Seems that over 60 million still voted for the congenital liar, and for the Democrat Party.
Hence.....remediation is never out of order.
Those votes supported the 'legacy' of the most inept and destructive President in modern history
Barack Hussein Obama was a fraud from the get-go. He never had any ability or competence in the job the Left elected him to.
This was proven by an unbroken string of failures and gaffes in both domestic policies and foreign policy blunders.
Let's focus on the latter.
1. Whenever the horrific slaughter that has taken place, under his auspices, in the Middle East...he resorts to the same straw man argument: either we could do nothing, or we would have to intervene, and commit a half million US troops on the ground.
No we wouldn't.
a. When the Syrians used chemical weapons, and he stated that would have been 'a red line in the sand,' he did nothing. He could have destroyed Assad's air assets, preventing him from doing it again.
This was two or three years before the Russians were in the picture, and he could have destroyed the air bases, preventing Russia from exercising any power in Syria.
Instead, he did what no President in decades, since 1972, has done: brought Russia back into the Middle East.
b. Iran had warned Obama that if he enforced the 'red line' and punished Syria, there would be no nuclear agreement.....and he backed down.
Talking about an insane agenda: making certain that Iran was a nuclear power was primary to Obama!
2. When he had the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for regime change in Iran, the Green Revolution, by students who were being shot in the streets.....he did nothing. Effectively, he supported the Mullahs.
Even the NYTimes admitted his blunder back in 2009: "The president has been right to tread carefully, given poisonous American-Iranian history, but has erred on the side of caution. He sounds like a man rehearsing prepared lines rather than the leader of the free world."
City of Whispers
Obama could have handled Iran in the same way Reagan handled the Soviet Union....but, of course, he's not half the man Reagan was.
3. He could have armed the moderate rebels in Syria when there were moderates, he could have supported Saudi Arabia and Jordan against Iran, the world's leader in support of terrorism.
4. He could have left enough American troops in Iraq to counter balance Iran's efforts there, and forestalled the birth of ISIS. Instead, he left a huge WELCOME sign for ISIS.
The only individuals more incompetent and destructive than Obama are his voters.
The presidential vote was, in effect, a one-question IQ test.
Hence.....remediation is never out of order.
Those votes supported the 'legacy' of the most inept and destructive President in modern history
Barack Hussein Obama was a fraud from the get-go. He never had any ability or competence in the job the Left elected him to.
This was proven by an unbroken string of failures and gaffes in both domestic policies and foreign policy blunders.
Let's focus on the latter.
1. Whenever the horrific slaughter that has taken place, under his auspices, in the Middle East...he resorts to the same straw man argument: either we could do nothing, or we would have to intervene, and commit a half million US troops on the ground.
No we wouldn't.
a. When the Syrians used chemical weapons, and he stated that would have been 'a red line in the sand,' he did nothing. He could have destroyed Assad's air assets, preventing him from doing it again.
This was two or three years before the Russians were in the picture, and he could have destroyed the air bases, preventing Russia from exercising any power in Syria.
Instead, he did what no President in decades, since 1972, has done: brought Russia back into the Middle East.
b. Iran had warned Obama that if he enforced the 'red line' and punished Syria, there would be no nuclear agreement.....and he backed down.
Talking about an insane agenda: making certain that Iran was a nuclear power was primary to Obama!
2. When he had the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for regime change in Iran, the Green Revolution, by students who were being shot in the streets.....he did nothing. Effectively, he supported the Mullahs.
Even the NYTimes admitted his blunder back in 2009: "The president has been right to tread carefully, given poisonous American-Iranian history, but has erred on the side of caution. He sounds like a man rehearsing prepared lines rather than the leader of the free world."
City of Whispers
Obama could have handled Iran in the same way Reagan handled the Soviet Union....but, of course, he's not half the man Reagan was.
3. He could have armed the moderate rebels in Syria when there were moderates, he could have supported Saudi Arabia and Jordan against Iran, the world's leader in support of terrorism.
4. He could have left enough American troops in Iraq to counter balance Iran's efforts there, and forestalled the birth of ISIS. Instead, he left a huge WELCOME sign for ISIS.
The only individuals more incompetent and destructive than Obama are his voters.
The presidential vote was, in effect, a one-question IQ test.
