"I hate everyone", Trump seethes as advisers fear he is unravelling

[eddiew37]

You don't have to put on this little act for me. I know you reject anything that doesn't suit your Trump fantasy. All of these attempts to backward think to present other reasons for it are nonsense. You'll have to peddle that to someone who doesn't already know better.

That's where you're wrong. I value factual reporting, and if trump does something wrong i will castigate him for it., You, on the other hand are a partisan whore. No amount of evil on the part of your candidate will ever elicit a negative response from you. Your type is well known around here.

No, you are just a whiny little guy who bends himself into little pretzels trying to lend nobility and reason to his own bullshit. You hitched your wagon to the trump fantasy, and now you will bunker down to protect it. This is why you call things "false" instead of "maybe false". see? You think you are clever, but you are not. Your true motivations come through, despite your efforts.

Whiney? Me? Projection thy name is fort fun indiana! There is no doubt about the lies that the MSM has spewed. They are now a laughingstock and it is no wonder that they are all in financial difficulties. People used to buy the newspaper for news. When they realised that the news is lying to them they stopped buying it.

They are clearly smarter than you because you either still believe the BS, or are you one of those who peddle it and are now pissed off that you can't lie with impunity now? Are you railing against the injustices of smart people figuring out you're a dumb shit?

" Are you railing against the injustices of smart people figuring out you're a dumb shit?

Mods, please move this to the flame zone. Oh wait....

Yes, it's very easy to believe Trump is unraveling, and it's also very easy to believe that his administration is leaking like a sieve in an effort to warn the world that trump is unfit for office. These things are easy to believe precisely because of Trump's very own behavior, which is why there are people from both sides of the aisle agreeing on this.

"Easy to believe" On which planet? All you have are unsourced claims (many of which have been shown to be from the authors alone) that trump is "unravelling". The reality is the opposite. Trump is playing the MSM, and those who pay attention to them anymore, like a fiddle. The reality is the MSM and the political elite are so unhinged that they are spewing lies and half truths like they are going out of style.

You don't have to put on this little act for me. I know you reject anything that doesn't suit your Trump fantasy. All of these attempts to backward think to present other reasons for it are nonsense. You'll have to peddle that to someone who doesn't already know better.

That's where you're wrong. I value factual reporting, and if trump does something wrong i will castigate him for it., You, on the other hand are a partisan whore. No amount of evil on the part of your candidate will ever elicit a negative response from you. Your type is well known around here.

No, you are just a whiny little guy who bends himself into little pretzels trying to lend nobility and reason to his own bullshit. You hitched your wagon to the trump fantasy, and now you will bunker down to protect it. This is why you call things "false" instead of "maybe false". see? You think you are clever, but you are not. Your true motivations come through, despite your efforts.

Whiney? Me? Projection thy name is fort fun indiana! There is no doubt about the lies that the MSM has spewed. They are now a laughingstock and it is no wonder that they are all in financial difficulties. People used to buy the newspaper for news. When they realised that the news is lying to them they stopped buying it.

They are clearly smarter than you because you either still believe the BS, or are you one of those who peddle it and are now pissed off that you can't lie with impunity now? Are you railing against the injustices of smart people figuring out you're a dumb shit?

" Are you railing against the injustices of smart people figuring out you're a dumb shit?

Mods, please move this to the flame zone. Oh wait....

Yes, it's very easy to believe Trump is unraveling, and it's also very easy to believe that his administration is leaking like a sieve in an effort to warn the world that trump is unfit for office. These things are easy to believe precisely because of Trump's very own behavior, which is why there are people from both sides of the aisle agreeing on this.

"Easy to believe" On which planet? All you have are unsourced claims (many of which have been shown to be from the authors alone) that trump is "unravelling". The reality is the opposite. Trump is playing the MSM, and those who pay attention to them anymore, like a fiddle. The reality is the MSM and the political elite are so unhinged that they are spewing lies and half truths like they are going out of style.

LOL and the republican party is getting along so well and achieving so much for the American people AND pigs fly

 

[eddiew37]

I don't want you to trouble yourself, but if you -- not a website, but YOU-- had to go collect for me a list of times where a major paper or tv station had reported inaccurate information about Trump, it would be a shorter list than you would like. YES I know there is a left-slanting bias, in what aspect of a story the organization focuses on, on who they have to "analyze" the news of the day, what editorials they choose to publish, etc. Hopefully adults know how to detect that and take the reporting with a grain of salt. However, the facts themselves are not LIES. They are bound to verify their facts prior to publishing. It is how we somewhat trust what we hear so we can make any kind of informed decisions at all.

Let's see. There is the claim put forth by the New Republic that trump has a venereal disease

Then there is the claim from Grabell that trump alloewed the boeing execs to eavesdrop on his conversation with lockheed.

The NYT has been a constant source of lies about trum and the so called russian collusion nonsense.

Trump claimed he was wiretapped by the obummer admin. Proven to be true, but the MSM said no.

Then there was the claim that trumps travel ban caused a Muslim Olympian to be halted at the airport. The claim was found to be false as she was actually halted in 2016 before he was POTUS.

Numerous claims that trump hadn't spoken to Xi Jinping in months when the facts were that he had spoken with the Chinese leader the day prior, and when they were notified that their story was wrong they did correct it, but left no notification in the original to clarify for others.

Then there was the politico story that claimed trump was going to follow the gang of eights immigration Bill. We know that that was false from the get go.

Or how about the claim put forth by hillary's best bud sid blumenthal and reported in the London Review of Books that trump had printed two racist ads for a supposed New York City mayoral bid back in the 1960's? The ads were were proven to be fake and trump never even though about running for mayor.

Or how about the Reuters story that claimed trump was not familiar with the New START treaty? All claims were shown to be false. No retraction from Reuters though.

Then there were the multiple claims that Yemen would no longer allow US counter terrorist operations to be carried out. Lie.

Then there was the WAPO claim that bannon and Kelley had had a late night fight. Lie. They later recanted the story but by then no one was listening. It's the typical launch the lie and when the truth comes out the lie is so firmly entrenched that no one listens to the truth anymore.

Or how about the Raw Story claim that trump secretly spoke with putin and no record of their conversation was kept? Lie. There is indeed a transcript of the talk.

Then there was the claim that to pay back putin trump had eased the restrictions on russia so that American businesses could do business with the FSB, put forth by NBC's peter alexander. To his credit he corrected himslef later tweeting- "Source familiar w sanctions says it's a technical fix, planned under Obama, to avoid unintended consequences of cybersanctions." The NYT's Peter Baker had also stated that the fix was in the works long before trump took office.



These are just a few of the wild claims, and outright lies that the MSM has been spewing.

When will the sanctions Trump signed off on go into effect??? You know the answer but I'll tell you anyway He will not do anything to hurt his pal Putin

poootins putz in the WH was this guy



And she was slated to be his next putz in the WH.

Yes whitey your post explains the buddy buddy going on between the murderer Putin and our garbage in our WH NOT

I hate to break it to ya but it was your hero obummer telling medvedev that after he was a lame duck POTUS he would be more free to help his buddy pootin. That open mic was kind of inconvenient for your BS I know, and yet it is a fact.

And perhaps you can tell us all what sanctions Obama put on Russia that helped his ""buddy"" Putin?

 

[Rambunctious]

Believe 10% of what you read and see...the swamp is in full liar mode...

 

[radical right]

The NYT has been a constant source of lies about trum and the so called russian collusion nonsense.

Trump claimed he was wiretapped by the obummer admin. Proven to be true, but the MSM said no.

The source of meetings between the russsians and the Trump associates is because they had meetings with russians.

And it's not a good thing to claim Trump Tower was wiretaped, when it was Paul Manafort that was wiretaped. Just like you wouldn't accept your house being labeled a criminal drug den, just because one of your invited friends had drugs on him.

 

[radical right]

And perhaps you can tell us all what sanctions Obama put on Russia that helped his ""buddy"" Putin?

They confuse political flexibility with collusion. Odd that when Obama was president that people would have voted against him if they thought he was soliciting favors from russia. And today Trump voters would bend over backwards to support Trumps pro-russian stance.

 

[xotoxi]

Trump is volatile, thin-skinned and has the attention of a hummingbird?

Trump is, unlike Obama, demanding.

You've got that wrong.

Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. If anyone questions him or contradicts him, he flies off the handle and fires them.

He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen. Thank George and the Fathers for a three branch government and the concept of Checks & Balances.

 

[eddiew37]

And perhaps you can tell us all what sanctions Obama put on Russia that helped his ""buddy"" Putin?

They confuse political flexibility with collusion. Odd that when Obama was president that people would have voted against him if they thought he was soliciting favors from russia. And today Trump voters would bend over backwards to support Trumps pro-russian stance.

worlds greatest hypocrites are republicans

 

[xotoxi]

The media nor anyone else is spinning or being unfair when trump is caught telling a probable lie. That happens every week and often every day. If he is not spreading provable falsehoods, his staff is.
The whole "fake news" mantra is a deflection away from the truth of what trump is saying and doing. He lies and lies and lies. After that, he lies some more.

Trump and his supporters think it is unfair when the media reports his lying to the public. Try to make sense out of that. Why is it unfair to report when the President tells falsehoods and lies?

To a mind-numb Libroid that seems feasible.
However, because it's been clear since Trump first announced that he was running the media became his worst critics and spends most of their time reporting opinions rather than facts, well, that lame excuse just doesn't hold water.

No. His worst critics are the majority of people in America, who unfortunately, do not have the ability to broadcast their distain via the cable airways.

You only see the media's opinion because they are visible.

 

[eddiew37]

Trump is volatile, thin-skinned and has the attention of a hummingbird?

Trump is, unlike Obama, demanding.

You've got that wrong.

Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. If anyone questions him or contradicts him, he flies off the handle and fires them.

He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen. Thank George and the Fathers for a three branch government and the concept of Checks & Balances.

trump hasn't changed He's always been a low down POS but I guess Republicans like the smell

 

[K9Buck]

You've got that wrong. Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen.

LOL. You're hysterical. Trump gave a million for hurricane relief. How much did Barry and Hillary donate? Zero? Trump isn't taking a check either; neither is Ivanka nor Jared. Can you imagine Hillary or Chelsea not taking a check? ROFLMFAO!

 

[xotoxi]

You've got that wrong. Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen.

LOL. You're hysterical. Trump gave a million for hurricane relief. How much did Barry and Hillary donate? Zero? Trump isn't taking a check either; neither is Ivanka nor Jared. Can you imagine Hillary or Chelsea not taking a check? ROFLMFAO!

You proved my point.

Anyone publicly donating $1 million, or publicly not taking a salary is doing it to make themselves look good.

You would say the EXACT same thing if a movie star donated $1 million for a given political cause that you disagreed with.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You've got that wrong. Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen.

LOL. You're hysterical. Trump gave a million for hurricane relief. How much did Barry and Hillary donate? Zero? Trump isn't taking a check either; neither is Ivanka nor Jared. Can you imagine Hillary or Chelsea not taking a check? ROFLMFAO!

But that would be about .1% or less of his claimed wealth. For Obama , the equivalent would be about $40,000. And you don't hear about Obama's donation , because his was not done as a publicity stunt. Like xotoxi said, you made his point for him.

 

[K9Buck]

You've got that wrong. Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen.

LOL. You're hysterical. Trump gave a million for hurricane relief. How much did Barry and Hillary donate? Zero? Trump isn't taking a check either; neither is Ivanka nor Jared. Can you imagine Hillary or Chelsea not taking a check? ROFLMFAO!

But that would be about .1% or less of his claimed wealth. For Obama , the equivalent would be about $40,000. And you don't hear about Obama's donation , because his was not done as a publicity stunt. Like xotoxi said, you made his point for him.

If Obama threw in a $20 he would have held a press conference. LOL.

 

[Anathema]

Actual story - When you appoint people who never supported you and never backed your agenda, they badmouth you to the press.

You're absolutely correct. No POTUS should appoint, hire or support the election of individuals who don't support his agenda.

 

[K9Buck]

You've got that wrong. Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen.

LOL. You're hysterical. Trump gave a million for hurricane relief. How much did Barry and Hillary donate? Zero? Trump isn't taking a check either; neither is Ivanka nor Jared. Can you imagine Hillary or Chelsea not taking a check? ROFLMFAO!

You proved my point.

Anyone publicly donating $1 million, or publicly not taking a salary is doing it to make themselves look good.

You would say the EXACT same thing if a movie star donated $1 million for a given political cause that you disagreed with.

I proved that you're a non-objective, political hack whose purpose here is to shill for the radical left.

 

[xotoxi]

You've got that wrong. Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen.

LOL. You're hysterical. Trump gave a million for hurricane relief. How much did Barry and Hillary donate? Zero? Trump isn't taking a check either; neither is Ivanka nor Jared. Can you imagine Hillary or Chelsea not taking a check? ROFLMFAO!

But that would be about .1% or less of his claimed wealth. For Obama , the equivalent would be about $40,000. And you don't hear about Obama's donation , because his was not done as a publicity stunt. Like xotoxi said, you made his point for him.

If Obama threw in a $20 he would have held a press conference. LOL.

Strawman.

 

[xotoxi]

You've got that wrong. Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen.

LOL. You're hysterical. Trump gave a million for hurricane relief. How much did Barry and Hillary donate? Zero? Trump isn't taking a check either; neither is Ivanka nor Jared. Can you imagine Hillary or Chelsea not taking a check? ROFLMFAO!

You proved my point.

Anyone publicly donating $1 million, or publicly not taking a salary is doing it to make themselves look good.

You would say the EXACT same thing if a movie star donated $1 million for a given political cause that you disagreed with.

I proved that you're a non-objective, political hack whose purpose here is to shill for the radical left.

Nope, you only proved that YOU are a non-objective, political hack who would drink Trump's cum if it was offered.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You've got that wrong. Trump is, unlike Obama, only out for himself. He is the closest to a dictator that this country has ever seen.

LOL. You're hysterical. Trump gave a million for hurricane relief. How much did Barry and Hillary donate? Zero? Trump isn't taking a check either; neither is Ivanka nor Jared. Can you imagine Hillary or Chelsea not taking a check? ROFLMFAO!

But that would be about .1% or less of his claimed wealth. For Obama , the equivalent would be about $40,000. And you don't hear about Obama's donation , because his was not done as a publicity stunt. Like xotoxi said, you made his point for him.

If Obama threw in a $20 he would have held a press conference. LOL.

Of course, you know he wouldn't, but hitching your wagons to Trump has caused you to abandon anything resembling honesty or integrity. Yessir, you will literally say anything. Do you think Baby Jaysus gives you a pass because you type "LOL"?

 

[radical right]

LOL. You're hysterical. Trump gave a million for hurricane relief. How much did Barry and Hillary donate? Zero?

Actually you don't know that, because they aren't reality stars craving adulation.

Trump isn't taking a check either; neither is Ivanka nor Jared. Can you imagine Hillary or Chelsea not taking a check? ROFLMFAO!

They're not taking salaries to avoid nepotism charges. And yes, Bill, Hillary and Chelsea worked for the Clinton foundation for years without taking a check.

 

[westwall]

The NYT has been a constant source of lies about trum and the so called russian collusion nonsense.

Trump claimed he was wiretapped by the obummer admin. Proven to be true, but the MSM said no.

The source of meetings between the russsians and the Trump associates is because they had meetings with russians.

And it's not a good thing to claim Trump Tower was wiretaped, when it was Paul Manafort that was wiretaped. Just like you wouldn't accept your house being labeled a criminal drug den, just because one of your invited friends had drugs on him.

Yes. Manafort was wiretapped in Trump Tower, and trump was likewise recorded. The legal ramifications of that are not lost on those of us who are concerned about government over reach. You all claim that trump is the next incarnation of hitler but it was the obama admin that has been shown to have repeatedly violated the law.