Every Liberal Cause Is Based On A Lie

Was this supposed to be a clever insult?

You continue to be boring.


I'm absolutely devastated that you find me boring, Cecilie.

.....and right when I thought you were about to invite me to the trailer park for one of your famous roadkill potlucks, too.
 
This is a copy of an article about an article in the Daily Caller written by Ann Coulter, Conservative flame thrower and a woman I would trust as a fellow fighter in a foxhole over ANY dimocrap. Any.

Any.

Basically, what she's done is expand on my view that dimocraps are liars. That their entire system, their entire party, their existence and their causes are nothing more than lies backed by other lies. One untruth backed dozens of other untruths

But this reviewer, and Coulter, are more able to put it into words.

Read it. Those few of you in here that are still fair and logical and want to use truth and wisdom as a guiding force on which side to join. Read it.



Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider





Ann Coulter wrote an op-ed at the Daily Caller which absolutely skewers the left for their latest cause, hatred of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

From the onset, as only Coulter can, the sarcastic barbs are hurled at far-left lunatics who have been distorting the religious freedom law.

She refers to the new controversy in liberal circles as another in “a steady stream of manufactured events.”

This particular ‘manufactured event’ has liberals claiming that “a law protecting religious freedom will lead to separate water fountains for gays in Indiana.”

It’s not the first time of course, that liberals have gotten all worked up over something completely non-existent. The recent gang-rape hoax at the University of Virginia, Lena Dunham’s rape claims, and police brutality are all spotlighted by Coulter.

The latter gains extra scrutiny, as the ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story coming from Ferguson was completely debunked.

“Many months, several million wasted taxpayer dollars and one cop’s career later,” Coulter writes, “Even Eric Holder’s Justice Department finally admitted that the whole ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story was bunk.”

Coulter then goes on to skewer every major liberal cause today as based on a lie:

… why do we have to treat liberal fantasists in the media as if they’re children, too? Believing there’s a monster under the bed is cute. Falsely accusing cops of murder, men of rape and an entire state of homophobia is not.

Every single cause championed by liberals is based on a fake story. They make up events that didn’t happen and get apoplectic over things that never will happen. The definition of “liberal” is quickly becoming: people who believe their fantasies should be facts.


Another good point addressed is that after each of these lies is revealed, the liberal media, after spending weeks and months whipping up their base into a frenzy over those lies, barely reports on the truth afterward.

Coulter has struck a nerve and revealed the reality behind the liberal mindset. The left lies, swears to it, then quietly moves on to the next false crisis.



Read more: Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider

PLEASE, pretty please will one of you smart conservatives PLEASE tell me ONE policy you've EVER been on the correct side of history on in the US? Just one?? For the life of me I can't think of one!

Were you trying to sound like a three-year-old who needs a timeout, or is this just your natural way of speaking? Inquiring minds want to know.

FYI, I found your posting so annoying that I didn't even bother to try to understand the content. Impressive communication there.



So NO, you can't think of ONE policy conservatives have been on the correct side of US history either. Shocking

Yes, that's what it is. People tell you that you post like a retarded three-year-old and cannot be taken seriously and addressed like an adult, it CLEARLY means that you're so brilliant and incisive that you have instantly won a victory and settled the question for all time!
 
This is a copy of an article about an article in the Daily Caller written by Ann Coulter, Conservative flame thrower and a woman I would trust as a fellow fighter in a foxhole over ANY dimocrap. Any.

Any.

Basically, what she's done is expand on my view that dimocraps are liars. That their entire system, their entire party, their existence and their causes are nothing more than lies backed by other lies. One untruth backed dozens of other untruths

But this reviewer, and Coulter, are more able to put it into words.

Read it. Those few of you in here that are still fair and logical and want to use truth and wisdom as a guiding force on which side to join. Read it.



Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider





Ann Coulter wrote an op-ed at the Daily Caller which absolutely skewers the left for their latest cause, hatred of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

From the onset, as only Coulter can, the sarcastic barbs are hurled at far-left lunatics who have been distorting the religious freedom law.

She refers to the new controversy in liberal circles as another in “a steady stream of manufactured events.”

This particular ‘manufactured event’ has liberals claiming that “a law protecting religious freedom will lead to separate water fountains for gays in Indiana.”

It’s not the first time of course, that liberals have gotten all worked up over something completely non-existent. The recent gang-rape hoax at the University of Virginia, Lena Dunham’s rape claims, and police brutality are all spotlighted by Coulter.

The latter gains extra scrutiny, as the ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story coming from Ferguson was completely debunked.

“Many months, several million wasted taxpayer dollars and one cop’s career later,” Coulter writes, “Even Eric Holder’s Justice Department finally admitted that the whole ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story was bunk.”

Coulter then goes on to skewer every major liberal cause today as based on a lie:

… why do we have to treat liberal fantasists in the media as if they’re children, too? Believing there’s a monster under the bed is cute. Falsely accusing cops of murder, men of rape and an entire state of homophobia is not.

Every single cause championed by liberals is based on a fake story. They make up events that didn’t happen and get apoplectic over things that never will happen. The definition of “liberal” is quickly becoming: people who believe their fantasies should be facts.


Another good point addressed is that after each of these lies is revealed, the liberal media, after spending weeks and months whipping up their base into a frenzy over those lies, barely reports on the truth afterward.

Coulter has struck a nerve and revealed the reality behind the liberal mindset. The left lies, swears to it, then quietly moves on to the next false crisis.



Read more: Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider

PLEASE, pretty please will one of you smart conservatives PLEASE tell me ONE policy you've EVER been on the correct side of history on in the US? Just one?? For the life of me I can't think of one!

Were you trying to sound like a three-year-old who needs a timeout, or is this just your natural way of speaking? Inquiring minds want to know.

FYI, I found your posting so annoying that I didn't even bother to try to understand the content. Impressive communication there.



So NO, you can't think of ONE policy conservatives have been on the correct side of US history either. Shocking

Yes, that's what it is. People tell you that you post like a retarded three-year-old and cannot be taken seriously and addressed like an adult, it CLEARLY means that you're so brilliant and incisive that you have instantly won a victory and settled the question for all time!

I don't think so; liberals are like scientists and never settle a question as a truth for all time. That's the exclusive province of the idiot fringe, the willfully ignorant and the stupid, ruled by emotion, prejudice and bias.

I've sat on committees where some very liberal/progressive and diverse member argued on strategies, and methods in place and projected; and on committees with elected officials, school administrators, teachers and social workers, district attorney's, law enforcement, community organizers (no, that label is not the pejorative those on the right have made it into), parents, both natural and foster.

Believe me, the politics and opinions range far and wide and never did I hear any tell another, "you post like a retarded three-year-old and cannot be taken seriously and addressed like an adult, it CLEARLY means that you're so brilliant and incisive that you have instantly won a victory and settled the question for all time!"
 
To funny conflating party with ideology Bubba

"To hold people in Slavery is viewed by Conservatives as an affront to God, as abhorrent."



Sure Bubba, that's why the CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa, today's GOP base, hated it right? Aren't/weren't they heavily "Christian"? Must've been a liberal thing I guess ? lol


EVERYTHING you posit is nonsense, again

When I think of 'bubba' I think of the rapist, Clinton. Funny how that connection works...

As to the KKK, they were the terrorist arm of the dimocrap scum party. dimocrap FILTH have always had one -- Either the KKK or some other group intended only to frighten people and threaten businesses... Like today's terrorsit arm of the dimocrap FILTH party...... The Occupy (bowel) Movement, the "Hands Up" Crowd, the LSM.....

In fact, the KKK and the dimocrap scum party were so closely tied together as late as the 20th Century that the ENTIRE dimocrap scum NATIONAL CONVENTION in 1924 was known as THE KLANBAKE 1924 Democratic National Convention - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The LONGEST SERVING Senator in American History was a scumbag dimocrap named Robert Byrd, who was a long-time member (A Grand Kleagle) in the KKK.

Harry Truman, dimocrap scumbag, only man to ever use nuclear weapons, gave away most of Europe to the Soviets and invented OUT OF WHOLE CLOTH the LIE about Eisenhower and his English Driver.......

That scumbag was a former member of the KKK. Just a fact.

The scumbag who invented the term "Separation of Church and State" was NOT Thomas Jefferson, it was an FDR SCOTUS Appointee named Hugo Black,

A former member of the KKK and complete and total racist scumbag.

Fuck you, liar.

This is what I mean people..... dimocraps are lying scum.

Rather than admit what they were/are, they turn around and scream about how you were what they actually were..... When nothing could be further from the truth.

The fact is, the KKK was an ANTI-REPUBLICAN terrorist group formed BY AND FOR the dimocrap scum party. The majority of the people they lynched in their early years were WHITE PEOPLE because they were REPUBLICANS trying to help Black People. As an aside, the NRA was formed by White REPUBLICANS in attempt to arm Southern Blacks so they could defend themselves from dimocrap scum like you

After they ran Republicans out of the South, Blacks remained and stayed loyal to Republicans so dimocrap FILTH lynched them, too. In fact, MLK Jr was a lifelong Republican. Just a fact.

As to why the South is a solid Republican area -- dimocrap filth purposely allowed their Blue Dog democrats to be defeated in the name of party purity; mostly in 2010 is when it happened

There is no more Blue DOG democrat coalition. It no longer exists.

dimocraps are the scum of the earth. All they do is lie.
 
This is a copy of an article about an article in the Daily Caller written by Ann Coulter, Conservative flame thrower and a woman I would trust as a fellow fighter in a foxhole over ANY dimocrap. Any.

Any.

Basically, what she's done is expand on my view that dimocraps are liars. That their entire system, their entire party, their existence and their causes are nothing more than lies backed by other lies. One untruth backed dozens of other untruths

But this reviewer, and Coulter, are more able to put it into words.

Read it. Those few of you in here that are still fair and logical and want to use truth and wisdom as a guiding force on which side to join. Read it.



Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider





Ann Coulter wrote an op-ed at the Daily Caller which absolutely skewers the left for their latest cause, hatred of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

From the onset, as only Coulter can, the sarcastic barbs are hurled at far-left lunatics who have been distorting the religious freedom law.

She refers to the new controversy in liberal circles as another in “a steady stream of manufactured events.”

This particular ‘manufactured event’ has liberals claiming that “a law protecting religious freedom will lead to separate water fountains for gays in Indiana.”

It’s not the first time of course, that liberals have gotten all worked up over something completely non-existent. The recent gang-rape hoax at the University of Virginia, Lena Dunham’s rape claims, and police brutality are all spotlighted by Coulter.

The latter gains extra scrutiny, as the ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story coming from Ferguson was completely debunked.

“Many months, several million wasted taxpayer dollars and one cop’s career later,” Coulter writes, “Even Eric Holder’s Justice Department finally admitted that the whole ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story was bunk.”

Coulter then goes on to skewer every major liberal cause today as based on a lie:

… why do we have to treat liberal fantasists in the media as if they’re children, too? Believing there’s a monster under the bed is cute. Falsely accusing cops of murder, men of rape and an entire state of homophobia is not.

Every single cause championed by liberals is based on a fake story. They make up events that didn’t happen and get apoplectic over things that never will happen. The definition of “liberal” is quickly becoming: people who believe their fantasies should be facts.


Another good point addressed is that after each of these lies is revealed, the liberal media, after spending weeks and months whipping up their base into a frenzy over those lies, barely reports on the truth afterward.

Coulter has struck a nerve and revealed the reality behind the liberal mindset. The left lies, swears to it, then quietly moves on to the next false crisis.



Read more: Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider

PLEASE, pretty please will one of you smart conservatives PLEASE tell me ONE policy you've EVER been on the correct side of history on in the US? Just one?? For the life of me I can't think of one!

Were you trying to sound like a three-year-old who needs a timeout, or is this just your natural way of speaking? Inquiring minds want to know.

FYI, I found your posting so annoying that I didn't even bother to try to understand the content. Impressive communication there.



So NO, you can't think of ONE policy conservatives have been on the correct side of US history either. Shocking

Yes, that's what it is. People tell you that you post like a retarded three-year-old and cannot be taken seriously and addressed like an adult, it CLEARLY means that you're so brilliant and incisive that you have instantly won a victory and settled the question for all time!

Cecilie1200,

I suggest instead of acting like a three year old who resorts to name calling, why don't you actually find areas where conservatives were actually on the right side.

While I don't think they were always wrong they have generally fought on the wrong side some of the biggest issues in American History, Slavery, Segregation, Suffragette movement, interracial marriage, Iraq War....
Here is a list of Liberal Accomplishments:
- Social Security
- GI Bill of Rights (Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944)
- Electrification of rural areas
- NASA
- Medicaid/Medicare
- Clean water act
- Anti-discrimination laws
- Family Leave Act
- Federal Deposit Insurance
- Unemployment Insurance

Now please don't give a list of Republican Accomplishments but of Conservative ones...
 
Open question to supporters of the OP:

What lie was the liberal cause to free the slaves based on?

What lie was the liberal cause to break away from Britain and start our country based on?



:wink_2:

Lincoln said many times that he never intended to free the slaves, so that's a lie right there.

Also, 18th century liberals and modern liberals are two separate animals with no relation to each other.

You're really a fool, evidenced by parroting such crap as these statements, first without any evidence and then by failing to understand the essence of liberalism, alive in the 1700's as it is today.

The dichotomy that existed then, still exists today between conservatives and liberals, a simple concept even a simpleton like bripat might understand. The former resist change, and the latter welcome change; the former look backward, the latter look forward.

The significance of J. S. Mill's economic masterpiece, Principle of Political Economy, is no different than something Democrats argue for today, he maintained:
  • workers should form unions and cooperatives to seek higher wages
  • he opposed communism as a threat to individualism
  • he believe laws were necessary to protect women and children
  • he favored government intervention to remedy injustice
  • he wanted taxes on inheritance and rent
  • he wanted equal rights and education for women

JS Mill?

Quite dishonest in quoting a social liberal.

You really area a dishonest partisan jerk, and the truth of that is clear in this post. My response was to this comment by you, "Also, 18th century liberals and modern liberals are two separate animals with no relation to each other".

Notwithstanding your use of the word, socialist, a pejorative in todays parlance, each bullet point mirrors facts supported by most liberals today, and rejected by the Crazy Right Wing.

Even George Will, with a slip of the tongue, agrees with some of them.

George Will s Firing Offense at Fox Paul Abrams

You call me dishonest and partisan while citing HuffPo, and making references to the "Crazy Right Wing."

Physician heal thyself.
 
Last edited:
To funny conflating party with ideology Bubba

"To hold people in Slavery is viewed by Conservatives as an affront to God, as abhorrent."



Sure Bubba, that's why the CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa, today's GOP base, hated it right? Aren't/weren't they heavily "Christian"? Must've been a liberal thing I guess ? lol


EVERYTHING you posit is nonsense, again

When I think of 'bubba' I think of the rapist, Clinton. Funny how that connection works...

As to the KKK, they were the terrorist arm of the dimocrap scum party. dimocrap FILTH have always had one -- Either the KKK or some other group intended only to frighten people and threaten businesses... Like today's terrorsit arm of the dimocrap FILTH party...... The Occupy (bowel) Movement, the "Hands Up" Crowd, the LSM.....

In fact, the KKK and the dimocrap scum party were so closely tied together as late as the 20th Century that the ENTIRE dimocrap scum NATIONAL CONVENTION in 1924 was known as THE KLANBAKE 1924 Democratic National Convention - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The LONGEST SERVING Senator in American History was a scumbag dimocrap named Robert Byrd, who was a long-time member (A Grand Kleagle) in the KKK.

Harry Truman, dimocrap scumbag, only man to ever use nuclear weapons, gave away most of Europe to the Soviets and invented OUT OF WHOLE CLOTH the LIE about Eisenhower and his English Driver.......

That scumbag was a former member of the KKK. Just a fact.

The scumbag who invented the term "Separation of Church and State" was NOT Thomas Jefferson, it was an FDR SCOTUS Appointee named Hugo Black,

A former member of the KKK and complete and total racist scumbag.

Fuck you, liar.

This is what I mean people..... dimocraps are lying scum.

Rather than admit what they were/are, they turn around and scream about how you were what they actually were..... When nothing could be further from the truth.

The fact is, the KKK was an ANTI-REPUBLICAN terrorist group formed BY AND FOR the dimocrap scum party. The majority of the people they lynched in their early years were WHITE PEOPLE because they were REPUBLICANS trying to help Black People. As an aside, the NRA was formed by White REPUBLICANS in attempt to arm Southern Blacks so they could defend themselves from dimocrap scum like you

After they ran Republicans out of the South, Blacks remained and stayed loyal to Republicans so dimocrap FILTH lynched them, too. In fact, MLK Jr was a lifelong Republican. Just a fact.

As to why the South is a solid Republican area -- dimocrap filth purposely allowed their Blue Dog democrats to be defeated in the name of party purity; mostly in 2010 is when it happened

There is no more Blue DOG democrat coalition. It no longer exists.

dimocraps are the scum of the earth. All they do is lie.

Honestly Edgetho, If you have an argument! Make it.

The consent insults and lack of fact based opinion is just trying...

If you keep with the insults everyone just presumes you lost your argument and resorted throwing mud.
 
This is a copy of an article about an article in the Daily Caller written by Ann Coulter, Conservative flame thrower and a woman I would trust as a fellow fighter in a foxhole over ANY dimocrap. Any.

Any.

Basically, what she's done is expand on my view that dimocraps are liars. That their entire system, their entire party, their existence and their causes are nothing more than lies backed by other lies. One untruth backed dozens of other untruths

But this reviewer, and Coulter, are more able to put it into words.

Read it. Those few of you in here that are still fair and logical and want to use truth and wisdom as a guiding force on which side to join. Read it.



Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider





Ann Coulter wrote an op-ed at the Daily Caller which absolutely skewers the left for their latest cause, hatred of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

From the onset, as only Coulter can, the sarcastic barbs are hurled at far-left lunatics who have been distorting the religious freedom law.

She refers to the new controversy in liberal circles as another in “a steady stream of manufactured events.”

This particular ‘manufactured event’ has liberals claiming that “a law protecting religious freedom will lead to separate water fountains for gays in Indiana.”

It’s not the first time of course, that liberals have gotten all worked up over something completely non-existent. The recent gang-rape hoax at the University of Virginia, Lena Dunham’s rape claims, and police brutality are all spotlighted by Coulter.

The latter gains extra scrutiny, as the ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story coming from Ferguson was completely debunked.

“Many months, several million wasted taxpayer dollars and one cop’s career later,” Coulter writes, “Even Eric Holder’s Justice Department finally admitted that the whole ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story was bunk.”

Coulter then goes on to skewer every major liberal cause today as based on a lie:

… why do we have to treat liberal fantasists in the media as if they’re children, too? Believing there’s a monster under the bed is cute. Falsely accusing cops of murder, men of rape and an entire state of homophobia is not.

Every single cause championed by liberals is based on a fake story. They make up events that didn’t happen and get apoplectic over things that never will happen. The definition of “liberal” is quickly becoming: people who believe their fantasies should be facts.


Another good point addressed is that after each of these lies is revealed, the liberal media, after spending weeks and months whipping up their base into a frenzy over those lies, barely reports on the truth afterward.

Coulter has struck a nerve and revealed the reality behind the liberal mindset. The left lies, swears to it, then quietly moves on to the next false crisis.



Read more: Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider

PLEASE, pretty please will one of you smart conservatives PLEASE tell me ONE policy you've EVER been on the correct side of history on in the US? Just one?? For the life of me I can't think of one!

Were you trying to sound like a three-year-old who needs a timeout, or is this just your natural way of speaking? Inquiring minds want to know.

FYI, I found your posting so annoying that I didn't even bother to try to understand the content. Impressive communication there.



So NO, you can't think of ONE policy conservatives have been on the correct side of US history either. Shocking

Yes, that's what it is. People tell you that you post like a retarded three-year-old and cannot be taken seriously and addressed like an adult, it CLEARLY means that you're so brilliant and incisive that you have instantly won a victory and settled the question for all time!


So for the 3rd time, you can't think of a single policy conservatives were EVER on the correct side of US history either. Thanks anyways Bubba
 
To funny conflating party with ideology Bubba

"To hold people in Slavery is viewed by Conservatives as an affront to God, as abhorrent."



Sure Bubba, that's why the CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa, today's GOP base, hated it right? Aren't/weren't they heavily "Christian"? Must've been a liberal thing I guess ? lol


EVERYTHING you posit is nonsense, again

When I think of 'bubba' I think of the rapist, Clinton. Funny how that connection works...

As to the KKK, they were the terrorist arm of the dimocrap scum party. dimocrap FILTH have always had one -- Either the KKK or some other group intended only to frighten people and threaten businesses... Like today's terrorsit arm of the dimocrap FILTH party...... The Occupy (bowel) Movement, the "Hands Up" Crowd, the LSM.....

In fact, the KKK and the dimocrap scum party were so closely tied together as late as the 20th Century that the ENTIRE dimocrap scum NATIONAL CONVENTION in 1924 was known as THE KLANBAKE 1924 Democratic National Convention - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The LONGEST SERVING Senator in American History was a scumbag dimocrap named Robert Byrd, who was a long-time member (A Grand Kleagle) in the KKK.

Harry Truman, dimocrap scumbag, only man to ever use nuclear weapons, gave away most of Europe to the Soviets and invented OUT OF WHOLE CLOTH the LIE about Eisenhower and his English Driver.......

That scumbag was a former member of the KKK. Just a fact.

The scumbag who invented the term "Separation of Church and State" was NOT Thomas Jefferson, it was an FDR SCOTUS Appointee named Hugo Black,

A former member of the KKK and complete and total racist scumbag.

Fuck you, liar.

This is what I mean people..... dimocraps are lying scum.

Rather than admit what they were/are, they turn around and scream about how you were what they actually were..... When nothing could be further from the truth.

The fact is, the KKK was an ANTI-REPUBLICAN terrorist group formed BY AND FOR the dimocrap scum party. The majority of the people they lynched in their early years were WHITE PEOPLE because they were REPUBLICANS trying to help Black People. As an aside, the NRA was formed by White REPUBLICANS in attempt to arm Southern Blacks so they could defend themselves from dimocrap scum like you

After they ran Republicans out of the South, Blacks remained and stayed loyal to Republicans so dimocrap FILTH lynched them, too. In fact, MLK Jr was a lifelong Republican. Just a fact.

As to why the South is a solid Republican area -- dimocrap filth purposely allowed their Blue Dog democrats to be defeated in the name of party purity; mostly in 2010 is when it happened

There is no more Blue DOG democrat coalition. It no longer exists.

dimocraps are the scum of the earth. All they do is lie.


Got it Bubba, you'll stick to conflating ideology with party. I'm shocked

And NO, MLK Jr WASN'T a "life long Republican", lol


No, Martin Luther King Jr. Was Not A Republican — But Here’s What He Had To Say About Them


King was not a partisan and never endorsed any political candidate. In a 1958 interview, King said “I don’t think the Republican party is a party full of the almighty God nor is the Democratic party. They both have weaknesses … And I’m not inextricably bound to either party.”

King did, however, weigh in on the Republican party during his lifetime. In Chapter 23 of his autobiography, King writes this about the 1964 Republican National Convention:

The Republican Party geared its appeal and program to racism, reaction, and extremism. All people of goodwill viewed with alarm and concern the frenzied wedding at the Cow Palace of the KKK with the radical right.


I had no alternative but to urge every Negro and white person of goodwill to vote against Mr. Goldwater and to withdraw support from any Republican candidate that did not publicly disassociate himself from Senator Goldwater and his philosophy.

King barnstormed the country on behalf on Johnson in 1964, “maintaining only a thin veneer of nonpartisanship,” according to biographer Nick Kotz. King called Johnson’s win a “great victory for the forces of progress and a defeat for the forces of retrogress.”

Here is what King had to say about Ronald Reagan, the hero of modern Republicans:

When a Hollywood performer, lacking distinction even as an actor can become a leading war hawk candidate for the Presidency, only the irrationalities induced by a war psychosis can explain such a melancholy turn of events.

David Garrow, who wrote a Pulitzer Prize winning biography of King, stated “It’s simply incorrect to call Dr. King a Republican.”

King, according to Garrow, did hold some Republicans — including Richard Nixon and Nelson Rockefeller — in high regard. He also was harshly critical of Lyndon Johnson’s escalation of the Vietnam War.

In 2008, King’s son Martin Luther King III said “It is disingenuous to imply that my father was a Republican. He never endorsed any presidential candidate, and there is certainly no evidence that he ever even voted for a Republican.” Garrow claimed there is little doubt King voted for Kennedy in 1960 and Johnson in 1964.










Conservatives on the Wrong Side of History on Mandela, Most Other Things


When has the American right ever—ever—been on the right side of history?

The answer is almost never.


...Do you support the American Revolution? I should hope so. You would not have, however, had you been a conservative in 1785. American Loyalists, perhaps 20 percent of the white population of the day, were devoted to king and crown for mostly the usual reasons: They were older, better established, had more money, were scared of change.


How about the abolition of slavery? I reckon you’re on board with that. Well, Lord knows you wouldn’t have been if you’d been among the 1860 conservatives who started a war over it (and whose apologists today insist the Civil War was not about slavery).

In terms of domestic politics, few polemical tasks are easier than demonstrating how wrong conservatism has been about pretty much everything in all of American history. Eradication of child labor? Why, an imposition on business owners to run their factories as they saw fit, you socialist! Giving women the right to vote? Women?! They simply don’t possess the logical faculties to be entrusted with such a responsibility, and anyway where will it end—I suppose you’ll be suggesting that black people get the franchise next? Segregation. Miscegenation laws. Immigration. Civil rights. The environmental movement. Conservatism’s record: wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong.

Conservatives on the Wrong Side of History on Mandela Most Other Things - The Daily Beast

Abraham Lincoln Might Have Been a Republican, But He Damn Sure Wasn’t a Conservative

Lincoln also instituted the first “income tax,” and told the Southern states claiming “states’ rights” when it came to slavery that they were completely full of crap.

Could you imagine a Republican today creating a tax and telling states that their claim of “states’ rights” on an issue was absurd?

Abraham Lincoln might have been a Republican, but that was before Republicans became “conservatives.” See, there’s a difference between what Republicans were and what conservatives are. Conservatives have always been conservatives. Decades ago, racist conservatives aligned with the Democratic party. Today these same conservatives call themselves Republicans.


Anyone who knows anything about history knows that long ago Democrats were the party of racists. But those who are honest about history also know that over time, the political ideology of both parties switched.

This isn’t hard to prove – just look at reality. What groups align with the fringe of the Republican party? The KKK, neo-Nazis and people who seek to glorify the confederacy. In other words, racists. You don’t see members of the KKK, Nazi groups or confederate sympathizers siding with modern day Democrats. Oh, no – they vote Republican.


...
Nothing about Lincoln made him a conservative. He fought against “states’ rights,” he created a tax, he bucked tradition, he embraced change and he did all of this by using the power of big government.

Abraham Lincoln Might Have Been a Republican But He Damn Sure Wasn t a Conservative
 
This is a copy of an article about an article in the Daily Caller written by Ann Coulter, Conservative flame thrower and a woman I would trust as a fellow fighter in a foxhole over ANY dimocrap. Any.

Any.

Basically, what she's done is expand on my view that dimocraps are liars. That their entire system, their entire party, their existence and their causes are nothing more than lies backed by other lies. One untruth backed dozens of other untruths

But this reviewer, and Coulter, are more able to put it into words.

Read it. Those few of you in here that are still fair and logical and want to use truth and wisdom as a guiding force on which side to join. Read it.



Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider





Ann Coulter wrote an op-ed at the Daily Caller which absolutely skewers the left for their latest cause, hatred of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

From the onset, as only Coulter can, the sarcastic barbs are hurled at far-left lunatics who have been distorting the religious freedom law.

She refers to the new controversy in liberal circles as another in “a steady stream of manufactured events.”

This particular ‘manufactured event’ has liberals claiming that “a law protecting religious freedom will lead to separate water fountains for gays in Indiana.”

It’s not the first time of course, that liberals have gotten all worked up over something completely non-existent. The recent gang-rape hoax at the University of Virginia, Lena Dunham’s rape claims, and police brutality are all spotlighted by Coulter.

The latter gains extra scrutiny, as the ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story coming from Ferguson was completely debunked.

“Many months, several million wasted taxpayer dollars and one cop’s career later,” Coulter writes, “Even Eric Holder’s Justice Department finally admitted that the whole ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story was bunk.”

Coulter then goes on to skewer every major liberal cause today as based on a lie:

… why do we have to treat liberal fantasists in the media as if they’re children, too? Believing there’s a monster under the bed is cute. Falsely accusing cops of murder, men of rape and an entire state of homophobia is not.

Every single cause championed by liberals is based on a fake story. They make up events that didn’t happen and get apoplectic over things that never will happen. The definition of “liberal” is quickly becoming: people who believe their fantasies should be facts.


Another good point addressed is that after each of these lies is revealed, the liberal media, after spending weeks and months whipping up their base into a frenzy over those lies, barely reports on the truth afterward.

Coulter has struck a nerve and revealed the reality behind the liberal mindset. The left lies, swears to it, then quietly moves on to the next false crisis.



Read more: Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider

PLEASE, pretty please will one of you smart conservatives PLEASE tell me ONE policy you've EVER been on the correct side of history on in the US? Just one?? For the life of me I can't think of one!

Were you trying to sound like a three-year-old who needs a timeout, or is this just your natural way of speaking? Inquiring minds want to know.

FYI, I found your posting so annoying that I didn't even bother to try to understand the content. Impressive communication there.



So NO, you can't think of ONE policy conservatives have been on the correct side of US history either. Shocking

Yes, that's what it is. People tell you that you post like a retarded three-year-old and cannot be taken seriously and addressed like an adult, it CLEARLY means that you're so brilliant and incisive that you have instantly won a victory and settled the question for all time!

Cecilie1200,

I suggest instead of acting like a three year old who resorts to name calling, why don't you actually find areas where conservatives were actually on the right side.

While I don't think they were always wrong they have generally fought on the wrong side some of the biggest issues in American History, Slavery, Segregation, Suffragette movement, interracial marriage, Iraq War....
Here is a list of Liberal Accomplishments:
- Social Security
- GI Bill of Rights (Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944)
- Electrification of rural areas
- NASA
- Medicaid/Medicare
- Clean water act
- Anti-discrimination laws
- Family Leave Act
- Federal Deposit Insurance
- Unemployment Insurance

Now please don't give a list of Republican Accomplishments but of Conservative ones...

I suggest you take your suggestions to someone who thinks you have something to say and that you are someone they aspire to impress.

I also suggest you look up the word "accomplishments", because - in my eyes, at least - it requires that things not just be done, but that they be positive. By the standard you've apparently applied to list "liberal accomplishments", one could consider Auschwitz an accomplishment of Hitler's, since he certainly did make it happen.

If you have something you'd like to ask me, might I suggest that next time, you don't do it by barging into a conversation with someone else and condescendingly making demands as though I was speaking to you all along?
 
Every major accomplishment made in our country is because of liberals. All of the founding fathers were liberals, radical liberals as a matter of fact. The Revolutionary war was fought by liberals. Conservatives of that time were known as Tories, and they aided the British. In the Civil War, liberals fought for the Union, and conservatives fought for the Confederates. Liberals are responsible for the end of slavery, voting rights for women and minorities, civil rights for women and minorities, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the 40 hour work week, minimum wage, workplace safety, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and the list goes on and on. Conservatives? They gave us prohibition, McCarthyism, two financial collapses, and a long list of unnecessary wars that have cost the lives of thousands of our soldiers. So I am proud to call myself a liberal, and yes, Republicans used to be liberal.
 
Every major accomplishment made in our country is because of liberals. All of the founding fathers were liberals, radical liberals as a matter of fact. The Revolutionary war was fought by liberals. Conservatives of that time were known as Tories, and they aided the British. In the Civil War, liberals fought for the Union, and conservatives fought for the Confederates. Liberals are responsible for the end of slavery, voting rights for women and minorities, civil rights for women and minorities, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the 40 hour work week, minimum wage, workplace safety, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and the list goes on and on. Conservatives? They gave us prohibition, McCarthyism, two financial collapses, and a long list of unnecessary wars that have cost the lives of thousands of our soldiers. So I am proud to call myself a liberal, and yes, Republicans used to be liberal.
The Founding Fathers today would be called "conservatives." Milton Friedman called himself a liberal. I doubt anyone today would.
 
PLEASE, pretty please will one of you smart conservatives PLEASE tell me ONE policy you've EVER been on the correct side of history on in the US? Just one?? For the life of me I can't think of one!

Were you trying to sound like a three-year-old who needs a timeout, or is this just your natural way of speaking? Inquiring minds want to know.

FYI, I found your posting so annoying that I didn't even bother to try to understand the content. Impressive communication there.



So NO, you can't think of ONE policy conservatives have been on the correct side of US history either. Shocking

Yes, that's what it is. People tell you that you post like a retarded three-year-old and cannot be taken seriously and addressed like an adult, it CLEARLY means that you're so brilliant and incisive that you have instantly won a victory and settled the question for all time!

Cecilie1200,

I suggest instead of acting like a three year old who resorts to name calling, why don't you actually find areas where conservatives were actually on the right side.

While I don't think they were always wrong they have generally fought on the wrong side some of the biggest issues in American History, Slavery, Segregation, Suffragette movement, interracial marriage, Iraq War....
Here is a list of Liberal Accomplishments:
- Social Security
- GI Bill of Rights (Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944)
- Electrification of rural areas
- NASA
- Medicaid/Medicare
- Clean water act
- Anti-discrimination laws
- Family Leave Act
- Federal Deposit Insurance
- Unemployment Insurance

Now please don't give a list of Republican Accomplishments but of Conservative ones...

I suggest you take your suggestions to someone who thinks you have something to say and that you are someone they aspire to impress.

I also suggest you look up the word "accomplishments", because - in my eyes, at least - it requires that things not just be done, but that they be positive. By the standard you've apparently applied to list "liberal accomplishments", one could consider Auschwitz an accomplishment of Hitler's, since he certainly did make it happen.

If you have something you'd like to ask me, might I suggest that next time, you don't do it by barging into a conversation with someone else and condescendingly making demands as though I was speaking to you all along?

Your BS dodge noted Bubba

Thanks though, I can't think of a single US policy conservatives have EVER stood on the correct side of history with either!
 
Referring to OP: Every Liberal Cause Is Based On a Lie

I think this fits here: Judge accuses Obama lawyers of misleading him

Oops, it can't be. Obama lawyers lied.

President Obama’s new deportation amnesty will remain halted, a federal judge in Texas ruled Tuesday night in an order that also delivered a judicial spanking to the president’s lawyers for misleading the court.

Judge Andrew S. Hanen, who first halted the amnesty in February, just two days before it was to take effect, said he’s even more convinced of his decision now, particularly after Mr. Obama earlier this year said he intends for his policies to supersede federal laws.

Judge Hanen pointed to Mr. Obama’s comments at a February town hall when the president warned immigration agents to adhere to his policies or else face “consequences.”
 
Every major accomplishment made in our country is because of liberals. All of the founding fathers were liberals, radical liberals as a matter of fact. The Revolutionary war was fought by liberals. Conservatives of that time were known as Tories, and they aided the British. In the Civil War, liberals fought for the Union, and conservatives fought for the Confederates. Liberals are responsible for the end of slavery, voting rights for women and minorities, civil rights for women and minorities, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the 40 hour work week, minimum wage, workplace safety, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and the list goes on and on. Conservatives? They gave us prohibition, McCarthyism, two financial collapses, and a long list of unnecessary wars that have cost the lives of thousands of our soldiers. So I am proud to call myself a liberal, and yes, Republicans used to be liberal.
The Founding Fathers today would be called "conservatives." Milton Friedman called himself a liberal. I doubt anyone today would.


Sure Bubba, sure

The most radical liberals of their times, the guys who chose the BIG FEDERAL CONSTITUTION over the small states rights that was a failure? lol

Tories/Loyalists were largely conservatives of their time Bubba



Yes, the conservatives in the the South (later Conservative States of AmeriKKKa) states were largely conservatives, but weird they didn't go with Adam Smith's model right, like Uncle Miltie?



Uncle Miltie could call himself whatever he wants Bubba, he believed in myths and fairy tales anyways. He fits well into today's lying POS GOP party however!
 
Referring to OP: Every Liberal Cause Is Based On a Lie

I think this fits here: Judge accuses Obama lawyers of misleading him

Oops, it can't be. Obama lawyers lied.

President Obama’s new deportation amnesty will remain halted, a federal judge in Texas ruled Tuesday night in an order that also delivered a judicial spanking to the president’s lawyers for misleading the court.

Judge Andrew S. Hanen, who first halted the amnesty in February, just two days before it was to take effect, said he’s even more convinced of his decision now, particularly after Mr. Obama earlier this year said he intends for his policies to supersede federal laws.

Judge Hanen pointed to Mr. Obama’s comments at a February town hall when the president warned immigration agents to adhere to his policies or else face “consequences.”


lol, Seriously, that's the best you have?
 
Referring to OP: Every Liberal Cause Is Based On a Lie

I think this fits here: Judge accuses Obama lawyers of misleading him

Oops, it can't be. Obama lawyers lied.

President Obama’s new deportation amnesty will remain halted, a federal judge in Texas ruled Tuesday night in an order that also delivered a judicial spanking to the president’s lawyers for misleading the court.

Judge Andrew S. Hanen, who first halted the amnesty in February, just two days before it was to take effect, said he’s even more convinced of his decision now, particularly after Mr. Obama earlier this year said he intends for his policies to supersede federal laws.

Judge Hanen pointed to Mr. Obama’s comments at a February town hall when the president warned immigration agents to adhere to his policies or else face “consequences.”


lol, Seriously, that's the best you have?

Who's talking to you? Have trouble comprehending?

Read again... Let me color it for you... Referring to OP: Every Liberal Cause Is Based On a Lie
 

Forum List

Back
Top