- Moderator
- #141
How about looking at it rationally instead of hysterically.
The OP article states this:
According to the articles link to the bill it is already against the law for doctors to do this, so that is one law in place
While Minnesota law makes it illegal for a doctor to perform FGM, current law says nothing on parents subjecting their girls to this practice. Franson’s bill would identify Female Genital Mutilation as child abuse.
I would think most in America would recognize FGM as child abuse...so is there a need for an extra law to state the obvious?
Where in the Quran is FGM mandated?
The OP article states this:
Franson’s efforts have been far from smooth sailing. When her bill first hit the floor in 2017, it faced tough questioning from several lawmakers – among them then-state legislator and current U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, who suggested Franson was using the bill as a bid for press attention.
"What I don't want us to do is to create laws because we want to get in the media,” Omar stated in a committee at the time. "What I would like to have been done is to have (the parents) charged with laws that already exist.”
Despite Omar's concerns, she and another 123 House members voted for the bill to pass on. Four other representatives did not. The bill fell flat in the Minnesota Senate.
"What I don't want us to do is to create laws because we want to get in the media,” Omar stated in a committee at the time. "What I would like to have been done is to have (the parents) charged with laws that already exist.”
Despite Omar's concerns, she and another 123 House members voted for the bill to pass on. Four other representatives did not. The bill fell flat in the Minnesota Senate.
According to the articles link to the bill it is already against the law for doctors to do this, so that is one law in place
While Minnesota law makes it illegal for a doctor to perform FGM, current law says nothing on parents subjecting their girls to this practice. Franson’s bill would identify Female Genital Mutilation as child abuse.
I would think most in America would recognize FGM as child abuse...so is there a need for an extra law to state the obvious?
She voted for the bill. DidNothing like cutting out a little girl's labia, cutting off her clitoris, cutting out the labia minor, then scrapping all the top layers of skin off, and destroying as many nerve endings as you can so that a woman can never enjoy sex once they are at the age of consent.
There are Muslim countries where 98% of women are forced to have this procedure and it has Zero Health Benefits.
There is nothing more degrading to women than Islam.
Welcome to the new Democrat Party.
And you wonder why OMAR is so angry.
Ok, so here is a question....at some point......there is a limit to what is permissible in religion. And I am all about religious freedom but running a little girls vagina through a Ronco vegematic is not an expression of religion. So how did the F'n Supreme Court decide the ban on it was Unconstitutional? I realize the Court has leaned Left for some time, but seriously?So we can't ban beheadings in America....cuz.....Cultural.Trust an anti-semite to claim that we have to allow female genital mutilation..which is not religious....because we allow circumcision. Way to toss the female babies out with the buckets of blood for the purpose of attacking a religious group.
It's not religious, but it is cultural, which is the same thing. Even people who read the same Bible, don't follows the same beliefs structure. What one Christian sect believes is often seen as blasphemy by another.
FGM has already been banned in the United States, asshats. It's also illegal under child endangerment laws. Additional laws isn't what is needed. Enforcement of existing laws will do the trick.
FGM is banned in only 28 states and it is federally banned for females under the age of 18, otherwise, it is legal. The federal ban in 1996 was ruled unconstitutional.
Where in the Quran is FGM mandated?