Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"Im trying to figure out what piece of evidence 70% of Americans have seen that I haven't that have led them to this conclusion."
" We have to get to the truth."
Yup. They were pro-police for a few hours. Then it was right back to vilifying them.Libbies hate police Except this time and hate buildings of authority except this time and hate incarceration Except This Time!
Cannot possibly be more insincere, disingenuous and hypocritical
He'll try to bully his way thru it with his big mouth like he tried in the debate because he thinks he's the smartest guy in the room. But he won't show because the poor thing knows that Liz Cheney especially is going to nail his ass to the wall & won't take any of his shit.If he ever testifies in person under oath... one of three things will happen.
1. It will be an "I don't remember" fest
2. He'll perjure himself.
3. He'll plead the fifth.
Yeah, I don't know if this is a great idea.
On one hand, the committee must think, based on the evidence it has gathered to date, that it can effectively put the screws to key Jan 6 players, and it wants to do so in front of as many American eyes (in "prime time", like a reality show) as possible. I can see that. Maybe.
But on the other hand, we've all seen a zillion times how politicians use this opportunity for endless tedious grandstanding, preening and posing. That will turn people off and they'll go straight to "Dancing with the Stars". And wouldn't this effect the testimony of the witnesses in some way?
I dunno. What would this look like?
He'll try to bully his way thru it with his big mouth like he tried in the debate because he thinks he's the smartest guy in the room. But he won't show because the poor thing knows that Liz Cheney especially is going to nail his ass to the wall & won't take any of his shit.
Read your thread.Yeah, I don't know if this is a great idea.
...
That's fine though I find it hard to believe that 10% let alone 70% are going to actually watch them so Im not sure that they would solve the issue. The vast majority of people are going to get their info about the hearings through an intermediary.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is a relevant observation.
Accordingly, I would refer back to poster JohnLaw's trenchant wisdom in post #51 vis-a-vis televised hearings.
Hence, a fulsome televised exposition of the Select Committee's investigation.
Which posters would that be?Read your thread.
They're terrified of a primetime show.
They are absolutely dependent on the OANN/FAUX/NEWSWHAX et al., view and terrified of seeing the unfiltered truth.
Prime Time it is!
Yeah who is terrified?Read your thread.
They're terrified of a primetime show.
They are absolutely dependent on the OANN/FAUX/NEWSWHAX et al., view and terrified of seeing the unfiltered truth.
Prime Time it is!
Especially with the already public admissions that they have altered documents.It would be as dysfunctional as anything else they try to do. Government is broken...the committee is just the latest indicator.
I'd imagine it would be weird for them, hearing much of this stuff for the first time. It's pretty clear that most of what is already out has been kept from them. To no surprise. No doubt they'll just dismiss it as fake news, as they are conditioned to do.Read your thread.
They're terrified of a primetime show.
They are absolutely dependent on the OANN/FAUX/NEWSWHAX et al., view and terrified of seeing the unfiltered truth.
Prime Time it is!
And couldn't recall about 300 times.She testified for hours. And she dragged hacks like Billy Goat Trey Gowdy around that hearing room for hours.
It was a sight to behold.
I mean really at this point what difference does it make?She testified for hours. And she dragged hacks like Billy Goat Trey Gowdy around that hearing room for hours.
It was a sight to behold.
"That's fine though I find it hard to believe that 10% let alone 70% are going to actually watch them so Im not sure that they would solve the issue."
If this would happen.I'm a little at a loss as to what they think they are going to ask Trump as a "gotcha" question? If they had a smoking gun directly linking Trump to anything associated with what happened on Jan 6, we would already know about it I would think. If you haul him in and everyone is watching but you don't have a kill shot... The Republicans made this same mistake with Hilary. They had her dead to rights on the email server debacle, hauled her into Congress but didn't have the goods or weren't willing to use them. Either way she was better off politically after that hearing than before it.
Then why have it?Yeah who is terrified?
1, Few people are going to watch
2. Those that do will see nothing new
3. If you stab at the "king" you better kill him.
So you can't list these posters.Did I mention you or yours in my post?
