How did the Tennessee gunman KNOW he could blast away with impunity?

[deltex1]

Ray Ordierno has some tough decisions to make...God help the USA.



4-star Army reviewing breastfeeding policy

 

[koshergrl]

You think only criminals should be armed.

God no.

I think that relaxing gun laws even further, and making it easier for people to carry, you will create an environment where more criminals and more violent psychopaths will thrive, erasing the advantage of being able to shoot them.

Having said that, I grew up in a family that hunts, and have zero problem with responsible gun ownership. I just don't buy the logic that by putting more guns out there the result will necessarily be fewer gun massacres.

That's because you don't think logically. You are thinking emotionally, and you aren't paying attention to the reality of the situation because you're wrapped up in propaganda meant to talk us into disarming ourselves.

 

[Ravi]

If every time a mass shooter opened fire on a crowd of people, several of them blew him away with their own guns, the shooters would start thinking twice before they opened fire and these incidents would become far less common.

The sad thing is this very thing happens more often than not..and our admin propagandist "journalists" won't report it. So idiots like Londoner aren't aware of it, since they only tune into propaganda and anti-American bs.

When has it happened at all?

 

[2aguy]

The gunman could have picked any office, anywhere.

But apparently he wanted one where, even though it was staffed by U.S. Marines, he could just sit there and fire away without worrying about being stopped before he could rack up a large body count.

And he knew this office would suit his purposes.

How did he know?

Look at the sign on the door (now peppered with bullet holes):

Yep... a sign saying "Guns are forbidden here", or its equivalent.

The gunmen knew all law-abiding people inside would be disarmed and unable to shoot back, even though they were Marines.

Good job, whoever put up the sign. Did it accomplish what you wanted?

With open carry, this guy could have walked in carrying a weapon in each hand and the LAW YOU WANT would prevent the occupants from legally taking any action before he started firing.

...and, as you see, none of the gun rights extremists have any problem with that scenario.

And you know just how stupid what you just posted is.........today...at that office, not one law abiding, peaceful, decent person could walk into that place with a gun of any kind....while nothing at all stopped this guy from doing the same.....the gun free zone sticker kept law abiding people out....and did absolutely nothing to stop him from shooting the place up....

Boy, you are just stupid.

 

[2aguy]

Nothing screams 'American Christians are dangerous' like a Yemeni Muslim immigrant who floated back and forth between Jordan and the US before targeting unarmed military stations. Yup Americans are bad news.

Yeah....but is there any connection that can be traced back, in any way, to the Tea Party or Donald Trump....that is the important question don't you think? Did he at least drink tea?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The gunman could have picked any office, anywhere.

But apparently he wanted one where, even though it was staffed by U.S. Marines, he could just sit there and fire away without worrying about being stopped before he could rack up a large body count.

And he knew this office would suit his purposes.

How did he know?

Look at the sign on the door (now peppered with bullet holes):

Yep... a sign saying "Guns are forbidden here", or its equivalent.

The gunmen knew all law-abiding people inside would be disarmed and unable to shoot back, even though they were Marines.

Good job, whoever put up the sign. Did it accomplish what you wanted?

With open carry, this guy could have walked in carrying a weapon in each hand and the LAW YOU WANT would prevent the occupants from legally taking any action before he started firing.

...and, as you see, none of the gun rights extremists have any problem with that scenario.

And you know just how stupid what you just posted is.........today...at that office, not one law abiding, peaceful, decent person could walk into that place with a gun of any kind....while nothing at all stopped this guy from doing the same.....the gun free zone sticker kept law abiding people out....and did absolutely nothing to stop him from shooting the place up....

Boy, you are just stupid.

No, you're the idiot because if you had your way that office would NOT be a gun free zone and the perpetrator would have been able to open carry into the office.

 

[2aguy]

The gunman could have picked any office, anywhere.

But apparently he wanted one where, even though it was staffed by U.S. Marines, he could just sit there and fire away without worrying about being stopped before he could rack up a large body count.

And he knew this office would suit his purposes.

How did he know?

Look at the sign on the door (now peppered with bullet holes):

Yep... a sign saying "Guns are forbidden here", or its equivalent.

The gunmen knew all law-abiding people inside would be disarmed and unable to shoot back, even though they were Marines.

Good job, whoever put up the sign. Did it accomplish what you wanted?

With open carry, this guy could have walked in carrying a weapon in each hand and the LAW YOU WANT would prevent the occupants from legally taking any action before he started firing.

...and, as you see, none of the gun rights extremists have any problem with that scenario.

And you know just how stupid what you just posted is.........today...at that office, not one law abiding, peaceful, decent person could walk into that place with a gun of any kind....while nothing at all stopped this guy from doing the same.....the gun free zone sticker kept law abiding people out....and did absolutely nothing to stop him from shooting the place up....

Boy, you are just stupid.

No, you're the idiot because if you had your way that office would NOT be a gun free zone and the perpetrator would have been able to open carry into the office.

Really? Are you that dumb? He could have just walked in that day...he chose not to you moron........and fired from the street.....what exactly kept him from open carrying into that storefront that day.....the stupid fucking sign?

The only people who couldn't open carry were the peaceful, law abiding citizens who were not going to shoot up the place.......

Really...do you guys think before you post......

 

[NYcarbineer]

The gunman could have picked any office, anywhere.

But apparently he wanted one where, even though it was staffed by U.S. Marines, he could just sit there and fire away without worrying about being stopped before he could rack up a large body count.

And he knew this office would suit his purposes.

How did he know?

Look at the sign on the door (now peppered with bullet holes):

Yep... a sign saying "Guns are forbidden here", or its equivalent.

The gunmen knew all law-abiding people inside would be disarmed and unable to shoot back, even though they were Marines.

Good job, whoever put up the sign. Did it accomplish what you wanted?

With open carry, this guy could have walked in carrying a weapon in each hand and the LAW YOU WANT would prevent the occupants from legally taking any action before he started firing.

...and, as you see, none of the gun rights extremists have any problem with that scenario.

And you know just how stupid what you just posted is.........today...at that office, not one law abiding, peaceful, decent person could walk into that place with a gun of any kind....while nothing at all stopped this guy from doing the same.....the gun free zone sticker kept law abiding people out....and did absolutely nothing to stop him from shooting the place up....

Boy, you are just stupid.

No, you're the idiot because if you had your way that office would NOT be a gun free zone and the perpetrator would have been able to open carry into the office.

Really? Are you that dumb? He could have just walked in that day...he chose not to you moron........and fired from the street.....what exactly kept him from open carrying into that storefront that day.....the stupid fucking sign?

The only people who couldn't open carry were the peaceful, law abiding citizens who were not going to shoot up the place.......

Really...do you guys think before you post......

Squirm and meltdown all you want.

Open carry means just that. You can walk around with guns in both hands ready to fire and because it's legal you can't be bothered.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The gunman could have picked any office, anywhere.

But apparently he wanted one where, even though it was staffed by U.S. Marines, he could just sit there and fire away without worrying about being stopped before he could rack up a large body count.

And he knew this office would suit his purposes.

How did he know?

Look at the sign on the door (now peppered with bullet holes):

Yep... a sign saying "Guns are forbidden here", or its equivalent.

The gunmen knew all law-abiding people inside would be disarmed and unable to shoot back, even though they were Marines.

Good job, whoever put up the sign. Did it accomplish what you wanted?

With open carry, this guy could have walked in carrying a weapon in each hand and the LAW YOU WANT would prevent the occupants from legally taking any action before he started firing.

...and, as you see, none of the gun rights extremists have any problem with that scenario.

And you know just how stupid what you just posted is.........today...at that office, not one law abiding, peaceful, decent person could walk into that place with a gun of any kind....while nothing at all stopped this guy from doing the same.....the gun free zone sticker kept law abiding people out....and did absolutely nothing to stop him from shooting the place up....

Boy, you are just stupid.

No, you're the idiot because if you had your way that office would NOT be a gun free zone and the perpetrator would have been able to open carry into the office.

Really? Are you that dumb? He could have just walked in that day...he chose not to you moron........and fired from the street.....what exactly kept him from open carrying into that storefront that day.....the stupid fucking sign?

The only people who couldn't open carry were the peaceful, law abiding citizens who were not going to shoot up the place.......

Really...do you guys think before you post......

You want open carry, really? You want to be at your bank and see these three guys come walking in?

 

[Auld Phart]

With open carry, this guy could have walked in carrying a weapon in each hand and the LAW YOU WANT would prevent the occupants from legally taking any action before he started firing.

...and, as you see, none of the gun rights extremists have any problem with that scenario.

And you know just how stupid what you just posted is.........today...at that office, not one law abiding, peaceful, decent person could walk into that place with a gun of any kind....while nothing at all stopped this guy from doing the same.....the gun free zone sticker kept law abiding people out....and did absolutely nothing to stop him from shooting the place up....

Boy, you are just stupid.

No, you're the idiot because if you had your way that office would NOT be a gun free zone and the perpetrator would have been able to open carry into the office.

Really? Are you that dumb? He could have just walked in that day...he chose not to you moron........and fired from the street.....what exactly kept him from open carrying into that storefront that day.....the stupid fucking sign?

The only people who couldn't open carry were the peaceful, law abiding citizens who were not going to shoot up the place.......

Really...do you guys think before you post......

You want open carry, really? You want to be at your bank and see these three guys come walking in?

Does it scare you to see people walking around with guns slung over their shoulders?

 

[Brain357]

The gunman could have picked any office, anywhere.

But apparently he wanted one where, even though it was staffed by U.S. Marines, he could just sit there and fire away without worrying about being stopped before he could rack up a large body count.

And he knew this office would suit his purposes.

How did he know?

Look at the sign on the door (now peppered with bullet holes):

Yep... a sign saying "Guns are forbidden here", or its equivalent.

The gunmen knew all law-abiding people inside would be disarmed and unable to shoot back, even though they were Marines.

Good job, whoever put up the sign. Did it accomplish what you wanted?

He was probably also suicidal and didn't care if they were armed or not. He was going to kill a few people even if they had M16s, surprise was on his side.

 

[2aguy]

With open carry, this guy could have walked in carrying a weapon in each hand and the LAW YOU WANT would prevent the occupants from legally taking any action before he started firing.

...and, as you see, none of the gun rights extremists have any problem with that scenario.

And you know just how stupid what you just posted is.........today...at that office, not one law abiding, peaceful, decent person could walk into that place with a gun of any kind....while nothing at all stopped this guy from doing the same.....the gun free zone sticker kept law abiding people out....and did absolutely nothing to stop him from shooting the place up....

Boy, you are just stupid.

No, you're the idiot because if you had your way that office would NOT be a gun free zone and the perpetrator would have been able to open carry into the office.

Really? Are you that dumb? He could have just walked in that day...he chose not to you moron........and fired from the street.....what exactly kept him from open carrying into that storefront that day.....the stupid fucking sign?

The only people who couldn't open carry were the peaceful, law abiding citizens who were not going to shoot up the place.......

Really...do you guys think before you post......

You want open carry, really? You want to be at your bank and see these three guys come walking in?

No way......who open carries a package of oreo cookies but doesn't have the sense to have a fresh quart of milk to go with them......thanks for posting this....people need to be aware of this travesty.....

 

[2aguy]

With open carry, this guy could have walked in carrying a weapon in each hand and the LAW YOU WANT would prevent the occupants from legally taking any action before he started firing.

...and, as you see, none of the gun rights extremists have any problem with that scenario.

And you know just how stupid what you just posted is.........today...at that office, not one law abiding, peaceful, decent person could walk into that place with a gun of any kind....while nothing at all stopped this guy from doing the same.....the gun free zone sticker kept law abiding people out....and did absolutely nothing to stop him from shooting the place up....

Boy, you are just stupid.

No, you're the idiot because if you had your way that office would NOT be a gun free zone and the perpetrator would have been able to open carry into the office.

Really? Are you that dumb? He could have just walked in that day...he chose not to you moron........and fired from the street.....what exactly kept him from open carrying into that storefront that day.....the stupid fucking sign?

The only people who couldn't open carry were the peaceful, law abiding citizens who were not going to shoot up the place.......

Really...do you guys think before you post......

Squirm and meltdown all you want.

Open carry means just that. You can walk around with guns in both hands ready to fire and because it's legal you can't be bothered.

Sorry, you can't carry guns in your hands......that would be a crime called brandishing, you can be arrested for that....

Again, you didn't answer the question so I will restate it here.....if that killer had just walked into the store with his gun.......what would have stopped him.....that sign?

Since there was a gun free zone sign...only law abiding citizens were kept from carrying guns into that storefront.......

 

[2aguy]

With open carry, this guy could have walked in carrying a weapon in each hand and the LAW YOU WANT would prevent the occupants from legally taking any action before he started firing.

...and, as you see, none of the gun rights extremists have any problem with that scenario.

And you know just how stupid what you just posted is.........today...at that office, not one law abiding, peaceful, decent person could walk into that place with a gun of any kind....while nothing at all stopped this guy from doing the same.....the gun free zone sticker kept law abiding people out....and did absolutely nothing to stop him from shooting the place up....

Boy, you are just stupid.

No, you're the idiot because if you had your way that office would NOT be a gun free zone and the perpetrator would have been able to open carry into the office.

Really? Are you that dumb? He could have just walked in that day...he chose not to you moron........and fired from the street.....what exactly kept him from open carrying into that storefront that day.....the stupid fucking sign?

The only people who couldn't open carry were the peaceful, law abiding citizens who were not going to shoot up the place.......

Really...do you guys think before you post......

You want open carry, really? You want to be at your bank and see these three guys come walking in?

And for the record...rifles and shot guns are for when you are actually expecting trouble....just walking around with one is excessive...but these guys.....aren't shooting anyone are they......

You really want to focus on the guys actually walking in and shooting people....if they yell allah ahkbar before hand......then you can be worrried......the cookie monster above...not so much...

 

[Clementine]

The gunman could have picked any office, anywhere.

But apparently he wanted one where, even though it was staffed by U.S. Marines, he could just sit there and fire away without worrying about being stopped before he could rack up a large body count.

And he knew this office would suit his purposes.

How did he know?

Look at the sign on the door (now peppered with bullet holes):

Yep... a sign saying "Guns are forbidden here", or its equivalent.

The gunmen knew all law-abiding people inside would be disarmed and unable to shoot back, even though they were Marines.

Good job, whoever put up the sign. Did it accomplish what you wanted?

It took a while before it was even reported that the shooter was a Muslim and had tweeted that it was time to submit to Allah before the killings.

Yes, these whackos clearly prefer gun-free zones. Yet, the idiots keep putting up those signs to make sure law abiding people aren't armed when they enter. Only a complete moron would feel safer knowing that only people who respect the law will leave their guns behind. I honestly cannot understand why these signs are still posted since they merely serve as a heads up to murderers? Only a brain dead liberal would think they are a good idea.

The left immediately starts calling for gun control when there is a shooting, but they aren't real interested in preventing it. The gun-free zones are an invitation, not a deterrence and they should know that. Of course, if a would-be mass murderer was shot by a would-be victim, it would hardly support their calls for more gun control.

And it's even crazier that the left thinks gun control will stop radical Muslims like this puke.

 

[Brain357]

The gunman could have picked any office, anywhere.

But apparently he wanted one where, even though it was staffed by U.S. Marines, he could just sit there and fire away without worrying about being stopped before he could rack up a large body count.

And he knew this office would suit his purposes.

How did he know?

Look at the sign on the door (now peppered with bullet holes):

Yep... a sign saying "Guns are forbidden here", or its equivalent.

The gunmen knew all law-abiding people inside would be disarmed and unable to shoot back, even though they were Marines.

Good job, whoever put up the sign. Did it accomplish what you wanted?

It took a while before it was even reported that the shooter was a Muslim and had tweeted that it was time to submit to Allah before the killings.

Yes, these whackos clearly prefer gun-free zones. Yet, the idiots keep putting up those signs to make sure law abiding people aren't armed when they enter. Only a complete moron would feel safer knowing that only people who respect the law will leave their guns behind. I honestly cannot understand why these signs are still posted since they merely serve as a heads up to murderers? Only a brain dead liberal would think they are a good idea.

The left immediately starts calling for gun control when there is a shooting, but they aren't real interested in preventing it. The gun-free zones are an invitation, not a deterrence and they should know that. Of course, if a would-be mass murderer was shot by a would-be victim, it would hardly support their calls for more gun control.

And it's even crazier that the left thinks gun control will stop radical Muslims like this puke.

You realize way more people are killed in accidental shootings than these types of mass shootings right?

Gainesville Police investigate accidental shooting at recruitmen - Atlanta News Weather Traffic and Sports FOX 5

 

[Clementine]

You realize way more people are killed in accidental shootings than these types of mass shootings right?

Yes, so why do Dems always latch onto mass shootings to push their radical agenda?

Most shootings are in cities, but you never hear Dems rallying against gang members and thugs. Chicago is a dangerous city, but since they already have stricter gun control than most, the left doesn't like to talk about it.

 

[Brain357]

You realize way more people are killed in accidental shootings than these types of mass shootings right?

Yes, so why do Dems always latch onto mass shootings to push their radical agenda?

Most shootings are in cities, but you never hear Dems rallying against gang members and thugs. Chicago is a dangerous city, but since they already have stricter gun control than most, the left doesn't like to talk about it.

I've seen a lot of republicans latch onto mass shootings to push the gun agenda. Need a guy with a gun to stop one right? They both try to take advantage when they can. They are politicians.

Dems try to keep guns from criminals. While I think gun control can lower gun crime, a city is very limited. It's easy to go to the next town and get a gun. And of course while you can lower gun crime, it won't lower crime. They will just switch to other weapons. Guns don't create criminals, nor do less guns eliminate criminals.

 

[2aguy]

The gunman could have picked any office, anywhere.

But apparently he wanted one where, even though it was staffed by U.S. Marines, he could just sit there and fire away without worrying about being stopped before he could rack up a large body count.

And he knew this office would suit his purposes.

How did he know?

Look at the sign on the door (now peppered with bullet holes):

Yep... a sign saying "Guns are forbidden here", or its equivalent.

The gunmen knew all law-abiding people inside would be disarmed and unable to shoot back, even though they were Marines.

Good job, whoever put up the sign. Did it accomplish what you wanted?

It took a while before it was even reported that the shooter was a Muslim and had tweeted that it was time to submit to Allah before the killings.

Yes, these whackos clearly prefer gun-free zones. Yet, the idiots keep putting up those signs to make sure law abiding people aren't armed when they enter. Only a complete moron would feel safer knowing that only people who respect the law will leave their guns behind. I honestly cannot understand why these signs are still posted since they merely serve as a heads up to murderers? Only a brain dead liberal would think they are a good idea.

The left immediately starts calling for gun control when there is a shooting, but they aren't real interested in preventing it. The gun-free zones are an invitation, not a deterrence and they should know that. Of course, if a would-be mass murderer was shot by a would-be victim, it would hardly support their calls for more gun control.

And it's even crazier that the left thinks gun control will stop radical Muslims like this puke.

You realize way more people are killed in accidental shootings than these types of mass shootings right?

Gainesville Police investigate accidental shooting at recruitmen - Atlanta News Weather Traffic and Sports FOX 5

So. In 2013 there were only 505 accidental gun deaths in a country of over 320 million people, with over 320 million guns in private hands and over 12.8 million people actually carrying guns for self defense. that is pretty good control and respect for the responsibility of owning a gun.

 

[2aguy]

You realize way more people are killed in accidental shootings than these types of mass shootings right?

Yes, so why do Dems always latch onto mass shootings to push their radical agenda?

Most shootings are in cities, but you never hear Dems rallying against gang members and thugs. Chicago is a dangerous city, but since they already have stricter gun control than most, the left doesn't like to talk about it.

I've seen a lot of republicans latch onto mass shootings to push the gun agenda. Need a guy with a gun to stop one right? They both try to take advantage when they can. They are politicians.

Dems try to keep guns from criminals. While I think gun control can lower gun crime, a city is very limited. It's easy to go to the next town and get a gun. And of course while you can lower gun crime, it won't lower crime. They will just switch to other weapons. Guns don't create criminals, nor do less guns eliminate criminals.

No, democrats do not try to keep guns from criminals. If that was their goal they would push different methods, since what they do now does nothing to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. democrats focus their efforts on law abiding citizens, the very people who won't misuse guns.