Gay love is not against the law.

Let me be completely clear here

The law should not- prevent Tipsy from having as much gay sex as he wants and is willing to pay for.

But I do think that the law should not allow Tipsy to cleave body parts from another man, unless he is a qualified surgeon or mohel.
I have certainly had sex with men. I have never had gay sex. I find the female body appalling. So gay sex never appealed to me.
Anyone else catch the self-hate in that comment?
No. As a man, I find the male body to be "ugly".

Nothing about it "turns me on".

Mark
 
Let me be completely clear here

The law should not- prevent Tipsy from having as much gay sex as he wants and is willing to pay for.

But I do think that the law should not allow Tipsy to cleave body parts from another man, unless he is a qualified surgeon or mohel.
I have certainly had sex with men. I have never had gay sex. I find the female body appalling. So gay sex never appealed to me.
Anyone else catch the self-hate in that comment?
No. As a man, I find the male body to be "ugly".

Nothing about it "turns me on".

Mark
Bodecea is a lesbian. That explains the comment. She finds the female body sexy and stimulating. Therefore all women must find the female body sexy and stimulating. If they don't they are self hating. It goes along with the line that all women are lesbians if they only gave it a chance.
 
Ca3KEJHW0AQtECR.png
 
Now this came right out of left field. Did you not like the topic and want to change the subject?
No ...you do not like the message of the post ...its not changing the subject...consensula murder is murder ...ask Doc Kevarkian ....in the cases of "bestiality, necrophilia, and pedophile"relations there is no ability for there to be consent .....conflating to gay is not logical.
 
I don't care about the message of the post. Is the message that cannibalism between consenting gay adults acceptable if they are married?

Dr Kevorkian had folks traveling long distances because their health condition made them seek death...in spite of that Kevorkian was convicted after long intense efforts by the authorities to convict him...consent to cannibalism is not valid consent in terms of the legal system...by the way cannibalism between heterosexuals would also not be acceptable...its not the gay or hetero nature of the encounter that is problematic its the murder aspect......
 
Let me be completely clear here

The law should not- prevent Tipsy from having as much gay sex as he wants and is willing to pay for.

But I do think that the law should not allow Tipsy to cleave body parts from another man, unless he is a qualified surgeon or mohel.
I have certainly had sex with men. I have never had gay sex. I find the female body appalling. So gay sex never appealed to me.
Anyone else catch the self-hate in that comment?
No. As a man, I find the male body to be "ugly".

Nothing about it "turns me on".

Mark
Bodecea is a lesbian. That explains the comment. She finds the female body sexy and stimulating. Therefore all women must find the female body sexy and stimulating. If they don't they are self hating. It goes along with the line that all women are lesbians if they only gave it a chance.
There is a wide wide difference between calling your own gender's body sexy and appalling. A very wide difference. Tipsy could have said that she doesn't find the female body sexy or stimulating....but she did not. She said the female body is "appalling"....a heavy dose of self-hate right there.
 
Now this came right out of left field. Did you not like the topic and want to change the subject?

Actually the topic is about assisted suicide and cannibalism. You are the one that brought gay love into it which has nothing to do with the subject of the article.
Both consenting parties are or were gay. It was the basis of their relationship. Do you have the right to insert yourself into their bedroom? It seems so.
 
what is being done is conflating the admittedly bizarre practice of cannibalism with being gay in order to hate on homosexuals ...hey there are any number of really weird practices involving heterosexual encounters....one of them is something called "crush sex" in which small animals are crushed by the sexual partners or something like that ...then there is Fifty Shades of Grey stuff ...
 
Now this came right out of left field. Did you not like the topic and want to change the subject?

Actually the topic is about assisted suicide and cannibalism. You are the one that brought gay love into it which has nothing to do with the subject of the article.
Both consenting parties are or were gay. It was the basis of their relationship. Do you have the right to insert yourself into their bedroom? It seems so.
It would be crowded with you already in there, don't you think?
 
Now this came right out of left field. Did you not like the topic and want to change the subject?

Actually the topic is about assisted suicide and cannibalism. You are the one that brought gay love into it which has nothing to do with the subject of the article.
Both consenting parties are or were gay. It was the basis of their relationship. Do you have the right to insert yourself into their bedroom? It seems so.

What does gay have ANYTHING to do with it? The german wasn't arrested because they were gay, he was arrested because of assisted suicide and cannibalism which have NOTHING to do with being gay. Let me ask you a question, if this was a straight couple that did this would your title of the thread be "straight love is not against the law"?
 
Let me be completely clear here

The law should not- prevent Tipsy from having as much gay sex as he wants and is willing to pay for.

But I do think that the law should not allow Tipsy to cleave body parts from another man, unless he is a qualified surgeon or mohel.
I have certainly had sex with men. I have never had gay sex. I find the female body appalling. So gay sex never appealed to me.
Anyone else catch the self-hate in that comment?
No. As a man, I find the male body to be "ugly".

Nothing about it "turns me on".

Mark
Bodecea is a lesbian. That explains the comment. She finds the female body sexy and stimulating. Therefore all women must find the female body sexy and stimulating. If they don't they are self hating. It goes along with the line that all women are lesbians if they only gave it a chance.
There is a wide wide difference between calling your own gender's body sexy and appalling. A very wide difference. Tipsy could have said that she doesn't find the female body sexy or stimulating....but she did not. She said the female body is "appalling"....a heavy dose of self-hate right there.
Only because you are a lesbian. The female body is attractive to you. There has to be something wrong with someone that finds the female body appallingly unattractive. I understand the thought processes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is what goes on in private bedrooms between consenting adults any of your business?
 
Now this came right out of left field. Did you not like the topic and want to change the subject?
No ...you do not like the message of the post ...its not changing the subject...consensula murder is murder ...ask Doc Kevarkian ....in the cases of "bestiality, necrophilia, and pedophile"relations there is no ability for there to be consent .....conflating to gay is not logical.

Bullshit. We kill and use animals everyday without their consent. As to consent of the young, we as a society sets an age of consent while nature tells us when we are ready to have sex when we reach puberty. So, "consent" of a "minor" is a human construct. If you agree with a limit, you are a bigot.

Its a big tent, welcome.

Mark
 
Now this came right out of left field. Did you not like the topic and want to change the subject?

Actually the topic is about assisted suicide and cannibalism. You are the one that brought gay love into it which has nothing to do with the subject of the article.
Both consenting parties are or were gay. It was the basis of their relationship. Do you have the right to insert yourself into their bedroom? It seems so.
It would be crowded with you already in there, don't you think?
I'm the one upholding the right of privacy between consenting adults.
 
Now this came right out of left field. Did you not like the topic and want to change the subject?

Actually the topic is about assisted suicide and cannibalism. You are the one that brought gay love into it which has nothing to do with the subject of the article.
Both consenting parties are or were gay. It was the basis of their relationship. Do you have the right to insert yourself into their bedroom? It seems so.
It would be crowded with you already in there, don't you think?
I'm the one upholding the right of privacy between consenting adults.

So you are FOR cannibalism and assisted suicide then correct? That would apply to any sexual orientation regardless if they were gay or straight.
 

Forum List

Back
Top