NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Jesus had no problem giving people food to eat and healing them for free.
I quess you guys are not christians.
He didn't do it with Caesar's money though, did He??
He told people to pay their taxes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Jesus had no problem giving people food to eat and healing them for free.
I quess you guys are not christians.
He didn't do it with Caesar's money though, did He??
You have the freedom to help all of those in need that you choose to
you do not have the freedom to FORCE anyone else to do it
Then give me back my money that helped build roads that you use.
Give me back all those times you went to a public park, a national forest and the military i pay to help protect you.
Do you benefit from roads, parks, forests and the military? (General Welfare) Do I benefit from your welfare check? (Specific Welfare)
Then give me back my money that helped build roads that you use.
Give me back all those times you went to a public park, a national forest and the military i pay to help protect you.
Do you benefit from roads, parks, forests and the military? (General Welfare) Do I benefit from your welfare check? (Specific Welfare)
I will in all likelihood never ever go to Yellowstone Park, or need a welfare check. But they are there if I do.
That is what the general welfare means.
Why does the right want to keep their freedom?
Freedom from living in a civilized first world nation that helps supports its citizens who are in need. That type of freedom?
In my world, you have the freedom to help whoever you want. In your world there is no freedom not to.
If you find a family in desperate need of help, by all means, help them as I have done. Just allow me the freedom of helping who I want to help.
I believe in random acts of kindness and not in forced servitude like you do.
I'll take "Things Simple Minded People Say" for $100 Alex.
What confuses you about personal responsibility? In stead of calling me "simple minded" perhaps you can justify why you think I might be.
So far, you have ridiculed my position, but there has been no reason given for it. I'm beginning to think I'm wasting my time, or using words too big for your little brain to comprehend.
There is plenty of reason. You have been mooching for years. You see it as a success because you have been lucky enough to not get seriously sick or injured. I call it reckless mooching.
You're the complete opposite of personal responsibility. You have gambled that you wouldn't get sick. What is responsible about that? You're a hypocrite and typical of the so-called "personal responsibility" crowd who are anything but.
Do you benefit from roads, parks, forests and the military? (General Welfare) Do I benefit from your welfare check? (Specific Welfare)
I will in all likelihood never ever go to Yellowstone Park, or need a welfare check. But they are there if I do.
That is what the general welfare means.
I took you up on your one on one challenge. Get to it.
Today's education system that tunnels young people into fields where there is no employment opportunities is a good place to begin...not to mention that simply showing up at school you can be fed three times a day without any parental involvement to help at all.
That's a good start about how it trains our current population to do not for themselves.
Sure. Because elementary students would do so much better if they learned to scrounge for food at an early age.
The ability to read, write, and do math gives an individual the ability to educate himself, and to take full advantage of further teaching. If the elementary schools could provide those skills to their students, they would be accomplishing something. Too many public schools are failing their students at the elementary level, and condemning them to a life of poverty.
But, what the hell, what teacher wants to have to teach to the tests? Much more fun to do arts and crafts, and send those children home with doodads made at school.
Then give me back my money that helped build roads that you use.
Give me back all those times you went to a public park, a national forest and the military i pay to help protect you.
Do you benefit from roads, parks, forests and the military? (General Welfare) Do I benefit from your welfare check? (Specific Welfare)
I will in all likelihood never ever go to Yellowstone Park, or need a welfare check. But they are there if I do.
That is what the general welfare means.
Freedom from living in a civilized first world nation that helps supports its citizens who are in need. That type of freedom?
In my world, you have the freedom to help whoever you want. In your world there is no freedom not to.
If you find a family in desperate need of help, by all means, help them as I have done. Just allow me the freedom of helping who I want to help.
I believe in random acts of kindness and not in forced servitude like you do.
The country you live in couldn't be defended if we didn't force people to contribute to that defense.
It's not that you don't believe in forcing people to do things against their will, in principle. You don't believe in it where it suits your agenda not to believe in it.
Strawman. No one worth paying attention to is advocating eliminating all public assistance.You really hate the poor huh
LOL.. wow.. is that the typical mindless Lib response, or what? Personal responsibility... a term the left just doesn't understand.
pretending that cutting off all aid to the poor will not result in people starving to death is insanity
Can people on public assistance afford the babies they have?More simple concepts from a simple mind.
Simple concept?? Yep.. you fucking work to take care of your fucking personal responsibilities.... it's not hard to understand, unless you are a goddamn leftwinger
Simple mind.... hardly
You heard me, simple concept. I mean you wrapped up your entire argument with a cute little reference to people popping out babies that they can't afford. Nice and simple. Right simpleton?
What confuses you about personal responsibility? In stead of calling me "simple minded" perhaps you can justify why you think I might be.
So far, you have ridiculed my position, but there has been no reason given for it. I'm beginning to think I'm wasting my time, or using words too big for your little brain to comprehend.
There is plenty of reason. You have been mooching for years. You see it as a success because you have been lucky enough to not get seriously sick or injured. I call it reckless mooching.
You're the complete opposite of personal responsibility. You have gambled that you wouldn't get sick. What is responsible about that? You're a hypocrite and typical of the so-called "personal responsibility" crowd who are anything but.
How is it mooching? I have not, nor will I ever, ask for anything I have not paid for.. That includes health care, food stamps or housing assistance.
All I want from you is to stand on your own 2 feet and be responsible for your decisions, your health care and your grocery bill. In other words, YOUR obligations. I am not responsible for the bad choices you have made. I'm also not responsible for your obvious paltry IQ.
Can people on public assistance afford the babies they have?Simple concept?? Yep.. you fucking work to take care of your fucking personal responsibilities.... it's not hard to understand, unless you are a goddamn leftwinger
Simple mind.... hardly
You heard me, simple concept. I mean you wrapped up your entire argument with a cute little reference to people popping out babies that they can't afford. Nice and simple. Right simpleton?
Hint: No.
Does that refute my statement?Can people on public assistance afford the babies they have?You heard me, simple concept. I mean you wrapped up your entire argument with a cute little reference to people popping out babies that they can't afford. Nice and simple. Right simpleton?
Hint: No.
Do all people on public assistance have babies?
Hint: No.
Does that refute my statement?Can people on public assistance afford the babies they have?
Hint: No.
Do all people on public assistance have babies?
Hint: No.
Hint: No.
The number stated that receive any portion of their support from from welfare assistance--including food stamps--it is 29,900,000 or roughly 8% of the total population in the United States.
Reality is more like... you catch 10 fish, the government takes four, three to cover the costs of your business, 2 go to those that have no interest in fishing (or anything else for theat matter) and you keep one to feed your family. Any small business owner will know what I'm saying.
Yes, I deal with whiny small businessmen every day... The bane of my existence.
But the reality is, we have the lowest tax rate in the industrialized world, and most of what the government spends money on benefits business. I've never seen a businessman yet who wouldn't run over his own mother to get a lucrative government contract.
One only has to look at the Black community to see what handouts do to people.
I thought that had to do more with 400 years of insitutionalized racism...
Oh, wait, in Conservatard Land, Blacks have no history prior to 1965. YOu didn't see them on Leave it to Beaver at all.
Can people on public assistance afford the babies they have?Simple concept?? Yep.. you fucking work to take care of your fucking personal responsibilities.... it's not hard to understand, unless you are a goddamn leftwinger
Simple mind.... hardly
You heard me, simple concept. I mean you wrapped up your entire argument with a cute little reference to people popping out babies that they can't afford. Nice and simple. Right simpleton?
Hint: No.