Every Liberal Cause Is Based On A Lie

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Another iteration of a BIG LIE, accusing liberals, progressives and Democrats of doing what they have done and continue doing.

LOL! Mimicry, truly is the height of flattery.

(Reader what you're seeing here is the hysterical response to the Left being chronically caught in the act, of precisely that which they're bitching about.

"You're a Racist!" they charge, as they're demanding that racial minorities are too stupid to get an ID...

"You're a Bigot!" they demand, as they demonstrate unbridled intolerance for the differing views and opinions of others. And so on... .

LOL! Its heard others note this and realized how effective that point was, so it's decided to simply 'copy' it, not realizing that what made it effective, was the legitimacy common to the truth.

As Ive noted many times before, as a Relativist, its mental disorder rejects the objectivity that is essential to understanding truth, thus it has no means to understand things that are centered upon it.

 

[Dad2three]

WHY would someone risk voting IF they weren't eligible since it's a FELONY???


WHAT DO THEY GAIN FOR THE RISK DUMMY???

And what if there is no risk?

How many of those felons end up in jail, really.

WHY would they do it, THAT'S the question? Duibya's DOJ looked at it for 5 years, 300+ million votes. States have looked at it, investigation after investigation. What was the outcome again?? lol

THIS is where reason and logic are SUPPOSED to come into play Bubba


New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed


A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.

In an exhaustive public records search, reporters from the investigative reporting projecdt News21 sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation.


In-person voter-impersonation fraud is rare. The database shows 207 cases of other types of fraud for every case of voter impersonation. “The fraud that matters is the fraud that is organized. That's why voter impersonation is practically non-existent because it is difficult to do and it is difficult to pull people into conspiracies to do it,”


New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations



Roxanne Rubin, Nevada Republican, Accepts Plea Deal After Committing Voter Fraud


Rubin said that she was trying to show how easy it would be to commit voter fraud with just a signature. "This has always been an issue with me. I just feel the system is flawed," she told the AP Thursday. "If we’re showing ID for everything else, why wouldn’t we show our ID in order to vote?”

Rubin, like many Republicans, claim that the threat from voter fraud -- which is close to non-existent -- is why voter ID laws need to be in place. But Nevada has no voter ID law -- other than for first-time voters who didn't show ID when they registered to vote -- and she was caught anyway.

Roxanne Rubin Nevada Republican Accepts Plea Deal After Committing Voter Fraud

 

[Dad2three]

Another iteration of a BIG LIE, accusing liberals, progressives and Democrats of doing what they have done and continue doing.

LOL! Mimicry, truly is the height of flattery.

(Reader what you're seeing here is the hysterical response to the Left being chronically caught in the act, of precisely that which they're bitching about.

"You're a Racist!" they charge, as they're demanding that racial minorities are too stupid to get an ID...

"You're a Bigot!" they demand, as they demonstrate unbridled intolerance for the differing views and opinions of others. And so on... .

LOL! Its heard others note this and realized how effective that point was, so it's decided to simply 'copy' it, not realizing that what made it effective, was the legitimacy common to the truth.

As Ive noted many times before, as a Relativist, its mental disorder rejects the objectivity that is essential to understanding truth, thus it has no means to understand things that are centered upon it.

Keep showing why 80%+ of minority's stay away from the GOP Bubba


If it weren't for false premises, distortions and lies, what would right wingers EVER have???

 

[TemplarKormac]

Open question to supporters of the OP:

What lie was the liberal cause to free the slaves based on?

What lie was the liberal cause to break away from Britain and start our country based on?

Lincoln said many times that he never intended to free the slaves, so that's a lie right there.

Also, 18th century liberals and modern liberals are two separate animals with no relation to each other.

You're really a fool, evidenced by parroting such crap as these statements, first without any evidence and then by failing to understand the essence of liberalism, alive in the 1700's as it is today.

The dichotomy that existed then, still exists today between conservatives and liberals, a simple concept even a simpleton like bripat might understand. The former resist change, and the latter welcome change; the former look backward, the latter look forward.

The significance of J. S. Mill's economic masterpiece, Principle of Political Economy, is no different than something Democrats argue for today, he maintained:

• workers should form unions and cooperatives to seek higher wages
• he opposed communism as a threat to individualism
• he believe laws were necessary to protect women and children
• he favored government intervention to remedy injustice
• he wanted taxes on inheritance and rent
• he wanted equal rights and education for women

JS Mill?

Quite dishonest in quoting a social liberal.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Though there are many varieties of the view discussed, utilitarianism is generally held to be the view that the morally right action is the action that produces the most good.

As if liberals espouse to such a philosophy. The only morally right action the produces the most good for a liberal like you is the action which falls in line with a your own ideologies. Nice way to say "let us dictate our form of morality on you!"

Like bripat pointed out, you can use utilitarianism to justify anything, and especially morality.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I could, in a ten-page term paper, or in a blue book. But if I write more than three paragraphs people like you won't read it. Anything that challenges your biases is either ignored as evidenced by cutting and running, or given a single sentence of zero substance but for the usual ad hominem.

Or in other words, you have no answer. Insulting people's intelligence is in fact ad hominem. These kinds of statements have no substance either. And you can't lecture anyone on "biases" after quoting JS Mill. He was a social liberal, which naturally draws you in.

 

[TemplarKormac]

What conservative policy has been for the greater good in the history of the United States?

Just off the top of my head, the Emancipation Proclamation comes to mind.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Of course they were RINO's, but the Republican Party once was concerned with our environment:

Environmental policy is partisan. It wasn t always. - The Washington Post

Today's conservative is concerned with one thing only: ME

And yet another conservative policy that has been beneficial to America, well it was to a point, until Democrats hijacked the environmental debate and started using the EPA as attack dogs.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

What conservative policy has been for the greater good in the history of the United States?

Just off the top of my head, the Emancipation Proclamation comes to mind.

What makes the the Emancipation Proclamation "conservative"?

 

[TemplarKormac]

What conservative policy has been for the greater good in the history of the United States?

Just off the top of my head, the Emancipation Proclamation comes to mind.

What makes the the Emancipation Proclamation "conservative"?

I'm assuming Wry is referring to Republicans, in essence the term is a misnomer. Since someone like Wry automatically conflates a conservative with a Republican, it would therefore be easy to assume using such a definition that the Emancipation Proclamation was "conservative."

I know what the difference is, Doc. I don't think it is conservative, I think it came from socially liberal Republicans in the latter half of the 1800's.

 

[Dad2three]

Of course they were RINO's, but the Republican Party once was concerned with our environment:

Environmental policy is partisan. It wasn t always. - The Washington Post

Today's conservative is concerned with one thing only: ME

And yet another conservative policy that has been beneficial to America, well it was to a point, until Democrats hijacked the environmental debate and started using the EPA as attack dogs.

LOL, Seriously? The conservatives want to do away with the EPA? Yes, Nixon was a RINO in many way, after the first Earth day, he awoke. Weird right? lol

 

[bripat9643]

Were you trying to sound like a three-year-old who needs a timeout, or is this just your natural way of speaking? Inquiring minds want to know.

FYI, I found your posting so annoying that I didn't even bother to try to understand the content. Impressive communication there.

I'll dumb it down for you: What conservative policy has been for the greater good in the history of the United States?

freedom.

Policy? lol

Freedom is a policy.

Sure it is Buba, sure

And you "believe in" the BS Ayn Rand wrote too!

Your contempt for freedom is duly noted.

 

[Dad2three]

I'll dumb it down for you: What conservative policy has been for the greater good in the history of the United States?

freedom.

Policy? lol

Freedom is a policy.

Sure it is Buba, sure

And you "believe in" the BS Ayn Rand wrote too!

Your contempt for freedom is duly noted.

 

[jon_berzerk]

This is a copy of an article about an article in the Daily Caller written by Ann Coulter, Conservative flame thrower and a woman I would trust as a fellow fighter in a foxhole over ANY dimocrap. Any.

Any.

Basically, what she's done is expand on my view that dimocraps are liars. That their entire system, their entire party, their existence and their causes are nothing more than lies backed by other lies. One untruth backed dozens of other untruths

But this reviewer, and Coulter, are more able to put it into words.

Read it. Those few of you in here that are still fair and logical and want to use truth and wisdom as a guiding force on which side to join. Read it.



Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider





Ann Coulter wrote an op-ed at the Daily Caller which absolutely skewers the left for their latest cause, hatred of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

From the onset, as only Coulter can, the sarcastic barbs are hurled at far-left lunatics who have been distorting the religious freedom law.

She refers to the new controversy in liberal circles as another in “a steady stream of manufactured events.”

This particular ‘manufactured event’ has liberals claiming that “a law protecting religious freedom will lead to separate water fountains for gays in Indiana.”

It’s not the first time of course, that liberals have gotten all worked up over something completely non-existent. The recent gang-rape hoax at the University of Virginia, Lena Dunham’s rape claims, and police brutality are all spotlighted by Coulter.

The latter gains extra scrutiny, as the ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story coming from Ferguson was completely debunked.

“Many months, several million wasted taxpayer dollars and one cop’s career later,” Coulter writes, “Even Eric Holder’s Justice Department finally admitted that the whole ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story was bunk.”

Coulter then goes on to skewer every major liberal cause today as based on a lie:

… why do we have to treat liberal fantasists in the media as if they’re children, too? Believing there’s a monster under the bed is cute. Falsely accusing cops of murder, men of rape and an entire state of homophobia is not.

Every single cause championed by liberals is based on a fake story. They make up events that didn’t happen and get apoplectic over things that never will happen. The definition of “liberal” is quickly becoming: people who believe their fantasies should be facts.

Another good point addressed is that after each of these lies is revealed, the liberal media, after spending weeks and months whipping up their base into a frenzy over those lies, barely reports on the truth afterward.

Coulter has struck a nerve and revealed the reality behind the liberal mindset. The left lies, swears to it, then quietly moves on to the next false crisis.



Read more: Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider

that certainly seems to be the case

 

[Dad2three]

This is a copy of an article about an article in the Daily Caller written by Ann Coulter, Conservative flame thrower and a woman I would trust as a fellow fighter in a foxhole over ANY dimocrap. Any.

Any.

Basically, what she's done is expand on my view that dimocraps are liars. That their entire system, their entire party, their existence and their causes are nothing more than lies backed by other lies. One untruth backed dozens of other untruths

But this reviewer, and Coulter, are more able to put it into words.

Read it. Those few of you in here that are still fair and logical and want to use truth and wisdom as a guiding force on which side to join. Read it.



Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider





Ann Coulter wrote an op-ed at the Daily Caller which absolutely skewers the left for their latest cause, hatred of Indiana’s Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

From the onset, as only Coulter can, the sarcastic barbs are hurled at far-left lunatics who have been distorting the religious freedom law.

She refers to the new controversy in liberal circles as another in “a steady stream of manufactured events.”

This particular ‘manufactured event’ has liberals claiming that “a law protecting religious freedom will lead to separate water fountains for gays in Indiana.”

It’s not the first time of course, that liberals have gotten all worked up over something completely non-existent. The recent gang-rape hoax at the University of Virginia, Lena Dunham’s rape claims, and police brutality are all spotlighted by Coulter.

The latter gains extra scrutiny, as the ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story coming from Ferguson was completely debunked.

“Many months, several million wasted taxpayer dollars and one cop’s career later,” Coulter writes, “Even Eric Holder’s Justice Department finally admitted that the whole ‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ story was bunk.”

Coulter then goes on to skewer every major liberal cause today as based on a lie:

… why do we have to treat liberal fantasists in the media as if they’re children, too? Believing there’s a monster under the bed is cute. Falsely accusing cops of murder, men of rape and an entire state of homophobia is not.

Every single cause championed by liberals is based on a fake story. They make up events that didn’t happen and get apoplectic over things that never will happen. The definition of “liberal” is quickly becoming: people who believe their fantasies should be facts.

Another good point addressed is that after each of these lies is revealed, the liberal media, after spending weeks and months whipping up their base into a frenzy over those lies, barely reports on the truth afterward.

Coulter has struck a nerve and revealed the reality behind the liberal mindset. The left lies, swears to it, then quietly moves on to the next false crisis.



Read more: Ann Coulter Every Liberal Cause Is Based on a Lie - The Political Insider

that certainly seems to be the case

Benghazzzzzi, Voter fraud, death panels, lol

 

[Edgetho]

What makes the the Emancipation Proclamation "conservative"?

Our Founding Principles based on Natural Law.

dimocraps don't believe in Natural Law, dimocraps believe that only people make laws and not God.

Republicans believe that there are certain immutable, undeniable, unalienable Rights granted by the Creator; among those the Rights of Life, LIBERTY and the Pursuit of Happiness.

To hold people in Slavery is viewed by Conservatives as an affront to God, as abhorrent.

To hold people in slavery was viewed by dimocraps as perfectly legal (which it was at the time) and something they should be entitled to do. Man makes laws, not God

To dimocraps, might makes right. It's all they know. It's all they've ever known, it's all they ever will know.

Plus, I'm sick of this 'liberal' -- 'Conservative' bullshit.

It seems that everything that dimocraps want to claim as their own turns out to be a 'liberal' idea. WTF's up with that?

What's a liberal? Tell me that.....

Was Lenin a liberal? Was Stalin? He was a redistributionist, shouldn't that make him a liberal?

How about Pol Pot? Another redistributionist mass-murderer but it'll be a cold day in hell when dimocraps claim him as one of theirs.

Just like they walked away from Hitler after he invaded their pretend-Utopia and ally, the USSR.

Then there's the 'left' and the 'right' mis-identification dimocraps use all the time.

All it refers to is where certain political elements sat in the French Parliament (or whatever it was called) prior to the French Revolution.

Again, using dimocrap misidentification rules, who is 'left' and who is 'right'?

Seems like dimocraps always want to claim the good guys as one of their own while eschewing bad guys as 'right wing'..... Whatever the fuck that is.

After Hitler invaded his former Ally, the USSR (they were allies for the first 2 years of WWII) Stalin prevailed on the American Press to stop calling the Nazis what they were -- National Socialists because he felt it portrayed socialism in a bad light. He asked them to call the Nazis what they were NOT -- Fascists.

So the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM did exactly what Stalin wanted and started calling the National Socialists Fascists to appease him.

This is why I call dimocraps what they are -- dimocraps.

They're not 'left' and they're not 'liberal'. They're scum-sucking radicals -- dimocraps.

EVERYTHING dimocraps do is based on a lie. Everything.

Even their speech is based on lies.

 

[bripat9643]

freedom.

Policy? lol

Freedom is a policy.

Sure it is Buba, sure

And you "believe in" the BS Ayn Rand wrote too!

Your contempt for freedom is duly noted.

That just further demonstrates your contempt.

 

[Dad2three]

What makes the the Emancipation Proclamation "conservative"?

Our Founding Principles based on Natural Law.

dimocraps don't believe in Natural Law, dimocraps believe that only people make laws and not God.

Republicans believe that there are certain immutable, undeniable, unalienable Rights granted by the Creator; among those the Rights of Life, LIBERTY and the Pursuit of Happiness.

To hold people in Slavery is viewed by Conservatives as an affront to God, as abhorrent.

To hold people in slavery was viewed by dimocraps as perfectly legal (which it was at the time) and something they should be entitled to do. Man makes laws, not God

To dimocraps, might makes right. It's all they know. It's all they've ever known, it's all they ever will know.

Plus, I'm sick of this 'liberal' -- 'Conservative' bullshit.

It seems that everything that dimocraps want to claim as their own turns out to be a 'liberal' idea. WTF's up with that?

What's a liberal? Tell me that.....

Was Lenin a liberal? Was Stalin? He was a redistributionist, shouldn't that make him a liberal?

How about Pol Pot? Another redistributionist mass-murderer but it'll be a cold day in hell when dimocraps claim him as one of theirs.

Just like they walked away from Hitler after he invaded their pretend-Utopia and ally, the USSR.

Then there's the 'left' and the 'right' mis-identification dimocraps use all the time.

All it refers to is where certain political elements sat in the French Parliament (or whatever it was called) prior to the French Revolution.

Again, using dimocrap misidentification rules, who is 'left' and who is 'right'?

Seems like dimocraps always want to claim the good guys as one of their own while eschewing bad guys as 'right wing'..... Whatever the fuck that is.

After Hitler invaded his former Ally, the USSR (they were allies for the first 2 years of WWII) Stalin prevailed on the American Press to stop calling the Nazis what they were -- National Socialists because he felt it portrayed socialism in a bad light. He asked them to call the Nazis what they were NOT -- Fascists.

So the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM did exactly what Stalin wanted and started calling the National Socialists Fascists to appease him.

This is why I call dimocraps what they are -- dimocraps.

They're not 'left' and they're not 'liberal'. They're scum-sucking radicals -- dimocraps.

EVERYTHING dimocraps do is based on a lie. Everything.

Even their speech is based on lies.

To funny conflating party with ideology Bubba

"To hold people in Slavery is viewed by Conservatives as an affront to God, as abhorrent."



Sure Bubba, that's why the CONfederate States of AmeriKKKa, today's GOP base, hated it right? Aren't/weren't they heavily "Christian"? Must've been a liberal thing I guess ? lol


EVERYTHING you posit is nonsense, again

 

[Wry Catcher]

Open question to supporters of the OP:

What lie was the liberal cause to free the slaves based on?

What lie was the liberal cause to break away from Britain and start our country based on?

Lincoln said many times that he never intended to free the slaves, so that's a lie right there.

Also, 18th century liberals and modern liberals are two separate animals with no relation to each other.

You're really a fool, evidenced by parroting such crap as these statements, first without any evidence and then by failing to understand the essence of liberalism, alive in the 1700's as it is today.

The dichotomy that existed then, still exists today between conservatives and liberals, a simple concept even a simpleton like bripat might understand. The former resist change, and the latter welcome change; the former look backward, the latter look forward.

The significance of J. S. Mill's economic masterpiece, Principle of Political Economy, is no different than something Democrats argue for today, he maintained:

• workers should form unions and cooperatives to seek higher wages
• he opposed communism as a threat to individualism
• he believe laws were necessary to protect women and children
• he favored government intervention to remedy injustice
• he wanted taxes on inheritance and rent
• he wanted equal rights and education for women

JS Mill?

Quite dishonest in quoting a social liberal.

You really area a dishonest partisan jerk, and the truth of that is clear in this post. My response was to this comment by you, "Also, 18th century liberals and modern liberals are two separate animals with no relation to each other".

Notwithstanding your use of the word, socialist, a pejorative in todays parlance, each bullet point mirrors facts supported by most liberals today, and rejected by the Crazy Right Wing.

Even George Will, with a slip of the tongue, agrees with some of them.

George Will s Firing Offense at Fox Paul Abrams

 

[Wry Catcher]

What makes the the Emancipation Proclamation "conservative"?

Our Founding Principles based on Natural Law.

dimocraps don't believe in Natural Law, dimocraps believe that only people make laws and not God.

Republicans believe that there are certain immutable, undeniable, unalienable Rights granted by the Creator; among those the Rights of Life, LIBERTY and the Pursuit of Happiness.

To hold people in Slavery is viewed by Conservatives as an affront to God, as abhorrent.

To hold people in slavery was viewed by dimocraps as perfectly legal (which it was at the time) and something they should be entitled to do. Man makes laws, not God

To dimocraps, might makes right. It's all they know. It's all they've ever known, it's all they ever will know.

Plus, I'm sick of this 'liberal' -- 'Conservative' bullshit.

It seems that everything that dimocraps want to claim as their own turns out to be a 'liberal' idea. WTF's up with that?

What's a liberal? Tell me that.....

Was Lenin a liberal? Was Stalin? He was a redistributionist, shouldn't that make him a liberal?

How about Pol Pot? Another redistributionist mass-murderer but it'll be a cold day in hell when dimocraps claim him as one of theirs.

Just like they walked away from Hitler after he invaded their pretend-Utopia and ally, the USSR.

Then there's the 'left' and the 'right' mis-identification dimocraps use all the time.

All it refers to is where certain political elements sat in the French Parliament (or whatever it was called) prior to the French Revolution.

Again, using dimocrap misidentification rules, who is 'left' and who is 'right'?

Seems like dimocraps always want to claim the good guys as one of their own while eschewing bad guys as 'right wing'..... Whatever the fuck that is.

After Hitler invaded his former Ally, the USSR (they were allies for the first 2 years of WWII) Stalin prevailed on the American Press to stop calling the Nazis what they were -- National Socialists because he felt it portrayed socialism in a bad light. He asked them to call the Nazis what they were NOT -- Fascists.

So the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM did exactly what Stalin wanted and started calling the National Socialists Fascists to appease him.

This is why I call dimocraps what they are -- dimocraps.

They're not 'left' and they're not 'liberal'. They're scum-sucking radicals -- dimocraps.

EVERYTHING dimocraps do is based on a lie. Everything.

Even their speech is based on lies.

Are the Ten Commandments the word of GOD?