GOP Senator Celebrates His Vote Against Gay Marriage By Attending Son's Gay Marriage

[Papageorgio]

False....


But thanks for confirming that you are more than ok with same sex marriages not being federally protected - which then breaks down to states not recognizing marriages because that couple is from a different state...


Funny how that states rights argument didn't apply to gun laws tho..


Stop hiding behind "states rights" in order to justify using government power to punish minorities.....we have a long history of it now and its always the Conservatives behind it...

Gun rights are a 2nd Amendment right, and I don't really care if you marry another guy, it isn't my business.

 

[BS Filter]

We already have evidence that marriage can be between 2 consenting adults no matter the genders -- because that is the law of the land now -- so if you morons are continuously saying "but bro, nobody is trying to ban same sex-marriage? -- why do you keep making these stupid arguments???

Whether marriage is between a man and a woman or a woman and a woman.....your idiotic belief that marriage can only be between a man and a woman because a book supposedly written by your imaginary Sky Daddy told you -- is just that, idiotic...

It's your opinion that our beliefs are "idiotic", but the reality is our belief is a Constitutional right. Why do you hate American democracy?

 

[Hossfly]

There is nothing I can do about the abortions or the mentally sick LGBT+ abominations but as God said, "You shall surely die" and I am satisfied with that comment.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Gun rights are a 2nd Amendment right, and I don't really care if you marry another guy, it isn't my business.

Yes, you do care......you definitely care if it is 2 guys....which is why you are either incapable of criticizing any action to use the power of government to restrict what 2 adults do -- or you do want that but too much of a coward to admit it...


Fact remains..when it comes to ACTUALLY ROLLING BACK RIGHTS -- Conservatives are front and center in doing so...while you folks have to conjur up imaginary shit to pretend your rights are being stripped away -- like pretending you are losing your rights because you are triggered too many interracial couples are on TV

Adorable Cheerios Commercial Gets Racist Backlash Online

Adorable Cheerios Commercial Gets Racist Backlash Online

www.huffpost.com

 

[Meathead]

Pa. Rep. Glenn Thompson votes against same-sex marriage days after attending son's gay wedding

A Pennsylvania lawmaker is facing criticism for attending his gay son's wedding last week, just days after opposing a bill in the U.S. house that would enshrine protections for same-sex marriage into federal law.

www.cbsnews.com

"A Pennsylvania lawmaker is facing criticism for attending his gay son's wedding last week, just days after opposing a bill in the U.S. house that would enshrine protections for same-sex marriage into federal law. Representative Glenn Thompson's office said in a statement that he and his wife were thrilled to attend the nuptials and are very happy to welcome a new son-in-law into the family. His office did not respond to a follow-up question about why he decided to vote against the measure."

So I guess the key to opposing same sex marriage is to just oppose it for everyone else but not your own family? Cool...Kinda makes for an awkward wedding knowing your Dad would have gladly voted to stop you from being married "legally" if Republicans ever had their wish....I am sure the weasel excuse given is:

"I am totally for gay marriage bro, I just don't want them to be federally protected...that's all"

I assume this is a case of a politician just doing what he thinks he has to do to get elected -- and for some reason, there are a lot of Republicans believing that the easiest way to remain in power is to oppose gay rights in any form it pops up...which is odd, because I keep hearing from the so-called Conservatives on this message board that "Bro, nobody is trying to take away rights from gays bro..." -- Seems once again, Conservatives are lying about their own positions....

Senator?

 

[Papageorgio]

Yes, you do care......you definitely care if it is 2 guys....which is why you are either incapable of criticizing any action to use the power of government to restrict what 2 adults do -- or you do want that but too much of a coward to admit it...


Fact remains..when it comes to ACTUALLY ROLLING BACK RIGHTS -- Conservatives are front and center in doing so...while you folks have to conjur up imaginary shit to pretend your rights are being stripped away -- like pretending you are losing your rights because you are triggered too many interracial couples are on TV

Adorable Cheerios Commercial Gets Racist Backlash Online

Adorable Cheerios Commercial Gets Racist Backlash Online

www.huffpost.com

No. I don't. You want to marry, go for it. It makes no difference in my life either way. It is a state's issue, unless Congress wants to federalize gay marriage, then they need to do it and not rely on the Supreme Court to interpret the law. We went 50 years of a lazy Congress and overturned. Until Congress acts, gay marriage and abortion are state issues and the only way to change it is have Congress act but they seem incapable of doing anything.

 

[airplanemechanic]

We already have evidence that marriage can be between 2 consenting adults no matter the genders -- because that is the law of the land now -- so if you morons are continuously saying "but bro, nobody is trying to ban same sex-marriage? -- why do you keep making these stupid arguments???

Whether marriage is between a man and a woman or a woman and a woman.....your idiotic belief that marriage can only be between a man and a woman because a book supposedly written by your imaginary Sky Daddy told you -- is just that, idiotic...

Marriage is a union between two adults, a man and a woman, for the purposes of creating life and continuing our species. While we let older people marry of course, it's all man and woman.

Letting two fags call themselves married perverts the true definition of marriage.

Marriage | Definition, History, Types, Customs, Laws, & Facts

Marriage, a legally and socially sanctioned union, usually between a man and a woman, that is regulated by laws, rules, customs, beliefs, and attitudes that prescribe the rights and duties of the partners and accords status to their offspring (if any). Learn more about marriage, including...

www.britannica.com

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

We already have evidence that marriage can be between 2 consenting adults no matter the genders -- because that is the law of the land now -- so if you morons are continuously saying "but bro, nobody is trying to ban same sex-marriage? -- why do you keep making these stupid arguments???

Whether marriage is between a man and a woman or a woman and a woman.....your idiotic belief that marriage can only be between a man and a woman because a book supposedly written by your imaginary Sky Daddy told you -- is just that, idiotic...

You can pretend that two males or two females can actually form a marriage, but as the picture states, if you both have plugs, or both have holes, then there can be no marriage, just like if a man with tits pretends to be a woman, he scientifically isnt. I refer to the chart again.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

States can regulate marriage, but they can't deny someone Equal Protection, via the US Constitution, nor could they pass a law not recognizing the contract one state had granted.

Therefore, gay marriage can't be banned in a state. Certainly a state can regulate marriage, ie require a licence, blood testing etc....but gay marriage can't be treated differently then hetrosexual marriage.

This is not an issue, but something the dembots want to make an issue, since they can't run on their horrible policies that are making homosexuals, hetrosexuals, married and unmarried people all poorer.

Yet some states dont follow the Equal Protection, because while some states legally let people carry, other states infringe on that right to carry, which is in the Constitution. Fuck the faggots there is nothing about queers in the Constitution...May the rot in hell, with the rest of the worthless progressives.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Why are all fags democrats?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

How are you people making excuses for a guy blatantly acting against his so called principles?

Cock-a-Doodle-Dindu

Chickenhawks identifying as roosters.

 

[struth]

Yet some states dont follow the Equal Protection, because while some states legally let people carry, other states infringe on that right to carry, which is in the Constitution. Fuck the faggots there is nothing about queers in the Constitution...May the rot in hell, with the rest of the worthless progressives.

and when you feel that state is, take it to court and challenge the law…as they have with Heller and other cases

and equal protection isn’t the argument in those cases…equal protection deals with treating class of people different…women, men, black, white, etc

 

[initforme]

Oh no two consenting adults got married. Oh the horror of it all.

 

[Marener]

States can regulate marriage, but they can't deny someone Equal Protection, via the US Constitution, nor could they pass a law not recognizing the contract one state had granted.

Therefore, gay marriage can't be banned in a state. Certainly a state can regulate marriage, ie require a licence, blood testing etc....but gay marriage can't be treated differently then hetrosexual marriage.

This is not an issue, but something the dembots want to make an issue, since they can't run on their horrible policies that are making homosexuals, hetrosexuals, married and unmarried people all poorer.

Most states banner gay marriage before the court ruled it was protected by the constitution.

Now the liberals in that court are gone and the conservatives took over so it’s a real concern.

 

[struth]

Most states banner gay marriage before the court ruled it was protected by the constitution.

Now the liberals in that court are gone and the conservatives took over so it’s a real concern.

they did, and even folks like obama said it was ok.

thankfully the right case came up and the court ruled..in a correct way

i think it’s going to be hard to overturn under equal protection standards not to mention the contract clause

 

[BS Filter]

False....


But thanks for confirming that you are more than ok with same sex marriages not being federally protected - which then breaks down to states not recognizing marriages because that couple is from a different state...


Funny how that states rights argument didn't apply to gun laws tho..


Stop hiding behind "states rights" in order to justify using government power to punish minorities.....we have a long history of it now and its always the Conservatives behind it...

Why do you hate the Constitution?

 

[BS Filter]

Most states banner gay marriage before the court ruled it was protected by the constitution.

Now the liberals in that court are gone and the conservatives took over so it’s a real concern.

"Elections have consequences". President Obama.

 

[BS Filter]

they did, and even folks like obama said it was ok.

thankfully the right case came up and the court ruled..in a correct way

i think it’s going to be hard to overturn under equal protection standards not to mention the contract clause

False. Abortion and marriage are not mentioned in the Constitution.

 

[Marener]

"Elections have consequences". President Obama.

The court isn’t supposed to be a political body. The founders would be pretty disappointed in this attitude.

 

[BS Filter]

The court isn’t supposed to be a political body. The founders would be pretty disappointed in this attitude.

Agree. We have a Supreme Court Justice Obama appointed who believes decisions should consider popular opinions. That's about as political as you can get.