Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why?Duh. WHY? "I think there was a 4 point change for Trumpers refusing to cooperate with polls..."'Everyone' had her winning after Comey as well.Everyone had her winning easily before Comey...Liberal pundits had her at 400 electoral college votes.....Many polls showed her up 8 to 10 pts before Comey. Also I think there was a 4 point change for Trumpers refusing to cooperate with polls...Honestly, I dont see how she was held back for being a Woman. She had plenty of opportunity in her life, was a Senator, Secretary of State, but because she lost a Presidential Election, it's because of sexism and not how she ran her campaign? Trump actually worked harder than she did when it came to going out on the road and campaigning, whether you liked his message or not. Had he not done that, he would not be president
'Everyone' was wrong.
Republicans are responsible the for civil rights LBJ took credit for. Remember he said " I will have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years."Medicare, Medicaid, civil rights, dupe- too bad about the gd war.LBJ? He was a racist and a thug. The Dems set the bar pretty low.Good gov't policy IS good ethics and morality. Like the Greatest Generation and FDR and Truman, Ike, JFK, and LBJ.The GI bill, infrastructure investment, and cheap college was what made us great. Stopping investment in America is what's made us chumps the last 35 years. Thanks New BS GOP and the dupes.She had more policies than tax the rich. Spending was her second policy.
Spending is bad enough, but what Democrats do is spend money on their constituents and not for the better of the country. Vote buying is costing us an arm and a leg but liberals are too blind too see it. They want to keep spending and even expand spending on social goodies like what big-ears did.
No. Some govt policy is not what made our country. That came from ethics and morals. Not some worthless bureaucratic policy that is never held to accountability.
It's only in the House, dupe.Gerrymandering has never been worse, ditto reporting and foreign interference- and voter suppression (that one, maybe not lol). Some people still like thinking.How exactly did Gerrymandering win trump more EV?
I've noticed, in the past several years, “gerrymandering” popping up with increasing frequency among liberals' excuses for losing elections; even on votes where there is no plausible way for gerrymandering to have any effect. I suspect that the overwhelming vast majority of those who make this excuse have no clue at all what gerrymandering is, how it works, or what its limitations are.
It might be interesting to see a liberal trying to explain how gerrymandering is supposed to have affected the Presidential election.
Democrat voters are like trained seals. They are told what to say, not understand what they say.
The Party of Excuses just gives them talking points and they come to places like USMB and repeat what they were told.
In the mind of a Democrat, most of the country is liberal. Their friends are liberals, most of their family are liberals, their coworkers are liberal, and everybody at Starbucks is liberal, therefore, most of the country must be liberal in their mind.
Sure, there are Republicans, but they are on their yachts or in their pickup trucks with a gun rack on the back. But they are very much the minority. After all, the Democrat politicians told them Republicans are a dying breed of old white men and will soon be off the planet.
This is why when Republicans win seats and even the presidency, they flip out. They can't understand. Republicans can't be winning fairly because most of the country is liberal just like me! Something must have went terribly wrong!
Gerrymandering has absolutely nothing to do with the ev, which is determined by state, not congressional district. So how did it cause Hillary to lose?
bsWhy?Duh. WHY? "I think there was a 4 point change for Trumpers refusing to cooperate with polls..."'Everyone' had her winning after Comey as well.Everyone had her winning easily before Comey...Liberal pundits had her at 400 electoral college votes.....Many polls showed her up 8 to 10 pts before Comey. Also I think there was a 4 point change for Trumpers refusing to cooperate with polls...
'Everyone' was wrong.
Because they based their projections on algorithms that were totally incorrect this cycle.
Idiot. U of Rochester.It's only in the House, dupe.Gerrymandering has never been worse, ditto reporting and foreign interference- and voter suppression (that one, maybe not lol). Some people still like thinking.I've noticed, in the past several years, “gerrymandering” popping up with increasing frequency among liberals' excuses for losing elections; even on votes where there is no plausible way for gerrymandering to have any effect. I suspect that the overwhelming vast majority of those who make this excuse have no clue at all what gerrymandering is, how it works, or what its limitations are.
It might be interesting to see a liberal trying to explain how gerrymandering is supposed to have affected the Presidential election.
Democrat voters are like trained seals. They are told what to say, not understand what they say.
The Party of Excuses just gives them talking points and they come to places like USMB and repeat what they were told.
In the mind of a Democrat, most of the country is liberal. Their friends are liberals, most of their family are liberals, their coworkers are liberal, and everybody at Starbucks is liberal, therefore, most of the country must be liberal in their mind.
Sure, there are Republicans, but they are on their yachts or in their pickup trucks with a gun rack on the back. But they are very much the minority. After all, the Democrat politicians told them Republicans are a dying breed of old white men and will soon be off the planet.
This is why when Republicans win seats and even the presidency, they flip out. They can't understand. Republicans can't be winning fairly because most of the country is liberal just like me! Something must have went terribly wrong!
Gerrymandering has absolutely nothing to do with the ev, which is determined by state, not congressional district. So how did it cause Hillary to lose?
I don't think there is enough facepalms for this moronic response.
Of course gerrymandering only affects the house. That is precisely what I've been telling you. You guys are the idiots who keep trying to claim that gerrymandering is why Hillary lost.
This is precisely why I'm not impressed when people brag about advanced degrees. Where did you get your masters, clown college?
He wrote and pushed the laws. Duh. This was back before the GOP was a lockstep RW, bs propaganda, racist, pander to the rich mess, dupe. Yes, one piece of malevolent gossip beats history in dupe world.Republicans are responsible the for civil rights LBJ took credit for. Remember he said " I will have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years."Medicare, Medicaid, civil rights, dupe- too bad about the gd war.LBJ? He was a racist and a thug. The Dems set the bar pretty low.Good gov't policy IS good ethics and morality. Like the Greatest Generation and FDR and Truman, Ike, JFK, and LBJ.The GI bill, infrastructure investment, and cheap college was what made us great. Stopping investment in America is what's made us chumps the last 35 years. Thanks New BS GOP and the dupes.
No. Some govt policy is not what made our country. That came from ethics and morals. Not some worthless bureaucratic policy that is never held to accountability.
You do realize that censoring that word defeats the purpose of using that quote.
[
If she won by enough to get congress, not true. False GOP line...
He wrote and pushed the laws. Duh. This was back before the GOP was a lockstep RW, bs propaganda, racist, pander to the rich mess, dupe. Yes, one piece of malevolent gossip beats history in dupe world.Republicans are responsible the for civil rights LBJ took credit for. Remember he said " I will have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years."Medicare, Medicaid, civil rights, dupe- too bad about the gd war.LBJ? He was a racist and a thug. The Dems set the bar pretty low.Good gov't policy IS good ethics and morality. Like the Greatest Generation and FDR and Truman, Ike, JFK, and LBJ.No. Some govt policy is not what made our country. That came from ethics and morals. Not some worthless bureaucratic policy that is never held to accountability.
You do realize that censoring that word defeats the purpose of using that quote.
Idiot. U of Rochester.It's only in the House, dupe.Gerrymandering has never been worse, ditto reporting and foreign interference- and voter suppression (that one, maybe not lol). Some people still like thinking.Democrat voters are like trained seals. They are told what to say, not understand what they say.
The Party of Excuses just gives them talking points and they come to places like USMB and repeat what they were told.
In the mind of a Democrat, most of the country is liberal. Their friends are liberals, most of their family are liberals, their coworkers are liberal, and everybody at Starbucks is liberal, therefore, most of the country must be liberal in their mind.
Sure, there are Republicans, but they are on their yachts or in their pickup trucks with a gun rack on the back. But they are very much the minority. After all, the Democrat politicians told them Republicans are a dying breed of old white men and will soon be off the planet.
This is why when Republicans win seats and even the presidency, they flip out. They can't understand. Republicans can't be winning fairly because most of the country is liberal just like me! Something must have went terribly wrong!
Gerrymandering has absolutely nothing to do with the ev, which is determined by state, not congressional district. So how did it cause Hillary to lose?
I don't think there is enough facepalms for this moronic response.
Of course gerrymandering only affects the house. That is precisely what I've been telling you. You guys are the idiots who keep trying to claim that gerrymandering is why Hillary lost.
This is precisely why I'm not impressed when people brag about advanced degrees. Where did you get your masters, clown college?
He wrote and pushed the laws. Duh. This was back before the GOP was a lockstep RW, bs propaganda, racist, pander to the rich mess, dupe. Yes, one piece of malevolent gossip beats history in dupe world.Republicans are responsible the for civil rights LBJ took credit for. Remember he said " I will have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years."Medicare, Medicaid, civil rights, dupe- too bad about the gd war.LBJ? He was a racist and a thug. The Dems set the bar pretty low.Good gov't policy IS good ethics and morality. Like the Greatest Generation and FDR and Truman, Ike, JFK, and LBJ.No. Some govt policy is not what made our country. That came from ethics and morals. Not some worthless bureaucratic policy that is never held to accountability.
You do realize that censoring that word defeats the purpose of using that quote.
Then we saw how Americans actually thought about her corruption
We saw what happens when a woman dares to seek power. It was heartbreaking.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Though the sexism behind Clinton’s loss has hardly been a secret, it’s taken me awhile to truly grapple with what lays at the bottom of those election results. Clinton’s loss isn’t simply about emails or Russian hacking or James Comey or the perils of the Electoral College or the struggles of the so-called white working class. Underneath that, her loss has everything to do with the different expectations men and women face in our country. Her loss is about what we do to women who dare to seek power.
This struck me as I read Ta-Nehisi Coates’ incredible essay on Barack Obama’s presidency. “To secure the White House,” Coates writes in The Atlantic, “Donald Trump needed only money and white bluster.” This is the simplest evidence you need to understand that of course racism played a role Trump’s election, Coates writes.
Immediately, I realized, Coates missed something.
It wasn’t just money and bluster.
Trump is a man.
Much of the country went for the guy. Sure, technically she got more votes, is winning the popular vote by millions, but a huge percentage of the country went for him. Obama voters switched sides. He won.
With his utter lack of government experience, track record of lies, without disclosing his taxes, with his hateful comments about women, his boast about sexual assault. For all that, Trump was seen as more “authentic” than her. More likable.
That’s sexism. You can dress it up in as many ill-advised email servers or Benghazi hearings as you like.
Time and again, men get a pass.
More: It’s OK To Mourn For Our First Female President
Amen! If you liked the above, you should read the other half of the link.
Not really.bsWhy?Duh. WHY? "I think there was a 4 point change for Trumpers refusing to cooperate with polls..."'Everyone' had her winning after Comey as well.Everyone had her winning easily before Comey...Liberal pundits had her at 400 electoral college votes.....
'Everyone' was wrong.
Because they based their projections on algorithms that were totally incorrect this cycle.
We saw what happens when a woman dares to seek power. It was heartbreaking.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Though the sexism behind Clinton’s loss has hardly been a secret, it’s taken me awhile to truly grapple with what lays at the bottom of those election results. Clinton’s loss isn’t simply about emails or Russian hacking or James Comey or the perils of the Electoral College or the struggles of the so-called white working class. Underneath that, her loss has everything to do with the different expectations men and women face in our country. Her loss is about what we do to women who dare to seek power.
This struck me as I read Ta-Nehisi Coates’ incredible essay on Barack Obama’s presidency. “To secure the White House,” Coates writes in The Atlantic, “Donald Trump needed only money and white bluster.” This is the simplest evidence you need to understand that of course racism played a role Trump’s election, Coates writes.
Immediately, I realized, Coates missed something.
It wasn’t just money and bluster.
Trump is a man.
Much of the country went for the guy. Sure, technically she got more votes, is winning the popular vote by millions, but a huge percentage of the country went for him. Obama voters switched sides. He won.
With his utter lack of government experience, track record of lies, without disclosing his taxes, with his hateful comments about women, his boast about sexual assault. For all that, Trump was seen as more “authentic” than her. More likable.
That’s sexism. You can dress it up in as many ill-advised email servers or Benghazi hearings as you like.
Time and again, men get a pass.
More: It’s OK To Mourn For Our First Female President
Amen! If you liked the above, you should read the other half of the link.
Are you saying the democrats don't have rich people? You know more than republicans right? Come on don't act stupid every post!He wrote and pushed the laws. Duh. This was back before the GOP was a lockstep RW, bs propaganda, racist, pander to the rich mess, dupe. Yes, one piece of malevolent gossip beats history in dupe world.Republicans are responsible the for civil rights LBJ took credit for. Remember he said " I will have those ******* voting Democratic for the next 200 years."Medicare, Medicaid, civil rights, dupe- too bad about the gd war.LBJ? He was a racist and a thug. The Dems set the bar pretty low.Good gov't policy IS good ethics and morality. Like the Greatest Generation and FDR and Truman, Ike, JFK, and LBJ.No. Some govt policy is not what made our country. That came from ethics and morals. Not some worthless bureaucratic policy that is never held to accountability.
You do realize that censoring that word defeats the purpose of using that quote.
Nobody cares about that crooked Hillary bs anymore. That was just to get your vote, dupe. She was a fine senator- I live there, dupe- and everyone voted to give W more leverage- which he misused.[
If she won by enough to get congress, not true. False GOP line...
Are you talking about her getting elected Senator in bat shit crazy Libtard New York just because of the name of her husband? LOL
She wasn't even from that state and she had absolutely no qualifications and the idiot Moon Bats elected her to the Senate. Of course they got what they voted for. A do nothing Senator that voted for the invasion of Iraq.
Crooked Hillary has always been a piece of shit. Thank goodness she will not be President. She need to spend the rest of her miserable hateful life in a Federal Women's Correctional Facility.
No evidence of any actual rigging, Putin lover/dupe..ummm..... she didn't lose becuase of her gender, she lost because she was an ultimate- insider and rigged her own Primary
BTW- nice 16 smiley thread
We saw what happens when a woman dares to seek power. It was heartbreaking.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Though the sexism behind Clinton’s loss has hardly been a secret, it’s taken me awhile to truly grapple with what lays at the bottom of those election results. Clinton’s loss isn’t simply about emails or Russian hacking or James Comey or the perils of the Electoral College or the struggles of the so-called white working class. Underneath that, her loss has everything to do with the different expectations men and women face in our country. Her loss is about what we do to women who dare to seek power.
This struck me as I read Ta-Nehisi Coates’ incredible essay on Barack Obama’s presidency. “To secure the White House,” Coates writes in The Atlantic, “Donald Trump needed only money and white bluster.” This is the simplest evidence you need to understand that of course racism played a role Trump’s election, Coates writes.
Immediately, I realized, Coates missed something.
It wasn’t just money and bluster.
Trump is a man.
Much of the country went for the guy. Sure, technically she got more votes, is winning the popular vote by millions, but a huge percentage of the country went for him. Obama voters switched sides. He won.
With his utter lack of government experience, track record of lies, without disclosing his taxes, with his hateful comments about women, his boast about sexual assault. For all that, Trump was seen as more “authentic” than her. More likable.
That’s sexism. You can dress it up in as many ill-advised email servers or Benghazi hearings as you like.
Time and again, men get a pass.
More: It’s OK To Mourn For Our First Female President
Amen! If you liked the above, you should read the other half of the link.
Incorrect....We saw what happens when a woman dares to seek power. It was heartbreaking...
We saw what happens when a woman dares to seek power. It was heartbreaking.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Six months ago I lay in bed with tears in my eyes. I was staring at my tiny iPhone screen, watching a larger-than-life woman stand before a packed crowd in Brooklyn, dressed all in white like some kind of goddess wizard, making history as she officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.
For the first time, a woman had a shot at real political power. For the first time, we could tell our daughters: You could be anything! And it would actually be true. As autumn approached, you could feel the excitement. Women were on the brink. On the morning of Election Day, they dressed in pantsuits and welled up, holding their little girls’ hands at the voting booth, posting adorable photos.
That night was a devastation. Ambitious women and girls across the country didn’t get a new role model. They got a smackdown.
Though the sexism behind Clinton’s loss has hardly been a secret, it’s taken me awhile to truly grapple with what lays at the bottom of those election results. Clinton’s loss isn’t simply about emails or Russian hacking or James Comey or the perils of the Electoral College or the struggles of the so-called white working class. Underneath that, her loss has everything to do with the different expectations men and women face in our country. Her loss is about what we do to women who dare to seek power.
This struck me as I read Ta-Nehisi Coates’ incredible essay on Barack Obama’s presidency. “To secure the White House,” Coates writes in The Atlantic, “Donald Trump needed only money and white bluster.” This is the simplest evidence you need to understand that of course racism played a role Trump’s election, Coates writes.
Immediately, I realized, Coates missed something.
It wasn’t just money and bluster.
Trump is a man.
Much of the country went for the guy. Sure, technically she got more votes, is winning the popular vote by millions, but a huge percentage of the country went for him. Obama voters switched sides. He won.
With his utter lack of government experience, track record of lies, without disclosing his taxes, with his hateful comments about women, his boast about sexual assault. For all that, Trump was seen as more “authentic” than her. More likable.
That’s sexism. You can dress it up in as many ill-advised email servers or Benghazi hearings as you like.
Time and again, men get a pass.
More: It’s OK To Mourn For Our First Female President
Amen! If you liked the above, you should read the other half of the link.
Gerrymandering has never been worse, ditto reporting and foreign interference- and voter suppression (that one, maybe not lol). Some people still like thinking.Yeah, thanks to NaziCon gerrymandering, voter suppression, conspiracy theories, fake news, lies, Comey, and Putin. You must feel really proud.
How exactly did Gerrymandering win trump more EV?
I've noticed, in the past several years, “gerrymandering” popping up with increasing frequency among liberals' excuses for losing elections; even on votes where there is no plausible way for gerrymandering to have any effect. I suspect that the overwhelming vast majority of those who make this excuse have no clue at all what gerrymandering is, how it works, or what its limitations are.
It might be interesting to see a liberal trying to explain how gerrymandering is supposed to have affected the Presidential election.
Democrat voters are like trained seals. They are told what to say, not understand what they say.
The Party of Excuses just gives them talking points and they come to places like USMB and repeat what they were told.
In the mind of a Democrat, most of the country is liberal. Their friends are liberals, most of their family are liberals, their coworkers are liberal, and everybody at Starbucks is liberal, therefore, most of the country must be liberal in their mind.
Sure, there are Republicans, but they are on their yachts or in their pickup trucks with a gun rack on the back. But they are very much the minority. After all, the Democrat politicians told them Republicans are a dying breed of old white men and will soon be off the planet.
This is why when Republicans win seats and even the presidency, they flip out. They can't understand. Republicans can't be winning fairly because most of the country is liberal just like me! Something must have went terribly wrong!
