Get used to Robert Mueller. He's not going away!

[iceberg]

not from lack of effort.

do you really want the links? maxine, threats against the president for his life, people wanting him out of the country.

do you REALLY want me to link you up there?

people are after that for an *if* cause they want that *if* to be true so they can validate their emo. rational people can wait until investigations are over, warranted or not.

People running their mouths, mostly on Twitter and social media (then there's Maxine--what can anyone say). That's a far cry from it actually happening.

i didn't say it was. i said people were trying hard to make it happen. people in our own government. they cater to a base of people obviously who feel this way.

obviously it has NOT happened but again - not from lack of effort.

Our government is now operated by the Republicans. Why are they catering to the Dem flake contingent?

really?

lord it's a pain to talk you at times.

Then don't.

hey - you jumped into my convo this am. i gave a nice long reply and didn't hear from you again.

seems to be your MO.

 

[iceberg]

Obama coming out publicly in support of his viewpoints prior to the Israeli elections is NOT the same as covertly influencing the American electorate the way Russia did.

He used American taxpayer money to fund the campaign of Netanyahu's opponent. Do you live under a rock somewhere?

No, I just don't subscribe to Breitbart. I'd ask for a link, but you've gone wildly off topic.

I am only pointing out the hypocrisy of you on the left. Guilt by accusation is not how we do things in this country

i told her that. she told me only loudmouths on twitter were doing it.

i'm like "great, so we agree the left on twitter is doing it. along with members of our own gov"

the most jacked up part of talking to oldlady is when we agree and disagree on the same damn point. it's like a "i agree HOWEVER" each and every time. and each and every time it points back to pre-determining trump being guilty.

No. I am not pre-determining Trump being guilty of collusion. Truly. Why must you jump to that conclusion?

maybe cause everything you say leads me to think you want him gone and don't really care how.

maybe cause when "events" happen you *always* are on the side of BAD TRUMP, oh wait, we'll see..."

maybe cause you can't help but reek how distaste for trump.

maybe. but who knows anymore.

 

[jc456]

People running their mouths, mostly on Twitter and social media (then there's Maxine--what can anyone say). That's a far cry from it actually happening.

i didn't say it was. i said people were trying hard to make it happen. people in our own government. they cater to a base of people obviously who feel this way.

obviously it has NOT happened but again - not from lack of effort.

Our government is now operated by the Republicans. Why are they catering to the Dem flake contingent?

really?

lord it's a pain to talk you at times.

Then don't.

hey - you jumped into my convo this am. i gave a nice long reply and didn't hear from you again.

seems to be your MO.

it's all of their MO's. they don't want to discuss anything. they just wish to make stupid statements and watch us respond. it's what they do really well. it all means the same thing as what it means when I wipe my ass everyday. shit.

 

[iceberg]

Don't you care if Russia meddled in our elections?

Frankly I'm not sure who meddled more The Russians, or the DNC.
I tend to think it was both.
Did you watch the DNC convention? I did. And it gave a pretty clear impression of a corrupt political party that would stoop to any length to retain power. DWS stepping down on the first night of the convention was hilarious. The Bernie supporters walking out was hilarious. The half empty convention hall was hilarious. Filling the vacant seats via an advertisement on Craig's list was hilarious.
Maybe the Russians were working for the DNC. (DNC/FSB)

So you are not sure?

Don't you want to know what the Mueller investigation finds in terms of an election influenced by a foreign nation?

How do you think the Russians "influenced" our election? What exactly do you think they did?

That is NOT the point, and most people know it. Only hacks and fools argue the Russian's "influenced" our election [Unless the investigation uncovers facts that they did covertly "stuff" the ballot box]. We don't know yet how far the investigation goes or who is culpable.

before any investigation begins there must be a suspicion of some wrong doing. I am merely asking what you THINK the Russians did and how that had an affect on the outcome of our election. Unless there is some suspicion, the investigation is truly a waste of money and a witchhunt. Clinton was investigated because there was proof they he defiled the oval office with a young intern and then lied under oath about it.

So, what exactly is this investigation about? What do the "investigators" think happened?

is it the wikileaks leak of the data on the DNC servers that proved corruption? What are they looking for?

every time i ask this i get "he met with russians!!!"

bring up others doing the same, don't care. trump won, now it's bad.

then claim they're being objective. of sorts. amusingly irritating.

 

[OldLady]

I believe none of that was hidden or denied. That is how detractors are "spinning" those incidents. But I'm not here to defend the Clintons. I wouldn't have entered a thread about that.
Can we discuss what I said?
Is collusion bad? Yes or no?
Is there any problem with finding out if it happened, especially if it was collusion between a sitting President's men and an adversarial government?
Clinton lost after all. Trump is in office. And I couldn't help but notice that Trump raked all our enemies over the coals at the UN General Assemby on Tuesday, except for Russia who we know attacked the root of our democracy by very intentionally interfering in our election with the hope of a particular outcome. The only thing he said to Russia was Thank You.

how do we "know" this? still waiting on valid proof and not speculation and investigations.

i would think a person NOT pushing for an outcome of their choosing would wait for evidence to be proven before "they know" something happened.

I'm not pretending to know, yet. I am, however, arguing against the posters on this thread who ARE pushing for an outcome of their choosing by saying there was no collusion. We don't know that yet, as you correctly pointed out.

i didn't say you knew.

i said you're seeing things in a manner that you feel proper, i'm sure, but lead to guilt.

"i notice he didn't say a thing about russia!"

you're *looking* for reasons to find him guilty. you can deny it, i really don't care. but that's what i see you doing.

Just an observation. One more observation in the "coincidences." He's obviously got a mancrush on Putin, and maybe that's all this is. We'll see.

WTF is wrong with you? do you have a "girlcrush" on the hildebeast?

Nuthin wrong with me. More deflecting to Hillary, huh? Is that ALL you got?

 

[iceberg]

i didn't say it was. i said people were trying hard to make it happen. people in our own government. they cater to a base of people obviously who feel this way.

obviously it has NOT happened but again - not from lack of effort.

Our government is now operated by the Republicans. Why are they catering to the Dem flake contingent?

really?

lord it's a pain to talk you at times.

Then don't.

hey - you jumped into my convo this am. i gave a nice long reply and didn't hear from you again.

seems to be your MO.

it's all of their MO's. they don't want to discuss anything. they just wish to make stupid statements and watch us respond. it's what they do really well. it all means the same thing as what it means when I wipe my ass everyday. shit.

well it's especially funny here given her history of her telling me i never back up what i say. or that i ride the middle and just kinda taunt both sides. she'll dive in, get a shot in, i'll try to be respectful and give an honest, thought out reply, and she doesn't answer.

maybe she has an oldlady crush on me.

 

[iceberg]

how do we "know" this? still waiting on valid proof and not speculation and investigations.

i would think a person NOT pushing for an outcome of their choosing would wait for evidence to be proven before "they know" something happened.

I'm not pretending to know, yet. I am, however, arguing against the posters on this thread who ARE pushing for an outcome of their choosing by saying there was no collusion. We don't know that yet, as you correctly pointed out.

i didn't say you knew.

i said you're seeing things in a manner that you feel proper, i'm sure, but lead to guilt.

"i notice he didn't say a thing about russia!"

you're *looking* for reasons to find him guilty. you can deny it, i really don't care. but that's what i see you doing.

Just an observation. One more observation in the "coincidences." He's obviously got a mancrush on Putin, and maybe that's all this is. We'll see.

WTF is wrong with you? do you have a "girlcrush" on the hildebeast?

Nuthin wrong with me. More deflecting to Hillary, huh? Is that ALL you got?

TRUMP MET WITH RUSSIANS!!!
HE DIDN'T CALL THEM OUT AT THE UN!!!

I HAVE COINCIDENCES DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND!!!! DAMNING COINCIDENCES!!!​

that all YOU got? when you take people to the land of stupid with phantom investigations, don't expect intelligent answers.

 

[jc456]

Our government is now operated by the Republicans. Why are they catering to the Dem flake contingent?

really?

lord it's a pain to talk you at times.

Then don't.

hey - you jumped into my convo this am. i gave a nice long reply and didn't hear from you again.

seems to be your MO.

it's all of their MO's. they don't want to discuss anything. they just wish to make stupid statements and watch us respond. it's what they do really well. it all means the same thing as what it means when I wipe my ass everyday. shit.

well it's especially funny here given her history of her telling me i never back up what i say. or that i ride the middle and just kinda taunt both sides. she'll dive in, get a shot in, i'll try to be respectful and give an honest, thought out reply, and she doesn't answer.

maybe she has an oldlady crush on me.

sounds reasonable to me

 

[Wry Catcher]

Trump supporters: I know you're not happy with Robert Mueller poking around in Donald Trump's affairs, and those of his family and associates. I also know you think this is a witch hunt, and a Liberal conspiracy to smear the Trump White House, but there are 2 things you'd better start warming up to:

1. Robert Mueller was appointed by Rob Rosenstein a lifelong Republican appointed to his position by President George W Bush. Mr. Rosenstein found probable cause that Russia did indeed meddle in our election in 2016, and judged that a special counsel was warranted, so please....stop crying Liberal which hunt, it doesn't make any sense.

2. You folks didn't have any problems with special counsels when one was appointed to poke around in Bill Clinton's dealings with Whitewater real estate, and this investigation led them to the Monica Lewinski scandal that got Bill Clinton impeached.

Special counsels are a fact of life for Presidents, and if your golden boy is as squeaky clean as he claims, then there is nothing to worry about. So, put your big boy pants on and get used to Robert Mueller. He's not going away!


Rod Rosenstein’s Political Affiliation: Is He a Republican or a Democrat?

TRUMP HATERS - get used to him. he's not going away.

the more you do stupid juvenille shit like this and the whole WAH WE LOST THE ELECTION WAH the more you shove people away from your side of things. why not go after real issues? problems? find ways to work together vs. kick each other in the nuts all the time? the whole point of a 2 party system is sometimes you just don't like who is in power. sometimes quite strongly.

but in a country built for us all, this is not a single decision and when someone is president you may not like, tough shit. it happens and it will happen again. liberals need to learn to deal with it vs. pretending if they keep making shit up someone will finally give them their way.

so sure. keep this shit up and you'll have him for 8 years to say ANY DAY NOW YOU'LL SEE WE'RE RIGHT!

Silly and ^^^ very panglossian.; Impeachment maybe unlikely, at least until Jan 2019. If the GOP loses the majority and the Democrats take the H. of Rep. It will become more likely, especially if Trump continues to embarrass us with his foolish remarks and tweets.

BTW, Brinkmanship exacerbates the tension between our nation and N. Korea - NO ONE will win if words are replaced by weapons.

lord you can't help but be a condescending asshole.

bless you.

I didn't sneeze. I'm so sorry (sarcasm) that you believe my opinion is any more condescending than the crap the Trumpanzees post.

 

[jc456]

how do we "know" this? still waiting on valid proof and not speculation and investigations.

i would think a person NOT pushing for an outcome of their choosing would wait for evidence to be proven before "they know" something happened.

I'm not pretending to know, yet. I am, however, arguing against the posters on this thread who ARE pushing for an outcome of their choosing by saying there was no collusion. We don't know that yet, as you correctly pointed out.

i didn't say you knew.

i said you're seeing things in a manner that you feel proper, i'm sure, but lead to guilt.

"i notice he didn't say a thing about russia!"

you're *looking* for reasons to find him guilty. you can deny it, i really don't care. but that's what i see you doing.

Just an observation. One more observation in the "coincidences." He's obviously got a mancrush on Putin, and maybe that's all this is. We'll see.

WTF is wrong with you? do you have a "girlcrush" on the hildebeast?

Nuthin wrong with me. More deflecting to Hillary, huh? Is that ALL you got?

self diagnostics doesn't work. there is plenty wrong with you. and you brought up crushes. you opened the door. why is it you're afraid to address what threads you engage in? you just pop out stupid and expect someone to know what kind of stupid you're referring to. speak intelligent and engage in a discussion. no fly by's allowed.

 

[iceberg]

Trump supporters: I know you're not happy with Robert Mueller poking around in Donald Trump's affairs, and those of his family and associates. I also know you think this is a witch hunt, and a Liberal conspiracy to smear the Trump White House, but there are 2 things you'd better start warming up to:

1. Robert Mueller was appointed by Rob Rosenstein a lifelong Republican appointed to his position by President George W Bush. Mr. Rosenstein found probable cause that Russia did indeed meddle in our election in 2016, and judged that a special counsel was warranted, so please....stop crying Liberal which hunt, it doesn't make any sense.

2. You folks didn't have any problems with special counsels when one was appointed to poke around in Bill Clinton's dealings with Whitewater real estate, and this investigation led them to the Monica Lewinski scandal that got Bill Clinton impeached.

Special counsels are a fact of life for Presidents, and if your golden boy is as squeaky clean as he claims, then there is nothing to worry about. So, put your big boy pants on and get used to Robert Mueller. He's not going away!


Rod Rosenstein’s Political Affiliation: Is He a Republican or a Democrat?

TRUMP HATERS - get used to him. he's not going away.

the more you do stupid juvenille shit like this and the whole WAH WE LOST THE ELECTION WAH the more you shove people away from your side of things. why not go after real issues? problems? find ways to work together vs. kick each other in the nuts all the time? the whole point of a 2 party system is sometimes you just don't like who is in power. sometimes quite strongly.

but in a country built for us all, this is not a single decision and when someone is president you may not like, tough shit. it happens and it will happen again. liberals need to learn to deal with it vs. pretending if they keep making shit up someone will finally give them their way.

so sure. keep this shit up and you'll have him for 8 years to say ANY DAY NOW YOU'LL SEE WE'RE RIGHT!

Silly and ^^^ very panglossian.; Impeachment maybe unlikely, at least until Jan 2019. If the GOP loses the majority and the Democrats take the H. of Rep. It will become more likely, especially if Trump continues to embarrass us with his foolish remarks and tweets.

BTW, Brinkmanship exacerbates the tension between our nation and N. Korea - NO ONE will win if words are replaced by weapons.

lord you can't help but be a condescending asshole.

bless you.

I didn't sneeze. I'm so sorry (sarcasm) that you believe my opinion is any more condescending than the crap the Trumpanzees post.

trumpanzees. wow. you're a clever little one.

i quit doing that shit in 4th grade.

 

[OldLady]

Our government is now operated by the Republicans. Why are they catering to the Dem flake contingent?

really?

lord it's a pain to talk you at times.

Then don't.

hey - you jumped into my convo this am. i gave a nice long reply and didn't hear from you again.

seems to be your MO.

it's all of their MO's. they don't want to discuss anything. they just wish to make stupid statements and watch us respond. it's what they do really well. it all means the same thing as what it means when I wipe my ass everyday. shit.

well it's especially funny here given her history of her telling me i never back up what i say. or that i ride the middle and just kinda taunt both sides. she'll dive in, get a shot in, i'll try to be respectful and give an honest, thought out reply, and she doesn't answer.

maybe she has an oldlady crush on me.

Don't flatter yourself. Show me what I haven't answered, liar.

 

[jc456]

really?

lord it's a pain to talk you at times.

Then don't.

hey - you jumped into my convo this am. i gave a nice long reply and didn't hear from you again.

seems to be your MO.

it's all of their MO's. they don't want to discuss anything. they just wish to make stupid statements and watch us respond. it's what they do really well. it all means the same thing as what it means when I wipe my ass everyday. shit.

well it's especially funny here given her history of her telling me i never back up what i say. or that i ride the middle and just kinda taunt both sides. she'll dive in, get a shot in, i'll try to be respectful and give an honest, thought out reply, and she doesn't answer.

maybe she has an oldlady crush on me.

Don't flatter yourself. Show me what I haven't answered, liar.

anything. how's that. what evidence do you have the russians did anything? for one.

what did they influence is two?

 

[OldLady]

I'm not pretending to know, yet. I am, however, arguing against the posters on this thread who ARE pushing for an outcome of their choosing by saying there was no collusion. We don't know that yet, as you correctly pointed out.

i didn't say you knew.

i said you're seeing things in a manner that you feel proper, i'm sure, but lead to guilt.

"i notice he didn't say a thing about russia!"

you're *looking* for reasons to find him guilty. you can deny it, i really don't care. but that's what i see you doing.

Just an observation. One more observation in the "coincidences." He's obviously got a mancrush on Putin, and maybe that's all this is. We'll see.

WTF is wrong with you? do you have a "girlcrush" on the hildebeast?

Nuthin wrong with me. More deflecting to Hillary, huh? Is that ALL you got?

TRUMP MET WITH RUSSIANS!!!
HE DIDN'T CALL THEM OUT AT THE UN!!!

I HAVE COINCIDENCES DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND!!!! DAMNING COINCIDENCES!!!​

that all YOU got? when you take people to the land of stupid with phantom investigations, don't expect intelligent answers.

What's "phantom" about the Mueller investigation?

 

[jc456]

i didn't say you knew.

i said you're seeing things in a manner that you feel proper, i'm sure, but lead to guilt.

"i notice he didn't say a thing about russia!"

you're *looking* for reasons to find him guilty. you can deny it, i really don't care. but that's what i see you doing.

Just an observation. One more observation in the "coincidences." He's obviously got a mancrush on Putin, and maybe that's all this is. We'll see.

WTF is wrong with you? do you have a "girlcrush" on the hildebeast?

Nuthin wrong with me. More deflecting to Hillary, huh? Is that ALL you got?

TRUMP MET WITH RUSSIANS!!!
HE DIDN'T CALL THEM OUT AT THE UN!!!

I HAVE COINCIDENCES DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND!!!! DAMNING COINCIDENCES!!!​

that all YOU got? when you take people to the land of stupid with phantom investigations, don't expect intelligent answers.

What's "phantom" about the Mueller investigation?

the entire thing. what is the charge they are investigating? oh look old lady has me on ignore. hahahahahhahaahahahaha fking loser.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Like I said, susceptible to fake news.

Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go? - FactCheck.org

"Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina says that “so little” of the charitable donations to the Clinton Foundation “actually go to charitable works” — a figure CARLY for America later put at about 6 percent of its annual revenues — but Fiorina is simply wrong.

Fiorina and others are referring only to the amount donated by the Clinton Foundation to outside charities, ignoring the fact that most of the Clinton Foundation’s charitable work is performed in-house. One independent philanthropy watchdog did an analysis of Clinton Foundation funding and concluded that about 89 percent of its funding went to charity."

Would the people of Haiti agree?

You tell me. You're obviously trying to make a point.

Ok.
There was a Haitian delegation outside of the DNC convention that the MSM mistakenly covered once, and then promptly avoided. The Haitians were there to protest the Clinton foundation for profiteering from Haitian misery after an earthquake. Does that refresh your memory?

Sure. Now what's your point?

If you have not gotten the point yet there is no hope for you. You may return to your safe space

You made no point. You told a story of protesters.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I'm not pretending to know, yet. I am, however, arguing against the posters on this thread who ARE pushing for an outcome of their choosing by saying there was no collusion. We don't know that yet, as you correctly pointed out.

i didn't say you knew.

i said you're seeing things in a manner that you feel proper, i'm sure, but lead to guilt.

"i notice he didn't say a thing about russia!"

you're *looking* for reasons to find him guilty. you can deny it, i really don't care. but that's what i see you doing.

Just an observation. One more observation in the "coincidences." He's obviously got a mancrush on Putin, and maybe that's all this is. We'll see.

WTF is wrong with you? do you have a "girlcrush" on the hildebeast?

Nuthin wrong with me. More deflecting to Hillary, huh? Is that ALL you got?

TRUMP MET WITH RUSSIANS!!!
HE DIDN'T CALL THEM OUT AT THE UN!!!

that all YOU got? when you take people to the land of stupid with phantom investigations, don't expect intelligent answers.

LOL - "lord you ^^^ can't help but be a condescending asshole".

 

[Siete]

Just an observation. One more observation in the "coincidences." He's obviously got a mancrush on Putin, and maybe that's all this is. We'll see.

WTF is wrong with you? do you have a "girlcrush" on the hildebeast?

Nuthin wrong with me. More deflecting to Hillary, huh? Is that ALL you got?

TRUMP MET WITH RUSSIANS!!!
HE DIDN'T CALL THEM OUT AT THE UN!!!

I HAVE COINCIDENCES DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND!!!! DAMNING COINCIDENCES!!!​

that all YOU got? when you take people to the land of stupid with phantom investigations, don't expect intelligent answers.

What's "phantom" about the Mueller investigation?

the entire thing. what is the charge they are investigating? oh look old lady has me on ignore. hahahahahhahaahahahaha fking loser.

17 special investigators following you is phucking phantom ?


tell that onE to the Trump Cartel.

TICK TICK TICK TICK TICK

 

[jc456]

Would the people of Haiti agree?

You tell me. You're obviously trying to make a point.

Ok.
There was a Haitian delegation outside of the DNC convention that the MSM mistakenly covered once, and then promptly avoided. The Haitians were there to protest the Clinton foundation for profiteering from Haitian misery after an earthquake. Does that refresh your memory?

Sure. Now what's your point?

If you have not gotten the point yet there is no hope for you. You may return to your safe space

You made no point. You told a story of protesters.

holy fk, you really don't understand what the point was he made. It is as fking clear as glass. hint, it had to do with the clinton foundation stealing money from haitians. and the media not reporting the protest about that. to hide hitlery's corruption. but don't let me spell it out for you, you should learn to read.

 

[iceberg]

really?

lord it's a pain to talk you at times.

Then don't.

hey - you jumped into my convo this am. i gave a nice long reply and didn't hear from you again.

seems to be your MO.

it's all of their MO's. they don't want to discuss anything. they just wish to make stupid statements and watch us respond. it's what they do really well. it all means the same thing as what it means when I wipe my ass everyday. shit.

well it's especially funny here given her history of her telling me i never back up what i say. or that i ride the middle and just kinda taunt both sides. she'll dive in, get a shot in, i'll try to be respectful and give an honest, thought out reply, and she doesn't answer.

maybe she has an oldlady crush on me.

Don't flatter yourself. Show me what I haven't answered, liar.

too easy.

Get used to Robert Mueller. He's not going away!

you really need to check yourself and your facts before you lob the LIAR tag around.

that's where you started talking *to me* and i tried, in good faith, to give a well thought out answer. you went on playing forum-tag and didn't bother.

it's ok. i'm used to it from my #1 fan in here.

now take it back since i didn't lie. you can do it!