How Ginny Thomas Proves Judge Jackson Can't Be Trusted On The Supreme Court

[bripat9643]

The Clarence Thomas Scandal Shows The Supreme Court Considers Itself Above Ethics​

SCOTUS has become a joke!

What "scandal?"

 

[meaner gene]

They are all predicated on the assumption that married couples have children. Otherwise, why give them to anyone?

Yet not all married couples have children. Nor civil unions go childless.

All you assumptions are wrong, as usual.

What is the percentage of childless couples?
While married couples with children were the majority decades ago, now nearly 57 percent of U.S. households are childless

 

[bripat9643]

Yet not all married couples have children. Nor civil unions go childless.

All you assumptions are wrong, as usual.

Rarely does federal legislation help only the people it was intended to help.

Do you want couples to get a fertility test to get a deduction? Progs will be the first people to howl about that.

Dumb argument.

 

[meaner gene]

Rarely does federal legislation help only the people it was intended to help.

Do you want couples to get a fertility test to get a deduction? Progs will be the first people to howl about that.

Dumb argument.

You left out adoption.

 

[meaner gene]

Rarely does federal legislation help only the people it was intended to help.

And rarely do voter integrity laws hurt only the people it was intended to hurt.

Your point is noted.

 

[bripat9643]

And rarely do voter integrity laws hurt only the people it was intended to hurt.

Your point is noted.

They don't hurt anyone except criminals.

 

[mamooth]

Ginni Thomas is a lobbyist. She accepts money from a whole lot of people in return for her "influence".

Since they're a married couple, Ginni's lobbyist money goes to Clarence as well.

For the first time in US history, a US Supreme Court justice is being bribed. Those who give money to Ginni do it knowing that they're buying the vote of Clarence.

Naturally, the Trump cult supports such corruption. They always do. Now, moral people, they think Clarence should be impeached for such corruption.

Go on, Trump cultists. Tell us you'd be totally fine if a democratic couple did such a thing. Except you wouldn't, and you know it. You're excusing corruption because the corruption brings you power.

 

[bripat9643]

Ginni Thomas is a lobbyist. She accepts money from a whole lot of people in return for her "influence".

Since they're a married couple, Ginni's lobbyist money goes to Clarence as well.

For the first time in US history, a US Supreme Court justice is being bribed. Those who give money to Ginni do it knowing that they're buying the vote of Clarence.

Naturally, the Trump cult supports such corruption. They always do. Now, moral people, they think Clarence should be impeached for such corruption.

Go on, Trump cultists. Tell us you'd be totally fine if a democratic couple did such a thing. Except you wouldn't, and you know it. You're excusing corruption because the corruption brings you power.

I don't see you calling for Biden to be indicted? The money Hunter "earns" also goes to quid pro Joe.

 

[meaner gene]

They don't hurt anyone except criminals.

Not according to your first point, and not according to the election commission investigating such claims. Who found 10's of thousands (statistically) illegally disenfranchised voterws, and personally verified, through affidavits and cross examination under oath, dozens of people who had been illegally disenfranchised.

 

[bripat9643]

Not according to your first point, and not according to the election commission investigating such claims. Who found 10's of thousands (statistically) illegally disenfranchised voterws, and personally verified, through affidavits and cross examination under oath, dozens of people who had been illegally disenfranchised.

When they file a legal complaint, perhaps you'll have a legitimate issue.

 

[BS Filter]

Ginni Thomas is a lobbyist. She accepts money from a whole lot of people in return for her "influence".

Since they're a married couple, Ginni's lobbyist money goes to Clarence as well.

For the first time in US history, a US Supreme Court justice is being bribed. Those who give money to Ginni do it knowing that they're buying the vote of Clarence.

Naturally, the Trump cult supports such corruption. They always do. Now, moral people, they think Clarence should be impeached for such corruption.

Go on, Trump cultists. Tell us you'd be totally fine if a democratic couple did such a thing. Except you wouldn't, and you know it. You're excusing corruption because the corruption brings you power.

I'll go along with that when you support the idea of Biden taking a cognitive test.

 

[meaner gene]

Ginni Thomas is a lobbyist. She accepts money from a whole lot of people in return for her "influence".

Since they're a married couple, Ginni's lobbyist money goes to Clarence as well.

For the first time in US history, a US Supreme Court justice is being bribed. Those who give money to Ginni do it knowing that they're buying the vote of Clarence.

Not only buying influence, but doing so secretly, like the Heritage foundation did with $680,000 paid to Ginni, without Clarence reporting it as required by the financial disclosure forms.

In fact, Thomas kept the payments undisclosed for 8 years.

 

[Lastamender]

I guess it should not be a surprise that an examination of Ginny Thomas's texts between herself and Trump's Chief of Staff reveals she is a Q-tard. Mark Meadows did nothing to dissuade her from her whackjob beliefs. In fact, he kept blessing her.

When Meadows wrote to Thomas on Nov. 24, the White House chief of staff invoked God to describe the effort to overturn the election. “This is a fight of good versus evil,” Meadows wrote. “Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. Do not grow weary in well doing. The fight continues. I have staked my career on it. Well at least my time in DC on it.”

Thomas replied: “Thank you!! Needed that! This plus a conversation with my best friend just now… I will try to keep holding on. America is worth it!”

[snip]

Ginni Thomas, in that interview, also acknowledged that she had attended Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally at the Ellipse near the White House on Jan. 6, but said that she left early because it was too cold and that she did not have any role in planning the event.


[snip]

In February 2021, when the Supreme Court rejected election challenges filed by Trump and his allies, Thomas wrote in a dissent that it was “baffling” and “inexplicable” that the majority had decided against hearing the cases because he believed the Supreme Court should provide states with guidance for future elections.


Ginny goes full batshit:

“The intense pressures you and our President are now experiencing are more intense than Anything Experienced (but I only felt a fraction of it in 1991),” Thomas wrote to Meadows on Nov. 19, an apparent reference to Justice Thomas’s 1991 confirmation hearings in which lawyer Anita Hill testified that he had made unwanted sexual comments when he was her boss. Thomas strongly denied the accusations.
The first of the 29 messages between Ginni Thomas and Meadows was sent on Nov. 5, two days after the election. She sent him a link to a YouTube video labeled “TRUMP STING w CIA Director Steve Pieczenik, The Biggest Election Story in History, QFS-BLOCKCHAIN.”

Pieczenik, a former State Department official, is a far-right commentator who has falsely claimed that the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., was a “false-flag” operation to push a gun-control agenda.

The video Thomas shared with Meadows is no longer available on YouTube. But Thomas wrote to Meadows, “I hope this is true; never heard anything like this before, or even a hint of it. Possible???”

“Watermarked ballots in over 12 states have been part of a huge Trump & military white hat sting operation in 12 key battleground states,” she wrote.

During that period, supporters of the QAnon extremist ideology embraced a false theory that Trump had watermarked mail-in ballots so he could track potential fraud. “Watch the water” was a refrain in QAnon circles at the time.

In the Nov. 5 message to Meadows, Thomas went on to quote a passage that had circulated on right-wing websites: “Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators (elected officials, bureaucrats, social media censorship mongers, fake stream media reporters, etc) are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/24/virginia-thomas-mark-meadows-texts/

What you idiots call trying to overturn an election is just people trying to prove fraud that stole the election. Try the truth. Anyone who did that is well within our laws.

 

[bripat9643]

Not only buying influence, but doing so secretly, like the Heritage foundation did with $680,000 paid to Ginni, without Clarence reporting it as required by the financial disclosure forms.

In fact, Thomas kept the payments undisclosed for 8 years.

Proof?

 

[meaner gene]

I don't see you calling for Biden to be indicted? The money Hunter "earns" also goes to quid pro Joe.

Bidens financial statements, tax records, and other financial disclosures prove otherwise.

If any money was transferred, there would be a record of it in the last 30+ years.

This is no different than the claims of "voter fraud" that have no actual proof, other than the rantings of those claiming it.

 

[meaner gene]

When they file a legal complaint, perhaps you'll have a legitimate issue.

They filed a legal complaint, the election commission verified their complaint, and is a matter of public record that thousands had been illegally disenfranchised by the election law put in place to fight voter fraud.

Sorry Charlie, but it's on the federal record.

 

[bripat9643]

Bidens financial statements, tax records, and other financial disclosures prove otherwise.

No they don't.

If any money was transferred, there would be a record of it in the last 30+ years.

There are plenty of records showing that Hunter paid plenty of quid-pro-joes expense.

This is no different than the claims of "voter fraud" that have no actual proof, other than the rantings of those claiming it.

Both have actual proof.

 

[bripat9643]

They filed a legal complaint, the election commission verified their complaint, and is a matter of public record that thousands had been illegally disenfranchised by the election law put in place to fight voter fraud.

Sorry Charlie, but it's on the federal record.

Voters claimed they weren't allowed to vote?

 

[strollingbones]

there are grounds for impeachment..simple as that...but it would only be the 2nd time in history for that to happen...but we are living in interesting times

 

[BS Filter]

Not only buying influence, but doing so secretly, like the Heritage foundation did with $680,000 paid to Ginni, without Clarence reporting it as required by the financial disclosure forms.

In fact, Thomas kept the payments undisclosed for 8 years.

Clarance Thomas and his wife are conservatives??? I'm shocked.