Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And it is wrong to interfere in a woman's pregnancy: society does not share it nor its consequences. It's the individual who should make the decision, not the state.Shared society, shared consequences. Hence a secular society with laws based upon the principle of right and wrong.
No, you are stating opinion and, yes, you are quarreling to quarrel.No, I'm not quarrelling at all. I'm stating fact.
You have rationalized it so you can sleep at night thinking you are a good person.And it is wrong to interfere in a woman's pregnancy: society does not share it nor its consequences. It's the individual who should make the decision, not the state.
PS: an abortion is neither moral or immoral, no right or wrong. It simply "is."
It's a fact that men wrote the Bible. Tell me you disagree.No, you are stating opinion and, yes, you are quarreling to quarrel.
The American people, as you call them, want abortion to be legal. They don't want the government forcing women to carry a fetus to term against their will.If politicians and judges get it wrong, it is up to us, the American people to make them understand.
www.pewresearch.org
It's a fact that you have rationalized into an unsupportable opinion.You have rationalized it so you can sleep at night thinking you are a good person.
You are being duplicitious in that you believe in Holy Scripture as your priests tell you how to believe.It's a fact that men wrote the Bible. Tell me you disagree.
abortionName the harm please.
And so. why do you want government to deprive women of liberty when they refuse to take the risk of giving birth to a unique one of kind human life form after erroneously getting pregnant.Common sense tells us that every life form is unique one of a kind.
how does abortion harm you when you have no idea who is pregnant and who Is not pregnant.abortion
New unique life in the womb has human rights in the womb in most cases unless the potential birth mother chooses to terminate that life in the womb She is the only one who holds absolute autonomy over the life in the womb and she gets to decide whether or not the life in the womb gets to develop all the way to live birth.No, just that if life in the womb has no human rights then it's just property. Common sense, really.
George Washington had slaves.Slave owners were abject scum ..... Done.
No. It's a fact that men wrote the Bible. It's my belief that you have rationalized it's ok to kill a human life in the womb to make you feel better about supporting it.It's a fact that you have rationalized into an unsupportable opinion.
Yep. So my respect for him is not high.George Washington had slaves.
No, I am being factual when I say that men wrote the Bible.You are being duplicitious in that you believe in Holy Scripture as your priests tell you how to believe.
What was the crisis prior to the Dobbs decision if a minority from all of America’s churchgoing Christians were asked to keep their religion to themselves and they did?We haven't faced a crisis like this since the days of legalized slavery.
Every life is one of kind that has never existed before and will never exist again, so what?The science is limited to human life begins at conception and that that human life is a one of a kind that has never existed before and will never exist again. That's the science.
That's how slave owners saw it too.Every life is one of kind that has never existed before and will never exist again, so what?
