Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet, they insist it happened without being able to produce a single iota of actual proof. Federal judges have gone over their affidavits line by line, and said they were so full of nothing but speculation and innuendo, that they should never have been presented to a federal court, and even sanctioned the lawyers for doing so.What you idiots call trying to overturn an election is just people trying to prove fraud that stole the election. Try the truth. Anyone who did that is well within our laws.
It's all over the news. Heritage foundation paid Ginni $680,000 from 2003 to 2007, and Clarence failed to report it, until and outside group pointed it out. At which point (8 years later) Clarence filed an "amended" financial statement.Proof?
The speculation is over. WI. has proven fraud.Yet, they insist it happened without being able to produce a single iota of actual proof. Federal judges have gone over their affidavits line by line, and said they were so full of nothing but speculation and innuendo, that they should never have been presented to a federal court, and even sanctioned the lawyers for doing so.
Then post any of those payments, other than the times Hunter bought dad an ice cream cone, and didn't declare it.There are plenty of records showing that Hunter paid plenty of quid-pro-joes expense.
A federal election commission PROVED , they weren't allowed to vote, and as a matter of federal record. They even got the statements from the state election officials admitting those people had been illegally prevented from voting.Voters claimed they weren't allowed to vote?
The "proof" is the opinion of one person.The speculation is over. WI. has proven fraud.
Tell it to a judge.The speculation is over. WI. has proven fraud.
Should we withhold government cash and prizes for married heteros who choose not to have kids?So you want gays for population control.. how do we carry on American traditions culture heritage if we stop reproducing?
So we should withhold government cash and prizes for married heteros who choose not to have children?Those tax benefits are predicated on the assumption that they have children or may someday have children. There's no reason to give Adam or Steve such a benefit.
Just like thousands of years ago the Egyptians claimed the earth was proven flat.The speculation is over. WI. has proven fraud.
America has slowed down reproduction, but it is not the fault of TH3 GAYZ. Married heteros are having less kids than our ancestors did. Many couples are choosing not to procreate.So you want gays for population control.. how do we carry on American traditions culture heritage if we stop reproducing?
The opinion of the legislature is not one person. They have said they believe there was widespread fraud. True the Vote has proven it.The "proof" is the opinion of one person.
Step down pig
Time for Clarence Thomas to step down after 'haunting the court for years': NYT editorial board member
Stepping out under his own byline, a member of the New York Times Editorial Board used revelations in a Washington Post report that Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, conspired with members of Donald Trump's White House to overturn the 2020 election as a springboard to say the justice needs to resign.
According to Jesse Wegman, Clarence and Ginni Thomas have "done enough damage" since Clarence took his spot on the country's highest court in 1991.
As the columnist noted, Ginni Thomas' antics have not only cast a cloud over her husband's curious sole vote to keep Trump's White House documents secret but also what influence she has had on his 30-year career.
"What did Justice Clarence Thomas know, and when did he know it? " Wegman asked before adding, "The question usually gets directed at politicians, not judges, but it’s a fair one in light of the revelation on Thursday that Justice Thomas’s wife, Ginni, was working feverishly behind the scenes — and to a far greater degree than she previously admitted — in a high-level effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election."
Graciously conceding that Justice Thomas may not have known that his wife was texting during the insurrection attempt -- and with whom -- the columnist insisted that, nonetheless, the damage is done.
"It sure makes you wonder, doesn’t it?" he wrote. "And that’s precisely the problem: We shouldn’t have to wonder. The Supreme Court is the most powerful judicial body in the country, and yet, as Alexander Hamilton reminded us, it has neither the sword nor the purse as a means to enforce its rulings. It depends instead on the American people’s acceptance of its legitimacy, which is why the justices must make every possible effort to appear fair, unbiased and beyond reproach."
Citing a speech by Justice Thomas, where he noted, "I think the media makes it sound as though you are just always going right to your personal preference. That’s a problem. You’re going to jeopardize any faith in the legal institutions, " Wegman pointed out, "Bench memo to the justice: You know what jeopardizes public faith in legal institutions? Refusing to recuse yourself from numerous high-profile cases in which your wife has been personally and sometimes financially entangled, as The New Yorker reported in January."
According to Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor, "She signed up for Stop the Steal. She was part of the team, and that team had an interest in how the court would rule. That’s all I need to know," Gillers explained that his patience with the couple has run out, adding, "they’ve really abused that tolerance."
"Ms. Thomas’s antics, and her husband’s refusal to respond appropriately, have been haunting the court for years, but this latest conflagration shouldn’t be a close call," Wegman wrote. "The court is in deep trouble these days, pervaded by what Justice Sonia Sotomayor recently called the 'stench' of partisanship — a stench arising in no small part from the Thomases’ behavior. It is hard to imagine that the other justices, regardless of their personal politics, aren’t bothered."
"Justice Thomas has shown himself unwilling or unable to protect what remains of the court’s reputation from the appearance of extreme bias he and his wife have created<" he added before concluding, "He would do the country a service by stepping down and making room for someone who won’t have that problem."
You can read his whole opinion piece here.
The Egyptians did not have tracking data and cell phones to ping. True the Vote does and did.Just like thousands of years ago the Egyptians claimed the earth was proven flat.
Prosperous societies reproduce less.
To keep our economy growing, we will have to increase immigration, which would make BrokeLoser into BrokeLosingHisMind.
Tell the corrupt courts and the RINOs to do something about it. If it gets to court fraud will be proven easily.Tell it to a judge.
So the "proof" can be judged.
The opinion isn't of the legislature, or they would have voted on it. It is the opinion of the speaker, who without a floor vote, can only speak for himself.The opinion of the legislature is not one person. They have said they believe there was widespread fraud. True the Vote has proven it.
One does have to question the judgement of someone who married her.She sleeps in the same bed as a Supreme Court Justice. Absolutely ridiculous.
What a nut job. Reading some of these texts you can see just how much she has lost her mind
It's been to court. Been there, done that. Every last judge, both state and federal, democrat and republican, even those personally appointed by Donald Trump, have dismissed your claim.Tell the corrupt courts and the RINOs to do something about it. If it gets to court fraud will be proven easily.
