Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. That’s not filing charges. Filing charges is a criminal matter. Alien or citizen: makes no difference. It’s a governmental action to file criminal charges.Well, FFI has a point, it’s a citizen filing the suit on behalf of the haitian non citizens.
If they want to file a civil suit of some kind, that’s ok. The case should never advance beyond the non criminal complaint stage unless they have a valid legal basis for such a filing.So, if you feel another group has been threatened, you can sue on their behalf.
Hmm, didn’t Biden call maga people a threat to the nation? I think we need to sue him for generating hate and hostility.
Well it wasn’t the naacp, it was the Haitian Bridge Alliance, and activist group.I have never heard of this concept that the NAACP can sue on behalf of white peoples rights
It’s a novel feeling that one “party” can do that for another.
Is that based on the determination of a threatened feeling because your culture eats pets in America?
With millions of people claiming asylum, you’d think it would be easy to find out. That would be no small thing. If the Mexican and Honduran governments were so oppressive to the people where they feared for their lives from the government, and tens of millions of people were fleeing becaus of it, I think our government would know.That's not always apparent in general.
Criminal complaint, citizen charges. The point is, I don’t believe this will go anywhere. They would have to prove that trump acted with malice, in other words, they would have to show his intent was to cause these people harmExcept they aren't suing.
No, they are not. they are here illegally via the government abusing the asylum process.
Criminal complaint, citizen charges. The point is, I don’t believe this will go anywhere. They would have to prove that trump acted with malice, in other words, they would have to show his intent was to cause these people harm
"Criminal complaint, citizen charges. The point is, I don’t believe this will go anywhere. They would have to prove that trump acted with malice, in other words, they would have to show his intent was to cause these people harm
Nope. That’s not filing charges. Filing charges is a criminal matter. Alien or citizen: makes no difference. It’s a governmental action to file criminal charges.
If they want to file a civil suit of some kind, that’s ok. The case should never advance beyond the non criminal complaint stage unless they have a valid legal basis for such a filing.
They don’t.
False. Since they can’t do so, whatever they imagine their basis might be is of no value.But they DO have a "valid legal basis for filing criminal charges".
Some are. And you don’t know whether there have been instances of any of them eating some cats or dogs. You just make the baseless claim.The Haitians in Springfield are not here illegally and there are not instances of missing cats or dogs.m
Nope. It means that he said out loud (nationally) what some Springfield locals had claimed.That means the videos claiming illegals are eating cats and dogs was deliberate hate speech intended to get Haitians murdered.
Nope.{...
18 U.S. Code § 373 - Solicitation to commit a crime of violence
(a)
Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against property or against the person of another in violation of the laws of the United States, and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half of the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the crime solicited, or both; or if the crime solicited is punishable by life imprisonment or death, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty years.
(b)
It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this section that, under circumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunciation of his criminal intent, the defendant prevented the commission of the crime solicited. A renunciation is not “voluntary and complete” if it is motivated in whole or in part by a decision to postpone the commission of the crime until another time or to substitute another victim or another but similar objective. If the defendant raises the affirmative defense at trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence.
(c)
It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person solicited could not be convicted of the crime because he lacked the state of mind required for its commission, because he was incompetent or irresponsible, or because he is immune from prosecution or is not subject to prosecution.
...}
Falsely saying that the Haitians in Springfield were illegal and eating pets, is clearly criminal.
If the Hatians being numbered at 20,000, and the report was that they were dumped into that community, then how is it that they've been there along time, and that they somehow hold green card's etc ?Wrong.
When you make harmful public statements such as the Haitians being illegal and eating cats and dogs, what you believe to be true is not a sufficient defense.
Legally you have to investigate and determine what is true before you make these public statements. So then Trump is guilty. He was wrong about Springfield, even if he at the time thought he was correct. He did not do the due diligence required before making harmful public statement.
False. Since they can’t do so, whatever they imagine their basis might be is of no value.
Some are. And you don’t know whether there have been instances of any of them eating some cats or dogs. You just make the baseless claim.
Nope. It means that he said out loud (nationally) what some Springfield locals had claimed.
And there was no intent (and certainly you have no evidence to support you baseless claim) about what was “intended.”
The calls making threats were all bullshit probably made up — by libturds making the calls just to stir up some shit. You fall for it.
Nope.
Not illegal at all.
Your claim is criminally retarded. As usual.
Wrong.
Anyone can and often do "file charges".
Whether the police, prosecutors, or judges decide to not press the charges is irrelevant.
We all know that there have been not cats or dogs eaten
Some folks don’t report missing pets, you dolt.because we know that no missing pets have been reported,
Nonsense. Dogs are cooked in China on a regular basis, you ignorant dimwit.and that the high uric acid content of dogs and cats would make it taste bad and make a person sick.
And yet, it happens.It is very difficult to prepare any predator to be safely eaten.
False. Stop just making shit up. You libturds are so fact free, by your metrics you could never post anything.You are not allowed to broadcast harmful claims about someone unless you have done due diligence to ensure the claims are correct.
Which didn’t happen.There is a huge difference between saying to another person that you think a crime had been committed, and broadcasting on TV that you are sure of it.
That is a crime,
Nobody incited any violence.deliberately inciting violenc
you don’t know that it didn’t happen. Just more of your fact free posting.e by falsely claiming something happened which did not really happen at all.
Fuck the Haitians.we were on our way to immigration reform, but yer chosen one took his diaper off & shit all over it because he didn't want biden to take a win before the election.
If the Hatians being numbered at 20,000, and the report was that they were dumped into that community, then how is it that they've been there along time, and that they somehow hold green card's etc ?
i agree that trump shouldn’t have said it, but you have to prove damages and think you have to prove that his actions were willfully and knowingly done to harm someone. Still, the damages part might be tricky, because you’ll have to subpoena all those people in other countries to testify that the acted because of Trump.Wrong.
When you make harmful public statements such as the Haitians being illegal and eating cats and dogs, what you believe to be true is not a sufficient defense.
Legally you have to investigate and determine what is true before you make these public statements. So then Trump is guilty. He was wrong about Springfield, even if he at the time thought he was correct. He did not do the due diligence required before making harmful public statement.
even if he at the time thought he was correct
In short, they're cheap labor. It's no different from the Latin Americans that flood here as well.Do some reading.
The truth is they were solicited by companies years ago, who got them green cards, and it took years before they slowly swelled to 20,000.
The claim the Haitians were recently "dumped" there are deliberate lies.
{...
How many Haitians are living in Springfield?
There’s no official tally. Mayor Rob Rue told CNN the city’s population has grown about 25% over the past three years, in part due to the arrival of Haitian immigrants.
Between 12,000 and 15,000 immigrants are living in Clark County, which includes Springfield, according to estimates on the city’s website. Of that group, an estimated 10,000-12,000 are Haitian, according to a July presentation from the county’s health commissioner, who cited data from school and social services officials.
The 2020 Census estimated about 60,000 people were living in Springfield, and 2022 data from the American Community Survey indicated about 2% of the city’s population was born outside the US.
Did a government program send them there for resettlement?
No. Immigrants have chosen to live in Springfield due to its low cost of living and available work, according to a city website, which notes that “no government entity is responsible for the influx of Haitians into Clark County.”
“Any system is going to struggle with the rapid population growth we have seen,” Clark County Health Commissioner Chris Cook told the Springfield City Council in July as he stressed the importance of getting more resources and funding to help.
“This is not part of a federal resettlement program. … It’s not someplace it was planned, and it’s not someplace those resources initially go by policy,” he said.
So how did they end up there? And why was Springfield their destination?
Officials and Springfield residents who’ve spoken with CNN say employment opportunities and word of mouth drew an influx of immigrants to the city.
Koveleski, the interpreter and community activist in Springfield, said word that jobs were available spread quickly among Haitians’ family and friends.
“Before you know it,” she told CNN’s Omar Jimenez, “it was almost like, ‘If there’s a good Friday sale and you got a great deal at Macy’s, you tell all your friends, and the stores are packed.’”
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said businesses in the area are grateful to have the help of a growing labor force.
...}
