Carla_Danger
Platinum Member
- Feb 10, 2013
- 17,913
- 5,405
Carrying the fetus to term was the risk, and it wasn't full-term because of the risk, just as she was too little to give birth without a C-section. That alone could have killed her but you don't seem to care about that or her health, just abortion.It's sick to subject her to the added risk of abortion to protect and enrich her abusers.
And come on there Kosher, is there any abortion that you approve of?
the wackos aren't pro life... they're pro birth.
and then they think the moms should be screwed and starved and their kids live in poverty. that way the harlots are punished.
cause that's how they roll.
Lying troll.
You would vote to cut that baby's SNAP benefits in a heartbeat.
And you know this how? What a f..king disingenuous argument. And look how many agreed or liked your lying piece of tripe. Points towards the degeneration we are seeing in the country. Points towards the degeneration of honest civil debate.
What we know for a fact is you hate unborn babies.
On second thought I know why you said such a BS thing, it is because that is what YOU are doing. YOU are more then happy to thin the weeds to reduce those children that are dependent on YOU the tax payer. Mass killing to stop SNAP payments. No wonder you sounded so degenerate. Damn you be projecting big time.
Because you bitch about food stamps all the time. You also bitch about imaginary SNAP fraud.
What are you talking about? How many programs do we need to feed the poor and to help the poor do you think we need?
I guess the truth rubbed you the wrong way tonight.