How we know Hitler was right wing.

There are only degrees of collectivism in societies.
Society is, by definition, collective.
Individualist society is an oxymoron. If one stays in society, one can only be more or less part of the collective (remember defense, for example?).
 
The conservative movement is losing more and more adherents.

This is actually the natural progression which occurs as a group moves toward totalitarianism.

The UnConservatives are moving toward national socialism. They do not know this consciously. In fact, it is important they do not know this. This is why they must be deluded into believing Nazis are left wing. It's circular logic: Nazis are left wing, I cannot be a Nazi because Nazis are left wing.

The Nazi movement, like all wild and crazy movements, begins by forming a very small, but very passionate core. It purges and prunes away all the chaff. It denigrates old heroes and former adherents as it becomes more and more extreme. It runs off more and more people until just the hard core remains.

Nazis party members made up less than three percent of the population when Hitler came to power.

After 9/11, America lost its collective mind. We gave birth to the totalitarian Patriot Act, Homeland Security (just think about name!), and waterboarding of prisoners.

Then came the financial crash, and this pushed millions of people even further into the darkness. Many plunged into the abyss of the irretrievably insane.

You see them every day. Right here on this forum.

The wannabe Nazis cling to the "socialist" in "national socialist" as evidence Nazis are left wing.

But have we not seen the schizophrenic nature of the GOP attacking government entitlements one day, but then defending them when Obama tries to cut them the next?

The wannabe Nazis say Nazis are liberal because they believe in a strong central government.

Did we not see the birth of the Department of Homeland Security and the miltarizing of our domestic police during the peak of the conservative heyday? Warrantless wiretaps anyone? NDLs anyone? The attempt to deny constitutional protections to US citizens in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld anyone?

Unconservatives are militaristic, if nothing else.


The deluded also don gigantic blinders to the racialist half of nazism. This is because it makes them extremely uncomfortable to hear some of their own rhetoric echoed back at them. The attacks on multiculturalism. The hatred of homosexuals. The anti-immigrant rants. The stereotyping of all Muslims as evil. This hatred is becoming more and more naked by the day.

And now we are even beginning to see anti-semitic rhetoric on the rise. Diatribes against international Jewish bankers. The old favorites are making a comeback.

We also see classic projecting of these Nazi tendencies onto Obama. Invented dictatorial behaviors.

All the signs are there. These people are right on the edge.

During the Great Depression, Nazis were quite popular in the US. As were Communists. Each side competed for the minds of the masses.

There was even a Glenn Beck. His names was Charles Coughlin. The story of Coughlin's devolution in his thinking is a cautionary tale.

Nazis used to fill auditoriums in America. People get fearful during hard times and if someone comes along to tell them it isn't their fault, and that it is the fault of (Muslims, Jew bankers, negroes on food stamps), that person can go far.


They don't have armbands today. They won't be waving swastikas. But they do have their flag pins and slogans and such. They are inventing a neologism.

Great example of a Hitler worshiper and all around brown shirt wearer
 
There are only degrees of collectivism in societies.
Society is, by definition, collective.
Individualist society is an oxymoron. If one stays in society, one can only be more or less part of the collective (remember defense, for example?).







No, it's not. It defines the relationship beween the State and the individual. Individualist governments honor the rights and responsiblities of the individual as taking precedence over the needs and desires of the State.

That's why during WWII Germany and the Soviet Union lost millions upon millions of soldiers whereas we lost 350,000, the British (who were in it longer than us) around 400,000 for the simple reason that in a collectivist society the individual simply doesn't matter.

I allways look at how countries operate in extreme situations because that is where you determine their real intent and ethos. In a collectivist society if you die in war it is expected, in an individualist society the State is thankful for your sacrafice because we don't expect you to die for your country.
 
Three months.

That's it.

Just spend three months with the Nazis on Stormfront and you will never delude yourself ever again that Nazis are left wing.

Bullshit.

Most of the Stormfront JOOOOOOOO haters are very left wing. They claim that Bush and the JOOOOOOZZZZ rigged the WTC and the Bilderbergs and Rothschildes are oppressing the workers on behalf of the Illuminati (JOOOZZZ)

Stormfront are a bunch of Jooo hating Occupoo Wall Street morons.

You clearly know nothing about them except superficial shit.

I take it you are too chickenshit to actually spend time with them.

Go and tell them Obama is just like them. That would be priceless!

Wake up, before it is too late for you.

[ame=http://youtu.be/RQcQdWBqt14]Helen Thomas tells Jews to go back to Germany - YouTube[/ame]
 
Three months.

That's it.

Just spend three months with the Nazis on Stormfront and you will never delude yourself ever again that Nazis are left wing.

Bullshit.

Most of the Stormfront JOOOOOOOO haters are very left wing. They claim that Bush and the JOOOOOOZZZZ rigged the WTC and the Bilderbergs and Rothschildes are oppressing the workers on behalf of the Illuminati (JOOOZZZ)

Stormfront are a bunch of Jooo hating Occupoo Wall Street morons.

You clearly know nothing about them except superficial shit.

I take it you are too chickenshit to actually spend time with them.

Go and tell them Obama is just like them. That would be priceless!

Wake up, before it is too late for you.





More importantly anyone who is a neo NAZI has no knowledge of real history. They say that nazism is all about family values but that was a absolute lie. The NAZI regime wnated children to born in huge quantities so that they could be used in the expansionist schemes of Hitler et al.

That's why the BDM was formed as well as the HJ, to inculcate the youth with a feeling of a "volksgemeinschaft" in other words the state was dominant over all other considerations.
The girls of the BDM were expected to bear children with whomever the party officials told them to for the benefit of the STATE.

Everything about Nazi Germany was for the benefit of the STATE. Just. like. every. other. collectivist/socialist. State.
 
The conservative movement is losing more and more adherents.

This is actually the natural progression which occurs as a group moves toward totalitarianism.

The UnConservatives are moving toward national socialism. They do not know this consciously. In fact, it is important they do not know this. This is why they must be deluded into believing Nazis are left wing. It's circular logic: Nazis are left wing, I cannot be a Nazi because Nazis are left wing.

The Nazi movement, like all wild and crazy movements, begins by forming a very small, but very passionate core. It purges and prunes away all the chaff. It denigrates old heroes and former adherents as it becomes more and more extreme. It runs off more and more people until just the hard core remains.

Nazis party members made up less than three percent of the population when Hitler came to power.

After 9/11, America lost its collective mind. We gave birth to the totalitarian Patriot Act, Homeland Security (just think about name!), and waterboarding of prisoners.

Then came the financial crash, and this pushed millions of people even further into the darkness. Many plunged into the abyss of the irretrievably insane.

You see them every day. Right here on this forum.

The wannabe Nazis cling to the "socialist" in "national socialist" as evidence Nazis are left wing.

But have we not seen the schizophrenic nature of the GOP attacking government entitlements one day, but then defending them when Obama tries to cut them the next?

The wannabe Nazis say Nazis are liberal because they believe in a strong central government.

Did we not see the birth of the Department of Homeland Security and the miltarizing of our domestic police during the peak of the conservative heyday? Warrantless wiretaps anyone? NDLs anyone? The attempt to deny constitutional protections to US citizens in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld anyone?

Unconservatives are militaristic, if nothing else.


The deluded also don gigantic blinders to the racialist half of nazism. This is because it makes them extremely uncomfortable to hear some of their own rhetoric echoed back at them. The attacks on multiculturalism. The hatred of homosexuals. The anti-immigrant rants. The stereotyping of all Muslims as evil. This hatred is becoming more and more naked by the day.

And now we are even beginning to see anti-semitic rhetoric on the rise. Diatribes against international Jewish bankers. The old favorites are making a comeback.

We also see classic projecting of these Nazi tendencies onto Obama. Invented dictatorial behaviors.

All the signs are there. These people are right on the edge.

During the Great Depression, Nazis were quite popular in the US. As were Communists. Each side competed for the minds of the masses.

There was even a Glenn Beck. His names was Charles Coughlin. The story of Coughlin's devolution in his thinking is a cautionary tale.

Nazis used to fill auditoriums in America. People get fearful during hard times and if someone comes along to tell them it isn't their fault, and that it is the fault of (Muslims, Jew bankers, negroes on food stamps), that person can go far.


They don't have armbands today. They won't be waving swastikas. But they do have their flag pins and slogans and such. They are inventing a neologism.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7zfnbdyAW8]Sean Penn/Jeff Spicoli - You dick! - YouTube[/ame]
 
The conservative movement is losing more and more adherents.

This is actually the natural progression which occurs as a group moves toward totalitarianism.

The UnConservatives are moving toward national socialism. They do not know this consciously. In fact, it is important they do not know this. This is why they must be deluded into believing Nazis are left wing. It's circular logic: Nazis are left wing, I cannot be a Nazi because Nazis are left wing.

The Nazi movement, like all wild and crazy movements, begins by forming a very small, but very passionate core. It purges and prunes away all the chaff. It denigrates old heroes and former adherents as it becomes more and more extreme. It runs off more and more people until just the hard core remains.

Nazis party members made up less than three percent of the population when Hitler came to power.

After 9/11, America lost its collective mind. We gave birth to the totalitarian Patriot Act, Homeland Security (just think about name!), and waterboarding of prisoners.

Then came the financial crash, and this pushed millions of people even further into the darkness. Many plunged into the abyss of the irretrievably insane.

You see them every day. Right here on this forum.

The wannabe Nazis cling to the "socialist" in "national socialist" as evidence Nazis are left wing.

But have we not seen the schizophrenic nature of the GOP attacking government entitlements one day, but then defending them when Obama tries to cut them the next?

The wannabe Nazis say Nazis are liberal because they believe in a strong central government.

Did we not see the birth of the Department of Homeland Security and the miltarizing of our domestic police during the peak of the conservative heyday? Warrantless wiretaps anyone? NDLs anyone? The attempt to deny constitutional protections to US citizens in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld anyone?

Unconservatives are militaristic, if nothing else.


The deluded also don gigantic blinders to the racialist half of nazism. This is because it makes them extremely uncomfortable to hear some of their own rhetoric echoed back at them. The attacks on multiculturalism. The hatred of homosexuals. The anti-immigrant rants. The stereotyping of all Muslims as evil. This hatred is becoming more and more naked by the day.

And now we are even beginning to see anti-semitic rhetoric on the rise. Diatribes against international Jewish bankers. The old favorites are making a comeback.

We also see classic projecting of these Nazi tendencies onto Obama. Invented dictatorial behaviors.

All the signs are there. These people are right on the edge.

During the Great Depression, Nazis were quite popular in the US. As were Communists. Each side competed for the minds of the masses.

There was even a Glenn Beck. His names was Charles Coughlin. The story of Coughlin's devolution in his thinking is a cautionary tale.

Nazis used to fill auditoriums in America. People get fearful during hard times and if someone comes along to tell them it isn't their fault, and that it is the fault of (Muslims, Jew bankers, negroes on food stamps), that person can go far.


They don't have armbands today. They won't be waving swastikas. But they do have their flag pins and slogans and such. They are inventing a neologism.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7zfnbdyAW8]Sean Penn/Jeff Spicoli - You dick! - YouTube[/ame]
You better get your brown shirt while you can.
 
Bullshit.

Most of the Stormfront JOOOOOOOO haters are very left wing. They claim that Bush and the JOOOOOOZZZZ rigged the WTC and the Bilderbergs and Rothschildes are oppressing the workers on behalf of the Illuminati (JOOOZZZ)

Stormfront are a bunch of Jooo hating Occupoo Wall Street morons.

You clearly know nothing about them except superficial shit.

I take it you are too chickenshit to actually spend time with them.

Go and tell them Obama is just like them. That would be priceless!

Wake up, before it is too late for you.





More importantly anyone who is a neo NAZI has no knowledge of real history. They say that nazism is all about family values but that was a absolute lie. The NAZI regime wnated children to born in huge quantities so that they could be used in the expansionist schemes of Hitler et al.

That's why the BDM was formed as well as the HJ, to inculcate the youth with a feeling of a "volksgemeinschaft" in other words the state was dominant over all other considerations.

Very much so. We all agree on that (at least until the next revisionism). Hell, it's in the historical records, just as all this other history was.
And that kind of hypernationlism/hyperpatriotism is born and raised on the right. Firmly.

Guess we'll pick this up again when y'all decide the above in bold wasn't true after all... then we'll have to re-prove the Holocaust....

The more historical things stay the same, the more they're changed... :eusa_wall:
 
Adolf Hitler was not a socialist. As a matter of fact he sounds a lot like an Ayn Rand social Darwinist disciple. And in Hitler's eyes, the Jews were the '47%'...


In Mein Kampf, Hitler states: "...it [Nazi philosophy] by no means believes in an equality of races, but along with their difference it recognizes their higher or lesser value and feels itself obligated to promote the victory of the better and stronger, and demand the subordination of the inferior and weaker in accordance with the eternal will that dominates this universe."

Hitler describes the struggle for world domination as an ongoing racial, cultural, and political battle between Aryans and Jews. He outlines his thoughts in detail, accusing the Jews of conducting an international conspiracy to control world finances, controlling the press, inventing liberal democracy as well as Marxism, promoting prostitution and vice, and using culture to spread disharmony.

Throughout Mein Kampf, Hitler refers to Jews as parasites, liars, dirty, crafty, sly, wily, clever, without any true culture, a sponger, a middleman, a maggot, eternal blood suckers, repulsive, unscrupulous, monsters, foreign, menace, bloodthirsty, avaricious, the destroyer of Aryan humanity, and the mortal enemy of Aryan humanity...
 
The Soviet Union officially abandoned socialism in 1921 when Lenin instituted the New Economic Policy allowing for taxation, local trade, some state capitalism... and extreme profiteering.

Hitler removed the socialists from the party in 1934, the night of the long knives. The anti-capitalist, anti-tradition sentiments often expressed by SA leaders and echoed by the restless masses of storm troopers also caused great concern to big industry leaders who had helped put Hitler in power. Hitler had promised them he would put down the trade union movement and Marxists, which he had done. However, now his own storm troopers with their talk of a 'second revolution' were sounding more and more like Marxists themselves.
 
Adolf Hitler was not a socialist. As a matter of fact he sounds a lot like an Ayn Rand social Darwinist disciple. And in Hitler's eyes, the Jews were the '47%'...


In Mein Kampf, Hitler states: "...it [Nazi philosophy] by no means believes in an equality of races, but along with their difference it recognizes their higher or lesser value and feels itself obligated to promote the victory of the better and stronger, and demand the subordination of the inferior and weaker in accordance with the eternal will that dominates this universe."

Hitler describes the struggle for world domination as an ongoing racial, cultural, and political battle between Aryans and Jews. He outlines his thoughts in detail, accusing the Jews of conducting an international conspiracy to control world finances, controlling the press, inventing liberal democracy as well as Marxism, promoting prostitution and vice, and using culture to spread disharmony.

Throughout Mein Kampf, Hitler refers to Jews as parasites, liars, dirty, crafty, sly, wily, clever, without any true culture, a sponger, a middleman, a maggot, eternal blood suckers, repulsive, unscrupulous, monsters, foreign, menace, bloodthirsty, avaricious, the destroyer of Aryan humanity, and the mortal enemy of Aryan humanity...

NAWH he was just a member and leader of the german workers socialist party who gave the 25 points of what his party stood for

COMMON GOOD BEFORE PERSONAL GAIN

25. In order to achieve this we demand the setting up of a strong, central administration for the Reich.

We demand unlimited authority for a central, national parliament and its organizations. We demand the establishment of professional and industrial bodies to assist in implementing national laws throughout the Länder (states).

The Party leaders commit themselves fully to achieving the aims set out above, even at the cost of their own lives, if need be.
THE HOLOCAUST - The 25 Point Program
 
The Soviet Union officially abandoned socialism in 1921 when Lenin instituted the New Economic Policy allowing for taxation, local trade, some state capitalism... and extreme profiteering.

Hitler removed the socialists from the party in 1934, the night of the long knives. The anti-capitalist, anti-tradition sentiments often expressed by SA leaders and echoed by the restless masses of storm troopers also caused great concern to big industry leaders who had helped put Hitler in power. Hitler had promised them he would put down the trade union movement and Marxists, which he had done. However, now his own storm troopers with their talk of a 'second revolution' were sounding more and more like Marxists themselves.

That's total bull shit not much was trade past the iron curtain. except blood for bullets of those trying to flee the country.
 
adolf_hitler_biography_4.jpg


"Today Christians stand at the head of our country. I pledge that I will never tie myself to parties who want to destroy Christianity... We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit.... We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theatre, and in the press - in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past few years."

Adolf Hitler
The Speeches of Adolph Hitler, 1922-1939, Vol. 1 (London, Oxford University Press, 1942), pg. 871-872.
 
adolf_hitler_biography_4.jpg


"Today Christians stand at the head of our country. I pledge that I will never tie myself to parties who want to destroy Christianity... We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit.... We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theatre, and in the press - in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past few years."

Adolf Hitler
The Speeches of Adolph Hitler, 1922-1939, Vol. 1 (London, Oxford University Press, 1942), pg. 871-872.

Christians don't hate Jews hitler wasn't a Christian idiot.
 
adolf_hitler_biography_4.jpg


"Today Christians stand at the head of our country. I pledge that I will never tie myself to parties who want to destroy Christianity... We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit.... We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theatre, and in the press - in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past few years."

Adolf Hitler
The Speeches of Adolph Hitler, 1922-1939, Vol. 1 (London, Oxford University Press, 1942), pg. 871-872.

Christians don't hate Jews hitler wasn't a Christian idiot.


Hitler's religious beliefs and fanaticism


(Selected quotes from Mein Kampf)

People often make the claim that Adolph Hitler adhered to Atheism, Humanism or some ancient Nordic pagan mythology. None of these fanciful and wrong ideas hold. Although one of Hitler's henchmen, Alfred Rosenberg, did undertake a campaign of Nordic mythological propaganda, Hitler and most of his henchmen did not believe in it .

Many American books, television documentaries, and Sunday sermons that preach of Hitler's "evil" have eliminated Hitler's god for their Christian audiences, but one only has to read from his own writings to appreciate that Hitler's God equals the same God of the Christian Bible. Hitler held many hysterical beliefs which not only include, God and Providence but also Fate, Social Darwinism, and ideological politics. He spoke, unashamedly, about God, fanaticism, idealism, dogma, and the power of propaganda. Hitler held strong faith in all his convictions. He justified his fight for the German people and against Jews by using Godly and Biblical reasoning. Indeed, one of his most revealing statements makes this quite clear:

"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."

Although Hitler did not practice religion in a churchly sense, he certainly believed in the Bible's God. Raised as Catholic he went to a monastery school and, interestingly, walked everyday past a stone arch which was carved the monastery's coat of arms which included a swastika. As a young boy, Hitler's most ardent goal was to become a priest. Much of his philosophy came from the Bible, and more influentially, from the Christian Social movement. (The German Christian Social movement, remarkably, resembles the Christian Right movement in America today.) Many have questioned Hitler's stand on Christianity. Although he fought against certain Catholic priests who opposed him for political reasons, his belief in God and country never left him. Many Christians throughout history have opposed Christian priests for various reasons; this does not necessarily make one against one's own Christian beliefs. Nor did the Vatican's Pope & bishops ever disown him; in fact they blessed him! As evidence to his claimed Christianity, he said:

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

-Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)
 
First there is the hate mongering radio personality Jonah Goldberg who is so intent on smearing any progressive or liberal that he wrote a laughably researched screed called Liberal Fascism. Even fair minded conservatives attacked Goldberg's 'scholarship':

Former NRO editor Austin W. Bramwell writing in The American Conservative:

Repeatedly, Goldberg fails to recognize a reductio ad absurdum. ... In no case does Goldberg uncover anything more ominous than a coincidence. ... In elaborating liberalism's similarities to fascism, Goldberg shows a near superstitious belief in the power of taxonomy. ... Goldberg falsely saddles liberalism not just with relativism but with all manner of alleged errors having nothing to do with liberalism. ... Not only does Goldberg misunderstand liberalism, but he refuses to see it simply as liberalism... Liberal Fascism reads less like an extended argument than as a catalogue of conservative intellectual clichés, often irrelevant to the supposed point of the book. ... Liberal Fascism completes Goldberg's transformation from chipper humorist into humorless ideologue.[22]
Goldberg?s Trivial Pursuit | The American Conservative

Then there is the separate and much more plentiful strain of neo-fascists who have chosen to make common cause with the self described conservative and Neo Nazi David I don't count Duke as a conservative - he is, in fact, indescribable except, perhaps, as purely evil. But he now describes his movement as conservative and at least some nativist dolts here have attached themselves to more mainstream conservative movements and formed a mutual admiration society with Duke: The American Spectator : The Spectacle Blog : Ron Paul Praised David Duke

There is a larger problem in describing fascism. It makes noise out of both sides of it's face. Once fascists claimed to be both Nationalist and Socialist - those were the two polar sides of ideology in the late 20's when the party moniker was made. Today a US fascist party claims to be both Libertarian and Green - another impossible combination. NAZI's made noises to attract workers to a levelers platform while it made nice with big business and the conservative Junkers in Germany who gave it power. It never has believed in the sort of limited government some conservatives maintain they support. In practice it is a killing machine - interested in little ideology - and committed only to power through it's more naked practice.
 
You clearly know nothing about them except superficial shit.

I take it you are too chickenshit to actually spend time with them.

Go and tell them Obama is just like them. That would be priceless!

Wake up, before it is too late for you.





More importantly anyone who is a neo NAZI has no knowledge of real history. They say that nazism is all about family values but that was a absolute lie. The NAZI regime wnated children to born in huge quantities so that they could be used in the expansionist schemes of Hitler et al.

That's why the BDM was formed as well as the HJ, to inculcate the youth with a feeling of a "volksgemeinschaft" in other words the state was dominant over all other considerations.

Very much so. We all agree on that (at least until the next revisionism). Hell, it's in the historical records, just as all this other history was.
And that kind of hypernationlism/hyperpatriotism is born and raised on the right. Firmly.

Guess we'll pick this up again when y'all decide the above in bold wasn't true after all... then we'll have to re-prove the Holocaust....

The more historical things stay the same, the more they're changed... :eusa_wall:






If it's born on the "right", why is it used by every leftist country on the planet?

Riddle me that Batman.
 
Adolf Hitler was not a socialist. As a matter of fact he sounds a lot like an Ayn Rand social Darwinist disciple. And in Hitler's eyes, the Jews were the '47%'...


In Mein Kampf, Hitler states: "...it [Nazi philosophy] by no means believes in an equality of races, but along with their difference it recognizes their higher or lesser value and feels itself obligated to promote the victory of the better and stronger, and demand the subordination of the inferior and weaker in accordance with the eternal will that dominates this universe."

Hitler describes the struggle for world domination as an ongoing racial, cultural, and political battle between Aryans and Jews. He outlines his thoughts in detail, accusing the Jews of conducting an international conspiracy to control world finances, controlling the press, inventing liberal democracy as well as Marxism, promoting prostitution and vice, and using culture to spread disharmony.

Throughout Mein Kampf, Hitler refers to Jews as parasites, liars, dirty, crafty, sly, wily, clever, without any true culture, a sponger, a middleman, a maggot, eternal blood suckers, repulsive, unscrupulous, monsters, foreign, menace, bloodthirsty, avaricious, the destroyer of Aryan humanity, and the mortal enemy of Aryan humanity...





Sure thing Herr Gauleiter... Funny how you guys all run from the fact that there is no difference between the "leftist" Stalin and the "rightist" Hitler. The reason of course is there was NO DIFFERENCE. That means they were the same, so whether you choose to use the term leftist or rightist to define the two dictators is immaterial, they were THE SAME in every respect but name.


Mussolini’s fascism was a state socialism that was explicitly anti-Marx and aggressively nationalistic. Hitler’s National Socialism was state socialism at its worse. It not only shared the socialism of fascism, but was explicitly racist. In this it differs from the state socialism of Burma today, and that of some African and Arab dictatorships.

Two prevailing historical myths that the left has propagated successfully is that Hitler was a far right wing conservative and was democratically elected in 1933 (a blow at bourgeois democracy and conservatives). Actually, he was defeated twice in the national elections (he became chancellor in a smoke-filled-room appointment by those German politicians who thought they could control him — see “What? Hitler Was Not Elected?”) and as head of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, he considered himself a socialist, and was one by the evidence of his writings and the his economic policies.



Hitler Was A Socialist, (And Not A Right Wing Conservative) | DemocraticPeace Blog
 
Adolf Hitler was not a socialist. As a matter of fact he sounds a lot like an Ayn Rand social Darwinist disciple. And in Hitler's eyes, the Jews were the '47%'...


In Mein Kampf, Hitler states: "...it [Nazi philosophy] by no means believes in an equality of races, but along with their difference it recognizes their higher or lesser value and feels itself obligated to promote the victory of the better and stronger, and demand the subordination of the inferior and weaker in accordance with the eternal will that dominates this universe."

Hitler describes the struggle for world domination as an ongoing racial, cultural, and political battle between Aryans and Jews. He outlines his thoughts in detail, accusing the Jews of conducting an international conspiracy to control world finances, controlling the press, inventing liberal democracy as well as Marxism, promoting prostitution and vice, and using culture to spread disharmony.

Throughout Mein Kampf, Hitler refers to Jews as parasites, liars, dirty, crafty, sly, wily, clever, without any true culture, a sponger, a middleman, a maggot, eternal blood suckers, repulsive, unscrupulous, monsters, foreign, menace, bloodthirsty, avaricious, the destroyer of Aryan humanity, and the mortal enemy of Aryan humanity...





Sure thing Herr Gauleiter... Funny how you guys all run from the fact that there is no difference between the "leftist" Stalin and the "rightist" Hitler. The reason of course is there was NO DIFFERENCE. That means they were the same, so whether you choose to use the term leftist or rightist to define the two dictators is immaterial, they were THE SAME in every respect but name.


Mussolini’s fascism was a state socialism that was explicitly anti-Marx and aggressively nationalistic. Hitler’s National Socialism was state socialism at its worse. It not only shared the socialism of fascism, but was explicitly racist. In this it differs from the state socialism of Burma today, and that of some African and Arab dictatorships.

Two prevailing historical myths that the left has propagated successfully is that Hitler was a far right wing conservative and was democratically elected in 1933 (a blow at bourgeois democracy and conservatives). Actually, he was defeated twice in the national elections (he became chancellor in a smoke-filled-room appointment by those German politicians who thought they could control him — see “What? Hitler Was Not Elected?”) and as head of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, he considered himself a socialist, and was one by the evidence of his writings and the his economic policies.



Hitler Was A Socialist, (And Not A Right Wing Conservative) | DemocraticPeace Blog

Neither Hitler or Stalin were liberal. They had conservative upbringings and conservative beliefs. Both were believers in Darwinism...survival of the fittest. Just like today's Ayn Rand conservatives in America.

While not all conservatives are authoritarians; all highly authoritarian personalities are political conservatives.
Robert Altmeyer - The Authoritarians
 

Forum List

Back
Top