ideology - which is share the wealth, extort the successful, and reward the parasite.

 

[Dubya]

Stop being an idiot troll.... You're not fooling anyone. Claiming unions are more conservative than liberal is as fucking absurd as claiming that Frank Sinatra was more gay than Liberace or that Michael Jordan has more hair than Troy Polamalu. You know it. We all know it. You're just being a stupid asshole now (I mean, significantly more than usual).

I know a lot of union members, fool, and obviously you don't.

First of all, I do know a lot of union members (100% of them are liberals)

Second, and much more importantly, you don't have to know a union member to see and understand their policy/ideology - which is share the wealth, extort the successful, and reward the parasite.

Even teachers aren't 100% liberal and cops and firefighter surely aren't. The trade unions and UAW workers aren't anything near 100% liberal. Unions vote against Republicans, because the Republicans oppose the working man. The Republicans trade votes for money.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Unions vote against Republicans, because the Republicans oppose the working man.

actually unions oppose the working man by shipping 30 million working man jobs offshore with their high rip off wages, by supporting liberals who tax corporations to encourage them to move more and more jobs offshore, and by supporting liberals who keep 20 million illegals here to take our jobs.

 

[Mr Natural]

Unions vote against Republicans, because the Republicans oppose the working man.

actually unions oppose the working man by shipping 30 million working man jobs offshore with their high rip off wages, by supporting liberals who tax corporations to encourage them to move more and more jobs offshore, and by supporting liberals who keep 20 million illegals here to take our jobs.

Yep, the last thing a working person wants or needs is a high "rip off" wage.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Unions vote against Republicans, because the Republicans oppose the working man.

actually unions oppose the working man by shipping 30 million working man jobs offshore with their high rip off wages, by supporting liberals who tax corporations to encourage them to move more and more jobs offshore, and by supporting liberals who keep 20 million illegals here to take our jobs.

Yep, the last thing a working person wants or needs is a high "rip off" wage.

especially when it means his job and 30 milllion others will be shipped off shore!!!

See why we say liberals will be slow, so very very slow??

 

[P@triot]

Unions vote against Republicans, because the Republicans oppose the working man.

actually unions oppose the working man by shipping 30 million working man jobs offshore with their high rip off wages, by supporting liberals who tax corporations to encourage them to move more and more jobs offshore, and by supporting liberals who keep 20 million illegals here to take our jobs.

Yep, the last thing a working person wants or needs is a high "rip off" wage.

We're not talking about what people "want" stupid. Show me someone in the history of the world that didn't want a multi-million dollar salary.

What we are talking about is what's sustainable. You know our auto industry collapsed? Because the unions created "rip off" wages where a high school drop made $28 per hour to sweep the fuck'n shop floor, plus cadillac healthcare benefits for his entire family, plus a pension for not only his entire life, but for the entire life of his spouse as well, plus 401K. They were getting compensation packages in the hundreds of thousands (literally rivaling that of executives) - just to sweep a fuck'n floor. That is unsustainable.

So that greedy motherfucker, and those just like him, ruined jobs for everyone else. Instead of flourishing, GM was on the verge of bankruptcy (was bailed out illegally by Uncle Sam), and is now on the verge of bankruptcy once again. Once these companies go under, nobody else is going to have a job with them. But hey, at least the miserable fuck'n high school drop out is set for life, right?

 

[P@triot]

actually unions oppose the working man by shipping 30 million working man jobs offshore with their high rip off wages, by supporting liberals who tax corporations to encourage them to move more and more jobs offshore, and by supporting liberals who keep 20 million illegals here to take our jobs.

Yep, the last thing a working person wants or needs is a high "rip off" wage.

especially when it means his job and 30 milllion others will be shipped off shore!!!

See why we say liberals will be slow, so very very slow??

There is a reason they are called Dumbocrats. They simply can't understand that 1,000% of 0 is ZERO. Doesn't matter what a union negotiates for you, if it causes the company to go out of business - or ship the jobs offshore to stay afloat, then the net result for the union worker is still Z-E-R-O.

They are so blinded by their insane greed, they can't see the forest for the trees....

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

There is a reason they are called Dumbocrats.

yes its an incredible tragedy. The whole idea of our democracy was to have intelligent government. Liberals don't even mind being dumb. They have no respect for intelligence. Their ignorance is treasonous yet it is now an integral part of our democracy!!

 

[Mr Natural]

actually unions oppose the working man by shipping 30 million working man jobs offshore with their high rip off wages, by supporting liberals who tax corporations to encourage them to move more and more jobs offshore, and by supporting liberals who keep 20 million illegals here to take our jobs.

Yep, the last thing a working person wants or needs is a high "rip off" wage.

We're not talking about what people "want" stupid. Show me someone in the history of the world that didn't want a multi-million dollar salary.

What we are talking about is what's sustainable. You know our auto industry collapsed? Because the unions created "rip off" wages where a high school drop made $28 per hour to sweep the fuck'n shop floor, plus cadillac healthcare benefits for his entire family, plus a pension for not only his entire life, but for the entire life of his spouse as well, plus 401K. They were getting compensation packages in the hundreds of thousands (literally rivaling that of executives) - just to sweep a fuck'n floor. That is unsustainable.

So that greedy motherfucker, and those just like him, ruined jobs for everyone else. Instead of flourishing, GM was on the verge of bankruptcy (was bailed out illegally by Uncle Sam), and is now on the verge of bankruptcy once again. Once these companies go under, nobody else is going to have a job with them. But hey, at least the miserable fuck'n high school drop out is set for life, right?

Workers making too much money.

And you people wonder why you don't win elections anymore.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Yep, the last thing a working person wants or needs is a high "rip off" wage.

We're not talking about what people "want" stupid. Show me someone in the history of the world that didn't want a multi-million dollar salary.

What we are talking about is what's sustainable. You know our auto industry collapsed? Because the unions created "rip off" wages where a high school drop made $28 per hour to sweep the fuck'n shop floor, plus cadillac healthcare benefits for his entire family, plus a pension for not only his entire life, but for the entire life of his spouse as well, plus 401K. They were getting compensation packages in the hundreds of thousands (literally rivaling that of executives) - just to sweep a fuck'n floor. That is unsustainable.

So that greedy motherfucker, and those just like him, ruined jobs for everyone else. Instead of flourishing, GM was on the verge of bankruptcy (was bailed out illegally by Uncle Sam), and is now on the verge of bankruptcy once again. Once these companies go under, nobody else is going to have a job with them. But hey, at least the miserable fuck'n high school drop out is set for life, right?

Workers making too much money.

yes dear if workers make too much their jobs go away. Is that really over your head?? No need to answer, we know you're a liberal who proudly celebrates his ignorance.

Its interesting how a liberal gets brainwashed by the MSM and then come here only to find out he's been brainwashed. Do you hate what they did to you??

 

[Mr Natural]

We're not talking about what people "want" stupid. Show me someone in the history of the world that didn't want a multi-million dollar salary.

What we are talking about is what's sustainable. You know our auto industry collapsed? Because the unions created "rip off" wages where a high school drop made $28 per hour to sweep the fuck'n shop floor, plus cadillac healthcare benefits for his entire family, plus a pension for not only his entire life, but for the entire life of his spouse as well, plus 401K. They were getting compensation packages in the hundreds of thousands (literally rivaling that of executives) - just to sweep a fuck'n floor. That is unsustainable.

So that greedy motherfucker, and those just like him, ruined jobs for everyone else. Instead of flourishing, GM was on the verge of bankruptcy (was bailed out illegally by Uncle Sam), and is now on the verge of bankruptcy once again. Once these companies go under, nobody else is going to have a job with them. But hey, at least the miserable fuck'n high school drop out is set for life, right?

Workers making too much money.

yes dear if workers make too much their jobs go away. Is that really over your head?? No need to answer, we know you're a liberal who proudly celebrates his ignorance.

Its interesting how a liberal gets brainwashed by the MSM and then come here only to find out he's been brainwashed. Do you hate what they did to you??

"Prosperity Through Lower Wages!"

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Workers making too much money.

yes dear if workers make too much their jobs go away. Is that really over your head?? No need to answer, we know you're a liberal who proudly celebrates his ignorance.

Its interesting how a liberal gets brainwashed by the MSM and then come here only to find out he's been brainwashed. Do you hate what they did to you??

"Prosperity Through Lower Wages!"

too stupid!!! who said they'd be lower??? Kick 20 million liberal illegals out, end the liberal tax breaks for moving offshore, end the deficits so the Chinese have to buy our goods rather than out debt and there would be tremendous upward pressure on wages!!

Thats 1000 times over your head!!