Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,947
- 9,980
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I love how Liberals accuse others of what THEY are doing.
Yeah, especially in this thread. . .
Should Blacks trust the system that guns a 12 year old black kid in the park and the prosecutor says "its all good"...,
they are white men and carry guns ?...a no brainer...like teddyyearp hisself.......Why should the occupiers be given free land?
only white men are victimized by "an oppressive tyrannical Government" ...woooo hoooooooShould Blacks trust the system that guns a 12 year old black kid in the park and the prosecutor says "its all good"...,
Dude, really, get rid of your black and white tv, your crap is getting OLD!
And where did I indicate that they 'fired first' in my post? You were saying about 'assumptions'?
I see your game. I'm done playing.Shots fired at law enforcement officers,
And where did I indicate that they 'fired first' in my post? You were saying about 'assumptions'?
Ok, you conveniently ignored my quote of your post @ #243.
I see your game. I'm done playing.Shots fired at law enforcement officers,
Can you answer my question?
Why should the occupiers be given free land?
Can you answer my question?
Why should the occupiers be given free land?
Great Question. Our history is built upon the foundation of TAKING land from occupiers. 'You want it? Take it. Those with the most guns / force - the government - gets to keep it.'
'Manifest Destiny' - 'I want the land you are own, so I am going to take it, even if I have to kill you for it.'
You buy a house. You 'own' the house. You 'occupy' the house. The government shows up and says they can make more money with the property than you provide as a home-owner or they need to put a freeway in, 'we're taking your land - here's a 'few bucks' (the value of your house as THEY see it) - get out.'
Claiming ownership or seizing land as your own and claiming it is yours when you are not the government is down-right un-American.![]()
You just gave a description of one of the major ways Trump has made money over the years. He is a master at getting the government to inflict eminent domain to steal property.Can you answer my question?
Why should the occupiers be given free land?
Great Question. Our history is built upon the foundation of TAKING land from occupiers. 'You want it? Take it. Those with the most guns / force - the government - gets to keep it.'
'Manifest Destiny' - 'I want the land you are own, so I am going to take it, even if I have to kill you for it.'
You buy a house. You 'own' the house. You 'occupy' the house. The government shows up and says they can make more money with the property than you provide as a home-owner or they need to put a freeway in, 'we're taking your land - here's a 'few bucks' (the value of your house as THEY see it) - get out.'
Claiming ownership or seizing land as your own and claiming it is yours when you are not the government is down-right un-American.![]()
Witnesses often have their own agenda...remember the witnesses in the Michael Brown case.
1. Bundy called for the remaining militia members to go home. As we have seen already with this shooting things can only end badly.
2. Funny how you emphasize smoking weed; yet, it was you liberals who fought so hard to make it legal.
3. 'WAITING' to die...like Finicum died during a 'routine' traffic stop? Are you implying if they remain they will be killed or that if they remain, put up resistance - attempt to fight - they will be killed? Big difference.
'Sucker's Bet' - you lose. I am not a 'Trump' guy.If you really believed that, you would not vote for Drumpf and yet, my bet is that you will/would.
How can you 'steal' public property? You can occupy it. You can use it. How can you 'steal' it?
The Bundys, for example, were raising cattle on public lands their family had used for about 100 years. The land was still there. It wasn't 'stolen'. Then a millionaire Democrats got the opportunity to make a lot of money using that same public land .He tried to make the rancher leave - he wouldn't. So he called in the 'Militant Enforcement Division' of the Bureau of Land Management. They came in, aimed sniper rifles at the heads of the rancher's wife and kids, STOLE about 100 head of his cows and slaughtered them in an attempt to intimidate and force the rancher off the land.
Last I checked, the DOJ is responsible for stepping in and handling criminal acts, breaking the law, NOT the Bureau of land management. If the rancher was breaking the law the DOJ should have had him arrested, NOT allow the BLM to aim sniper rifles at unarmed women and children or steal and slaughter a man's cows. In this case I would argue that the BLM was just as much in violation of the law, if not more so, than the rancher.
'Sucker's Bet' - you lose. I am not a 'Trump' guy.If you really believed that, you would not vote for Drumpf and yet, my bet is that you will/would.
How can you 'steal' public property? You can occupy it. You can use it. How can you 'steal' it?
The Bundys, for example, were raising cattle on public lands their family had used for about 100 years. The land was still there. It wasn't 'stolen'. Then a millionaire Democrats got the opportunity to make a lot of money using that same public land .He tried to make the rancher leave - he wouldn't. So he called in the 'Militant Enforcement Division' of the Bureau of Land Management. They came in, aimed sniper rifles at the heads of the rancher's wife and kids, STOLE about 100 head of his cows and slaughtered them in an attempt to intimidate and force the rancher off the land.
Last I checked, the DOJ is responsible for stepping in and handling criminal acts, breaking the law, NOT the Bureau of land management. If the rancher was breaking the law the DOJ should have had him arrested, NOT allow the BLM to aim sniper rifles at unarmed women and children or steal and slaughter a man's cows. In this case I would argue that the BLM was just as much in violation of the law, if not more so, than the rancher.
The moron was criminal. He tried to escape from law enforcement. He told law enforcement to fuck off. He tried to intimidate law enforcement. He tried to take over government buildings and land. He was anti-American. He got what he deserved. The rest should got to prison for aiding a terrorist.I have no fkn idea and neither did the non eyewitness.no video , that is a lie.“He was not on his knees, none of that,” McConnell said. “He was none of that nonsense. You know, that was a miscommunication on somebody else’s part. But he went after them. He charged them. You know, LaVoy was very passionate about what he was doing up here.”
Finicum claimed early on during the occupation that he was willing to die for his interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.
By 'miscommunication', I think they mean "What? They have a fucking video?! Oh, well then all that shit we made up, forget it. Okay?'
HE CHARGED THE OFFICERS! You think he left his rifle in the car? The video is on Facebook somewhere. I have noT found it. LIAR!
The dude was driving and he jumped out of the car according to someone, not the guy being interviewed, but someone. Let's see he left the car in gear and made sure he got back in the car after jumping out to get a rifle that no one said was in the vehicle.
Does your family claim the land as their own?My family has been on US land for a few hundred years too. Should I be given free land?