Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It most definitely is, and so women have a gender privilege over men in that they are able to abort, put up for adoption or sue the man for child support.
Now prior to pregnancy a man and a woman have the choice whether or not to have sex with each other.
They also both have equal responsibility in taking measures to use protection.
But once the pregnancy occurs all power is given to women, it matters not how the man feels about her choice.
That seems unfair.
You might perceive it as unfair but its actually not, as the law wisely and appropriately acknowledges the fact that prior to birth the woman is alone effected, her personal liberty and physical person safeguarded by the Constitution from unwarranted government interference.
The notion that the father should be authorized by the state to overrule a womans decisions concerning her personal liberty and physical person is repugnant to the fundamental tenets of our Constitutional Republic and the rule of law.
Up to delivery .
But in the Forth trimester , what then ?
Oh, yeah. The fourth trimester. That's when we cut off WIC and SNAP. Because fuck you, that's why.
BD you have to get a grip on some. I don;t even know where to go from this crap.
That's code for "after birth abortion", genius.You might perceive it as unfair but its actually not, as the law wisely and appropriately acknowledges the fact that prior to birth the woman is alone effected, her personal liberty and physical person safeguarded by the Constitution from unwarranted government interference.
The notion that the father should be authorized by the state to overrule a womans decisions concerning her personal liberty and physical person is repugnant to the fundamental tenets of our Constitutional Republic and the rule of law.
Up to delivery .
But in the Forth trimester , what then ?
Forth trimester? We are not elephants.
Yeah, that's what they do at abortion clinics, too. And college kids think it should be legal.
Go away, ghoul. Trust you to show up once the conversation turns to outright infant murder.
I decided from the start to take the pregnancy as far as I could. At month 7 to the day, I noticed the baby had stopped kicking. I went to the hospital and they discovered the placenta had seperated and her heart rate was dropping. My blood pressure went through the roof. They tried to stabilize me but couldn't so they said my daughter had a chance if I gave birth and no chance if she was left in the uterus, so out she came. Same thing happened to my first daughter, but I went 8 months before that happened so there was no question she could make it. My first daughter was 4 lbs 2 oz. Both girls had apnea and my second daughter had a serious intestinal infection, but aside from that they did OK. I don't understand why any woman would have a late term abortion as opposed to giving birth, makes no sense and is clearly murder no matter what side of the abortion fence you are on.
Women don't choose to have a late term abortion unless they need to. If they are in the third trimester, one must assume (logically) that they want that baby, so they wouldn't just up and decide to have an abortion.
Women who have late abortions should be given compassion, as it cannot be an easy choice to make.
If the womans life is at risk and the baby can't live outside of the womb fine, I agree. But why have a late term abortion at all if the baby can live outside the womb just deliver the baby.
It most definitely is, and so women have a gender privilege over men in that they are able to abort, put up for adoption or sue the man for child support.
Now prior to pregnancy a man and a woman have the choice whether or not to have sex with each other.
They also both have equal responsibility in taking measures to use protection.
But once the pregnancy occurs all power is given to women, it matters not how the man feels about her choice.
That seems unfair.
You might perceive it as ‘unfair’ but it’s actually not, as the law wisely and appropriately acknowledges the fact that prior to birth the woman is alone effected, her personal liberty and physical person safeguarded by the Constitution from unwarranted government interference.
The notion that the father should be authorized by the state to ‘overrule’ a woman’s decisions concerning her personal liberty and physical person is repugnant to the fundamental tenets of our Constitutional Republic and the rule of law.
Up to delivery .
But in the Forth trimester , what then ?
I am not pro abortion. What a horrid phrase. I am not this choice of ending life.
Some how we must tend to these words.
A bit hard when both want to do something different, eh?
It most definitely is, and so women have a gender privilege over men in that they are able to abort, put up for adoption or sue the man for child support.
Now prior to pregnancy a man and a woman have the choice whether or not to have sex with each other.
They also both have equal responsibility in taking measures to use protection.
But once the pregnancy occurs all power is given to women, it matters not how the man feels about her choice.
That seems unfair.
And that's why men should never have sex if they're not ready to be a father.
A bit hard when both want to do something different, eh?
It most definitely is, and so women have a gender privilege over men in that they are able to abort, put up for adoption or sue the man for child support.
Now prior to pregnancy a man and a woman have the choice whether or not to have sex with each other.
They also both have equal responsibility in taking measures to use protection.
But once the pregnancy occurs all power is given to women, it matters not how the man feels about her choice.
That seems unfair.
You might perceive it as unfair but its actually not, as the law wisely and appropriately acknowledges the fact that prior to birth the woman is alone effected, her personal liberty and physical person safeguarded by the Constitution from unwarranted government interference.
The notion that the father should be authorized by the state to overrule a womans decisions concerning her personal liberty and physical person is repugnant to the fundamental tenets of our Constitutional Republic and the rule of law.
That 17 year old girl carrying around a dead fetus in her shopping bag at Victoria's Secret? Read about that? Turns out, the baby was born alive. Then asphyxiated. And they went shopping. She gave birth at the friends house. So yeah. She didn't abort it. She just flat out smothered it or choked it after it came out.
Just sayin'.
Further, from the same article;
What the hell?
Pathetic. Horridly written.
Honey, sometimes I can't tell if you are still speaking English - and you're going to point fingers at the author?
![]()
Stockhom!!! That is exciting, TD!!! Tell her to take LOTS of cool pics of beautiful scenery...then you share with us, ok?