protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,150
- 18,360
- 2,250
Nope. Just a recognition of reality, rather than pretending what is obviously false.As if on cue – proof of that rightwing fear, ignorance, bigotry, racism, and hate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. Just a recognition of reality, rather than pretending what is obviously false.As if on cue – proof of that rightwing fear, ignorance, bigotry, racism, and hate.
FALSE! White females are a small fraction of the beneficiaries of AA, which benefits Blacks, Hispanic, and other non-white races (of both sexes)Affirmative Action...used most by white females. Racism, eh?
Straight Pride reflects the heroic efforts of an oppressed majority to hate on a despised minority. Look at all the characters on this thread and tell me if they are reflective of normal ?Straight pride is fine....unless one's definition of "straight pride" is 100% running down gays.Because Straight pride is so wrong, and Gay pride is so right. (Rolls eyes)
In the way of deranged minds, who pretend to be proud, as a way of hiding their shame. They feel a need to compensate.In what way is immoral, insane sexual perversion anything to be proud of?
Being straight is perverted?? lmaoHomophobic pastors are organising Make America Straight Again to coincide with Pride Month
Ultra conservative pastors in Orlando are organising a “Make America Straight Again” in the middle of Pride Month and just two days after the third anniversary of the mass shooting which say 49 people killed at the Pulse nightclub.
The conference is taking place on the weekend of the 14th, 15th, and 16th of June.
In a video filled with homophobic statements made by a number of pastors, the conference was announced and Rev. Patrick Boyle, from Revival Baptist Church said the event will “expose the reprobates” and “against the sodomites and the filth that they’ve been spreading in.”
You know I understand that they are entitled to their sick and hate filled views. And their perverted lifestyle. But decent folk really shouldnt have to put up with this shit. Dont rub our noses in it you homophobic wankers.
Straight Pride reflects the heroic efforts of an oppressed majority to hate on a despised minority. Look at all the characters on this thread and tell me if they are reflective of normal ?Straight pride is fine....unless one's definition of "straight pride" is 100% running down gays.Because Straight pride is so wrong, and Gay pride is so right. (Rolls eyes)
Are you normal?
For the past 10,000 years, just about everyone was anti-Gay, and anti-Minorities, that all changed in the past 50 years, when really dumb White people, (Mostly Western f*cking Europeans) decided to do a 180, and started supporting everybody's impediments.
Homophobic pastors are organising Make America Straight Again to coincide with Pride Month
Ultra conservative pastors in Orlando are organising a “Make America Straight Again” in the middle of Pride Month and just two days after the third anniversary of the mass shooting which say 49 people killed at the Pulse nightclub.
The conference is taking place on the weekend of the 14th, 15th, and 16th of June.
In a video filled with homophobic statements made by a number of pastors, the conference was announced and Rev. Patrick Boyle, from Revival Baptist Church said the event will “expose the reprobates” and “against the sodomites and the filth that they’ve been spreading in.”
You know I understand that they are entitled to their sick and hate filled views. And their perverted lifestyle. But decent folk really shouldnt have to put up with this shit. Dont rub our noses in it you homophobic wankers.
White women benefit most from affirmative action — and are among its fiercest opponentsFALSE! White females are a small fraction of the beneficiaries of AA, which benefits Blacks, Hispanic, and other non-white races (of both sexes)Affirmative Action...used most by white females. Racism, eh?
Secondly, white females beneficiaries of AA, are a small fraction of the total white females, victimized by AA by being daughters or wives (dependents) of white male victims.
Third, there are also white females, victimized by AA when the AA programs only caters to blacks (as was the case in my graduate school years go)
Does the UN Universal Declaration of Rights match our 1st Amendment?Yes...as in all such things. Is it wrong to try to measure UK laws by our standards? Or is that the American way of global hegemony?A bad thing....here. We have secular laws that protect us from that.Do you think jailing people for political differences is a good thing or a bad thing?
That's an odd way to look at it. It is only wrong here because of the Law?
If discussing Rights from an American perspective is hateful for you, I'm happy to discuss it in the context of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
From that perspective,( much like from the American one ), Human Rights are inherent and inalienable.
Thus a law that empowers the UK government to imprison someone for simply having the wrong political opinion, or expressing said opinion,
is a violation of Human Rights and thus unjust and morally wrong.
FYI
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
I am keen to learn about this alleged law in the UK. I have never heard of it before.Yes...as in all such things. Is it wrong to try to measure UK laws by our standards? Or is that the American way of global hegemony?A bad thing....here. We have secular laws that protect us from that.Do you think jailing people for political differences is a good thing or a bad thing?
That's an odd way to look at it. It is only wrong here because of the Law?
If discussing Rights from an American perspective is hateful for you, I'm happy to discuss it in the context of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
From that perspective,( much like from the American one ), Human Rights are inherent and inalienable.
Thus a law that empowers the UK government to imprison someone for simply having the wrong political opinion, or expressing said opinion,
is a violation of Human Rights and thus unjust and morally wrong.
FYI
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
So, as usual, you are just spouting shit.I am keen to learn about this alleged law in the UK. I have never heard of it before.Yes...as in all such things. Is it wrong to try to measure UK laws by our standards? Or is that the American way of global hegemony?A bad thing....here. We have secular laws that protect us from that.
That's an odd way to look at it. It is only wrong here because of the Law?
If discussing Rights from an American perspective is hateful for you, I'm happy to discuss it in the context of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
From that perspective,( much like from the American one ), Human Rights are inherent and inalienable.
Thus a law that empowers the UK government to imprison someone for simply having the wrong political opinion, or expressing said opinion,
is a violation of Human Rights and thus unjust and morally wrong.
FYI
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
I've seen many reports, at least once with police discussing their intent to arrest and then actually arresting someone for having or expressing various opinions.
I have not researched the actually laws that empower your police to do this. I don't care about the legal specifics of your nation's fall.
My concern is more a matter of human decency mixed with personal fear as I see the same type of want a be despots operating here.
Your entire nation, should be ashamed.
Not our laws. Are we a global hegemony telling other countries what they can or cannot do with their laws?Does the UN Universal Declaration of Rights match our 1st Amendment?Yes...as in all such things. Is it wrong to try to measure UK laws by our standards? Or is that the American way of global hegemony?A bad thing....here. We have secular laws that protect us from that.
That's an odd way to look at it. It is only wrong here because of the Law?
If discussing Rights from an American perspective is hateful for you, I'm happy to discuss it in the context of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
From that perspective,( much like from the American one ), Human Rights are inherent and inalienable.
Thus a law that empowers the UK government to imprison someone for simply having the wrong political opinion, or expressing said opinion,
is a violation of Human Rights and thus unjust and morally wrong.
FYI
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
1. Yes.
2. Why do you ask?
3. Do you believe that imprisoning someone for the "crime" of having and/or expressing an opinion is right or wrong?
See ? This is the horsefeathers fake news you get, when you go to the liberal OMISSION media. And you have no excuse. I already gave you the refute argument >> Post # 142, which your fake news link lacks.
Dodge! That wasn't the question. He (CORRELL) was asking you about right or wrong.Not our laws. Are we a global hegemony telling other countries what they can or cannot do with their laws?
By what we are used to having been raised used to the 1st Amendment, it's wrong........but the UK doesn't have Freedom of the Press, nor have they EVER had freedom of the press....it isn't wrong for them. It's the law.Dodge! That wasn't the question. He (CORRELL) was asking you about right or wrong.Not our laws. Are we a global hegemony telling other countries what they can or cannot do with their laws?
Wow. You need a head fix. No such thing as "it isn't wrong for them"By what we are used to having been raised used to the 1st Amendment, it's wrong........but the UK doesn't have Freedom of the Press, nor have they EVER had freedom of the press....it isn't wrong for them. It's the law.
So, as usual, you are just spouting shit.I am keen to learn about this alleged law in the UK. I have never heard of it before.Yes...as in all such things. Is it wrong to try to measure UK laws by our standards? Or is that the American way of global hegemony?That's an odd way to look at it. It is only wrong here because of the Law?
If discussing Rights from an American perspective is hateful for you, I'm happy to discuss it in the context of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
From that perspective,( much like from the American one ), Human Rights are inherent and inalienable.
Thus a law that empowers the UK government to imprison someone for simply having the wrong political opinion, or expressing said opinion,
is a violation of Human Rights and thus unjust and morally wrong.
FYI
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
I've seen many reports, at least once with police discussing their intent to arrest and then actually arresting someone for having or expressing various opinions.
I have not researched the actually laws that empower your police to do this. I don't care about the legal specifics of your nation's fall.
My concern is more a matter of human decency mixed with personal fear as I see the same type of want a be despots operating here.
Your entire nation, should be ashamed.
Not our laws. Are we a global hegemony telling other countries what they can or cannot do with their laws?Does the UN Universal Declaration of Rights match our 1st Amendment?Yes...as in all such things. Is it wrong to try to measure UK laws by our standards? Or is that the American way of global hegemony?That's an odd way to look at it. It is only wrong here because of the Law?
If discussing Rights from an American perspective is hateful for you, I'm happy to discuss it in the context of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
From that perspective,( much like from the American one ), Human Rights are inherent and inalienable.
Thus a law that empowers the UK government to imprison someone for simply having the wrong political opinion, or expressing said opinion,
is a violation of Human Rights and thus unjust and morally wrong.
FYI
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
1. Yes.
2. Why do you ask?
3. Do you believe that imprisoning someone for the "crime" of having and/or expressing an opinion is right or wrong?
Ive only seen one case that I thought was unjustified.So, as usual, you are just spouting shit.I am keen to learn about this alleged law in the UK. I have never heard of it before.Yes...as in all such things. Is it wrong to try to measure UK laws by our standards? Or is that the American way of global hegemony?
If discussing Rights from an American perspective is hateful for you, I'm happy to discuss it in the context of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
From that perspective,( much like from the American one ), Human Rights are inherent and inalienable.
Thus a law that empowers the UK government to imprison someone for simply having the wrong political opinion, or expressing said opinion,
is a violation of Human Rights and thus unjust and morally wrong.
FYI
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
I've seen many reports, at least once with police discussing their intent to arrest and then actually arresting someone for having or expressing various opinions.
I have not researched the actually laws that empower your police to do this. I don't care about the legal specifics of your nation's fall.
My concern is more a matter of human decency mixed with personal fear as I see the same type of want a be despots operating here.
Your entire nation, should be ashamed.
Are you denying that people are being arrested for expressing the wrong opinion?