Greg Palast's 2000 Mules "Fact-Check" Fail

[munkle]

All the 2000 Mules "debunks" are laughable, but one simple example will serve to show how sloppy and reeking of desperation they all are.

Liberal hero Greg Palast: "2,000 Mules: Belly Laughs, Belly Aches from Film’s “Proof” that Trump Won"

Palast says in the key passage:

“In Fulton County (Atlanta), he tells us 92,670 ballots were stuffed illegally into drop boxes.That’s astonishing — because there were only 79,000 ballots cast in drop boxes in Fulton County! And in Detroit, it was worse. “Mules” stuffed 226,590 ballots into Detroit area drop boxes — way more than the total number of all mail-in ballots — about three times the number of ballots in drop boxes.”

Libtard reporter Palast asserts that the film says that “92,670 ballots were stuffed illegally into drop boxes” in Fulton County, Georgia, when all of Fulton County had only “79,000 ballots cast in drop boxes.”

But the 92,670 ballots referred to in the film were for all of the Georgia counties investigated, not just Fulton County. The below excerpt from the film shows the researchers discussing a massive discrepancy in Gwinnent County.




Similarly, Palast alleges that the film claims that mules “stuffed 226,590 ballots into Detroit area drop boxes, way more than the total number of all mail-in ballots .” But the film never alleges this. The 226,590 figure includes all of Michigan counties examined, not just Wayne County, the seat of Detroit.

Palast is too good of a reporter to not know he is deliberately lying to his audience, but to liberals truth means nothing. Zero. Nada. So he exults as if he has scored a big GOTCHA! in his article, when all he has done is dishonestly, flagrantly contort the film's claims. You can stop reading the "fact-checks" because they are all this bad.

Palast: 0
2000 Mules: 98

 

[candycorn]

Any arrests yet?

No?

Carry on.

 

[MarathonMike]

Debunk = Fact Check = Libtard coverup

 

[Lastamender]

They got caught. The data does not lie.

 

[Lastamender]

Any arrests yet?

No?

Carry on.

Criminals in charge of the country?

Yes.

 

[Soupnazi630]

They got caught. The data does not lie.

No one got caught and you lie about the data.

 

[candycorn]

Debunk = Fact Check = Libtard coverup

Wow, that must be frustrating.

 

[Lastamender]

No one got caught and you lie about the data.

The data is there, you are not.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The data is there, you are not.

The data does not prove theft or fraud

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Criminals in charge of the country?

Yes.

Criminals holding the country hostage.

 

[Muhammed]

The data does not prove theft or fraud

Biden admitted it on a livestream video, jackass. He confessed on video. How do explain that FACT?

 

[WTF19]

Any arrests yet?

No?

Carry on.

you should quit living your pathetic life in denial
IF YOU ONLY HAD A BRAIN

 

[Care4all]

All the 2000 Mules "debunks" are laughable, but one simple example will serve to show how sloppy and reeking of desperation they all are.

Liberal hero Greg Palast: "2,000 Mules: Belly Laughs, Belly Aches from Film’s “Proof” that Trump Won"

Palast says in the key passage:

“In Fulton County (Atlanta), he tells us 92,670 ballots were stuffed illegally into drop boxes.That’s astonishing — because there were only 79,000 ballots cast in drop boxes in Fulton County! And in Detroit, it was worse. “Mules” stuffed 226,590 ballots into Detroit area drop boxes — way more than the total number of all mail-in ballots — about three times the number of ballots in drop boxes.”

Libtard reporter Palast asserts that the film says that “92,670 ballots were stuffed illegally into drop boxes” in Fulton County, Georgia, when all of Fulton County had only “79,000 ballots cast in drop boxes.”

But the 92,670 ballots referred to in the film were for all of the Georgia counties investigated, not just Fulton County. The below excerpt from the film shows the researchers discussing a massive discrepancy in Gwinnent County.




Similarly, Palast alleges that the film claims that mules “stuffed 226,590 ballots into Detroit area drop boxes, way more than the total number of all mail-in ballots .” But the film never alleges this. The 226,590 figure includes all of Michigan counties examined, not just Wayne County, the seat of Detroit.

Palast is too good of a reporter to not know he is deliberately lying to his audience, but to liberals truth means nothing. Zero. Nada. So he exults as if he has scored a big GOTCHA! in his article, when all he has done is dishonestly, flagrantly contort the film's claims. You can stop reading the "fact-checks" because they are all this bad.

Palast: 0
2000 Mules: 98

Where did these mules get the thousands or hundreds of thousands, of Absentee Iballots from, that were legally accepted absentee ballots by the election workers, that were signature matched, and individually requested by the individual voter?

Can you explain your theory of fraud and how it all worked to give Joe Biden a win instead of Trump???

 

[candycorn]

you should quit living your pathetic life in denial
IF YOU ONLY HAD A BRAIN

So no arrests yet. Thanks for the confirmation.


lol

 

[Care4all]

A clip from Greg Palast's article that the op is criticizing:

THEY HAVE THE DAMNING FILM — THEY JUST WON’T SHOW IT​

They have the film, but they … just don’t, uh, show it. Why not show us at least a couple of film clips of the 27 times this Black felon repeated his crime? Well, that’s the problem with you liberal jerks: You see a Black man with a ballot and you, Mr. Liberal, assume he’s voting, when he’s obviously committing a crime. And he does it dozens of times! Why do we have to show you the evidence? We just need Elder, the Chubby Checker of right wing nuttery, to blubber his amazement at seeing the footage on D’Souza’s computer. Case closed! Guilty!

I was so angry at this criminal voter, I wanted to bust him! Expose him. Arrest him. They have his photo, his car, his license plate number. In fact, their “expert” says these ballot mules have, “bad backgrounds, bad reputations, …violent guys.”

Whoa! So, If D’Souza identifies their “backgrounds,” they must have their names. So why don’t they show us the files? Name the names? Show us their faces? Confront them. Call the cops, the feds!

But D’Souza and True the Vote didn’t bust anyone. Didn’t name a single mule — though they supposedly can identify them. They even fuzzed over the mules’ faces so we can’t see who it is. Nice of D’Souza to protect the guilty. Unless, of course, the Black men weren’t guilty. Or just guilty of Voting While Black. They don’t show us the files of their “bad reputations” because these files don’t exist.

Why did the Black man with the ballots commit a crime on camera that will get him five years in prison? For the money, of course! Did D’Souza know for certain the Black man took money? Of course! D’Souza shows a film of money being handed to someone. OK, it’s a reenactment — the actor gets a credit at the end of the film. But hey, it could have happened. Case closed! Guilty!

D’Souza knows the Black man was paid by a “non-profit” group. They showed a photo of Black candidate Stacey Abrams. But he doesn’t actually say that she or her group, Fair Fight Georgia, made the payments. In fact, he doesn’t say who made the payments. Why?

And what about those “non-profits” that paid the mules — 2,000 mules casting nearly a million illegal votes — 817,765 illegal ballots (we toted up their claims) in just five cities — i.e. Black cities. D’Souza tracked the mules to the offices of these “non-profits,” even had an Arizona whistleblower say she herself gathered the ballots and paid the mules out of one office. But the whistleblower is in shadow, unnamed…and D’Souza, oddly, conceals the name of this criminal “non-profit.” He won’t reveal the group because … well, that’s odd. When I reported investigations for BBC Television, not once did I say, “We have the proof — witnesses, film, documents — of felony crimes committed by … well, that’s our secret!”

HE KNOWS WHO PAID HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS TO THE MULES — BUT HE WON’T TELL US.​

D’Souza says, “We know that the mules got their stashes of ballots from these activist organizations.” He “knows,” but won’t say how he knows, what evidence he has. Hell, he doesn’t name even one evil organization (and he claims there are many) because… well, maybe they didn’t do it.

Why didn’t he confront this unnamed group or groups with the evidence? I do that in every report I’ve ever filmed (in fact, it’s required by British law for UK reporters). Maybe because D’Souza has no evidence. He certainly didn’t show us any evidence, zero, of a single payment to a single mule.

When the Palast team finds a crime or malfeasance or vote manipulation, we name the perps — Chevron, Katherine Harris, whomever, and I confront them.

A still from our last major report from Georgia, “New Mass Voter Challenge by GOP Exposed”, in which I confront Pam Reardon, a GOP operative who challenged the right to vote of tens of thousands of Black and young Georgians on false evidence.
Take a look at our last major report from Georgia. We discovered that GOP operatives challenged the right to vote of tens of thousands of Black and young Georgians on false evidence. We named the key operatives — Pam Reardon is the Republican challenger-in chief. Here’s a photo of me confronting Reardon with the evidence. We didn’t fuzz out her face. And we named and confronted the group who gave her the phony, racially poisonous purge list: True the Vote. Yep, the same characters who provided the bogus info for 2000 Mules.


Www.gregpalast.com/2000-mules-belly-laughs-belly-aches-from-dsouzas-proof-that-trump-won/

 

[Lastamender]

Where did these mules get the thousands or hundreds of thousands, of Absentee Iballots from, that were legally accepted absentee ballots by the election workers, that were signature matched, and individually requested by the individual voter?

Can you explain your theory of fraud and how it all worked to give Joe Biden a win instead of Trump???

Signatures were not verified in GA. The SOS made an agreement so it would not happen. Besides that the data makes fraud more than a theory. It makes it a fact because there is no other way to explain the activities the data uncovered.

Just admit they got caught, because they did.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Signatures were not verified in GA. The SOS made an agreement so it would not happen. Besides that the data makes fraud more than a theory. It makes it a fact because there is no other way to explain the activities the data uncovered.

Just admit they got caught, because they did.

Wrong.

The data proves nothing whatsoever about fraud or thet and there are endless explanations which has been proven.

You are a liar.

You have been caught

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Wrong.

The data proves nothing whatsoever about fraud or thet and there are endless explanations which has been proven.

You are a liar.

You have been caught

Nothing was ‘proven’. It wasn’t reviewed because lefties like the results and Americans were afraid of shakedown by democrat terrorists.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nothing was ‘proven’. It wasn’t reviewed because lefties like the results and Americans were afraid of shakedown by democrat terrorists.

There is no evidence to review

 

[Lastamender]

Wrong.

The data proves nothing whatsoever about fraud or thet and there are endless explanations which has been proven.

You are a liar.

You have been caught

What does it prove then? It proves people drive back and forth to drop boxes and non-profits for grins? You source nothing. You are just a piss poor very very stupid troll.