Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 131,773
- 25,821
- 2,180
I did already. When I was seven I knew exactly what I was doing.
Did you wash your hands after?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did already. When I was seven I knew exactly what I was doing.
Morals, ethics, principles, or humanity. Pick oneWhat screen name were you yesterday?
Fluff Bunny?Morals, ethics, principles, or humanity. Pick one
You are showing that communicating with you is useless.
This OP is not about Kamala.
Ok. You tell me what the thread is about when the name "Kamala" is literally the first word of the second sentence of the thread title."Kamala shows us what the difference is between her and Trump"
You didn't give anyone a link to the study fool.Why don't you address the OP and the study done. Can you do that simple task?
I think that we can all agree that our kids are our future. As such, we need to teach them at an early age (between 3-7) what is important and what is harmful.
This ad from Kamala makes the point in the clearest way possible.
Do we want our kids at a young age to learn Hate or learn Love?
On a stronger and more serious note (getting away from simply trying to dis Trump), here below is a very interesting non-biased research done by the NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138July2024.
This study compares Trump's hate rhetoric and hate speeches done by him to the same done by politicians in general. We are all aware of the fact that dissing the opponent in a political campaign is something all politicians do. This study shows the differences (Trump has been the absolute worst) and the consequences that come of it, such as crime done because of it.
It is a long study but worth reading as it goes into detail. Below is the conclusion part.
Here are some additional comments that Trump has made that show hate unfettered.............toward everyone (including members of his own party).
View attachment 1023179
Do you think that Hate is what we need in our country?
You are showing that communicating with you is useless.
BS and delusion.You're probably right.
I use logic, facts and empirical reality with links.
You use fallacies, mischaracterization, misdirection, gas-lighting and out right lies.
It is hard to have a conversation with someone as dishonest as you clearly are.
The study shows that Trump has done it more and worse than anyone else did ever. How can you sluff that off?For 9 years, the left has been demonizing “maga”. The dems believe that “maga” is anyone who voted for Trump, that’s over 70 million people. Our current president said maga extremism (70 million people) are a threat to the country.
I agree the political temperature is hot right now, but it’s coming from both sides.
You kept referring to a "study," in your OP.BS and delusion.
Point to anyone this where I did mischaracterization, misdirection or gas lighting. I dare you to prove it.
We are talking about hate speech. Show me any links to articles that state that hate speech is a positive or even excusable.You didn't give anyone a link to the study fool.
A government funded study to justify their own place as political elites?
Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions
View attachment 1023270
Examining long-term trends in politics and culture through language of political leaders and cultural institutions
Donald Trump and a small group of emerging leaders around the world have been labeled as outliers in the ways that they think and communicate with others. Are they really anomalies, or do they fit into larger political trends? This study adds to existing ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
". . This research was guided by analyses of language associated with the 2016 presidential election that found that Donald Trump was significantly less analytic than his opponents as well as more confident (39, 40).. . . "
View attachment 1023269
View attachment 1023282
View attachment 1023283
So the entire study hinges on annotations to their own work? Ummmm..... yeah, w/e.
And this is the guy that edited the whole thing. . .
View attachment 1023261
The OP is about the ad that Kamala put up that shows how Trump and Kamala are being seen by young children listening to them. It is not about either Kamala or Trump, it is about hate speech and about positive words speech.Ok. You tell me what the thread is about when the name "Kamala" is literally the first word of the second sentence of the thread title.
There is no standard metric for identifying "hate speech."Show me any links to articles that state that hate speech is a positive or even excusable.
I think that we can all agree that our kids are our future. As such, we need to teach them at an early age (between 3-7) what is important and what is harmful.
This ad from Kamala makes the point in the clearest way possible.
Do we want our kids at a young age to learn Hate or learn Love?
On a stronger and more serious note (getting away from simply trying to dis Trump), here below is a very interesting non-biased research done by the NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138July2024.
This study compares Trump's hate rhetoric and hate speeches done by him to the same done by politicians in general. We are all aware of the fact that dissing the opponent in a political campaign is something all politicians do. This study shows the differences (Trump has been the absolute worst) and the consequences that come of it, such as crime done because of it.
It is a long study but worth reading as it goes into detail. Below is the conclusion part.
Here are some additional comments that Trump has made that show hate unfettered.............toward everyone (including members of his own party).
View attachment 1023179
Do you think that Hate is what we need in our country?
Trump has been diagnosed by a slew of psychologists as being a narcissist.
There is no standard metric for identifying "hate speech."
Frankly, from MY POV? Everything YOU post is hate speech.
Yoar study is a thinly disguised opinion piece masquerading as. . "science." When in fact, it is not.
The fact is, all speech is protected by the First Amendment, but Kamala and Walz are either too stoopid, or liars in THEIR rhetoric.
Tim Walz Is DEAD WRONG—Hate Speech, Misinfo Are PROTECTED Speech: Robby Soave
Tim Walz ATTACKS Free Speech, Says Misinfo Is Illegal: Robby Soave
If you get slapped in the face, do you slap back or do you turn the other cheek and say keep hitting me?
Does getting people angry and attacking other people . . . .