Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm conservative and I see no problem with making college free ONLY if universities are FORCED to curb costs.
Fully agree.......Not only forced to curb costs, but also to rid themselves of the sports (and make them a private not an educational enterprise which turns out to be a farce,) eliminate tenure which has many professors earning $150K to teach ONE class or even none, etc.
Is the payout for a degree worth the government funding it? We all talk about the guy who got a degree and is making a lot of money but not all degrees are equal. Why should the government loan someone money for a degree in philosophy or another degree that doesn't have the same payout as a degree in chemistry. It just seems that kids who get degrees in history are getting screwed because they won't be getting a job good enough to pay off ther loan comfortably.
Is the payout for a degree worth the government funding it? We all talk about the guy who got a degree and is making a lot of money but not all degrees are equal. Why should the government loan someone money for a degree in philosophy or another degree that doesn't have the same payout as a degree in chemistry. It just seems that kids who get degrees in history are getting screwed because they won't be getting a job good enough to pay off ther loan comfortably.
Too funny. Look to your base.
Actually, take a look a YOUR base and their caliber of intelligence
View attachment 46998
I don't see the problem with making college football the only sport to have on campus, and I hate football so I'm not being biased. Football is not just for the university, but it's good business for the city and that needs to be taken into account. I agree about eliminating tenure.
I don't see the problem with making college football the only sport to have on campus, and I hate football so I'm not being biased. Football is not just for the university, but it's good business for the city and that needs to be taken into account. I agree about eliminating tenure.
Again, agreed....Actually, I fully know that sports are great revenue for some universities.....but just as often they're not and an actual drain (to please some alumni) on the institution's budget.....Make sports a SEPARATE enterprise from the academics.
I have. I'll match the middle working class with your inner city imbeciles any day of the week.
As expected, some right wingers on this forum are ridiculing Sanders' call for free college tuition......Of course, the low intelligence of some right wingers is legendary and, as usual, they mistake the term "free" as just another socialistic "give-away."
First, right wingers should realize that throughout the civilized world, college tuition IS free (except for books and lodging expenses.) Haw can the rest of the world do this? Simple, first one has to determine if free tuition is an investment in the most precious resource a country has....and that is a better economic future through educating its youth.
Second, YES tuition would be paid through an increase in state taxation; after all, most universities are sitting on land grants and universities' charter clearly spell out that they exist for the be betterment of the community, along with the need for both teaching and research.
Third, (and this is something that conservatives SHOULD like if they exercised their brain cells a bit more); that is, tenure for professors may be soon a thing of the past.....part-time/adjunct faculty is on the rise, and THAT should drastically cut down on the very expensive staffing of colleges and universities. The cost of a tenured professor's teaching of 2 or 3 classes could translate to the hiring of 5 part-timers to teach about 15 or so classes.
Fourth, tuition could also be drastically reduced if universities get off their insane quest for college sports. Coaches in such institutions make an average of 3 times the salary of the institution's president or provost. This insanity causes tuitions to be raised for ALL other students to basically subsidize jocks and the athletic staff.
Finally, free tuition should be granted FIRST to students who major in fields that can readily benefit all of the taxed society....Need more doctors? Offer free tuition at medical schools; Need more information technology graduates? the same applies; Need more engineers? Same........
Free tuition must have the caveats of a student's high grades, discipline at matriculation, completion and commitment to pay back to the society that subsidized (and invested in) such free tuition.
I would say the sports need to be city funded. However, if a student wants to play for that university they need to abide by academic requirements.
I would say the sports need to be city funded. However, if a student wants to play for that university they need to abide by academic requirements.
Although I agree in theory, let me relay a quick anecdote from a colleague who in one of his lectures he tangentially mentioned Sigmund Freud and, the jock that was in attendance said (with all seriousness), "Oh, you mean those guys in Vegas with the white tigers?"
What I mean is that recruiters could not care LESS is a high school jock even knows how to spell "jock".
Link?As expected, some right wingers on this forum are ridiculing Sanders' call for free college tuition......Of course, the low intelligence of some right wingers is legendary and, as usual, they mistake the term "free" as just another socialistic "give-away."
First, right wingers should realize that throughout the civilized world, college tuition IS free (except for books and lodging expenses.) Haw can the rest of the world do this? Simple, first one has to determine if free tuition is an investment in the most precious resource a country has....and that is a better economic future through educating its youth.
Second, YES tuition would be paid through an increase in state taxation; after all, most universities are sitting on land grants and universities' charter clearly spell out that they exist for the be betterment of the community, along with the need for both teaching and research.
Third, (and this is something that conservatives SHOULD like if they exercised their brain cells a bit more); that is, tenure for professors may be soon a thing of the past.....part-time/adjunct faculty is on the rise, and THAT should drastically cut down on the very expensive staffing of colleges and universities. The cost of a tenured professor's teaching of 2 or 3 classes could translate to the hiring of 5 part-timers to teach about 15 or so classes.
Fourth, tuition could also be drastically reduced if universities get off their insane quest for college sports. Coaches in such institutions make an average of 3 times the salary of the institution's president or provost. This insanity causes tuitions to be raised for ALL other students to basically subsidize jocks and the athletic staff.
Finally, free tuition should be granted FIRST to students who major in fields that can readily benefit all of the taxed society....Need more doctors? Offer free tuition at medical schools; Need more information technology graduates? the same applies; Need more engineers? Same........
Free tuition must have the caveats of a student's high grades, discipline at matriculation, completion and commitment to pay back to the society that subsidized (and invested in) such free tuition.
First, right wingers should realize that throughout the civilized world, college tuition IS free
Well, if we only let the top 10% of H.S. graduates go to college, we could be more like the rest of the world.
Of course with mostly white and Asian college students, liberal's tiny heads would explode.
No more affirmative action students actually sounds like a good idea.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that student athletes need to be held to a higher standard of academics if they want to STAY on the team.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that student athletes need to be held to a higher standard of academics if they want to STAY on the team.
I know, I know that you mean well on this...Yet the reality is that if a jock can run like the wind and tackle like a truck......NO coach would ever expect him to really comprehend chemistry.
I'm conservative and I see no problem with making college free ONLY if universities are FORCED to curb costs.
Fully agree.......Not only forced to curb costs, but also to rid themselves of the sports.....
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that student athletes need to be held to a higher standard of academics if they want to STAY on the team.
I know, I know that you mean well on this...Yet the reality is that if a jock can run like the wind and tackle like a truck......NO coach would ever expect him to really comprehend chemistry.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that student athletes need to be held to a higher standard of academics if they want to STAY on the team.
I know, I know that you mean well on this...Yet the reality is that if a jock can run like the wind and tackle like a truck......NO coach would ever expect him to really comprehend chemistry.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that student athletes need to be held to a higher standard of academics if they want to STAY on the team.
I know, I know that you mean well on this...Yet the reality is that if a jock can run like the wind and tackle like a truck......NO coach would ever expect him to really comprehend chemistry.That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that student athletes need to be held to a higher standard of academics if they want to STAY on the team.
I know, I know that you mean well on this...Yet the reality is that if a jock can run like the wind and tackle like a truck......NO coach would ever expect him to really comprehend chemistry.
You should take this inferiority complex up with your shrink.
As expected, some right wingers on this forum are ridiculing Sanders' call for free college tuition......Of course, the low intelligence of some right wingers is legendary and, as usual, they mistake the term "free" as just another socialistic "give-away."
First, right wingers should realize that throughout the civilized world, college tuition IS free (except for books and lodging expenses.) Haw can the rest of the world do this? Simple, first one has to determine if free tuition is an investment in the most precious resource a country has....and that is a better economic future through educating its youth.
Second, YES tuition would be paid through an increase in state taxation; after all, most universities are sitting on land grants and universities' charter clearly spell out that they exist for the be betterment of the community, along with the need for both teaching and research.
Third, (and this is something that conservatives SHOULD like if they exercised their brain cells a bit more); that is, tenure for professors may be soon a thing of the past.....part-time/adjunct faculty is on the rise, and THAT should drastically cut down on the very expensive staffing of colleges and universities. The cost of a tenured professor's teaching of 2 or 3 classes could translate to the hiring of 5 part-timers to teach about 15 or so classes.
Fourth, tuition could also be drastically reduced if universities get off their insane quest for college sports. Coaches in such institutions make an average of 3 times the salary of the institution's president or provost. This insanity causes tuitions to be raised for ALL other students to basically subsidize jocks and the athletic staff.
Finally, free tuition should be granted FIRST to students who major in fields that can readily benefit all of the taxed society....Need more doctors? Offer free tuition at medical schools; Need more information technology graduates? the same applies; Need more engineers? Same........
Free tuition must have the caveats of a student's high grades, discipline at matriculation, completion and commitment to pay back to the society that subsidized (and invested in) such free tuition.