jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,241
- 29,154
- 2,180
k!for every one life five die. stats aren't in your favor. you should actually do research.for every one life five die. stats aren't in your favor. you should actually do research.I don't buy that argument, as it is false on its face. Society has always placed a value on life, and those who use this argument always do it for things that won't effect them personally.
We could save tens of thousands of lives every year if we simply made it impossible for any vehicle to travel faster than maybe 30mph. We won't do that, because we value being able to drive fast over the lives lost.
We could save many lives every year if we simply closed swimming pool access to children and banned private ownership of pools. We won't do that, because we value playing in water over the lives lost.
And on it goes. Sure, if you don't own guns, it's easy to say it's worth it if one life is saved, but are you willing to save lives if it impacts you directly?
Exactly. "If it saves one life, it's worth it" has been trotted around as a given for too long. Often, it's just not.
Can you restate that in standard English?
Huh... ok. Well I can't make heads or tails out of that. Sorry.