Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah the irony. Who says they were all fired for a "different reason"? The WH? The same WH that has been caught over and over and over lying about all things Russia?
I
You have no proof that what I said is not true. That is your problem!
I have proof of the reasons I gave. You just don't want to believe because that shows your bias.
Only the White House is saying they were fired for a different reason. Lies come out of the White House 95% of the time.
Over and over the Trump/Pence duo have lied about Russia, Flynn, Comey, etc.
And NOBODY can seem to remember visits with the Russian Ambassador. It's like he's got a flashy thing like in Men in Black.
Uh, last time I checked the White House, i.e, Trump fired them. I would think that he would know why since he has stated the reasons many times in interviews and in writing.
Are you really that stupid or are you just practicing?
Trump and his admin have repeatedly been caught LYING about why people were fired.
1. Trump says/does something stupid.
2. Staff goes on cleanup and attempts to control damage
3. Trump goes on TV or Twitter and contradicts spin
4. Later contradicts contradiction
How is that lying? You have no facts, just innuendo. So how is any of that illegal?
No charges have been filed........yet
GIve the charges and evidence or shut the hell up.
Trump is under investigation. That means evidence is still being accumulated
You are correct.......in a court of law, Trump is innocent until proven guilty.
In the court of public opinion........the standard is much less
Firing Comey did not help
No charges have been filed........yet
GIve the charges and evidence or shut the hell up.
Trump is under investigation. That means evidence is still being accumulated
You are correct.......in a court of law, Trump is innocent until proven guilty.
In the court of public opinion........the standard is much less
Firing Comey did not help
Trump is not under investigation.
No charges have been filed........yet
GIve the charges and evidence or shut the hell up.
Trump is under investigation. That means evidence is still being accumulated
You are correct.......in a court of law, Trump is innocent until proven guilty.
In the court of public opinion........the standard is much less
Firing Comey did not help
Trump is not under investigation.
That's what they tell all criminals
You are not under investigation.....we just want to ask a few questions
Maybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you inNo charges have been filed........yet
GIve the charges and evidence or shut the hell up.
Trump is under investigation. That means evidence is still being accumulated
You are correct.......in a court of law, Trump is innocent until proven guilty.
In the court of public opinion........the standard is much less
Firing Comey did not help
Trump is not under investigation.
That's what they tell all criminals
You are not under investigation.....we just want to ask a few questions
He's not under investigation. What would they be investigating him for?
Where did all this nonsense start? It started when Trump was debating Hil-Liar and said he invited Russia to disclose what they found on her private server. That's it, and certainly no reason to have any kind of investigation.
Maybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you inNo charges have been filed........yet
GIve the charges and evidence or shut the hell up.
Trump is under investigation. That means evidence is still being accumulated
You are correct.......in a court of law, Trump is innocent until proven guilty.
In the court of public opinion........the standard is much less
Firing Comey did not help
Trump is not under investigation.
That's what they tell all criminals
You are not under investigation.....we just want to ask a few questions
He's not under investigation. What would they be investigating him for?
Where did all this nonsense start? It started when Trump was debating Hil-Liar and said he invited Russia to disclose what they found on her private server. That's it, and certainly no reason to have any kind of investigation.
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/us/politics/democrats-trump-impeachment.html
A few of the saner Democrats are trying to cool off the radicalized base, but apparently insanity has become the prevailing wind.
Let me tell you this. Millions of Americans voted for Donald Trump, we still support him, and if you do manage to topple him, all hell will break loose.
Simply put, we have had enough of the Democrats, the media, the academia, the bureaucrats, and the Hollywood types who have ruined our country and Trump has promised to fix it.
If you think you can depose him without a fight, you are wrong.
We will form human barricades to keep him from leaving the White House, and we will go into the streets, if necessary and show you what it means when the normally law abiding, patriotic, tax paying, hard working American people have finally had enough.
This is a warning which you should heed.
If you depose Trump, it will lead to all out civil war.
You want a civil war over a fat whiny-littlle-bitch narcissist asshole who never matured past age 11 and paints himself orange? Really, a civil war for that?
You're easily amused aintchya.
Maybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you inNo charges have been filed........yet
Trump is under investigation. That means evidence is still being accumulated
You are correct.......in a court of law, Trump is innocent until proven guilty.
In the court of public opinion........the standard is much less
Firing Comey did not help
Trump is not under investigation.
That's what they tell all criminals
You are not under investigation.....we just want to ask a few questions
He's not under investigation. What would they be investigating him for?
Where did all this nonsense start? It started when Trump was debating Hil-Liar and said he invited Russia to disclose what they found on her private server. That's it, and certainly no reason to have any kind of investigation.
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
All of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
FBI is still investigating the evidenceMaybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you inNo charges have been filed........yet
Trump is under investigation. That means evidence is still being accumulated
You are correct.......in a court of law, Trump is innocent until proven guilty.
In the court of public opinion........the standard is much less
Firing Comey did not help
Trump is not under investigation.
That's what they tell all criminals
You are not under investigation.....we just want to ask a few questions
He's not under investigation. What would they be investigating him for?
Where did all this nonsense start? It started when Trump was debating Hil-Liar and said he invited Russia to disclose what they found on her private server. That's it, and certainly no reason to have any kind of investigation.
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
All of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
It's not made upMaybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you inNo charges have been filed........yet
Trump is under investigation. That means evidence is still being accumulated
You are correct.......in a court of law, Trump is innocent until proven guilty.
In the court of public opinion........the standard is much less
Firing Comey did not help
Trump is not under investigation.
That's what they tell all criminals
You are not under investigation.....we just want to ask a few questions
He's not under investigation. What would they be investigating him for?
Where did all this nonsense start? It started when Trump was debating Hil-Liar and said he invited Russia to disclose what they found on her private server. That's it, and certainly no reason to have any kind of investigation.
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
All of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
It's not made upMaybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you inTrump is not under investigation.
That's what they tell all criminals
You are not under investigation.....we just want to ask a few questions
He's not under investigation. What would they be investigating him for?
Where did all this nonsense start? It started when Trump was debating Hil-Liar and said he invited Russia to disclose what they found on her private server. That's it, and certainly no reason to have any kind of investigation.
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
All of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
Those are undisputed facts.
Russians hacked DNC servers and leaked information. At the time of the leaks, Trump representatives were meeting with the Russians
Trump had no inside information on the DNC or the server.....but did he offer something in return for help in winning an election?
If he did, it is treason
That is why we need an investigation
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/18/us/politics/democrats-trump-impeachment.html
A few of the saner Democrats are trying to cool off the radicalized base, but apparently insanity has become the prevailing wind.
Let me tell you this. Millions of Americans voted for Donald Trump, we still support him, and if you do manage to topple him, all hell will break loose.
Simply put, we have had enough of the Democrats, the media, the academia, the bureaucrats, and the Hollywood types who have ruined our country and Trump has promised to fix it.
If you think you can depose him without a fight, you are wrong.
We will form human barricades to keep him from leaving the White House, and we will go into the streets, if necessary and show you what it means when the normally law abiding, patriotic, tax paying, hard working American people have finally had enough.
This is a warning which you should heed.
If you depose Trump, it will lead to all out civil war.
You want a civil war over a fat whiny-littlle-bitch narcissist asshole who never matured past age 11 and paints himself orange? Really, a civil war for that?
You're easily amused aintchya.
You people don't get it. It's not about defending Trump. It's about defending US from radical, violent, fringe lunatics who feel entitled enough to usurp the Will of The People.
It's not made upMaybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you inThat's what they tell all criminals
You are not under investigation.....we just want to ask a few questions
He's not under investigation. What would they be investigating him for?
Where did all this nonsense start? It started when Trump was debating Hil-Liar and said he invited Russia to disclose what they found on her private server. That's it, and certainly no reason to have any kind of investigation.
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
All of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
Those are undisputed facts.
Russians hacked DNC servers and leaked information. At the time of the leaks, Trump representatives were meeting with the Russians
Trump had no inside information on the DNC or the server.....but did he offer something in return for help in winning an election?
If he did, it is treason
That is why we need an investigation
There is no evidence that anything that took place had an impact on the election. What had an impact on the election was Hillary's drunkenness that prohibited her from campaigning and making stops, the border, and her Deplorable remark. Bet you can't find one person who voted that knew what was in those emails, and even if you could, find one that said it changed their mind to vote for Trump instead of Hillary.
It's all made up. There is nothing there. Can you tell me why they locked up Rich's computer? Can you tell me why they stopped investigating the murder? Can you tell me why he was killed and nothing was stolen from him? Just a coincidence?
That's what they should be investigating.
All I know is my vote was not influenced by Russians.
There is no evidence that anything that took place had an impact on the election.
What had an impact on the election was Hillary's drunkenness
All I know is my vote was not influenced by Russians.
You uh ----- you do know that when the Russians push fake news, they first put it in English, right? And that they don't sign "your friend, Russia" at the end?
Watch this -- perfect example of somebody buying, hook line and sinker:
There is no evidence that anything that took place had an impact on the election.
IMMEDIATELY followed by:
What had an impact on the election was Hillary's drunkenness
---- and her Parkinson's, and her affair with Yoko, and her "dementia', and her murder spree, and oh yeah another affair with Huma, and then there's Bill's "illegitimate black son" ..... etc etc etc etc etc.... but there's "no evidence", he said, while quoting the evidence.
Never seen so many people so easily led by the nose while so blithely oblivious to it.
Even this one was posted and taken seriously on these pages:
This is the pitfall of self-delusional confirmation bias and stark absence of healthy skepticism, where completely made-up crap, and even outright ridiculous satire, are taken seriously because they appear to go where the reader wishes they would go, rather than where logic goes. Russian trolls know it; Macedonian trolls know it; US trolls know it; bloggers everywhere know it. They play gullible dupes like a three-dollar banjo and the banjos just line up for more.
Perhaps most instructive in all this is that when the fake news purveyors tried the same thing using Rump as the target ----- it wouldn't sell. The gullibility factor was just not there. That contrast speaks volumes.
Clearly there's some confusion as to the definition of "majority".
To be fair, there was a majority of the electorate that turned out to vote. Barely. 45% said "fuck it, there's nothing worth voting for" and stayed home. That leaves 55% of the electorate that did vote, which is abysmal for a nation that purports to have championed this process, however it is more than half.
Of that 55%, 54% voted for somebody who does not paint him/herself orange.
That leaves Rump with 46% of the 55%, which boils down to 25% of the electorate.
Now tell the class what color the sky is on a planet where 25% constitutes a "majority".
The majority that elected him as President.
Once AGAIN --- there is no "majority" in the figure of 25%. Nor is there any "majority" in 46%.
Cannot be done.
I see the world of Fake News has branched out to Fake Math. Ah, the opaque bubble of self-delusion....
He beat Hillary. The only way to do that is to have a majority of active voters voting for him.
24/7?
It's not made upMaybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you inHe's not under investigation. What would they be investigating him for?
Where did all this nonsense start? It started when Trump was debating Hil-Liar and said he invited Russia to disclose what they found on her private server. That's it, and certainly no reason to have any kind of investigation.
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
All of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
Those are undisputed facts.
Russians hacked DNC servers and leaked information. At the time of the leaks, Trump representatives were meeting with the Russians
Trump had no inside information on the DNC or the server.....but did he offer something in return for help in winning an election?
If he did, it is treason
That is why we need an investigation
There is no evidence that anything that took place had an impact on the election. What had an impact on the election was Hillary's drunkenness that prohibited her from campaigning and making stops, the border, and her Deplorable remark. Bet you can't find one person who voted that knew what was in those emails, and even if you could, find one that said it changed their mind to vote for Trump instead of Hillary.
It's all made up. There is nothing there. Can you tell me why they locked up Rich's computer? Can you tell me why they stopped investigating the murder? Can you tell me why he was killed and nothing was stolen from him? Just a coincidence?
That's what they should be investigating.
You miss the point
Was there collusion?
if there was....it is treason
Do you agree?
If Trump traded concessions in return for help winning an election?
