candycorn
Diamond Member
I enjoy you being miserable.Enjoy it while you can, dumbass.
You can tell your grandkids about it
I have lotsa fun.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I enjoy you being miserable.Enjoy it while you can, dumbass.
You can tell your grandkids about it
It was a legal search, authorized by a magistrate judge, for the purpose of recovering classified information stolen by Trump. Information the government had previously tried to recover on two occasions but was concealed from them.On Monday, August 8, 2022, the Biden FBI-DOJ raided President Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago and rifled through his home and belongings for 9 hours. The FBI even ransacked 16-year-old Barron Trump’s room and First Lady Melania Trump’s closet.
What full thread? All I read is a few tweets, asserting stuff without backing. So let's look into it.
Catagorically false. The hearing for that appointment was on Thursday, NOT the day after the raid. This is what the judge said.
With regard to the injury factor, the Government contends that the timing of the Motion— filed two weeks after the subject seizure occurred—“militates against a finding of irreparable harm” [ECF No. 48 p. 20 (quoting Wreal, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., 840 F.3d 1244, 1248 (11th Cir. 2016))]. The Court disagrees. As the Government acknowledges, denials of injunctive relief based on a party’s delay usually arise in the context of considerably longer periods of time than the fourteen-day span implicated here.
While Plaintiff perhaps did not act as promptly as he could have, the twoweek delay
There were litterally thousands of pages seized that he took from the White House all in the scope of the original subpoena. They were intermingled with other material which can show that they were handled carelessly putting them squarely in the scope of the the subpoena. Don't take my word for it.
Listen to what Barr says at 1.40
The only thing unprecedented about it is the target. And Trump already got "special considerations" You try to hold on to special access material in your own home. I promise you you will not be asked politely to give them back. Followed by a subpoena that you ignore. As for standing. I find it a hard sell to claim you have the standing to claim executive privilege when you are no longer the executive. So by the way is the judge skeptical.
Plaintiff ultimately may not be entitled to return of much of the seized property or to prevail on his anticipated claims of privilege.
Sure and they were subsequently given back by the investigative team. Blowing the whole argument for the need for a special master out of the water since it shows the investigative team playing it above board.
NONE of this, by the way, answers the premise of the post you replied to.
The warrant was a freaking bill of attainder! We fought a revolutionary war over bullshit like this!It was a legal search, authorized by a magistrate judge, for the purpose of recovering classified information stolen by Trump. Information the government had previously tried to recover on two occasions but was concealed from them.
What else you got?
Get back to me when you can make a reality based argument.The warrant was a freaking bill of attainder! We fought a revolutionary war over bullshit like this!
Say that looking into a mirror.Get back to me when you can make a reality based argument.
We fought a revolutionary war over bullshit like this!
Do you know why Trump's attorneys are not challenging the legality of the search in court?Say that looking into a mirror.
That doesn't say WH ordered jackshit...They lied.
On Monday, August 8, 2022, the Biden FBI-DOJ raided President Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago and rifled through his home and belongings for 9 hours. The FBI even ransacked 16-year-old Barron Trump’s room and First Lady Melania Trump’s closet.
The following day White House Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre told reporters that the Biden White House learned of the raid in the news.
Jean Pierre insisted that the President was not briefed on the raid.
Published September 5, 2022
BOOM! Federal Judge Reveals Incumbent President Joe Biden Ordered FBI Access to Mar-a-Lago Documents | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
They lied.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Cause they found documents belonging to the US people...Do you know why Trump's attorneys are not challenging the legality of the search in court?
Lawyer is going to be in a little bit of trouble.Cause they found documents belonging to the US people...
It is that simple, Trump had property belonging to someone else...
His lawyer said that he gave all it back, they didn't and they had tapes to prove it...
They had there property, they saw it on security tapes... What more proof would you like?
You're preaching to the choir.Cause they found documents belonging to the US people...
It is that simple, Trump had property belonging to someone else...
His lawyer said that he gave all it back, they didn't and they had tapes to prove it...
They had there property, they saw it on security tapes... What more proof would you like?
They lied.
On Monday, August 8, 2022, the Biden FBI-DOJ raided President Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago and rifled through his home and belongings for 9 hours. The FBI even ransacked 16-year-old Barron Trump’s room and First Lady Melania Trump’s closet.
The following day White House Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre told reporters that the Biden White House learned of the raid in the news.
Jean Pierre insisted that the President was not briefed on the raid.
Published September 5, 2022
BOOM! Federal Judge Reveals Incumbent President Joe Biden Ordered FBI Access to Mar-a-Lago Documents | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
They lied.www.thegatewaypundit.com
To recap:
Page #2 and Page #3 of Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling cites a quote from the DOJ own legal filing, dated May 10th, that Joe Biden ordered the National Archives and Records Administration to provide access to the FBI to review the Trump records. Note the quotation marks:
On May 10, 2022, NARA informed Plaintiff that it would proceed with “provid[ing] the FBI access to the records in question, as requested by the incumbent President, beginning as early as Thursday, May 12, 2022.”
Oops ! Biden not only knew about the RAID on Donald Trump’s home — he ordered it.
August 24, 2022, Joe Biden was questioned about how much notice he had regarding the FBI raid on President Trump’s home at Mar-a-Lago in Florida.
Question: “Mr. President, how much advanced notice did you have of the FBI’s plan to search Mar-a-Lago?“
BIDEN: “I didn’t have any advanced notice. None, zero, not one single bit.”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
CASE NO. 22-81294-CIV-CANNON
It was a search warrant not a conviction in court...The warrant was a freaking bill of attainder! We fought a revolutionary war over bullshit like this!
So, what are you waiting for?
Get off your ass and do something about it other than whining on the internet
I ran one down the other day and disproved their claim. They suck.they list the sources for their fact check, so you could check those sources if you dont trust them.
Politifact - Bias and Credibility
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wordingmediabiasfactcheck.com
yes, slightly biased. But highly factual.
They weren’t mixed in, the corrupt FBI just took everything.The judge who granted the motion for a Special Master did not agree with the argument that Trump didn't have standing to request one or that the risk of a special master revealing classified information outweighed the need for someone to sort through the random boxes of mixed up crap to protect Trump in spite of himself. If they weren't random boxes of poorly maintained records, there would be no need for a special master to begin with because birth certificates, passports medical records, and highly classified papers wouldn't have been mixed together to begin with. This is Trump's political Waterloo.
Why would I rely on anyone's opinion? I have access to the actual court documents. I can read for myself what they say. I don't need someone else to tell me what THEY think those documents mean!