Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you try to impeach Trump, the American people will not stand for it
That's probably true in my case. I imagine I won't stand for it --- I'll sit back with a beer and some munchies, cheering on my team like a spor
Clearly there's some confusion as to the definition of "majority".
To be fair, there was a majority of the electorate that turned out to vote. Barely. 45% said "fuck it, there's nothing worth voting for" and stayed home. That leaves 55% of the electorate that did vote, which is abysmal for a nation that purports to have championed this process, however it is more than half.
Of that 55%, 54% voted for somebody who does not paint him/herself orange.
That leaves Rump with 46% of the 55%, which boils down to 25% of the electorate.
Now tell the class what color the sky is on a planet where 25% constitutes a "majority".
The majority that elected him as President.
Once AGAIN --- there is no "majority" in the figure of 25%. Nor is there any "majority" in 46%.
Cannot be done.
I see the world of Fake News has branched out to Fake Math. Ah, the opaque bubble of self-delusion....
He beat Hillary. The only way to do that is to have a majority of active voters voting for him.
You STILL haven't seen the numbers?
What do you do, go24/7?
You don't care about the collusion between the democrats and the Mexicans. So who gives a fuck about collusions between Conservatives and Russians.It's not made upMaybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you inHe's not under investigation. What would they be investigating him for?
Where did all this nonsense start? It started when Trump was debating Hil-Liar and said he invited Russia to disclose what they found on her private server. That's it, and certainly no reason to have any kind of investigation.
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
All of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
Those are undisputed facts.
Russians hacked DNC servers and leaked information. At the time of the leaks, Trump representatives were meeting with the Russians
Trump had no inside information on the DNC or the server.....but did he offer something in return for help in winning an election?
If he did, it is treason
That is why we need an investigation
There is no evidence that anything that took place had an impact on the election. What had an impact on the election was Hillary's drunkenness that prohibited her from campaigning and making stops, the border, and her Deplorable remark. Bet you can't find one person who voted that knew what was in those emails, and even if you could, find one that said it changed their mind to vote for Trump instead of Hillary.
It's all made up. There is nothing there. Can you tell me why they locked up Rich's computer? Can you tell me why they stopped investigating the murder? Can you tell me why he was killed and nothing was stolen from him? Just a coincidence?
That's what they should be investigating.
You miss the point
Was there collusion?
if there was....it is treason
Do you agree?
If Trump traded concessions in return for help winning an election?
Clearly there's some confusion as to the definition of "majority".
To be fair, there was a majority of the electorate that turned out to vote. Barely. 45% said "fuck it, there's nothing worth voting for" and stayed home. That leaves 55% of the electorate that did vote, which is abysmal for a nation that purports to have championed this process, however it is more than half.
Of that 55%, 54% voted for somebody who does not paint him/herself orange.
That leaves Rump with 46% of the 55%, which boils down to 25% of the electorate.
Now tell the class what color the sky is on a planet where 25% constitutes a "majority".
The majority that elected him as President.
Once AGAIN --- there is no "majority" in the figure of 25%. Nor is there any "majority" in 46%.
Cannot be done.
I see the world of Fake News has branched out to Fake Math. Ah, the opaque bubble of self-delusion....
He beat Hillary. The only way to do that is to have a majority of active voters voting for him.
You STILL haven't seen the numbers?
What do you do, go
He got the majority in every state he won the electoral votes. Popular vote doesn't count in this country.
Clearly there's some confusion as to the definition of "majority".
To be fair, there was a majority of the electorate that turned out to vote. Barely. 45% said "fuck it, there's nothing worth voting for" and stayed home. That leaves 55% of the electorate that did vote, which is abysmal for a nation that purports to have championed this process, however it is more than half.
Of that 55%, 54% voted for somebody who does not paint him/herself orange.
That leaves Rump with 46% of the 55%, which boils down to 25% of the electorate.
Now tell the class what color the sky is on a planet where 25% constitutes a "majority".
The majority that elected him as President.
Once AGAIN --- there is no "majority" in the figure of 25%. Nor is there any "majority" in 46%.
Cannot be done.
I see the world of Fake News has branched out to Fake Math. Ah, the opaque bubble of self-delusion....[/QUOTE
He beat Hillary. The only way to do that is to have a majority of active voters voting for him.
You STILL haven't seen the numbers?
What do you do, go
Problem with demo's 'popular vote meme' is that we elect out President's via the Electoral college for the very reason that this election went to Trump....No disproportionate majority in any one, or combination of area should be able to upend the country's wishes....Hillary won more votes but only on the coasts where it is just a fact that democrat votes outnumber Republican votes by a large margin...California shouldn't be allowed to undo the country's express vote.
Clearly there's some confusion as to the definition of "majority".
To be fair, there was a majority of the electorate that turned out to vote. Barely. 45% said "fuck it, there's nothing worth voting for" and stayed home. That leaves 55% of the electorate that did vote, which is abysmal for a nation that purports to have championed this process, however it is more than half.
Of that 55%, 54% voted for somebody who does not paint him/herself orange.
That leaves Rump with 46% of the 55%, which boils down to 25% of the electorate.
Now tell the class what color the sky is on a planet where 25% constitutes a "majority".
The majority that elected him as President.
Once AGAIN --- there is no "majority" in the figure of 25%. Nor is there any "majority" in 46%.
Cannot be done.
I see the world of Fake News has branched out to Fake Math. Ah, the opaque bubble of self-delusion....
He beat Hillary. The only way to do that is to have a majority of active voters voting for him.
You STILL haven't seen the numbers?
What do you do, go
He got the majority in every state he won the electoral votes. Popular vote doesn't count in this country.
The majority that elected him as President.
Once AGAIN --- there is no "majority" in the figure of 25%. Nor is there any "majority" in 46%.
Cannot be done.
I see the world of Fake News has branched out to Fake Math. Ah, the opaque bubble of self-delusion....
He beat Hillary. The only way to do that is to have a majority of active voters voting for him.
You STILL haven't seen the numbers?
What do you do, go
He got the majority in every state he won the electoral votes. Popular vote doesn't count in this country.
Just a fly in the ointment Hans..........Libs lost election............still crying about it............Establishment not getting their way.........crying about it................Whelp ---- apparently we're being Googly Image troll-bombed by a self-absorbed wackball who wishes he had something to say, but doesn't.
/thread
LOLOLLOL
By electing a president who took the unemployment down from 10% to 5%, nearly tripled the stock market, gave us national healthcare, kept this country from slipping into a depression despite Republicans best efforts.
Really? Now what did DumBama do that took unemployment down besides setting a record for the most people that dropped out of the workforce (which brings unemployment numbers down)? National healthcare? National healthcare means everybody is covered. The only people that got on Commie Care were french fry makers and people who got kicked off of their healthcare plan they liked; oh yes, and the majority that went on Medicaid. Until Commie Care went into effect, I had employer coverage my entire adult life. Thanks to that big-eared creep, I lost my insurance. The Stock Market? Yeah, that was manipulated by the federal reserve who pumped trillions of dollars into it--not anything DumBama did to make the economy better.
Fewer Americans Have Private Health Insurance Now Than in 2007
A crime was committedIt's not made upMaybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you in
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
All of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
Those are undisputed facts.
Russians hacked DNC servers and leaked information. At the time of the leaks, Trump representatives were meeting with the Russians
Trump had no inside information on the DNC or the server.....but did he offer something in return for help in winning an election?
If he did, it is treason
That is why we need an investigation
There is no evidence that anything that took place had an impact on the election. What had an impact on the election was Hillary's drunkenness that prohibited her from campaigning and making stops, the border, and her Deplorable remark. Bet you can't find one person who voted that knew what was in those emails, and even if you could, find one that said it changed their mind to vote for Trump instead of Hillary.
It's all made up. There is nothing there. Can you tell me why they locked up Rich's computer? Can you tell me why they stopped investigating the murder? Can you tell me why he was killed and nothing was stolen from him? Just a coincidence?
That's what they should be investigating.
You miss the point
Was there collusion?
if there was....it is treason
Do you agree?
If Trump traded concessions in return for help winning an election?
You don't investigate something based on what people make up in their heads. You investigate when there is some kind of evidence that something was done illegally. There is nothing.....not even a smidgen of evidence that Trump had anything to do with the Russians.
That would be similar if you lived down the street from me, and I went to the police and said I think you're a murderer. No body, no evidence, no names, just I decided that you were. Do you think the police department would send their detectives out to investigate you based on something I made up in my head?
Yeah... no evidence at all...It's not made upMaybe you have been in a cave for the last ten months. Let me fill you in
Russians hacked the DNC server.......that is a fact
Trump associates had contact with the Russians at the time information was being leaked.......that is a fact
That contact was not reported.......that is a fact
So why is Trump being investigated?
Was a deal made with the Russians?
We're policy concessions discussed?
Was Trump personally involved?
All of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
Those are undisputed facts.
Russians hacked DNC servers and leaked information. At the time of the leaks, Trump representatives were meeting with the Russians
Trump had no inside information on the DNC or the server.....but did he offer something in return for help in winning an election?
If he did, it is treason
That is why we need an investigation
There is no evidence that anything that took place had an impact on the election. What had an impact on the election was Hillary's drunkenness that prohibited her from campaigning and making stops, the border, and her Deplorable remark. Bet you can't find one person who voted that knew what was in those emails, and even if you could, find one that said it changed their mind to vote for Trump instead of Hillary.
It's all made up. There is nothing there. Can you tell me why they locked up Rich's computer? Can you tell me why they stopped investigating the murder? Can you tell me why he was killed and nothing was stolen from him? Just a coincidence?
That's what they should be investigating.
You miss the point
Was there collusion?
if there was....it is treason
Do you agree?
If Trump traded concessions in return for help winning an election?
You don't investigate something based on what people make up in their heads. You investigate when there is some kind of evidence that something was done illegally. There is nothing.....not even a smidgen of evidence that Trump had anything to do with the Russians.
That would be similar if you lived down the street from me, and I went to the police and said I think you're a murderer. No body, no evidence, no names, just I decided that you were. Do you think the police department would send their detectives out to investigate you based on something I made up in my head?
