How can Trump be charged federally in a state court?

I mean why isn't t he media talking about this?

As stated in the forum rules, please provide a source for your claim.

  • Furthermore, when starting a new thread and declaring something as fact in your opening post, you must also link to a source. For example, "Polls say 2/3 of people think x, y, z." You need to link to a source for one of those alleged polls. Telling others to Google it on their own is not acceptable.
 
I heard some former prosecutor on MSNBC talking about this as some offenses morph between state and federal laws with there sometimes being an agreement as to whether to pursue them under one or the other, especially when joint task forces are involved.
 
He isn't. He is being charged under NY State law of falsifying business records with the intent of concealing a crime. That crime need not be a NT State crime. It can be Federal, or in any other jurisdiction. It does not even need to have been committed by Trump. He falsified the records to conceal a crime.
 
He isn't. He is being charged under NY State law of falsifying business records with the intent of concealing a crime. That crime need not be a NT State crime. It can be Federal, or in any other jurisdiction. It does not even need to have been committed by Trump. He falsified the records to conceal a crime.
A crime that idiot DA. refuses to name. Why do you think that is? I can tell you what it is not. Justice.
 
He did not name it because it's not the indictment. The Statement of Facts list the crimes. And they will come up at trial. They are not relevant to the indictment.
He did not name it because there is no crime. The case is going to be dismissed.

You say crimes are not relevant to an indictment? Do you know how stupid you sound? You do now.
 
He did not name it because there is no crime. The case is going to be dismissed.

You say crimes are not relevant to an indictment? Do you know how stupid you sound? You do now.
The indictment is for falsifying business records with the intent of concealing another crime. Period.
The Statement of facts expound on this by listing the crimes being concealed. But since he is not being indicted for those crimes, they do not appear on the indictment document. Legal documents are narrow and precise.
 
The indictment is for falsifying business records with the intent of concealing another crime. Period.
The Statement of facts expound on this by listing the crimes being concealed. But since he is not being indicted for those crimes, they do not appear on the indictment document. Legal documents are narrow and precise.
I appreciate your effort, but you'll get nowhere. They can't admit to anything.
 
The indictment is for falsifying business records with the intent of concealing another crime. Period.
The Statement of facts expound on this by listing the crimes being concealed. But since he is not being indicted for those crimes, they do not appear on the indictment document. Legal documents are narrow and precise.
Again, what is the other crime? How fucking dumb are you?
 
As stated in the forum rules, please provide a source for your claim.

  • Furthermore, when starting a new thread and declaring something as fact in your opening post, you must also link to a source. For example, "Polls say 2/3 of people think x, y, z." You need to link to a source for one of those alleged polls. Telling others to Google it on their own is not acceptable.
CNN has a good mansplain of the Bragg indictment. Basically Bragg has to prove Trump KNOWINGLY covered up the payments to avoid another Federal crime that he didn't mention in the indictment. To transform the misdemeanors into felonys. Never gointg to happen. But the MSM is giddy anyway.
 

Forum List

Back
Top