If you're working for minimum wage your financial problems are yours alone

[ABikerSailor]

Did you know that Ann Lander's husband was one of the original owners of Budget? It was founded in Los Angeles then moved to Chicago and eventually New Jersey.

Why do you ask, do they hire a lot of minimum wage workers?

because i am engaging in ventures, on a not-for-profit basis.

profits go into venture development not private profit.

Sounds like you're very good at not making money

i am not the one relying on cheap labor.

Yes, you advocate overpaying them for the work they do and you think paying them more will make them work harder. A big factor in why you are good at not making money. In my entire 28 year career, I've never seen an employee work harder because they got a raise without earning it.

Obviously you've never managed anything

In our historical record, Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

One of the reasons that Ford paid his workers so well was that he wanted them to be able to buy a car as well.

 

[P@triot]

One of the reasons that Ford paid his workers so well was that he wanted them to be able to buy a car as well.

Beautiful! That's the way capitalism is supposed to work. Henry Ford made his own free decision of his own free will. He was not coerced by a government overstepping its authority.

 

[P@triot]

For all of those "Fight for $15" minimum wage nitwits who do not understand basic economics:

Two Minimum Wage Charts for Andy Puzder

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That's because you never knew a CEO. You watch too many movies about CEO's sitting in their office all day practicing their putts on their astroturf set up in their office.

Movies and television shows are not reality. But if you really believe that about CEO's, why don't you become a CEO yourself? Apply to companies and tell them that you want a job being overpaid and underworked.

Good luck with your CEO job hunting.

I would, but I don't want to have to work harder than my help, to convince them it really is hard work that got me where I am, not a loan from daddy.

Or, you would if you could. But the truth is you can't do the job of a CEO.

all it takes is a loan from daddy; anyone can make it, that way.

The Decline of Inherited Money

According to a study by Prince & Associates, less than 10% of today’s multi-millionaires cited “inheritance” as their source of wealth.

why wait to inherit when a simple loan will do?

According to PolitiFact and others, in 2011 the 400 wealthiest Americans "have more wealth than half of all Americans combined."[23][24][25][26] Inherited wealth may help explain why many Americans who have become rich may have had a "substantial head start".[27][28] In September 2012, according to the Institute for Policy Studies, "over 60 percent" of the Forbes richest 400 Americans "grew up in substantial privilege".--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_of_wealth#In_the_United_States

Why a loan? If a parent wants to give their kids any money, they just give it to them.

 

[danielpalos]

In our historical record, Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

I don't know what you're talking about, but then neither do you

only lousy capitalists, say that.

Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

You figure if you keep repeating your talking points then eventually you'll grasp what they mean?

They mean blah, blah blah, Marx, blah blah blah

only lousy capitalists don't understand the concept of efficiency through efficiency wages.

Can you translate that from gobbledy goop to English for me?

it is English; to bad you don't understand economics.

 

[danielpalos]

actually, i have. it was not for the minimum wage. and, if hire anyone in the future, it will be for fifteen dollars an hour, to make sure i know what i want done; and not just fake it to look good, for a minimum wage.

yeah right for your nonexistent business that you run out of your bedroom at mommy's house

FYI I never hired anyone for MW be cause the skill sets I need are worth more than MW

i am doing it on a not-for-profit basis.

like I said nonexistent

just like your logic and reason; why claim any Thing other than being paid to be a crony?

Do you ever listen to yourself?

you say you have a not for profit business that pays people at least 15 an hour but you live with mommy, you want to be able to collect welfare for choosing not to work

It's lunchtime now shouldn't you be sucking mama's teat right about now?

old habits die hard? i got used to it as a kid.

beats having to be a crony for capital under our form of Capitalism. Only the right, never gets it.

 

[danielpalos]

Also, if you live in the most powerful country in the world and your skill is one that somebody in the Phillipines can do for $2 an hour, when they get your job your problems are yours alone.

Exactly. About damn time you realized that.

Also it's imperative to realize that Dumbocrats have made it so that moving those jobs to the Philippines is lucrative. If they didn't make it impossible to compete with other nations, it wouldn't be an issue. Progressives have given the U.S. the highest taxes in the world (out of their greed) and the most costly regulations in the world (again, out of their greed).

So cry us a river ToS. It's the idiotic policies that you support which have placed jobs overseas.

Cool; let's hire management from the Third World, to lower costs.

 

[danielpalos]

only lousy capitalists don't understand the concept of efficiency through efficiency wages.

Only lousy socialists don't understand the concept of efficiency through the Free Market. There is literally no such thing as "efficient wages". A wage can be neither efficient nor inefficient. Efficiency is the ability to achieve maximum productivity through minimum effort.

A wage does not alter productivity. A person's output is a person's output. More or less money does not alter their maximum ability to output. If less money causes them to intentionally output less, then they should be fired for cheating/stealing from the company.

There is nothing more comical than progressives sitting around at a university and coming up with theories that are based on no rational real world experience whatsoever. You people are mindless nitwits who really need to get up off the sidelines and get into the game. Spewing "theory" that has no basis in experience is ridiculous.

Yes, there is. That concept exists. Only the right, never gets.

a tip, is a form of efficiency wage, To Insure Promptness.

 

[kaz]

I don't know what you're talking about, but then neither do you

only lousy capitalists, say that.

Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

You figure if you keep repeating your talking points then eventually you'll grasp what they mean?

They mean blah, blah blah, Marx, blah blah blah

only lousy capitalists don't understand the concept of efficiency through efficiency wages.

Can you translate that from gobbledy goop to English for me?

it is English; to bad you don't understand economics.

Using English words doesn't make it English. You have to put them together in a logical sequence

 

[danielpalos]

In our historical record, Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

Henry Ford invented the assembly line. It allowed the final product to be achieved in a more efficient manner. That lead to increased output and increased profits. The wages he paid had nothing to do with anything.

Had Henry Ford paid the exact same wages without the assembly line, nobody would even know who Henry Ford is today. Stop trying to attribute the success of X to the existence of Y. It was the assembly line that made Ford the powerhouse that he became. Period. End of story.

Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

 

[kaz]

Also, if you live in the most powerful country in the world and your skill is one that somebody in the Phillipines can do for $2 an hour, when they get your job your problems are yours alone.

Exactly. About damn time you realized that.

Also it's imperative to realize that Dumbocrats have made it so that moving those jobs to the Philippines is lucrative. If they didn't make it impossible to compete with other nations, it wouldn't be an issue. Progressives have given the U.S. the highest taxes in the world (out of their greed) and the most costly regulations in the world (again, out of their greed).

So cry us a river ToS. It's the idiotic policies that you support which have placed jobs overseas.

Cool; let's hire management from the Third World, to lower costs.

It's not about cost, numbnuts, it's about value. That's for both workers and management. You're just spewing your normal inane drivel

 

[danielpalos]

because i am engaging in ventures, on a not-for-profit basis.

profits go into venture development not private profit.

Sounds like you're very good at not making money

i am not the one relying on cheap labor.

Yes, you advocate overpaying them for the work they do and you think paying them more will make them work harder. A big factor in why you are good at not making money. In my entire 28 year career, I've never seen an employee work harder because they got a raise without earning it.

Obviously you've never managed anything

In our historical record, Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

One of the reasons that Ford paid his workers so well was that he wanted them to be able to buy a car as well.

Mr. Ford understood a positive multiplier effect.

 

[kaz]

In our historical record, Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

Henry Ford invented the assembly line. It allowed the final product to be achieved in a more efficient manner. That lead to increased output and increased profits. The wages he paid had nothing to do with anything.

Had Henry Ford paid the exact same wages without the assembly line, nobody would even know who Henry Ford is today. Stop trying to attribute the success of X to the existence of Y. It was the assembly line that made Ford the powerhouse that he became. Period. End of story.

Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

Ford also fired anyone not worth $5 a day

 

[danielpalos]

One of the reasons that Ford paid his workers so well was that he wanted them to be able to buy a car as well.

Beautiful! That's the way capitalism is supposed to work. Henry Ford made his own free decision of his own free will. He was not coerced by a government overstepping its authority.

Mr. Ford realized gains from efficiency, and competed with other capitalists in that same market, for market share.

 

[danielpalos]

For all of those "Fight for $15" minimum wage nitwits who do not understand basic economics:

View attachment 103007

Two Minimum Wage Charts for Andy Puzder

I am also advocating for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis; to abolish that right wing canard.

 

[danielpalos]

I would, but I don't want to have to work harder than my help, to convince them it really is hard work that got me where I am, not a loan from daddy.

Or, you would if you could. But the truth is you can't do the job of a CEO.

all it takes is a loan from daddy; anyone can make it, that way.

The Decline of Inherited Money

According to a study by Prince & Associates, less than 10% of today’s multi-millionaires cited “inheritance” as their source of wealth.

why wait to inherit when a simple loan will do?

According to PolitiFact and others, in 2011 the 400 wealthiest Americans "have more wealth than half of all Americans combined."[23][24][25][26] Inherited wealth may help explain why many Americans who have become rich may have had a "substantial head start".[27][28] In September 2012, according to the Institute for Policy Studies, "over 60 percent" of the Forbes richest 400 Americans "grew up in substantial privilege".--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution_of_wealth#In_the_United_States

Why a loan? If a parent wants to give their kids any money, they just give it to them.

without a work ethic from the Age of Iron?

 

[kaz]

Sounds like you're very good at not making money

i am not the one relying on cheap labor.

Yes, you advocate overpaying them for the work they do and you think paying them more will make them work harder. A big factor in why you are good at not making money. In my entire 28 year career, I've never seen an employee work harder because they got a raise without earning it.

Obviously you've never managed anything

In our historical record, Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

One of the reasons that Ford paid his workers so well was that he wanted them to be able to buy a car as well.

Mr. Ford understood a positive multiplier effect.

He understood the value in reliable, loyal hard workers.

What you do not understand is he didn't make crappy workers good workers by paying them more, he weeded them out by firing the ones who weren't that. You've obviously never hired or managed anyone

 

[danielpalos]

only lousy capitalists, say that.

Henry Ford competed through gains in efficiency and invented the efficiency wage, as a result. He did not whine about taxes regulations or minimum wages; only lousy capitalists do that.

You figure if you keep repeating your talking points then eventually you'll grasp what they mean?

They mean blah, blah blah, Marx, blah blah blah

only lousy capitalists don't understand the concept of efficiency through efficiency wages.

Can you translate that from gobbledy goop to English for me?

it is English; to bad you don't understand economics.

Using English words doesn't make it English. You have to put them together in a logical sequence

dear; I always make sense. It is You who is not worth equal for pay purposes in the non-porn sector.

 

[kaz]

For all of those "Fight for $15" minimum wage nitwits who do not understand basic economics:

View attachment 103007

Two Minimum Wage Charts for Andy Puzder

I am also advocating for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis; to abolish that right wing canard.

What you just said is more inane crap, it makes no sense

 

[danielpalos]

Also, if you live in the most powerful country in the world and your skill is one that somebody in the Phillipines can do for $2 an hour, when they get your job your problems are yours alone.

Exactly. About damn time you realized that.

Also it's imperative to realize that Dumbocrats have made it so that moving those jobs to the Philippines is lucrative. If they didn't make it impossible to compete with other nations, it wouldn't be an issue. Progressives have given the U.S. the highest taxes in the world (out of their greed) and the most costly regulations in the world (again, out of their greed).

So cry us a river ToS. It's the idiotic policies that you support which have placed jobs overseas.

Cool; let's hire management from the Third World, to lower costs.

It's not about cost, numbnuts, it's about value. That's for both workers and management. You're just spewing your normal inane drivel

twice the work ethic at one third the cost, is value. only the right, never gets it.