False Flag Expert Debunks 911 Arab Myth

[eots]

Can you show me another building that stood beside 2 110-story towers that were hit with airplanes causing them to collapse unto themselves?

And can you show me a building that was half as tall as the twin towers that were demolished with charges planted over a weekend by very few people - which is the theory of the conspiracists - even though large buildings that are demolished take many weeks to plant explosives and done so by hundreds of people?

So you answer a question with a question ............. typical.

And you do not answer the question.

Here was the process to destroy the world's largest building to be demolished at the time.

CDI’s 12 person loading crew took twenty four days to place 4,118 separate charges in 1,100 locations on columns on nine levels of the complex. Over 36,000 ft of detonating cord and 4,512 non-electric delay elements were installed in CDI’s implosion initiation system, some to create the 36 primary implosion sequence and another 216 micro-delays to keep down the detonation overpressure from the 2,728 lb of explosives which would be detonated during the demolition.

Controlled Demolition, Inc. | Buildings

Yet, supposedly, over a weekend, a group of people nobody saw went in and planted enough charges to destroy two of the largest free standing structures in the world.

no one said it was over a weekend ...but you..and we do not know if standered demolition techniques where used..this is why a real and fact driven investigation is required

 

[eots]

beijing Skyscraper Fire: The Silence Is Deafening

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, February 12, 2009



Three days after a towering inferno engulfed a 500 foot skyscraper in Beijing, debunkers have failed to come up with any answers as to why the building remained standing in comparison with WTC 7, which suffered a uniform 7 second implosion as a result of limited fires spread across just 8 floors on 9/11.

Beijing’s Mandarin Oriental hotel defied all known physics on Monday when it was consumed by fires but did not collapse, a modern day miracle in light of the commonly accepted premise that since 9/11, all steel buildings that suffer even limited fire damage implode in on their own footprint within seconds.

http://www.infowars.com/beijing-skyscraper-fire-the-silence-is-deafening/

 

[DiveCon]

beijing Skyscraper Fire: The Silence Is Deafening

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, February 12, 2009



Three days after a towering inferno engulfed a 500 foot skyscraper in Beijing, debunkers have failed to come up with any answers as to why the building remained standing in comparison with WTC 7, which suffered a uniform 7 second implosion as a result of limited fires spread across just 8 floors on 9/11.

Beijing’s Mandarin Oriental hotel defied all known physics on Monday when it was consumed by fires but did not collapse, a modern day miracle in light of the commonly accepted premise that since 9/11, all steel buildings that suffer even limited fire damage implode in on their own footprint within seconds.

Beijing Skyscraper Fire: The Silence Is Deafening

again, WTC7's collapse wasnt JUST FROM THE FIRES


btw, why dont you EVER use a legit source for your stories, its always Alex Jones BULLSHIT

 

[elvis]

beijing Skyscraper Fire: The Silence Is Deafening

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, February 12, 2009



Three days after a towering inferno engulfed a 500 foot skyscraper in Beijing, debunkers have failed to come up with any answers as to why the building remained standing in comparison with WTC 7, which suffered a uniform 7 second implosion as a result of limited fires spread across just 8 floors on 9/11.

Beijing’s Mandarin Oriental hotel defied all known physics on Monday when it was consumed by fires but did not collapse, a modern day miracle in light of the commonly accepted premise that since 9/11, all steel buildings that suffer even limited fire damage implode in on their own footprint within seconds.

Beijing Skyscraper Fire: The Silence Is Deafening

again, WTC7's collapse wasnt JUST FROM THE FIRES

yeah a 110 story building collapses and damages WTC7, but that's not significant at all.

 

[DiveCon]

Fire rages at Beijing luxury hotel after fireworks

the building wasnt even finished

 

[DiveCon]

Mandarin Oriental Hotel Beijing

 

[DiveCon]

beijing Skyscraper Fire: The Silence Is Deafening

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, February 12, 2009



Three days after a towering inferno engulfed a 500 foot skyscraper in Beijing, debunkers have failed to come up with any answers as to why the building remained standing in comparison with WTC 7, which suffered a uniform 7 second implosion as a result of limited fires spread across just 8 floors on 9/11.

Beijing’s Mandarin Oriental hotel defied all known physics on Monday when it was consumed by fires but did not collapse, a modern day miracle in light of the commonly accepted premise that since 9/11, all steel buildings that suffer even limited fire damage implode in on their own footprint within seconds.

Beijing Skyscraper Fire: The Silence Is Deafening

again, WTC7's collapse wasnt JUST FROM THE FIRES

yeah a 110 story building collapses and damages WTC7, but that's not significant at all.

yeah, a 110 story building falls over and into a 47 story building and that isnt supposed to do any damage
yet when they rebuilt WTC7 they made it taller and completely different in construction, but that had NOTHING to do with the reasons it fell in the first place

 

[eots]

again, WTC7's collapse wasnt JUST FROM THE FIRES

yeah a 110 story building collapses and damages WTC7, but that's not significant at all.

yeah, a 110 story building falls over and into a 47 story building and that isnt supposed to do any damage
yet when they rebuilt WTC7 they made it taller and completely different in construction, but that had NOTHING to do with the reasons it fell in the first place

why did the building not take the path of least Resistance and fall in the direction of the damaged section...how could it fall in 8 secs..how did every single truss give way at the exact same moment Even tho fires and damage where inconsitent...the towers and wtc where not of the same construction..yet they all suffered the same result

 

[elvis]

yeah a 110 story building collapses and damages WTC7, but that's not significant at all.

yeah, a 110 story building falls over and into a 47 story building and that isnt supposed to do any damage
yet when they rebuilt WTC7 they made it taller and completely different in construction, but that had NOTHING to do with the reasons it fell in the first place

why did the building not take the path of least Resistance and fall in the direction of the damaged section...how could it fall in 8 secs..how did every single truss give way at the exact same moment Even tho fires and damage where inconsitent...the towers and wtc where not of the same construction..yet they all suffered the same result

go to a physics message board. they will explain it to you. They explained it to me. it wasnt a controlled demolition.

 

[DiveCon]

yeah a 110 story building collapses and damages WTC7, but that's not significant at all.

yeah, a 110 story building falls over and into a 47 story building and that isnt supposed to do any damage
yet when they rebuilt WTC7 they made it taller and completely different in construction, but that had NOTHING to do with the reasons it fell in the first place

why did the building not take the path of least Resistance and fall in the direction of the damaged section...how could it fall in 8 secs..how did every single truss give way at the exact same moment Even tho fires and damage where inconsitent...the towers and wtc where not of the same construction..yet they all suffered the same result

it DID take the path of least resistance
it did NOT fall straight down like Alex Jones keeps saying
how many times do you have to be told to stop listening to that fucking liar

 

[DiveCon]

yeah, a 110 story building falls over and into a 47 story building and that isnt supposed to do any damage
yet when they rebuilt WTC7 they made it taller and completely different in construction, but that had NOTHING to do with the reasons it fell in the first place

why did the building not take the path of least Resistance and fall in the direction of the damaged section...how could it fall in 8 secs..how did every single truss give way at the exact same moment Even tho fires and damage where inconsitent...the towers and wtc where not of the same construction..yet they all suffered the same result

go to a physics message board. they will explain it to you. They explained it to me. it wasnt a controlled demolition.

no no no

they are all in on it

 

[elvis]

yeah, a 110 story building falls over and into a 47 story building and that isnt supposed to do any damage
yet when they rebuilt WTC7 they made it taller and completely different in construction, but that had NOTHING to do with the reasons it fell in the first place

why did the building not take the path of least Resistance and fall in the direction of the damaged section...how could it fall in 8 secs..how did every single truss give way at the exact same moment Even tho fires and damage where inconsitent...the towers and wtc where not of the same construction..yet they all suffered the same result

it DID take the path of least resistance
it did NOT fall straight down like Alex Jones keeps saying
how many times do you have to be told to stop listening to that fucking liar

In a demolition, there would have been a MOUND of debris. It wouldn't have travelled the several blocks down the street the way it did. David Ray Griffin is an expert in THEOLOGY. I am not going to take his word over and expert in STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING when it comes to how the towers collapsed.

 

[DiveCon]

why did the building not take the path of least Resistance and fall in the direction of the damaged section...how could it fall in 8 secs..how did every single truss give way at the exact same moment Even tho fires and damage where inconsitent...the towers and wtc where not of the same construction..yet they all suffered the same result

it DID take the path of least resistance
it did NOT fall straight down like Alex Jones keeps saying
how many times do you have to be told to stop listening to that fucking liar

In a demolition, there would have been a MOUND of debris. It wouldn't have travelled the several blocks down the street the way it did. David Ray Griffin is an expert in THEOLOGY. I am not going to take his word over and expert in STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING when it comes to how the towers collapsed.

oh, i know
it fell over into WTC6 and the streets all around it
and that is proven by the fact the south face is ON TOP of the pile

 

[elvis]

it DID take the path of least resistance
it did NOT fall straight down like Alex Jones keeps saying
how many times do you have to be told to stop listening to that fucking liar

In a demolition, there would have been a MOUND of debris. It wouldn't have travelled the several blocks down the street the way it did. David Ray Griffin is an expert in THEOLOGY. I am not going to take his word over and expert in STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING when it comes to how the towers collapsed.

oh, i know
it fell over into WTC6 and the streets all around it
and that is proven by the fact the south face is ON TOP of the pile

I must be getting tired. I thought I had quoted eots, sorry.

 

[DiveCon]

In a demolition, there would have been a MOUND of debris. It wouldn't have travelled the several blocks down the street the way it did. David Ray Griffin is an expert in THEOLOGY. I am not going to take his word over and expert in STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING when it comes to how the towers collapsed.

oh, i know
it fell over into WTC6 and the streets all around it
and that is proven by the fact the south face is ON TOP of the pile

I must be getting tired. I thought I had quoted eots, sorry.

no prob

 

[eots]

yeah, a 110 story building falls over and into a 47 story building and that isnt supposed to do any damage
yet when they rebuilt WTC7 they made it taller and completely different in construction, but that had NOTHING to do with the reasons it fell in the first place

why did the building not take the path of least Resistance and fall in the direction of the damaged section...how could it fall in 8 secs..how did every single truss give way at the exact same moment Even tho fires and damage where inconsitent...the towers and wtc where not of the same construction..yet they all suffered the same result

it DID take the path of least resistance
it did NOT fall straight down like Alex Jones keeps saying
how many times do you have to be told to stop listening to that fucking liar

you say Alex Jones even tho you know that is not the case .../the buildings indeed did fall all but straight down within seconeds...all this can be seen..no one has to tell you


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A]YouTube - wtc 7 collapse[/ame]




[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ&feature=related]YouTube - WTC7 - Incriminating evidence[/ame]

squibs
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmDGe-w60jk[/ame]




[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmL9F-TSIes&NR=1]YouTube - 9/11 Building 7 Close Up[/ame]

 

[DiveCon]

they did not you moron
that video is but ONE angle
and you can even tell it is falling AWAY from the camera

 

[elvis]

why did the building not take the path of least Resistance and fall in the direction of the damaged section...how could it fall in 8 secs..how did every single truss give way at the exact same moment Even tho fires and damage where inconsitent...the towers and wtc where not of the same construction..yet they all suffered the same result

it DID take the path of least resistance
it did NOT fall straight down like Alex Jones keeps saying
how many times do you have to be told to stop listening to that fucking liar

you say Alex Jones even tho you know that is not the case .../the buildings indeed did fall all but straight down within seconeds...all this can be seen..no one has to tell you


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A]YouTube - wtc 7 collapse[/ame]




[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwjmqkjwnvQ&feature=related]YouTube - WTC7 - Incriminating evidence[/ame]



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ul3Eia4jPCM]YouTube - WTC7 Squibs[/ame]



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmL9F-TSIes&NR=1]YouTube - 9/11 Building 7 Close Up[/ame]

straight down? is that why there were blocks of debris instead of a MOUND?

 

[eots]

they did not you moron
that video is but ONE angle
and you can even tell it is falling AWAY from the camera

it falls slightly in one direction not uncommon in a controlled demolition ..it does not however fall slightly toward the damaged area..so that is really no answer...

 

[DiveCon]

they did not you moron
that video is but ONE angle
and you can even tell it is falling AWAY from the camera

it falls slightly in one direction not uncommon in a controlled demolition ..it does not however fall slightly toward the damaged area..so that is really no answer...

you are NUTS
it fell over completely in the direction of the damage